arXiv++ Combinatorics

Asymptotic behaviour of maximum sizes of induced trees and forests has been studied extensively in last decades, though the overall picture is far from being complete. In this paper, we close several significant gaps: 1) We prove $2$-point concentration of the maximum sizes of an induced forest and an induced tree with maximum degree at most $Δ$ in dense binomial random graphs $G(n,p)$ with constant probability $p$. 2) We show concentration in an explicit interval of size $o(1/p)$ for the maximum size of an induced forest with maximum degree at most $Δ$ for $1/n\ll p=o(1)$. Our proofs rely on both the second moment approach, with the probabilistic part involving Talagrand's concentration inequality and the analytical part involving saddle-point analysis, and new results on enumeration of labelled trees and forests that might be of their own interest.

Given a graph $F$ and a positive integer $n$, the weak $F$-saturation number $\mathrm{wsat}(K_n,F)$ is the minimum number of edges in a graph $H$ on $n$ vertices such that the edges missing in $H$ can be added, one at a time, so that every edge creates a copy of $F$. Kalai in 1985 introduced a linear algebraic approach that became one of the most efficient tools to prove lower bounds on weak saturation numbers. If $W$ is a vector space spanned by vectors $w(e)$ assigned to edges $e$ of $K_n$ in such a way that, for every copy $F'\subset K_n$ of $F$, there exist non-zero $λ_e$, $e\in E(F')$, satisfying $\sum_{e\in E(F')}λ_e w(e)=0$, then $\mathrm{dim}W\leq \mathrm{wsat}(K_n,F)$. In this paper, we prove limitations of this approach: we show infinitely many $F$ such that, for every vector space $W$ as above, $\mathrm{dim}W<\mathrm{wsat}(K_n,F)$. We also suggest a modification of this approach that allows to get tight lower bounds even when the original linear algebraic approach is not sufficient. Finally, we generalise our results to random graphs, complete multipartite graphs, and hypergraphs.

We study the problem of distinguishing between two independent samples $\mathbf{G}_n^1,\mathbf{G}_n^2$ of a binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ by first order (FO) sentences. Shelah and Spencer proved that, for a constant $α\in(0,1)$, $G(n,n^{-α})$ obeys FO zero-one law if and only if $α$ is irrational. Therefore, for irrational $α\in(0,1)$, any fixed FO sentence does not distinguish between $\mathbf{G}_n^1,\mathbf{G}_n^2$ with asymptotical probability 1 (w.h.p.) as $n\to\infty$. We show that the minimum quantifier depth $\mathbf{k}_α$ of a FO sentence $\varphi=\varphi(\mathbf{G}_n^1,\mathbf{G}_n^2)$ distinguishing between $\mathbf{G}_n^1,\mathbf{G}_n^2$ depends on how closely $α$ can be approximated by rationals: (1) for all non-Liouville $α\in(0,1)$, $\mathbf{k}_α=Ω(\ln\ln\ln n)$ w.h.p.; (2) there are irrational $α\in(0,1)$ with $\mathbf{k}_α$ that grow arbitrarily slowly w.h.p.; (3) $\mathbf{k}_α=O_p(\frac{\ln n}{\ln\ln n})$ for all $α\in(0,1)$. The main ingredients in our proofs are a novel randomized algorithm that generates asymmetric strictly balanced graphs as well as a new method to study symmetry groups of randomly perturbed graphs.

Let $K^r_n$ be the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices, that is, the hypergraph whose vertex set is $[n]:=\{1,2,...,n\}$ and whose edge set is $\binom{[n]}{r}$. We form $G^r(n,p)$ by retaining each edge of $K^r_n$ independently with probability $p$. An $r$-uniform hypergraph $H\subseteq G$ is $F$-saturated if $H$ does not contain any copy of $F$, but any missing edge of $H$ in $G$ creates a copy of $F$. Furthermore, we say that $H$ is weakly $F$-saturated in $G$ if $H$ does not contain any copy of $F$, but the missing edges of $H$ in $G$ can be added back one-by-one, in some order, such that every edge creates a new copy of $F$. The smallest number of edges in an $F$-saturated hypergraph in $G$ is denoted by $sat(G,F)$, and in a weakly $F$-saturated hypergraph in $G$ by $wsat(G,F)$. In 2017, Korándi and Sudakov initiated the study of saturation in random graphs, showing that for constant $p$, with high probability $sat(G(n,p),K_s)=(1+o(1))n\log_{\frac{1}{1-p}}n$, and $wsat(G(n,p),K_s)=wsat(K_n,K_s)$. Generalising their results, in this paper, we solve the suturation problem for random hypergraphs for every $2\le r < s$ and constant $p$.

We estimate the minimum number of distance queries that is sufficient to reconstruct the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ with constant diameter with high probability. We get a tight (up to a constant factor) answer for all $p>n^{-1+o(1)}$ outside "threshold windows" around $n^{-k/(k+1)+o(1)}$, $k\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}$: with high probability the query complexity equals $Θ(n^{4-d}p^{2-d})$, where $d$ is the diameter of the random graph. This demonstrates the following non-monotone behaviour: the query complexity jumps down at moments when the diameter gets larger; yet, between these moments the query complexity grows. We also show that there exists a non-adaptive algorithm that reconstructs the random graph with $O(n^{4-d}p^{2-d}\ln n)$ distance queries with high probability, and this is best possible.

We prove that the family of largest cuts in the binomial random graph exhibits the following stability property: If $1/n \ll p = 1-Ω(1)$, then, with high probability, there is a set of $n - o(n)$ vertices that is partitioned in the same manner by all maximum cuts of $G_{n,p}$. Moreover, the analogous statement remains true when one replaces maximum cuts with nearly-maximum cuts. We then demonstrate how one can use this statement as a tool for showing that certain properties of $G_{n,p}$ that hold in a fixed balanced cut hold simultaneously in all maximum cuts. We provide two example applications of this tool. First, we prove that maximum cuts in $G_{n,p}$ typically partition the neighbourhood of every vertex into nearly equal parts; this resolves a conjecture of DeMarco and Kahn for all but a narrow range of densities $p$. Second, for all edge-critical, nonbipartite, and strictly 2-balanced graphs $H$, we prove a lower bound on the threshold density $p$ above which every largest $H$-free subgraph of $G_{n,p}$ is $(χ(H)-1)$-partite. Our lower bound exactly matches the upper bound on this threshold recently obtained by the first two authors.

For a sequence of random structures with $n$-element domains over a relational signature, we define its first order (FO) complexity as a certain subset in the Banach space $\ell^{\infty}/c_0$. The well-known FO zero-one law and FO convergence law correspond to FO complexities equal to $\{0,1\}$ and a subset of $\mathbb{R}$, respectively. We present a hierarchy of FO complexity classes, introduce a stochastic FO reduction that allows to transfer complexity results between different random structures, and deduce using this tool several new logical limit laws for binomial random structures. Finally, we introduce a conditional distribution on graphs, subject to a FO sentence $\varphi$, that generalises certain well-known random graph models, show instances of this distribution for every complexity class, and prove that the set of all $\varphi$ validating 0--1 law is not recursively enumerable.

We derive the distribution of the maximum number of common neighbours of a pair of vertices in a dense random regular graph.The proof involves two important steps. One step is to establish the extremal independence property: the asymptotic equivalence with the maximum component of a vector with independent marginal distributions. The other step is to prove that the distribution of the number of common neighbours for each pair of vertices can be approximated by the binomial distribution.

A class of graphs admits an adjacency labeling scheme of size $b(n)$, if the vertices in each of its $n$-vertex graphs can be assigned binary strings (called labels) of length $b(n)$ so that the adjacency of two vertices can be determined solely from their labels. We give tight bounds on the size of adjacency labels for every family of monotone (i.e., subgraph-closed) classes with a well-behaved growth function between $2^{O(n \log n)}$ and $2^{O(n^{2-δ})}$ for any $δ> 0$. Specifically, we show that for any function $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb R$ satisfying $\log n \leqslant f(n) \leqslant n^{1-δ}$ for any fixed $δ> 0$, and some~sub-multiplicativity condition, there are monotone graph classes with growth $2^{O(nf(n))}$ that do not admit adjacency labels of size at most $f(n) \log n$. On the other hand, any such class does admit adjacency labels of size $O(f(n)\log n)$. Surprisingly this tight bound is a $Θ(\log n)$ factor away from the information-theoretic bound of $Ω(f(n))$. The special case when $f = \log$ implies that the recently-refuted Implicit Graph Conjecture [Hatami and Hatami, FOCS 2022] also fails within monotone classes. We further show that the Implicit Graph Conjecture holds for all monotone \emph{small} classes. In other words, any monotone class with growth rate at most $n!\,c^n$ for some constant $c>0$, admits adjacency labels of information-theoretic order optimal size. In fact, we show a more general result that is of independent interest: any monotone small class of graphs has bounded degeneracy.We conjecture that the Implicit Graph Conjecture holds for all hereditary small classes.

We conjecture that the distribution of the edge-disjoint union of two random regular graphs on the same vertex set is asymptotically equivalent to a random regular graph of the combined degree, provided it grows as the number of vertices tends to infinity. We verify this conjecture for the cases when the graphs are sufficiently dense or sparse. We also prove an asymptotic formula for the expected number of spanning regular subgraphs in a random regular graph.

We find asymptotics of the maximum size of a chordal subgraph in a binomial random graph $G(n,p)$, for $p=\mathrm{const}$ and $p=n^{-α+o(1)}$.

A $k$-deck of a (coloured) graph is a multiset of its induced $k$-vertex subgraphs. Given a graph $G$, when is it possible to reconstruct with high probability a uniformly random colouring of its vertices in $r$ colours from its $k$-deck? In this paper, we study this question for grids and random graphs. Reconstruction of random colourings of $d$-dimensional $n$-grids from the deck of their $k$-subgrids is one of the most studied colour reconstruction questions. The 1-dimensional case is motivated by the problem of reconstructing DNA sequences from their `shotgunned' stretches. It was comprehensively studied and the above reconstruction question was completely answered in the '90s. In this paper, we get a very precise answer for higher $d$. For every $d\geq 2$ and every $r\geq 2$, we present an almost linear algorithm that reconstructs with high probability a random $r$-colouring of vertices of a $d$-dimensional $n$-grid from the deck of all its $k$-subgrids for every $k\geq(d\log_r n)^{1/d}+1/d+\varepsilon$ and prove that the random $r$-colouring is not reconstructible with high probability if $k\leq (d\log_r n)^{1/d}-\varepsilon$. This answers the question of Narayanan and Yap (that was asked for $d\geq 3$) on "two-point concentration" of the minimum $k$ so that $k$-subgrids determine the entire colouring. Next, we prove that with high probability a uniformly random $r$-colouring of vertices of a uniformly random graph $G(n,1/2)$ is reconstructible from its full $k$-deck if $k\geq 2\log_2 n+8$ and is not reconstructible with high probability if $k\leq\sqrt{2\log_2 n}$. We further show that the colour reconstruction algorithm for random graphs can be modified and used for graph reconstruction: we prove that with high probability $G(n,1/2)$ is reconstructible from its full $k$-deck if $k\geq 2\log_2 n+11$ while it is not reconstructible with high probability if $k\leq 2\sqrt{\log_2 n}$.

We show that for any natural number $s$, there is a constant $γ$ and a subgraph-closed class having, for any natural $n$, at most $γ^n$ graphs on $n$ vertices up to isomorphism, but no adjacency labeling scheme with labels of size at most $s \log n$. In other words, for every $s$, there is a small (even tiny) monotone class without universal graphs of size $n^s$. Prior to this result, it was not excluded that every small class has an almost linear universal graph, or equivalently a labeling scheme with labels of size $(1+o(1))\log n$. The existence of such a labeling scheme, a scaled-down version of the recently disproved Implicit Graph Conjecture, was repeatedly raised [Gavoille and Labourel, ESA '07; Dujmović et al., JACM '21; Bonamy et al., SIDMA '22; Bonnet et al., Comb. Theory '22]. Furthermore, our small monotone classes have unbounded twin-width, thus simultaneously disprove the already-refuted Small conjecture; but this time with a self-contained proof, not relying on elaborate group-theoretic constructions.

It is known that after an appropriate rescaling the maximum degree of the binomial random graph converges in distribution to a Gumbel random variable. The same holds true for the maximum number of common neighbours of a $k$-vertex set, and for the maximum number of $s$-cliques sharing a single vertex. Can these results be generalised to the maximum number of extensions of a $k$-vertex set for any given way of extending of a $k$-vertex set by an $s$-vertex set? In this paper, we generalise the above mentioned results to a class of ``symmetric extensions'' and show that the limit distribution is not necessarily from the Gumbel family.

The weak saturation number $\mathrm{wsat}(n,F)$ is the minimum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices such that all the missing edges can be activated sequentially so that each new edge creates a copy of $F$. A usual approach to prove a lower bound for the weak saturation number is algebraic: if it is possible to embed edges of $K_n$ in a vector space in a certain way (depending on $F$), then the dimension of the subspace spanned by the images of the edges of $K_n$ is a lower bound for the weak saturation number. In this paper, we present a new combinatorial approach to prove lower bounds for weak saturation numbers that allows to establish worst-case tight (up to constant additive terms) general lower bounds as well as to get exact values of the weak saturation numbers for certain graph families. It is known (Alon, 1985) that, for every $F$, there exists $c_F$ such that $\mathrm{wsat}(n,F)=c_Fn(1+o(1))$. Our lower bounds imply that all values in the interval $\left[\fracδ{2}-\frac{1}{δ+1},δ-1\right]$ with step size $\frac{1}{δ+1}$ are achievable by $c_F$ (while any value outside this interval is not achievable).

For a given graph $F$, the $F$-saturation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $ {sat}(G, F)$, is the minimum number of edges in an edge-maximal $F$-free subgraph of $G$. In 2017, Korándi and Sudakov determined $ {sat}({G}(n, p), K_r)$ asymptotically, where ${G}(n, p) $ denotes the Erdős-Rényi random graph and $ K_r$ is the complete graph on $r$ vertices. In this paper, among other results, we present an asymptotic upper bound on ${sat}({G}(n, p), F)$ for any bipartite graph $F$ and also an asymptotic lower bound on ${sat}({G}(n, p), F)$ for any complete bipartite graph $F$.

For graphs $G$ and $F$, the saturation number $\textit{sat}(G,F)$ is the minimum number of edges in an inclusion-maximal $F$-free subgraph of $G$. In 2017, Korándi and Sudakov initiated the study of saturation in random graphs. They showed that for constant $p\in (0,1)$, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),K_s\right)=\left(1+o(1)\right)n\log_{\frac{1}{1-p}}n$. We show that for every graph $F$ and every constant $p\in (0,1)$, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p), F\right)=O(n\ln n)$. Furthermore, if every edge of $F$ belongs to a triangle, then the above is the right asymptotic order of magnitude, that is, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),F\right)=Θ(n\ln n)$. We further show that for a large family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$ with an edge that does not belong to a triangle, which includes all the bipartite graphs, for every $F\in \mathcal{F}$ and constant $p\in(0,1)$, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),F\right)=O(n)$. We conjecture that this sharp transition from $O(n)$ to $Θ(n\ln n)$ depends only on this property, that is, that for any graph $F$ with at least one edge that does not belong to a triangle, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),F\right)=O(n)$. We further generalise the result of Korándi and Sudakov, and show that for a more general family of graphs $\mathcal{F}'$, including all complete graphs $K_s$ and all complete multipartite graphs of the form $K_{1,1,s_3,\ldots, s_{\ell}}$, for every $F\in \mathcal{F}'$ and every constant $p\in(0,1)$, whp $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),F\right)=\left(1+o(1)\right)n\log_{\frac{1}{1-p}}n$. Finally, we show that for every complete multipartite graph $K_{s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_{\ell}}$ and every $p\in \left[\frac{1}{2},1\right)$, $\textit{sat}\left(G(n,p),K_{s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_{\ell}}\right)=\left(1+o(1)\right)n\log_{\frac{1}{1-p}}n$.

Let $d\geq 3$ be a constant and let $F$ be a $d$-regular graph on $[n]$ with not too many symmetries. By the union bound, the probability threshold for the existence of a spanning subgraph in $G(n,p)$ isomorphic to $F$ is at least $p^*(n)=(1+o(1))(e/n)^{2/d}$. We give a tight bound on the edge expansion of $F$ guaranteeing that the probability threshold for the appearance of a copy of $F$ has the same order of magnitude as $p^*$. We also prove that, within a slight strengthening of this bound, the probability threshold is asymptotically equal to $p^*$. In particular, it proves the conjecture of Kahn, Narayanan and Park on a sharp threshold for the containment of a square of a Hamilton cycle. It also implies that, for $d\geq 4$ and (asymptotically) almost all $d$-regular graphs $F$ on $[n]$, $p(n)=(e/n)^{2/d}$ is a sharp threshold for $F$-containment.

For given graphs $F$ and $G$, the minimum number of edges in an inclusion-maximal $F$-free subgraph of $G$ is called the $F$-saturation number and denoted $\mathrm{sat}(G, F)$. For the star $F=K_{1,r}$, the asymptotics of $\mathrm{sat}(G(n,p),F)$ is known. We prove a sharper result: whp $\mathrm{sat}(G(n,p), K_{1,r})$ is concentrated in a set of 2 consecutive points.

A classical vertex Ramsey result due to Nešetřil and Rödl states that given a finite family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, a graph $A$ and a positive integer $r$, if every graph $B\in\mathcal{F}$ has a $2$-vertex-connected subgraph which is not a subgraph of $A$, then there exists an $\mathcal{F}$-free graph which is vertex $r$-Ramsey with respect to $A$. We prove that this sufficient condition for the existence of an $\mathcal{F}$-free graph which is vertex $r$-Ramsey with respect to $A$ is also necessary for large enough number of colours $r$. We further show a generalisation of the result to a family of graphs and the typical existence of such a subgraph in a dense binomial random graph.