arXiv++ Combinatorics

We obtain quantitative bounds in the polynomial Szemerédi theorem of Bergelson and Leibman, provided the polynomials are homogeneous and of the same degree. Such configurations include arithmetic progressions with common difference equal to a perfect kth power.

We say that a (di)graph $G$ has a perfect $H$-packing if there exists a set of vertex-disjoint copies of $H$ which cover all the vertices in $G$. The seminal Hajnal--Szemerédi theorem characterises the minimum degree that ensures a graph $G$ contains a perfect $K_r$-packing. In this paper we prove the following analogue for directed graphs: Suppose that $T$ is a tournament on $r$ vertices and $G$ is a digraph of sufficiently large order $n$ where $r$ divides $n$. If $G$ has minimum in- and outdegree at least $ (1-1/r)n$ then $G$ contains a perfect $T$-packing. In the case when $T$ is a cyclic triangle, this result verifies a recent conjecture of Czygrinow, Kierstead and Molla (for large digraphs). Furthermore, in the case when $T$ is transitive we conjecture that it suffices for every vertex in $G$ to have sufficiently large indegree or outdegree. We prove this conjecture for transitive triangles and asymptotically for all $r \geq 3$. Our approach makes use of a result of Keevash and Mycroft concerning almost perfect matchings in hypergraphs as well as the Directed Graph Removal lemma.

Recently Conlon, Fox, and the author gave a new proof of a relative Szemerédi theorem, which was the main novel ingredient in the proof of the celebrated Green-Tao theorem that the primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. Roughly speaking, a relative Szemerédi theorem says that if S is a set of integers satisfying certain conditions, and A is a subset of S with positive relative density, then A contains long arithmetic progressions, and our recent results show that S only needs to satisfy a so-called linear forms condition. This note contains an alternative proof of the new relative Szemerédi theorem, where we directly transfer Szemerédi's theorem, instead of going through the hypergraph removal lemma. This approach provides a somewhat more direct route to establishing the result, and it gives better quantitative bounds. The proof has three main ingredients: (1) a transference principle/dense model theorem of Green-Tao and Tao-Ziegler (with simplified proofs given later by Gowers, and independently, Reingold-Trevisan-Tulsiani-Vadhan) applied with a discrepancy/cut-type norm (instead of a Gowers uniformity norm as it was applied in earlier works), (2) a counting lemma established by Conlon, Fox, and the author, and (3) Szemerédi's theorem as a black box.

Tao conjectured that every dense subset of $\mathcal{P}^d$, the $d$-tuples of primes, contains constellations of any given shape. This was very recently proved by Cook, Magyar, and Titichetrakun and independently by Tao and Ziegler. Here we give a simple proof using the Green-Tao theorem on linear equations in primes and the Furstenberg-Katznelson multidimensional Szemerédi theorem.

The celebrated Green-Tao theorem states that there are arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions in the primes. One of the main ingredients in their proof is a relative Szemerédi theorem which says that any subset of a pseudorandom set of integers of positive relative density contains long arithmetic progressions. In this paper, we give a simple proof of a strengthening of the relative Szemerédi theorem, showing that a much weaker pseudorandomness condition is sufficient. Our strengthened version can be applied to give the first relative Szemerédi theorem for $k$-term arithmetic progressions in pseudorandom subsets of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ of density $N^{-c_k}$. The key component in our proof is an extension of the regularity method to sparse pseudorandom hypergraphs, which we believe to be interesting in its own right. From this we derive a relative extension of the hypergraph removal lemma. This is a strengthening of an earlier theorem used by Tao in his proof that the Gaussian primes contain arbitrarily shaped constellations and, by standard arguments, allows us to deduce the relative Szemerédi theorem.

This is a companion note to our paper 'A relative Szemerédi theorem', elaborating on a concluding remark. In that paper, we showed how to prove a relative Szemerédi theorem for $(r+1)$-term arithmetic progressions assuming a linear forms condition. Here we show how to replace this condition with an assumption about the Gowers uniformity norm $U^r$.

We study the mixing properties of progressions $(x,xg,xg^2)$, $(x,xg,xg^2,xg^3)$ of length three and four in a model class of finite non-abelian groups, namely the special linear groups $SL_d(F)$ over a finite field $F$, with $d$ bounded. For length three progressions $(x,xg,xg^2)$, we establish a strong mixing property (with error term that decays polynomially in the order $|F|$ of $F$), which among other things counts the number of such progressions in any given dense subset $A$ of $SL_d(F)$, answering a question of Gowers for this class of groups. For length four progressions $(x,xg,xg^2,xg^3)$, we establish a partial result in the $d=2$ case if the shift $g$ is restricted to be diagonalisable over the field, although in this case we do not recover polynomial bounds in the error term. Our methods include the use of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, the abelian Fourier transform, the Lang-Weil bound for the number of points in an algebraic variety over a finite field, some algebraic geometry, and (in the case of length four progressions) the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem.

We generalize the IP-polynomial Szemerédi theorem due to Bergelson and McCutcheon and the nilpotent Szemerédi theorem due to Leibman. Important tools in our proof include a generalization of Leibman's result that polynomial mappings into a nilpotent group form a group and a multiparameter version of the nilpotent Hales-Jewett theorem due to Bergelson and Leibman.

We prove a variant of the multidimensional polynomial Szemerédi theorem of Bergelson and Leibman where one replaces polynomial sequences with other sparse sequences defined by functions that belong to some Hardy field and satisfy certain growth conditions. We do this by studying the limiting behavior of the corresponding multiple ergodic averages and obtaining a simple limit formula. A consequence of this formula in topological dynamics shows denseness of certain orbits when the iterates are restricted to suitably chosen sparse subsequences. Another consequence is that every syndetic set of integers contains certain non-shift invariant patterns, and every finite coloring of $\N$, with each color class a syndetic set, contains certain polychromatic patterns, results very particular to our non-polynomial setup.

If $\vf_1, ... \vf_m\colon\Z\to\Z^\ell$ are polynomials with zero constant terms and $E\subset\Z^\ell$ has positive upper Banach density, then we show that the set $E\cap (E-\vf_1(p-1))\cap\...\cap (E-\vf_m(p-1))$ is nonempty for some prime $p$. We also prove mean convergence for the associated averages along the prime numbers, conditional to analogous convergence results along the full integers. This generalizes earlier results of the authors, of Wooley and Ziegler, and of Bergelson, Leibman and Ziegler.

We offer a new proof of Furstenberg and Katznelson's density version of the Hales-Jewett Theorem: For any $δ> 0$ there is some $N_0 \geq 1$ such that whenever $A \subseteq [k]^N$ with $N \geq N_0$ and $|A|\geq δk^N$, $A$ contains a \textbf{combinatorial line}: that is, for some $I \subseteq [N]$ nonempty and $w_0 \in [k]^{[N]\setminus I}$ we have A \supseteq \{w: w|_{[N]\setminus I} = w_0, w|_I = \rm{const.}\}. Following Furstenberg and Katznelson, we first show that this result is equivalent to a `multiple recurrence' assertion for a class of probability measures enjoying a certain kind of stationarity. However, we then give a quite different proof of this latter assertion through a reduction to an infinitary removal lemma in the spirit of Tao's work on infinite random hypergraphs (and also its recent re-interpretation in a new proof of the multidimensional Szemeredi Theorem by the present author). This reduction is based on a structural analysis of these stationary laws closely analogous to the classical representation theorems for various partial exchangeable stochastic processes in the sense of Hoover, Aldous and Kallenberg. However, the underlying combinatorial arguments used to prove this theorem are rather different from those required to work with exchangeable arrays, and involve crucially an observation that arose during ongoing work by a collaborative team of authors to give a purely finitary proof of the above theorem.

Let $q$ be a positve integer, and $G$ be a $q$-partite simple graph on $qn$ vertices, with $n$ vertices in each vertex class. Let $δ={k_q \over k_q+1}$, where $k_q=q+O(\log{q})$. If each vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least $δn$ vertices in each of the other vertex classes, $q$ is bounded and $n$ is large enough, then $G$ has a $K_q$-factor.

In an additive group (G,+), a three-dimensional corner is the four points g, g+d(1,0,0), g+d(0,1,0), g+d(0,0,1), where g is in G^3, and d is a non-zero element of G. The Ramsey number of interest is R_3(G) the maximal cardinality of a subset of G^3 that does not contain a three-dimensional corner. Furstenberg and Katznelson have shown R_3(Z_N) is little-o of N^3, and in fact the corresponding result holds in all dimensions, a result that is a far reaching extension of the Szemeredi Theorem. We give a new proof of the finite field version of this fact, a proof that is a common generalization of the Gowers proof of Szemeredi's Theorem for four term progressions, and the result of Shkredov on two-dimensional corners. The principal tool are the Gowers Box Norms.

Let $P=\{p_{1},\ld,p_{r}\}\subset\Q[n_{1},\ld,n_{m}]$ be a family of polynomials such that $p_{i}(\Z^{m})\sle\Z$, $i=1,\ld,r$. We say that the family $P$ has {\it PSZ property} if for any set $E\sle\Z$ with $d^{*}(E)=\limsup_{N-M\ras\infty}\frac{|E\cap[M,N-1]|}{N-M}>0$ there exist infinitely many $n\in\Z^{m}$ such that $E$ contains a polynomial progression of the form \hbox{$\{a,a+p_{1}(n),\ld,a+p_{r}(n)\}$}. We prove that a polynomial family $P=\{p_{1},\ld,p_{r}\}$ has PSZ property if and only if the polynomials $p_{1},\ld,p_{r}$ are {\it jointly intersective}, meaning that for any $k\in\N$ there exists $n\in\Z^{m}$ such that the integers $p_{1}(n),\ld,p_{r}(n)$ are all divisible by $k$. To obtain this result we give a new ergodic proof of the polynomial Szemerédi theorem, based on the fact that the key to the phenomenon of polynomial multiple recurrence lies with the dynamical systems defined by translations on nilmanifolds. We also obtain, as a corollary, the following generalization of the polynomial van der Waerden theorem: If $p_{1},\ld,p_{r}\in\Q[n]$ are jointly intersective integral polynomials, then for any finite partition of $\Z$, $\Z=\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}E_{i}$, there exist $i\in\{1,\ld,k\}$ and $a,n\in E_{i}$ such that $\{a,a+p_{1}(n),\ld,a+p_{r}(n)\}\sln E_{i}$.

We prove analogues for hypergraphs of Szemerédi's regularity lemma and the associated counting lemma for graphs. As an application, we give the first combinatorial proof of the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson, and the first proof that provides an explicit bound. Similar results with the same consequences have been obtained independently by Nagle, Rödl, Schacht and Skokan.

We find the smallest characteristic factor and a limit formula for the multiple ergodic averages associated to any family of three polynomials and polynomial families of the form $\{l_1p,l_2p,...,l_kp\}$. We then derive several multiple recurrence results and combinatorial implications, including an answer to a question of Brown, Graham, and Landman, and a generalization of the Polynomial Szemerédi Theorem of Bergelson and Leibman for families of three polynomials with not necessarily zero constant term. We also simplify and generalize a recent result of Bergelson, Host, and Kra, showing that for all $ε>0$ and every subset of the integers $Λ$ the set $$ \big\{n\in\N\colon d^*\big(Λ\cap (Λ+p_1(n))\cap (Λ+p_2(n))\cap (Λ+ p_3(n))\big)>(d^*(Λ))^4-ε\big\} $$ has bounded gaps for "most" choices of integer polynomials $p_1,p_2,p_3$.