arXiv++ Combinatorics

We say that a tree $T$ is an $S$-Steiner tree if $S \subseteq V(T)$ and a hypergraph is an $S$-Steiner hypertree if it can be trimmed to an $S$-Steiner tree. We prove that it is NP-complete to decide, given a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ and some $S \subseteq V(\mathcal{H})$, whether there is a subhypergraph of $\mathcal{H}$ which is an $S$-Steiner hypertree. As corollaries, we give two negative results for two Steiner orientation problems in hypergraphs. Firstly, we show that it is NP-complete to decide, given a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$, some $r \in V(\mathcal{H})$ and some $S \subseteq V(\mathcal{H})$, whether this hypergraph has an orientation in which every vertex of $S$ is reachable from $r$. Secondly, we show that it is NP-complete to decide, given a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ and some $S \subseteq V(\mathcal{H})$, whether this hypergraph has an orientation in which any two vertices in $S$ are mutually reachable from each other. This answers a longstanding open question of the Egerváry Research group. We further show that it is NP-complete to decide if a given hypergraph has a well-balanced orientation. On the positive side, we show that the problem of finding a Steiner hypertree and the first orientation problem can be solved in polynomial time if the number of terminals $|S|$ is fixed.

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, its exact-distance square, $G^{[\sharp 2]}$, is the graph with vertex set $V$ and with an edge between vertices $x$ and $y$ if and only if $x$ and $y$ have distance (exactly) $2$ in $G$. The graph $G$ is an exact-distance square root of $G^{[\sharp 2]}$. We give a characterization of graphs having an exact-distance square root, our characterization easily leading to a polynomial-time recognition algorithm. We show that it is NP-complete to recognize graphs with a bipartite exact-distance square root. These two results strongly contrast known results on (usual) graph squares. We then characterize graphs having a tree as an exact-distance square root, and from this obtain a polynomial-time recognition algorithm for these graphs. Finally, we show that, unlike for usual square roots, a graph might have (arbitrarily many) non-isomorphic exact-distance square roots which are trees.

Given a graph $G$, a geodesic packing in $G$ is a set of vertex-disjoint maximal geodesics, and the geodesic packing number of $G$, ${\gpack}(G)$, is the maximum cardinality of a geodesic packing in $G$. It is proved that the decision version of the geodesic packing number is NP-complete. We also consider the geodesic transversal number, ${\gt}(G)$, which is the minimum cardinality of a set of vertices that hit all maximal geodesics in $G$. While $\gt(G)\ge \gpack(G)$ in every graph $G$, the quotient ${\rm gt}(G)/{\rm gpack}(G)$ is investigated. By using the rook's graph, it is proved that there does not exist a constant $C < 3$ such that $\frac{{\rm gt}(G)}{{\rm gpack}(G)}\le C$ would hold for all graphs $G$. If $T$ is a tree, then it is proved that ${\rm gpack}(T) = {\rm gt}(T)$, and a linear algorithm for determining ${\rm gpack}(T)$ is derived. The geodesic packing number is also determined for the strong product of paths.

Foucaud, Krishna and Lekshmi recently introduced the concept of monitoring edge-geodetic sets in graphs, and a related graph invariant. These are sets of vertices such that the removal of any edge changes the distance between some pair of vertices in the set. They studied the minimum possible size of such a set in a given graph, which we call the monitoring edge-geodetic number. We show that the decision problem for the monitoring edge-geodetic number is NP-complete. We also give best-possible upper and lower bounds for the Cartesian and strong products of two graphs. These bounds establish the exact value in many cases, including many new examples of graphs whose only monitoring edge-geodetic set is the whole vertex set.

A graph $H$ is a clique graph if $H$ is a vertex-disjoin union of cliques. Abu-Khzam (2017) introduced the $(a,d)$-{Cluster Editing} problem, where for fixed natural numbers $a,d$, given a graph $G$ and vertex-weights $a^*:\ V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,\dots, a\}$ and $d^*{}:\ V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,\dots, d\}$, we are to decide whether $G$ can be turned into a cluster graph by deleting at most $d^*(v)$ edges incident to every $v\in V(G)$ and adding at most $a^*(v)$ edges incident to every $v\in V(G)$. Results by Komusiewicz and Uhlmann (2012) and Abu-Khzam (2017) provided a dichotomy of complexity (in P or NP-complete) of $(a,d)$-{Cluster Editing} for all pairs $a,d$ apart from $a=d=1.$ Abu-Khzam (2017) conjectured that $(1,1)$-{Cluster Editing} is in P. We resolve Abu-Khzam's conjecture in affirmative by (i) providing a serious of five polynomial-time reductions to $C_3$-free and $C_4$-free graphs of maximum degree at most 3, and (ii) designing a polynomial-time algorithm for solving $(1,1)$-{Cluster Editing} on $C_3$-free and $C_4$-free graphs of maximum degree at most 3.

A graph $G$ is said to be an $(s, k)$-polar graph if its vertex set admits a partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ and $B$ induce, respectively, a complete $s$-partite graph and the disjoint union of at most $k$ complete graphs. Polar graphs and monopolar graphs are defined as $(\infty, \infty)$- and $(1, \infty)$-polar graphs, respectively, and unipolar graphs are those graphs with a polar partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ is a clique. The problems of deciding whether an arbitrary graph is a polar graph or a monopolar graph are known to be NP-complete. In contrast, deciding whether a graph is a unipolar graph can be done in polynomial time. In this work we prove that the three previous problems can be solved in linear time on the classes of $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, generalizing analogous results previously known for cographs. Additionally, we provide finite forbidden subgraph characterizations for $(2,2)$-polar graphs on $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, also generalizing analogous results recently obtained for the class of cographs.

In this work, for a given oriented graph $D$, we study its interval and hull numbers, respectively, in the oriented geodetic, P3 and P3* convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph D, and the oriented geodetic convexity, we prove that $ohng(D)\leq m(D)-n(D)+2$ and that there is at least one such that $ohng(D) = m(D)-n(D)$. We also determine exact values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allow us to deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute $ohnp(D)$ when the underlying graph of $D$ is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether $oing(D)\leq k$ or $ohng(D)\leq k$ is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by $k$, for some $i\in\mathbb{Z_+^*}$, then the same holds even if the underlying graph of $D$ is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether $ohnp(D)\leq k$ or $ohnps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic and its underlying graph is bipartite; that deciding whether $ohng(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic; that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is NP-complete, even if $D$ has no directed cycles and the underlying graph of $D$ is a chordal bipartite graph; and that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if the underlying graph of $D$ is split. Finally, also argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented P3 and P3* convexities can be computed in cubic time for graphs of bounded clique-width by using Courcelle's theorem.

The Wiener index of a strong digraph $D$ is defined as the sum of the distances between all ordered pairs of vertices. This definition has been extended to digraphs that are not necessarily strong by defining the distance from a vertex $a$ to a vertex $b$ as $0$ if there is no path from $a$ to $b$ in $D$. Knor, uSkrekovski and Tepeh [Some remarks on Wiener index of oriented graphs. Appl.\ Math.\ Comput.\ {\bf 273}] considered orientations of graphs with maximum Wiener index. The authors conjectured that for a given tree $T$, an orientation $D$ of $T$ of maximum Wiener index always contains a vertex $v$ such that for every vertex $u$, there is either a $(u,v)$-path or a $(v,u)$-path in $D$. In this paper we disprove the conjecture. We also show that the problem of finding an orientation of maximum Wiener index of a given graph is NP-complete, thus answering a question by Knor, uSkrekovski and Tepeh [Orientations of graphs with maximum Wiener index. Discrete Appl.\ Math.\ 211]. We briefly discuss the corresponding problem of finding an orientation of minimum Wiener index of a given graph, and show that the special case of deciding if a given graph on $m$ edges has an orientation of Wiener index $m$ can be solved in time quadratic in $n$.

Completing partial latin squares is NP-complete. Motivated by Ryser's theorem for latin rectangles, in 1974, Cruse found conditions that ensure a partial symmetric latin square of order $m$ can be embedded in a symmetric latin square of order $n$. Loosely speaking, this results asserts that an $n$-coloring of the edges of the complete $m$-vertex graph $K_m$ can be embedded in a one-factorization of $K_n$ if and only if $n$ is even and the number of edges of each color is at least $m-n/2$. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which an edge-coloring of the complete $λ$-fold $m$-vertex 3-graph $λK_m^3$ can be embedded in a one-factorization of $λK_n^3$. In particular, we prove the first known Ryser type theorem for hypergraphs by showing that if $n \equiv 0 \;(\bmod\; 3)$, any edge-coloring of $λK_m^3$ where the number of triples of each color is at least $m/2-n/6$, can be embedded in a one-factorization of $λK_n^3$. Finally we prove an Evans type result by showing that if $n \equiv 0 \;(\bmod\; 3)$ and $n\geq 3m$, then any $q$-coloring of the edges of any $F\subseteqλK_m^3$ can be embedded in a one-factorization of $λK_n^3$ as long as $q\leq λ\binom{n-1}{2}-λ\binom{m}{3}/\left\lfloor m/3 \right\rfloor$.

A $k$-bend path is a non-self-intersecting polyline in the plane made of at most $k+1$ axis-parallel line segments. B$_k$-VPG is the class of graphs which can be represented as intersection graphs of $k$-bend paths in the same plane. In this paper, we show that all AT-free outerplanar graphs are B$_0$-VPG, i.e., intersection graphs of horizontal and vertical line segments in the plane. Our proofs are constructive and give a polynomial time B$_0$-VPG drawing algorithm for the class. Following a long line of improvements, Gonçalves, Isenmann, and Pennarun [SODA 2018] showed that all planar graphs are B$_1$-VPG. Since there are planar graphs which are not B$_0$-VPG, characterizing B$_0$-VPG graphs among planar graphs becomes interesting. Chaplick et al.\ [WG 2012] had shown that it is NP-complete to recognize B$_k$-VPG graphs within B$_{k+1}$-VPG. Hence recognizing B$_0$-VPG graphs within B$_1$-VPG is NP-complete in general, but the question is open when restricted to planar graphs. There are outerplanar graphs and AT-free planar graphs which are not B$_0$-VPG. This piqued our interest in AT-free outerplanar graphs.

We show that the eigenpolytopes of graphs are universal in the sense that every polytope, up to affine equivalence, appears as the eigenpolytope of some positively weighted graph. We next extend the theory of graphical designs, which are quadrature rules for graphs, to positively weighted graphs. Through Gale duality for polytopes, we show a bijection between graphical designs and the faces of eigenpolytopes. This bijection proves the existence of graphical designs with positive quadrature weights, and upper bounds the size of a minimal graphical design. Connecting this bijection with the universality of eigenpolytopes, we establish three complexity results: it is strongly NP-complete to determine if there is a graphical design smaller than the mentioned upper bound, it is NP-hard to find a smallest graphical design, and it is #P-complete to count the number of minimal graphical designs.

A locating-dominating set in a graph G is a subset of vertices representing "detectors" which can locate an "intruder" given that each detector covers its closed neighborhood and can distinguish its own location from its neighbors. We explore a fault-tolerant variant of locating-dominating sets called redundant locating-dominating sets, which can tolerate one detector malfunctioning (going offline or being removed). In particular, we characterize redundant locating-dominating sets and prove that the problem of determining the minimum cardinality of a redundant locating-dominating set is NP-complete. We also determine tight bounds for the minimum density of redundant locating-dominating sets in several classes of graphs including paths, cycles, ladders, k-ary trees, and the infinite hexagonal and triangular grids. We find tight lower and upper bounds on the size of minimum redundant locating-dominating sets for all trees of order $n$, and characterize the family of trees which achieve these two extremal values, along with polynomial time algorithms to classify a tree as minimum extremal or not.

A tree $t$-spanner of a graph $G$ is a spanning tree $T$ in which the distance between any two adjacent vertices of $G$ is at most $t$. The smallest $t$ for which $G$ has a tree $t$-spanner is called tree stretch index. The $t$-admissibility problem aims to decide whether the tree stretch index is at most $t$. Regarding its optimization version, the smallest $t$ for which $G$ is $t$-admissible is the stretch index of $G$, denoted by $σ_T(G)$. Given a graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, the recognition of $2$-admissible graphs can be done $O(n+m)$ time, whereas $t$-admissibility is NP-complete for $σ_T(G) \leq t$, $t \geq 4$ and deciding if $t = 3$ is an open problem, for more than 20 years. Since the structural knowledge of classes can be determinant to classify $3$-admissibility's complexity, in this paper we present simpler and faster algorithms to check $2$ and $3$-admissibility for families of graphs with few $P_4$'s and $(k,\ell)$-graphs. Regarding $(0,\ell)$-graphs, we present lower and upper bounds for the stretch index of these graphs and characterize graphs whose stretch indexes are equal to the proposed upper bound. Moreover, we prove that $t$-admissibility is NP-complete even for line graphs of subdivided graphs.

This paper introduces the notion of mesh patterns in multidimensional permutations and initiates a systematic study of singleton mesh patterns (SMPs), which are multidimensional mesh patterns of length 1. A pattern is avoidable if there exist arbitrarily large permutations that do not contain it. As our main result, we give a complete characterization of avoidable SMPs using an invariant of a pattern that we call its rank. We show that determining avoidability for a $d$-dimensional SMP $P$ of cardinality $k$ is an $O(d\cdot k)$ problem, while determining rank of $P$ is an NP-complete problem. Additionally, using the notion of a minus-antipodal pattern, we characterize SMPs which occur at most once in any $d$-dimensional permutation. Lastly, we provide a number of enumerative results regarding the distributions of certain general projective, plus-antipodal, minus-antipodal and hyperplane SMPs.

Homomorphically full graphs are those for which every homomorphic image is isomorphic to a subgraph. We extend the definition of homomorphically full to oriented graphs in two different ways. For the first of these, we show that homomorphically full oriented graphs arise as quasi-transitive orientations of homomorphically full graphs. This in turn yields an efficient recognition and construction algorithms for these homomorphically full oriented graphs. For the second one, we show that the related recognition problem is GI-hard, and that the problem of deciding if a graph admits a homomorphically full orientation is NP-complete. In doing so we show the problem of deciding if two given oriented cliques are isomorphic is GI-complete.

In this paper, we study the complexity of two types of digraph packing problems: perfect out-forests problem and Steiner cycle packing problem. For the perfect out-forest problem, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a given strong digraph contains a 1-perfect out-forest. However, when restricted to a semicomplete digraph $D$, the problem of deciding whether $D$ contains an $i$-perfect out-forest becomes polynomial-time solvable, where $i\in \{0,1\}$. We also prove that it is NP-hard to find a 0-perfect out-forest of maximum size in a connected acyclic digraph, and it is NP-hard to find a 1-perfect out-forest of maximum size in a connected digraph. For the Steiner cycle packing problem, when both $k\geq 2, \ell\geq 1$ are fixed integers, we show that the problem of deciding whether there are at least $\ell$ internally disjoint directed $S$-Steiner cycles in an Eulerian digraph $D$ is NP-complete, where $S\subseteq V(D)$ and $|S|=k$. However, when we consider the class of symmetric digraphs, the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable. We also show that the problem of deciding whether there are at least $\ell$ arc-disjoint directed $S$-Steiner cycles in a given digraph $D$ is NP-complete, where $S\subseteq V(D)$ and $|S|=k$.

A proper coloring of a graph is \emph{proper conflict-free} if every non-isolated vertex $v$ has a neighbor whose color is unique in the neighborhood of $v$. A proper coloring of a graph is \emph{odd} if for every non-isolated vertex $v$, there is a color appearing an odd number of times in the neighborhood of $v$. For an integer $k$, the \textsc{PCF $k$-Coloring} problem asks whether an input graph admits a proper conflict-free $k$-coloring and the \textsc{Odd $k$-Coloring} asks whether an input graph admits an odd $k$-coloring. We show that for every integer $k\geq3$, both problems are NP-complete, even if the input graph is bipartite. Furthermore, we show that the \textsc{PCF $4$-Coloring} problem is NP-complete when the input graph is planar.

Assume that a graph $G$ models a detection system for a facility with a possible ``intruder," or a multiprocessor network with a possible malfunctioning processor. We consider the problem of placing detectors at a subset of vertices in $G$ to determine the location of an intruder if there is any. Many types of detection systems have been defined for different sensor capabilities; in particular, we focus on Identifying Codes, where each detector can determine whether there is an intruder within its closed neighborhood. In this research we explore a fault-tolerant variant of identifying codes applicable to real-world systems. Specifically, error-detecting identifying codes permit a false negative transmission from any single detector. We investigate minimum-sized error-detecting identifying codes in several classes of graphs, including cubic graphs and infinite grids, and show that the problem of determining said minimum size in arbitrary graphs is NP-complete.

We generalize the familiar notion of periodicity in sequences to a new kind of pseudoperiodicity, and we prove some basic results about it. We revisit the results of a 2012 paper of Shevelev and reprove his results in a simpler and more unified manner, and provide a complete answer to one of his previously unresolved questions. We consider finding words with specific pseudoperiod and having the smallest possible critical exponent. Finally, we consider the problem of determining whether a finite word is pseudoperiodic of a given size, and show that it is NP-complete.

The NP-complete problem Matching Cut is to decide if a graph has a matching that is also an edge cut of the graph. We prove new complexity results for Matching Cut restricted to $H$-free graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain some fixed graph $H$ as an induced subgraph. We also prove new complexity results for two recently studied variants of Matching Cut, on $H$-free graphs. The first variant requires that the matching cut must be extendable to a perfect matching of the graph. The second variant requires the matching cut to be a perfect matching. In particular, we prove that there exists a small constant $r>0$ such that the first variant is NP-complete for $P_r$-free graphs. This addresses a question of Bouquet and Picouleau (arXiv, 2020). For all three problems, we give state-of-the-art summaries of their computational complexity for $H$-free graphs.