arXiv++ Combinatorics

We give a short and self-contained argument that shows that, for any positive integers $t$ and $n$ with $t =O\Bigl(\frac{n}{\log n}\Bigr)$, the number $α([t]^n)$ of antichains of the poset $[t]^n$ is at most \[\exp_2\Bigl(1+O\Bigl(\Bigl(\frac{t\log^3 n}{n}\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigr)\Bigr)N(t,n)\,,\] where $N(t,n)$ is the size of a largest level of $[t]^n$. This, in particular, says that if $t \ll n/\log^3 n$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$, then $\logα([t]^n)=(1+o(1))N(t,n)$, giving a (partially) positive answer to a question of Moshkovitz and Shapira for $t, n$ in this range. Particularly for $t=3$, we prove a better upper bound: \[\logα([3]^n)\le(1+4\log 3/n)N(3,n),\] which is the best known upper bound on the number of antichains of $[3]^n$.

Given a join semilattice $S$ with a minimum $\hat{0}$, the quarks (also called atoms in order theory) are the elements that cover $\hat{0}$, and for each $x \in S \setminus \{\hat{0}\}$ a factorization (into quarks) of $x$ is a minimal set of quarks whose join is $x$. If every element $x \in S \setminus \{\hat{0}\}$ has a factorization, then $S$ is called factorizable. If for each $x \in S \setminus \{\hat{0}\}$, any two factorizations of $x$ have equal (resp., distinct) size, then we say that $S$ is half-factorial (resp., length-factorial). Let $B_\mathbb{N}$ be the Boolean lattice consisting of all finite subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ under intersections and unions. Here we study factorizations into quarks in join subsemilattices of $B_\mathbb{N}$, focused on the notions of half-factoriality and length-factoriality. We also consider the unique factorization property, which is the most special and relevant type of half-factoriality, and the elasticity, which is an arithmetic statistic that measures the deviation from half-factoriality.

Given a family $S$ of $k$--subsets of $[n]$, its lower shadow $Δ(S)$ is the family of $(k-1)$--subsets which are contained in at least one set in $S$. The celebrated Kruskal--Katona theorem gives the minimum cardinality of $Δ(S)$ in terms of the cardinality of $S$. Füredi and Griggs (and Mörs) showed that the extremal families for this shadow minimization problem in the Boolean lattice are unique for some cardinalities and asked for a general characterization of these extremal families. In this paper we prove a new combinatorial inequality from which yet another simple proof of the Kruskal--Katona theorem can be derived. The inequality can be used to obtain a characterization of the extremal families for this minimization problem, giving an answer to the question of Füredi and Griggs. Some known and new additional properties of extremal families can also be easily derived from the inequality.

An induced subposet $(P_2,\le_2)$ of a poset $(P_1,\le_1)$ is a subset of $P_1$ such that for every two $X,Y\in P_2$, $X\le_2 Y$ if and only if $X\le_1 Y$. The Boolean lattice $Q_n$ of dimension $n$ is the poset consisting of all subsets of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ ordered by inclusion. Given two posets $P_1$ and $P_2$ the poset Ramsey number $R(P_1,P_2)$ is the smallest integer $N$ such that in any blue/red coloring of the elements of $Q_N$ there is either a monochromatically blue induced subposet isomorphic to $P_1$ or a monochromatically red induced subposet isomorphic to $P_2$. We provide upper bounds on $R(P,Q_n)$ for two classes of $P$: parallel compositions of chains, i.e.\ posets consisting of disjoint chains which are pairwise element-wise incomparable, as well as subdivided $Q_2$, which are posets obtained from two parallel chains by adding a common minimal and a common maximal element. This completes the determination of $R(P,Q_n)$ for posets $P$ with at most $4$ elements. If $P$ is an antichain $A_t$ on $t$ elements, we show that $R(A_t,Q_n)=n+3$ for $3\le t\le \log \log n$. Additionally, we briefly survey proof techniques in the poset Ramsey setting $P$ versus $Q_n$.

This is the second of two papers investigating for which positive integers $m$ there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$ (the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion). In the first part, the sizes of maximal antichains have been characterized. Here we provide an alternative construction with the benefit of showing that almost all sizes of maximal antichains can be obtained using antichains containing only $l$-sets and $(l+1)$-sets for some $l$.

Rowmotion is a certain well-studied bijective operator on the distributive lattice $J(P)$ of order ideals of a finite poset $P$. We introduce the rowmotion Markov chain ${\bf M}_{J(P)}$ by assigning a probability $p_x$ to each $x\in P$ and using these probabilities to insert randomness into the original definition of rowmotion. More generally, we introduce a very broad family of toggle Markov chains inspired by Striker's notion of generalized toggling. We characterize when toggle Markov chains are irreducible, and we show that each toggle Markov chain has a remarkably simple stationary distribution. We also provide a second generalization of rowmotion Markov chains to the context of semidistrim lattices. Given a semidistrim lattice $L$, we assign a probability $p_j$ to each join-irreducible element $j$ of $L$ and use these probabilities to construct a rowmotion Markov chain ${\bf M}_L$. Under the assumption that each probability $p_j$ is strictly between $0$ and $1$, we prove that ${\bf M}_{L}$ is irreducible. We also compute the stationary distribution of the rowmotion Markov chain of a lattice obtained by adding a minimal element and a maximal element to a disjoint union of two chains. We bound the mixing time of ${\bf M}_{L}$ for an arbitrary semidistrim lattice $L$. In the special case when $L$ is a Boolean lattice, we use spectral methods to obtain much stronger estimates on the mixing time, showing that rowmotion Markov chains of Boolean lattices exhibit the cutoff phenomenon.

Given partially ordered sets (posets) $(P, \leq_P)$ and $(P', \leq_{P'})$, we say that $P'$ contains a copy of $P$ if for some injective function $f\colon P\rightarrow P'$ and for any $A, B\in P$, $A\leq _P B$ if and only if $f(A)\leq_{P'} f(B)$. For any posets $P$ and $Q$, the poset Ramsey number $R(P,Q)$ is the least positive integer $N$ such that no matter how the elements of an $N$-dimensional Boolean lattice are colored in blue and red, there is either a copy of $P$ with all blue elements or a copy of $Q$ with all red elements. We focus on the poset Ramsey number $R(P, Q_n)$ for a fixed poset $P$ and an $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice $Q_n$, as $n$ grows large. It is known that $n+c_1(P) \leq R(P,Q_n) \leq c_2(P) n$, for positive constants $c_1$ and $c_2$. However, there is no poset $P$ known, for which $R(P, Q_n)> (1+ε)n$, for $ε>0$. This paper is devoted to a new method for finding upper bounds on $R(P, Q_n)$ using a duality between copies of $Q_n$ and sets of elements that cover them, referred to as blockers. We prove several properties of blockers and their direct relation to the Ramsey numbers. Using these properties we show that $R(\mathcal{N},Q_n)=n+Θ(n/\log n)$, for a poset $\mathcal{N}$ with four elements $A, B, C, $ and $D$, such that $A<C$, $B<D$, $B<C$, and the remaining pairs of elements are incomparable.

This paper introduces a partial order on the maximal chains of any finite bounded poset $P$ which has a CL-labeling $λ$. We call this the maximal chain descent order induced by $λ$, denoted $P_λ(2)$. As a first example, letting $P$ be the Boolean lattice and $λ$ its standard EL-labeling gives $P_λ(2)$ isomorphic to the weak order of type A. We discuss in depth other seemingly well-structured examples: the max-min EL-labeling of the partition lattice gives maximal chain descent order isomorphic to a partial order on certain labeled trees, and particular cases of the linear extension EL-labelings of finite distributive lattices produce maximal chain descent orders isomorphic to partial orders on standard Young tableaux. We observe that the order relations which one might expect to be the cover relations, those given by the "polygon moves" whose transitive closure defines the maximal chain descent order, are not always cover relations. Several examples illustrate this fact. Nonetheless, we characterize the EL-labelings for which every polygon move gives a cover relation, and we prove many well known EL-labelings do have the expected cover relations. One motivation for $P_λ(2)$ is that its linear extensions give all of the shellings of the order complex of $P$ whose restriction maps are defined by the descents with respect to $λ$. This yields strictly more shellings of $P$ than the lexicographic ones induced by $λ$. Thus, the maximal chain descent order $P_λ(2)$ might be thought of as encoding the structure of the set of shellings induced by $λ$.

For given positive integers $k$ and $n$, a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ is $k$-antichain saturated if it does not contain an antichain of size $k$, but adding any set to $\mathcal{F}$ creates an antichain of size $k$. We use sat$^*(n, k)$ to denote the smallest size of such a family. For all $k$ and sufficiently large $n$, we determine the exact value of sat$^*(n, k)$. Our result implies that sat$^*(n, k)=n(k-1)-Θ(k\log k)$, which confirms several conjectures on antichain saturation. Previously, exact values for sat$^*(n,k)$ were only known for $k$ up to $6$. We also prove a generalisation of a result of Lehman-Ron which may be of independent interest. We show that given $m$ disjoint chains in the Boolean lattice, we can create $m$ disjoint skipless chains that cover the same elements (where we call a chain skipless if any two consecutive elements differ in size by exactly one).

The Boolean lattice $\mathcal{P}(n)$ consists of all subsets of $[n] = \{1,\dots, n\}$ partially ordered under the containment relation. Sperner's Theorem states that the largest antichain of the Boolean lattice is given by a middle layer: the collection of all sets of size $\lfloor{n/2}\rfloor$, or also, if $n$ is odd, the collection of all sets of size $\lceil{n/2}\rceil$. Given $p$, choose each subset of $[n]$ with probability $p$ independently. We show that for every constant $p>3/4$, the largest antichain among these subsets is also given by a middle layer, with probability tending to $1$ as $n$ tends to infinity. This $3/4$ is best possible, and we also characterize the largest antichains for every constant $p>1/2$. Our proof is based on some new variations of Sapozhenko's graph container method.

For two posets $(P,\le_P)$ and $(P',\le_{P'})$, we say that $P'$ contains a copy of $P$ if there exists an injective function $f\colon P'\to P$ such that for every two $X,Y\in P$, $X\le_P Y$ if and only if $f(X)\le_{P'} f(Y)$. Given two posets $P$ and $Q$, let the poset Ramsey number $R(P,Q)$ be the smallest integer $N$ such that any coloring of the elements of an $N$-dimensional Boolean lattice in blue or red contains either a copy of $P$ where all elements are blue or a copy of $Q$ where all elements are red. We determine the poset Ramsey number $R(A_t,Q_n)$ of an antichain versus a Boolean lattice for small $t$ by showing that $R(A_t,Q_n)=n+3$ for $3\le t\le \log \log n$.

In 1978, motivated by E. Hückel's work in quantum chemistry, I. Gutman introduced the concept of the energy of a finite simple graph $G$ as the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of $G$. At the time of writing, the MathSciNet search for "Title=(graph energy) AND Review Text=(eigenvalue)" returns 351 publications, most of which going after Gutman's definition. A congruence $α$ of a finite algebra $A$ turns $A$ into a simple graph: we connect $x\neq y\in A$ by an edge iff $(x,y)\inα$; we let En$(α)$ be the energy of this graph. We introduce the congruence energy CE$(A)$ of $A$ by CE$(A):=\sum\{$En$(α): α\in$ Con$(A)\}$. Let LAT$(n)$ and CDA$(n)$ stand for the class of $n$-element lattices and that of $n$-element congruence distributive algebras of any type. For a class $\mathcal X$, let CE$(\mathcal X):= \{$CE$(A): A\in \mathcal X\}$. We prove the following. (1) For $α\in A$, En$(α)/2$ is the height of $α$ in the equivalence lattice of $A$. (2) The largest number and the second largest number in CE(LAT($n$)) are $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$ and, for $n\geq 4$, $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-2}+2^{n-3}$; these numbers are only witnessed by chains and lattices with exactly one two-element antichain, respectively. (3) The largest number in CE(CDA($n$)) is also $(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$, and if CE$(A)=(n-1)\cdot 2^{n-1}$ for an $A\in$ CDA$(n)$, then Con$(A)$ is a boolean lattice with size $|$Con$(A)|=2^{n-1}$.

A poset $(P',\le_{P'})$ contains a copy of some other poset $(P,\le_P)$ if there is an injection $f\colon P'\to P$ where for every $X,Y\in P$, $X\le_P Y$ if and only if $f(X)\le_{P'} f(Y)$. For any posets $P$ and $Q$, the poset Ramsey number $R(P,Q)$ is the smallest integer $N$ such that any blue/red coloring of a Boolean lattice of dimension $N$ contains either a copy of $P$ with all elements blue or a copy of $Q$ with all elements red. We denote by $K_{t_1,\dots,t_\ell}$ a complete $\ell$-partite poset, i.e.\ a poset consisting of $\ell$ pairwise disjoint sets $A^i$ of size $t_i$, $1\le i\le \ell$, such that for any $i,j\in\{1,\dots,\ell\}$ and any two $X\in A^{i}$ and $Y\in A^{j}$, $X<Y$ if and only if $i<j$. In this paper we show that $R(K_{t_1,\dots,t_\ell},Q_n)\le n+\frac{(2+o_n(1))\ell n}{\log n}$.

We introduce a novel approach to solve optimization problems on a boson sampling device assisted by classical machine-learning techniques. By virtue of the parity function, we map all measurement patterns, which label the basis spanning an $M$-mode bosonic Hilbert space, to the Hilbert space of $M$ qubits. As a result, the sampled probability function can be interpreted as a result of sampling a multiqubit circuit. The method is presented on several instances of a QUBO/Ising problem as well as portfolio optimization problems. Among many demonstrated properties of the parity function is the ability to chart the entire qubit Hilbert space no matter how shallow the initial bosonic circuits is. In order to show this we link boson sampling circuits to a class of finite Young's lattices (a special poset with the so-called Ferrers diagrams ordered by inclusion), Boolean lattices and the properties of Dyck/staircase paths on integer lattices. Our results and methods can be applied to a large variety of photonic circuits, including the deep ones of essentially any geometry, but our main focus is on shallow circuits as they are less affected by photon loss and relatively easy to implement in the form of a time-bin interferometer.

Given partially ordered sets (posets) $(P, \leq_P)$ and $(P', \leq_{P'})$, we say that $P'$ contains a copy of $P$ if for some injective function $f: P\rightarrow P'$ and for any $X, Y\in P$, $X\leq _P Y$ if and only of $f(X)\leq_{P'} f(Y)$. For any posets $P$ and $Q$, the poset Ramsey number $R(P,Q)$ is the least positive integer $N$ such that no matter how the elements of an $N$-dimensional Boolean lattice are colored in blue and red, there is either a copy of $P$ with all blue elements or a copy of $Q$ with all red elements. We focus on a poset Ramsey number $R(P, Q_n)$ for a fixed poset $P$ and an $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice $Q_n$, as $n$ grows large. We show a sharp jump in behaviour of this number as a function of $n$ depending on whether or not $P$ contains a copy of either a poset $V$, i.e. a poset on elements $A, B, C$ such that $B>C$, $A>C$, and $A$ and $B$ incomparable, or a poset $Λ$, its symmetric counterpart. Specifically, we prove that if $P$ contains a copy of $V$ or $Λ$ then $R(P, Q_n) \geq n +\frac{1}{15} \frac{n}{\log n}$. Otherwise $R(P, Q_n) \leq n + c(P)$ for a constant $c(P)$. This gives the first non-marginal improvement of a lower bound on poset Ramsey numbers and as a consequence gives $R(Q_2, Q_n) = n + Θ(\frac{n}{\log n})$.

For a given fixed poset $\mathcal P$ we say that a family of subsets of $[n]$ is $\mathcal P$-saturated if it does not contain an induced copy of $\mathcal P$, but whenever we add to it a new set, an induced copy of $\mathcal P$ is formed. The size of the smallest such family is denoted by $\text{sat}^*(n, \mathcal P)$. For the diamond poset $\mathcal D_2$ (the two-dimensional Boolean lattice), Martin, Smith and Walker proved that $\sqrt n\leq\text{sat}^*(n, \mathcal D_2)\leq n+1$. In this paper we prove that $\text{sat}^*(n, \mathcal D_2)\geq (4-o(1))\sqrt n$. We also explore the properties that a diamond-saturated family of size $c\sqrt n$, for a constant $c$, would have to have.

For given posets $P$ and $Q$ and an integer $n$, the generalized Turán problem for posets, asks for the maximum number of copies of $Q$ in a $P$-free subset of the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice, $2^{[n]}$. In this paper, among other results, we show the following: (i) For every $n\geq 5$, the maximum number of $2$-chains in a butterfly-free subfamily of $2^{[n]}$ is $\left\lceil\frac{n}{2}\right\rceil\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. (ii) For every fixed $s$, $t$ and $k$, a $K_{s,t}$-free family in $2^{[n]}$ has $O\left(n\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}\right)$ $k$-chains. (iii) For every $n\geq 3$, the maximum number of $2$-chains in an $\textbf{N}$-free family is $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$, where $\textbf{N}$ is a poset on 4 distinct elements $\{p_1,p_2,q_1,q_2\}$ for which $p_1 < q_1$, $p_2 < q_1$ and $p_2 < q_2$. (iv) We also prove exact results for the maximum number of $2$-chains in a family that has no $5$-path and asymptotic estimates for the number of $2$-chains in a family with no $6$-path.

Given posets $\mathbf{P}_1,\mathbf{P}_2,\ldots,\mathbf{P}_k$, let the {\em Boolean Ramsey number} $R(\mathbf{P}_1,\mathbf{P}_2,\ldots,\mathbf{P}_k)$ be the minimum number $n$ such that no matter how we color the elements in the Boolean lattice $\mathbf{B}_n$ with $k$ colors, there always exists a poset $\mathbf{P}_i$ contained in $\mathbf{B}_n$ whose elements are all colored with $i$. This function was first introduced by Axenovich and Walzer~\cite{AW}. Recently, many results on determining $R(\mathbf{B}_m,\mathbf{B}_n)$ have been published. In this paper, we will study the function $R(\mathbf{P}_1,\mathbf{P}_2,\ldots,\mathbf{P}_k)$ for each $\mathbf{P}_i$'s being the $V$-shaped poset. That is, a poset obtained by identifying the minimal elements of two chains. Another major result presented in the paper is to determine the minimal posets $\mathbf{Q}$ contained in $\mathbf{B}_n$, when $R(\mathbf{P}_1,\mathbf{P}_2,\ldots,\mathbf{P}_k)=n$ is determined, having the Ramsey property described in the previous paragraph. In addition, we define the {\em Boolean rainbow Ramsey number} $RR(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{Q})$ the minimum number $n$ such that when arbitrarily coloring the elements in $\mathbf{B}_n$, there always exists either a monochromatic $\mathbf{P}$ or a rainbow $\mathbf{Q}$ contained in $\mathbf{B}_n$. The upper bound for $RR(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{A}_k)$ was given by Chang, Li, Gerbner, Methuku, Nagy, Patkos, and Vizer for general poset $\mathbf{P}$ and $k$-element antichain $\mathbf{A}_k$. We study the function for $\mathbf{P}$ being the $V$-shaped posets in this paper as well.

Extending a classical theorem of Sperner, we characterize the integers $m$ such that there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$, that is, the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion. As an important ingredient in the proof, we initiate the study of an extension of the Kruskal-Katona theorem which is of independent interest. For given positive integers $t$ and $k$, we ask which integers $s$ have the property that there exists a family $\mathcal F$ of $k$-sets with $\lvert\mathcal F\rvert=t$ such that the shadow of $\mathcal F$ has size $s$, where the shadow of $\mathcal F$ is the collection of $(k-1)$-sets that are contained in at least one member of $\mathcal F$. We provide a complete answer for $t\leqslant k+1$. Moreover, we prove that the largest integer which is not the shadow size of any family of $k$-sets is $\sqrt 2k^{3/2}+\sqrt[4]{8}k^{5/4}+O(k)$.

This is the second in a sequence of three papers investigating the question for which positive integers $m$ there exists a maximal antichain of size $m$ in the Boolean lattice $B_n$ (the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, ordered by inclusion). In the previous paper we characterized those $m$ between $\binom{n}{\lceil n/2\rceil}-\lceil n/2\rceil^2$ and the maximum size $\binom{n}{\lceil n/2 \rceil}$ that are not sizes of maximal antichains. In this paper we show that all smaller $m$ are sizes of maximal antichains.