arXiv++ Combinatorics

We give a new proof of Maurer's homotopy theorem for matroids using polyhedral methods, in contrast to Maurer's original combinatorial proof. The same polyhedral approach yields a homotopy theorem for delta-matroids, from which the corresponding results for matroids, even delta-matroids, and antisymmetric matroids follow. We further prove an analogous theorem for integral polymatroids.

Motivated by algebraic correspondences and linear operators associated with volume and Lorentzian polynomials, we introduce matroid correspondences and their polymatroid analogues. A matroid correspondence defines a functor between poset categories of matroids whose morphisms are matroid quotients, and various standard functors, including deletion, contraction, free extension, truncation, intersection, union, and pullback, arise in this way. We show that these correspondences preserve representability and algebraicity under natural hypotheses. In the polymatroid setting, we establish compatibility with multisymmetric lifts. Finally, we relate this construction to the supports of linear operators with Lorentzian symbols.

One of the most important classes of even $Δ$-matroids arises from orientable ribbon graphs, which play a role analogous to that of graphic matroids in matroid theory. Motivated by a natural correspondence between strong $Δ$-matroids and even $Δ$-matroids due to Geelen and Murota, we characterize the class of strong $Δ$-matroids that correspond to orientable ribbon-graphic $Δ$-matroids. These are precisely the $Δ$-matroids associated with what we call pseudo-orientable ribbon graphs. Moreover, we present a geometric construction that transforms a pseudo-orientable ribbon graph into an orientable ribbon graph, thereby realizing this correspondence. As consequences, we obtain the Matrix--Quasi-tree Theorem, the Hurwitz stability of quasi-tree generating polynomials, and a log-concavity result for the sequence counting quasi-trees of size $2i-1$ or $2i$ for pseudo-orientable ribbon graphs. To establish the log-concavity, we generalize Stanley's log-concavity theorem for regular matroids to regular $Δ$-matroids. Finally, we exhibit an infinite family of non-pseudo-orientable ribbon graphs that fail to satisfy the Matrix--Quasi-tree theorem and Hurwitz stability.

We present a new cryptomorphic definition of orthogonal matroids with coefficients using Grassmann--Plücker functions. The equivalence is motivated by Cayley's identities expressing principal and almost-principal minors of a skew-symmetric matrix in terms of its Pfaffians. As a corollary of the new cryptomorphism, we deduce that each component of the orthogonal Grassmannian is parameterized by certain part of the Plücker coordinates.

Previous work of Chan--Church--Grochow and Baker--Wang shows that the set of spanning trees in a plane graph $G$ is naturally a torsor for the Jacobian group of $G$. Informally, this means that the set of spanning trees of $G$ naturally forms a group, except that there is no distinguished identity element. We generalize this fact to graphs embedded on orientable surfaces of arbitrary genus, which can be identified with ribbon graphs. In this generalization, the set of spanning trees of $G$ is replaced by the set of spanning quasi-trees of the ribbon graph, and the Jacobian group of $G$ is replaced by the Jacobian group of the associated regular orthogonal matroid $M$ (along with an associated regular representation of $M$). Our proof shows, more generally, that the family of "BBY torsors" constructed by Backman--Baker--Yuen and later generalized by Ding admit natural generalizations to (regular representations of) regular orthogonal matroids. In addition to shedding light on the role of planarity in the earlier work mentioned above, our results represent one of the first substantial applications of orthogonal matroids (also called "even delta-matroids" or "Lagrangian orthogonal matroids") to a natural combinatorial problem about graphs.

Every regular matroid is associated with a sandpile group, which acts simply transitively on the set of bases in various ways. Ganguly and the second author introduced the notion of consistency to describe classes of actions that respect deletion-contraction in a precise sense, and proved the consistency of rotor-routing torsors (and uniqueness thereof) for plane graphs. In this work, we prove that the class of actions introduced by Backman, Baker, and the fourth author, is consistent for regular matroids. More precisely, we prove the consistency of its generalization given by Backman, Santos and the fourth author, and independently by the first author. This extends the above existence assertion, as well as makes progress on the goal of classifying all consistent actions.

Csikvári constructed a poset on trees to prove that several graph functions attain extreme values at the star and the path among the trees on a fixed number of vertices. Reiner and Smith proved that the Tutte polynomials $T(1,y)$ of cones over trees, which are the graphs obtained by attaching a cone vertex to a tree, have the described extreme behavior. They further conjectured that the result can be strengthened in terms of Csikvári's poset. We solve this conjecture affirmatively.

The Jacobian group (also called the sandpile group, Picard group, or critical group) of a graph or, more generally, of a regular matroid has been well studied. Sixth-root-of-unity matroids, also called complex unimodular matroids, are generalizations of regular matroids. This paper provides a definition, and establishes some basic properties, of the Jacobian group of a sixth-root-of-unity matroid.

Let $G$ be a connected graph. The Jacobian group (also known as the Picard group or sandpile group) of $G$ is a finite abelian group whose cardinality equals the number of spanning trees of $G$. The Jacobian group admits a canonical simply transitive action on the set $\mathcal{R}(G)$ of cycle-cocycle reversal classes of orientations of $G$. Hence one can construct combinatorial bijections between spanning trees of $G$ and $\mathcal{R}(G)$ to build connections between spanning trees and the Jacobian group. The BBY bijections and the Bernardi bijections are two important examples. In this paper, we construct a new family of such bijections that includes both. Our bijections depend on a pair of atlases (different from the ones in manifold theory) that abstract and generalize certain common features of the two known bijections. The definitions of these atlases are derived from triangulations and dissections of the Lawrence polytopes associated to $G$. The acyclic cycle signatures and cocycle signatures used to define the BBY bijections correspond to regular triangulations. Our bijections can extend to subgraph-orientation correspondences. Most of our results hold for regular matroids. We present our work in the language of fourientations, which are a generalization of orientations.

Let $G$ be a connected finite graph. Backman, Baker, and Yuen have constructed a family of explicit and easy-to-describe bijections $g_{σ,σ^*}$ between spanning trees of $G$ and $(σ,σ^*)$-compatible orientations, where the $(σ,σ^*)$-compatible orientations are the representatives of equivalence classes of orientations up to cycle-cocycle reversal which are determined by a cycle signature $σ$ and a cocycle signature $σ^*$. Their proof makes use of zonotopal subdivisions and the bijections $g_{σ,σ^*}$ are called \emph{geometric bijections}. In this paper, we extend the geometric bijections to subgraph-orientation correspondences. Moreover, we extend the geometric constructions accordingly. Our proofs are purely combinatorial, even for the geometric constructions. We also provide geometric proofs for partial results, which make use of zonotopal tiling, relate to Backman, Baker, and Yuen's method, and motivate our combinatorial constructions. Finally, we explain that the main results hold for \emph{regular matroids}.

Let $G$ be a ribbon graph. Matthew Baker and Yao Wang proved that the rotor-routing torsor and the Bernardi torsor for $G$, which are two torsor structures on the set of spanning trees for the Picard group of $G$, coincide when $G$ is planar. We prove the conjecture raised by them that the two torsors disagree when $G$ is non-planar.