arXiv++ Combinatorics

The cover time C of a graph G is the expected time for a random walk starting from the worst vertex to cover all vertices in G. Similarly, the blanket time B is the expected time to visit all vertices within a constant factor of number of times suggested by the stationary distribution. (Our definition will be slightly stronger than this.) Obviously, all vertices are covered when the graph is blanketed, and hence C <= B. The blanket time is introduced by Winkler and Zuckerman motivated by applications in Markov estimation and distributed computing. They conjectured B =O(C) and proved B=O(C ln n ). In this paper, we introduce another parameter M motivated by Matthews' theorem and prove M/2 <= C <= B = O(( M ln ln n)^2). In particular, B = O(C (ln ln n)^2). The lower bound is still valid for the cover time C(π) starting from the stationary distribution. We also show that there is a polynomial time algorithm to approximate M within a factor of 2 and so does for C within a factor of O((ln ln n)^2), improving previous bound of O(ln n) of Matthews'.

Let $μ$ be a metric on a set T, and let c be a nonnegative function on the unordered pairs of elements of a superset $V\supseteq T$. We consider the problem of minimizing the inner product $c\cdot m$ over all semimetrics m on V such that m coincides with $μ$ within T and each element of V is at zero distance from T (a variant of the {\em multifacility location problem}). In particular, this generalizes the well-known multiterminal multiway) cut problem. Two cases of metrics $μ$ have been known for which the problem can be solved in polynomial time: (a) $μ$ is a modular metric whose underlying graph $H(μ)$ is hereditary modular and orientable (in a certain sense); and (b) $μ$ is a median metric. In the latter case an optimal solution can be found by use of a cut uncrossing method. \Xcomment{We give a common generalization for both cases by proving that the problem is in P for any modular metric $μ$ whose all orbit graphs are hereditary modular and orientable. To this aim, we show the existence of a retraction of the Cartesian product of the orbit graphs to $H(μ)$, which enables us to elaborate an analog of the cut uncrossing method for such metrics $μ$.} In this paper we generalize the idea of cut uncrossing to show the polynomial solvability for a wider class of metrics $μ$, which includes the median metrics as a special case. The metric uncrossing method that we develop relies on the existence of retractions of certain modular graphs. On the negative side, we prove that for $μ$ fixed, the problem is NP-hard if $μ$ is non-modular or $H(μ)$ is non-orientable.

The local tree-width of a graph G=(V,E) is the function ltw^G: N -> N that associates with every natural number r the maximal tree-width of an r-neighborhood in G. Our main graph theoretic result is a decomposition theorem for graphs with excluded minors that essentially says that such graphs can be decomposed into trees of graphs of bounded local tree-width. As an application of this theorem, we show that a number of combinatorial optimization problems, such as Minimum Vertex Cover, Minimum Dominating Set, and Maximum Independent Set have a polynomial time approximation scheme when restricted to a class of graphs with an excluded minor.

We give new positive and negative results (some conditional) on speeding up computational algebraic geometry over the reals: (1) A new and sharper upper bound on the number of connected components of a semialgebraic set. Our bound is novel in that it is stated in terms of the volumes of certain polytopes and, for a large class of inputs, beats the best previous bounds by a factor exponential in the number of variables. (2) A new algorithm for approximating the real roots of certain sparse polynomial systems. Two features of our algorithm are (a) arithmetic complexity polylogarithmic in the degree of the underlying complex variety (as opposed to the super-linear dependence in earlier algorithms) and (b) a simple and efficient generalization to certain univariate exponential sums. (3) Detecting whether a real algebraic surface (given as the common zero set of some input straight-line programs) is not smooth can be done in polynomial time within the classical Turing model (resp. BSS model over C) only if P=NP (resp. NP<=BPP). The last result follows easily from an unpublished result of Steve Smale.