arXiv++ Combinatorics

Interval graphs are a special class of chordal graphs, and hence have connections to commutative algebra via Fröberg's theorem that characterizes linear resolutions of squarefree quadratic ideals. In recent years, several hypergraphic analogues of interval and chordal graphs have been proposed, in part as an effort to extend Fröberg's theorem to ideals generated in higher degree. In this paper, we study two such classes from the literature, cointerval hypergraphs and underclosed complexes, and show that they are in fact equivalent up to complementation. We then consider their place in the broader theory of higher-dimensional chordality, proving that an underclosed clutter is chordal in the sense of Woodroofe. As a consequence, we answer a question of Dochtermann and Engström by showing that the associated Alexander dual complexes are vertex decomposable, implying that the corresponding circuit ideals have linear quotients. We furthermore show that these dual complexes have shellings induced by their underclosed vertex orders.

Unit interval and interval complexes are higher-dimensional generalizations of unit interval and interval graphs, respectively. We show that strongly connected unit interval complexes are shellable with shellings induced by their unit interval orders. We also show that these complexes are vertex decomposable and hence shelling completable. On the other hand, we give simple examples of strongly connected interval complexes that are not shellable in dimensions two and higher.

A universal partial cycle (or upcycle) for $\mathcal{A}^n$ is a cyclic sequence that covers each word of length $n$ over the alphabet $\mathcal{A}$ exactly once -- like a De Bruijn cycle, except that we also allow a wildcard symbol $\mathord{\diamond}$ that can represent any letter of $\mathcal{A}$. Chen et al. in 2017 and Goeckner et al. in 2018 showed that the existence and structure of upcycles are highly constrained, unlike those of De Bruijn cycles, which exist for every alphabet size and word length. Moreover, it was not known whether any upcycles existed for $n \ge 5$. We present several examples of upcycles over both binary and non-binary alphabets for $n = 8$. We generalize two graph-theoretic representations of De Bruijn cycles to upcycles. We then introduce novel approaches to constructing new upcycles from old ones. Notably, given any upcycle for an alphabet of size $a$, we show how to construct an upcycle for an alphabet of size $ak$ for any $k \in \mathbb{N}$, so each example generates an infinite family of upcycles. We also define folds and lifts of upcycles, which relate upcycles with differing densities of $\mathord{\diamond}$ characters. In particular, we show that every upcycle lifts to a De Bruijn cycle. Our constructions rely on a different generalization of De Bruijn cycles known as perfect necklaces, and we introduce several new examples of perfect necklaces. We extend the definitions of certain pseudorandomness properties to partial words and determine which are satisfied by all upcycles, then draw a conclusion about linear feedback shift registers. Finally, we prove new nonexistence results based on the word length $n$, alphabet size, and $\mathord{\diamond}$ density.

The matching complex $M(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the set of all matchings in $G$. A Buchsbaum simplicial complex is a generalization of both a homology manifold and a Cohen--Macaulay complex. We give a complete characterization of the graphs $G$ for which $M(G)$ is a two-dimensional Buchsbaum complex. As an intermediate step, we determine which graphs have matching complexes that are themselves connected graphs.

In pioneering works of Meyer and of McMullen in the early 1970s, the set of Minkowski summands of a polytope was shown to be a polyhedral cone called the type cone. Explicit computations of type cones are in general intractable. Nevertheless, we show that the type cone of the product of simplices is the cone over a simplex. This remarkably simple result derives from insights about rainbow point configurations and the work of McMullen.

Given a family of lattice polytopes, two common questions in Ehrhart Theory are determining when a polytope has the integer decomposition property and determining when a polytope is reflexive. While these properties are of independent interest, the confluence of these properties is a source of active investigation due to conjectures regarding the unimodality of the $h^\ast$-polynomial. In this paper, we consider the Newton polytopes arising from two families of polynomials in algebraic combinatorics: Schur polynomials and inflated symmetric Grothendieck polynomials. In both cases, we prove that these polytopes have the integer decomposition property by using the fact that both families of polynomials have saturated Newton polytope. Furthermore, in both cases, we provide a complete characterization of when these polytopes are reflexive. We conclude with some explicit formulas and unimodality implications of the $h^\ast$-vector in the case of Schur polynomials.

If a pure simplicial complex is partitionable, then its $h$-vector has a combinatorial interpretation in terms of any partitioning of the complex. Given a non-partitionable complex $Δ$, we construct a complex $Γ\supseteq Δ$ of the same dimension such that both $Γ$ and the relative complex $(Γ,Δ)$ are partitionable. This allows us to rewrite the $h$-vector of any pure simplicial complex as the difference of two $h$-vectors of partitionable complexes, giving an analogous interpretation of the $h$-vector of a non-partitionable complex. By contrast, for a given complex $Δ$ it is not always possible to find a complex $Γ$ such that both $Γ$ and $(Γ,Δ)$ are Cohen-Macaulay. We characterize when this is possible, and we show that the construction of such a $Γ$ in this case is remarkably straightforward. We end with a note on a similar notion for shellability and a connection to Simon's conjecture on extendable shellability for uniform matroids.

The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose vertex set is the set of edges of the graph with a face for each independent set of edges. In this paper we completely characterize the pairs (graph, matching complex) for which the matching complex is a homology manifold, with or without boundary. Except in dimension two, all of these manifolds are sphere or balls.

In 1993 Stanley showed that if a simplicial complex is acyclic over some field, then its face poset can be decomposed into disjoint rank $1$ boolean intervals whose minimal faces together form a subcomplex. Stanley further conjectured that complexes with a higher notion of acyclicity could be decomposed in a similar way using boolean intervals of higher rank. We provide an explicit counterexample to this conjecture. We also prove a version of the conjecture for boolean trees and show that the original conjecture holds when this notion of acyclicity is as high as possible.

We investigate generalized notions of the nerve complex for the facets of a simplicial complex. We show that the homologies of these higher nerve complexes determine the depth of the Stanley-Reisner ring $k[Δ]$ as well as the $f$-vector and $h$-vector of $Δ$. We present, as an application, a formula for computing regularity of monomial ideals.

Chen, Kitaev, Mütze, and Sun recently introduced the notion of universal partial words, a generalization of universal words and de Bruijn sequences. Universal partial words allow for a wild-card character $\diamond$, which is a placeholder for any letter in the alphabet. We settle and strengthen conjectures posed in the same paper where this notion was introduced. For non-binary alphabets, we show that universal partial words have periodic $\diamond$ structure and are cyclic, and we give number-theoretic conditions on the existence of universal partial words. In addition, we provide an explicit construction for a family of universal partial words over alphabets of even size.

A long-standing conjecture of Stanley states that every Cohen-Macaulay simplicial complex is partitionable. We disprove the conjecture by constructing an explicit counterexample. Due to a result of Herzog, Jahan and Yassemi, our construction also disproves the conjecture that the Stanley depth of a monomial ideal is always at least its depth.