arXiv++ Combinatorics

We define and study an extension of the notion of the VC-dimension of a hypergraph and apply it to establish a Tverberg type theorem for unions of convex sets. We also prove a new Radon type theorem for unions of convex sets, vastly improving the estimates in an earlier result of Bárány and Kalai.

A subset of the vertex set of a graph is geodetically convex if it contains every vertex on any shortest path between two elements of the subset. The convex hull of a set of vertices is the smallest convex set containing the set. We study two games in which two players take turns selecting vertices of a graph until the convex hull of the remaining unselected vertices is too small. The last player to move is the winner. The achievement game ends when the convex hull of the unselected vertices does not contain every vertex in the graph. In the avoidance game, the convex hull of the remaining vertices must contain every vertex. We determine the nim-number of these games for the family of grid graphs. We also provide some results for lattice graphs. Key tools in this analysis are delayed gamegraphs, option preserving maps, and case analysis diagrams.

In this paper, we study avoshifts and unishifts on $\mathbb{Z}^d$. Avoshifts are subshifts where for each convex set $C$, and each vector $v$ such that $C \cup \{\vec v\}$ is also convex, the set of valid extensions of globally valid patterns on $C$ to ones on $C \cup \{v\}$ is determined by a bounded subpattern of $C$. Unishifts are the subshifts where for such $C, \vec v$, every $C$-pattern has the same number of $\vec v$-extensions. Cellwise quasigroup shifts (including group shifts) and TEP subshifts are examples of unishifts, while unishifts and subshifts with topological strong spatial mixing are examples of avoshifts. We prove that every avoshift is the spacetime subshift of a nondeterministic cellular automaton on an avoshift of lower dimension up to a linear transformation and a convex blocking. From this, we deduce that all avoshifts contain periodic points, and that unishifts have dense periodic points and admit equal entropy full shift factors.

We study a class of signomials whose positive support is the set of vertices of a simplex and which may have several negative support points in the simplex. Various groups of authors have provided an exact characterization for the global nonnegativity of a signomial in this class in terms of circuit signomials and that characterization provides a tractable nonnegativity test. We generalize this characterization to the constrained nonnegativity over a set $X$ under an additional convexity precondition in the exponential moment space. This provides a tractable nonnegativity test over $X$ for the class in terms of a power cone program. Our proof methods rely on a variant of the convex cone of constrained SAGE signomials (sums of arithmetic-geometric exponentials) and the duality theory.

We present a unified approach to prove Helly-type theorems for monotone properties of boxes, such as having large volume or containing points from a given set. As a corollary, we obtain new proofs for several earlier results regarding specific monotone properties. Our results generalise to $H$-convex sets as well.

We develop the tools to bound extreme roots of multivariate real zero polynomials globally. This is done through the use of a relaxation that approximates their rigidly convex sets. This relaxation can easily be constructed using the degree $3$ truncation of the polynomial and it produces in this way a spectrahedron whose computation is relatively easy and whose size is relatively small and depending solely on the number of variables of the polynomial. As we know that, in order to be able to produce in general spectrahedral representations of rigidly convex sets it is necessary to build matrices of very big size, we try, analyze and experiment with several constructions that could increase the size of these matrices. These constructions are based principally in two main approaches: adding information about higher degree monomials or non-trivially increasing the number of variables of the original polynomial. We explore these two construction first in a general setting and see that it is necessary to particularize to certain families of polynomials in order to make them work. In particular, we are able to prove that increasing the number of variables improves the behavior of the relaxation along the diagonal in the case of Eulerian polynomials. We see that applying the relaxation to multivariate Eulerian polynomials and then looking at the univariate polynomials injected in their diagonals produces an exponential asymptotic improvement in the bounds provided. We compare these bounds with other bounds that have appeared previously in the literature and refine these previous bounds in order to study how close do the bounds provided by the relaxation are to the actual roots of the univariate Eulerian polynomials.

The stress interval $S(u,v)$ between $u,v\in V(G)$ is the set of all vertices in a graph $G$ that lie on every shortest $u,v$-path. A set $U \subseteq V(G)$ is stress convex if $S(u,v) \subseteq U$ for any $u,v\in U$. A vertex $v \in V(G)$ is s-extreme if $V(G)-v$ is a stress convex set in $G$. The stress number $sn(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $U$ where $\bigcup_{u,v \in U}S(u,v)=V(G)$. The stress hull number $sh(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set whose stress convex hull is $V(G)$. In this paper, we present many basic properties of stress intervals. We characterize s-extreme vertices of a graph $G$ and construct graphs $G$ with arbitrarily large difference between the number of s-extreme vertices, $sh(G)$ and $sn(G)$. Then we study these three invariants for some special graph families, such as graph products, split graphs, and block graphs. We show that in any split graph $G$, $sh(G)=sn(G)=|Ext_s(G)|$, where $Ext_s(G)$ is the set of s-extreme vertices of $G$. Finally, we show that for $k \in \mathbb{N}$, deciding whether $sn(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete problem, even when restricted to bipartite graphs.

Given a graph $G$ and a set $S \subseteq V(G)$, we say that $S$ is $Δ$-convex if the neighborhood of every vertex not in $S$ is an independent set. A collection ${\cal V} = (V_1, V_2, \ldots , V_p)$ of convex sets of $G$ is a convex $p$-cover if $V(G) = \underset{1 \leq i \leq p}{\bigcup} V_i$ and $V_i \nsubseteq {\underset{1 \leq j \leq p, j\ne i}{\bigcup}} V_j$ for $i \in \{1, \ldots, p\}$. If the convex sets of ${\cal V}$ are pairwise disjoint, ${\cal V}$ is a convex $p$-partition of $V(G)$. The convex cover number $φ_c(G)$ (the convex partition number $Θ_c(G)$) of a graph $G$ is the least integer $p \geq 2$ for which $G$ has a convex $p$-cover (convex $p$-partition). In this work, we prove that the {\sc Convex p-cover} and {\sc Convex p-Partition} problems are \NP-complete for any fixed $p \ge 4$ in $Δ$-convexity. Furthermore, for the three standard graph products, namely, the Cartesian, strong and lexicographic products, we determine these parameters for some cases and present bounds for others.

Given a graph $G$, a set is $Δ$-convex if there is no vertex $u\in V(G)\setminus S$ forming a triangle with two vertices of $S$. The $Δ$-convex hull of $S$ is the minimum $Δ$-convex set containing $S$. This article is an attempt to discuss the Carathéodory number and exchange number on various graph families and standard graph products namely Cartesian, strong and, lexicographic products of graphs.

We prove new quantitative bounds on the additive structure of sets obeying an $L^3$ 'control' assumption, which arises naturally in several questions within additive combinatorics. This has a number of applications - in particular we improve the known bounds for the sum-product problem, the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem, and the additive growth of convex sets.

This paper gives two different proofs to a structural theorem of decreasing minimization (lexicographic optimization) on integrally convex sets. The theorem states that the set of decreasingly minimal elements of an integrally convex set can be represented as the intersection of a unit discrete cube and a face of the convex hull of the given integrally convex set. The first proof resorts to the Fenchel-type duality theorem in discrete convex analysis and the second is more elementary using Farkas' lemma.

A separated $d$-interval is defined as a disjoint union of $d$ convex sets from the real line $\mathbb R$. In this paper, we establish a series of Helly-type theorems for convexity spaces derived from separated $d$-intervals. Our results encompass the Radon number, Helly number, colorful Helly number, fractional Helly number, colorful fractional Helly theorem, $(p,q)$ theorem, and two kinds of colorful $(p,q)$ theorems for these convexity spaces. The primary tools employed in our proofs involve simplicial complexes and collapsibility.

Let $G$ be a graph and $S \subseteq V(G)$. In the cycle convexity, we say that $S$ is \textit{cycle convex} if for any $u\in V(G)\setminus S$, the induced subgraph of $S\cup\{u\}$ contains no cycle that includes $u$. The \textit{cycle convex hull} of $S$ is the smallest convex set containing $S$. The \textit{cycle hull number} of $G$, denoted by $hn_{cc}(G)$, is the cardinality of the smallest set $S$ such that the convex hull of $S$ is $V(G)$. The \textit{convexity number} of $G$, denoted by $C_{cc}(G)$, is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of $V(G)$. This paper studies cycle convexity in graph products. We show that the cycle hull number is always two for strong and lexicographic products. For the Cartesian, we establish tight bounds for this product and provide a closed formula when the factors are trees, generalizing an existing result for grid graphs. In addition, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, we prove that $hn_{cc}(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete even if $G$ is a bipartite Cartesian product graph, addressing an open question in the literature. Furthermore, we present exact formulas for the cycle convexity number in those three graph products. That leads to the NP-completeness of, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $C_{cc}(G) \geq k$, when $G$ is a Cartesian, strong or lexicographic product graph.

A convex lattice set in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ is the intersection of a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and the integer lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$. A well-known theorem of Doignon states that the Helly number of $d$-dimensional convex lattice sets equals $2^d$, while a remarkable theorem of Bárány and Matoušek states that the fractional Helly number is only $d+1$. In this paper we generalize their result to abstract convexity spaces that are equipped with a suitable separation property. We also disprove a conjecture of Bárány and Kalai about an existence of fractional Helly property for a family of solutions of bounded-degree polynomial inequalities.

Pick $n$ independent and uniform random points $U_1,\ldots,U_n$ in a compact convex set $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ with volume 1, and let $P^{(d)}_K(n)$ be the probability that these points are in convex position. The Sylvester conjecture in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is that $\min_K P^{(d)}_K(d+2)$ is achieved by the $d$-dimensional simplices $K$ (only). In this paper, we focus on a companion model, already studied in the $2d$ case, which we define in any dimension $d$: we say that $K$ has $F$ as a flat floor, if $F$ is a subset of $K$, contained in a hyperplan $P$, such that $K$ lies in one of the half-spaces defined by $P$. We define $Q_K^F(n)$ as the probability that $U_1,\cdots,U_n$ together with $F$ are in convex position (i.e., the $U_i$ are on the boundary of the convex hull ${\sf CH}(\{U_1,\cdots,U_n\}\cup F\})$). We prove that, for all fixed $F$, $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ reaches its minimum on the "mountains" with floor $F$ (mountains are convex hull of $F$ union an additional vertex), while the maximum is not reached, but $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ has values arbitrary close to 1. If the optimisation is done on the set of $K$ contained in $F\times[0,d]$ (the "subprism case"), then the minimum is also reached by the mountains, and the maximum by the "prism" $F\times[0,1]$. Since again, $Q_K^F{(2)}$ relies on the expected volume (of ${\sf CH}(\{V_1,V_2\}\cup F\})$), this result can be seen as a proof of the Sylvester problem in the floor case. In $2d$, where $F$ can essentially be the segment $[0,1],$ we give a general decomposition formula for $Q_K^F(n)$ so to compute several formulas and bounds for different $K$. In 3D, we give some bounds for $Q_K^F(n)$ for various floors $F$ and special cases of $K$.

We solve a long-standing open problem posed by Goodman \& Pollack in 1988 by establishing a necessary and sufficient condition for a family of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to admit a $k$-transversal for any $0 \le k \le d-1$. This result is a common generalization of Helly's theorem ($k=0$) and the Goodman-Pollack-Wenger theorem ($k=d-1$). Additionally, we obtain an analogue in the complex setting by characterizing the existence of a complex $k$-transversal to a family of convex sets in $\mathbb{C}^d$, extending the work of McGinnis ($k=d-1$). Our approach is topological and employs a Borsuk-Ulam-type theorem on Stiefel manifolds. Finally, we demonstrate how our results imply the central transversal theorems of Živaljević-Vrećica and Dol'nikov in the real case and of Sadovek-Soberón in the complex case.

\emph{Minkowski rings} are certain rings of simple functions on the Euclidean space $W = {\mathbb{R}}^d$ with multiplicative structure derived from Minkowski addition of convex polytopes. When the ring is (finitely) generated by a set ${\cal{P}}$ of indicator functions of $n$ polytopes then the ring can be presented as ${\mathbb{C}}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/I$ when viewed as a ${\mathbb{C}}$-algebra, where $I$ is the ideal describing all the relations implied by identities among Minkowski sums of elements of ${\cal{P}}$. We discuss in detail the $1$-dimensional case, the $d$-dimensional box case and the affine Coxeter arrangement in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ where the convex sets are formed by closed half-planes with bounding lines making the regular triangular grid in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. We also consider, for a given polytope $P$, the Minkowski ring $M^\pm_F(P)$ of the collection ${\cal{F}}(P)$ of the nonempty faces of $P$ and their multiplicative inverses. Finally we prove some general properties of identities in the Minkowski ring of ${\cal{F}}(P)$; in particular, we show that Minkowski rings behave well under Cartesian product, namely that $M^\pm_F(P\times Q) \cong M^{\pm}_F(P)\otimes M^{\pm}_F(Q)$ as ${\mathbb{C}}$-algebras where $P$ and $Q$ are polytopes.

A finite family $\mathcal F$ of convex sets is $k$-intersecting in $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ if the intersection of every subset of $k$ convex sets in $\mathcal F$ contains a point in $S$. The Helly number of $S$ is the minimum $k$, if it exists, such that every $k$-intersecting family contains a point of $S$ in its intersection. In this paper, we improve bounds on the Helly number of product sets of the form $A^d$ for various sets $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$, including the ``exponential grid'' $A = \{α^n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ and sets $A\subseteq \mathbb{Z}$ defined by congruence relations.

Assume two finite families $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$ of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^3$ have the property that $A\cap B\ne \emptyset$ for every $A \in \mathcal A$ and $B\in \mathcal B$. Is there a constant $γ>0$ (independent of $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$) such that there is a line intersecting $γ|\mathcal A|$ sets in $\mathcal A$ or $γ|\mathcal B|$ sets in $\mathcal B$? This is an intriguing Helly-type question from a paper by Martínez, Roldan and Rubin. We confirm this in the special case when all sets in $\mathcal A$ lie in parallel planes and all sets in $\mathcal B$ lie in parallel planes; in fact, all sets from one of the two families has a line transversal.

The simplest way to generate a lattice of convex sets is to consider an initial set of points and draw segments, triangles, and any convex hull from it, then intersect them to obtain new points, and so forth. The result is an infinite lattice for most sets, while only a few initial sets of points perform a finite lattice. By giving an adequate notion of the configuration of points, we identify which sets in the plane define a finite convex hull lattice: four regular families and one sporadic configuration. We explore configurations in the space and higher dimensions.