arXiv++ Combinatorics

A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if the subgraph induced by $V-D$ is edgeless and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is the total co-independent domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. In this work we study some complexity and combinatorial properties of $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. Specifically, we prove that deciding whether $γ_{t,coi}(G)\le k$ for a given integer $k$ is an NP-complete problem and give several bounds on $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. Also, since any total co-independent dominating set is also a total dominating set, we characterize all the trees having equal total co-independent domination number and total domination number.

A set $D$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex of $G$, which is not in $D$, has a neighbor in $D$. A set of vertices $D$ in $G$ is convex (respectively, isometric), if all vertices in all shortest paths (respectively, all vertices in one of the shortest paths) between any two vertices in $D$ lie in $D$. The problem of finding a minimum convex dominating (respectively, isometric dominating) set is considered in this paper from algorithmic point of view. For the class of weak dominating pair graphs (i.e.,~the graphs that contain a dominating pair, which is a pair of vertices $x,y\in V(G)$ such that vertices of any path between $x$ and $y$ form a dominating set), we present an efficient algorithm that finds a minimum isometric dominating set of such a graph. On the other hand, we prove that even if one restricts to weak dominating pair graphs that are also chordal graphs, the problem of deciding whether there exists a convex dominating set bounded by a given arbitrary positive integer is NP-complete. By further restricting the class of graphs to chordal dominating pair graphs (i.e.,~the chordal graphs in which every connected induced subgraph has a dominating pair) we are able to find a polynomial time algorithm that determines the minimum size of a convex dominating set of such a graph.

For a set ${\cal F}$ of graphs, an instance of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} is a pair $(G_1,G_2)$ consisting of two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ with the same vertex set such that $G_1$ is a subgraph of $G_2$, and the task is to determine an ${\cal F}$-free graph $G$ containing $G_1$ and contained in $G_2$, or to decide that such a graph does not exist. Initially motivated by the graph sandwich problem for trivially perfect graphs, which are the $\{ P_4,C_4\}$-free graphs, we study the complexity of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} for sets ${\cal F}$ containing two non-isomorphic graphs of order four. We show that if ${\cal F}$ is one of the sets $\left\{ {\rm diamond},K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ K_4,\overline{K_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ C_4,\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm claw},\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, and $\left\{ {\rm claw},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, then the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} can be solved in polynomial time, and, if ${\cal F}$ is one of the sets $\left\{ C_4,K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{K_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, and $\left\{ {\rm diamond},\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, then the decision version of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} is NP-complete.

We consider a group-theoretic analogue of the classic subset sum problem. It is known that every virtually nilpotent group has polynomial time decidable subset sum problem. In this paper we use subgroup distortion to show that every polycyclic non-virtually-nilpotent group has NP-complete subset sum problem.

Correspondence homomorphisms are both a generalization of standard homomorphisms and a generalization of correspondence colourings. For a fixed target graph $H$, the problem is to decide whether an input graph $G$, with each edge labeled by a pair of permutations of $V(H)$, admits a homomorphism to $H$ `corresponding' to the labels, in a sense explained below. We classify the complexity of this problem as a function of the fixed graph $H$. It turns out that there is dichotomy -- each of the problems is polynomial-time solvable or NP-complete. While most graphs $H$ yield NP-complete problems, there are interesting cases of graphs $H$ for which the problem is solved by Gaussian elimination. We also classify the complexity of the analogous correspondence {\em list homomorphism} problems, and also the complexity of a {\em bipartite version} of both problems. We emphasize the proofs for the case when $H$ is reflexive, but, for the record, we include a rough sketch of the remaining proofs in an Appendix.

The feedback arc (vertex) set problem, shortened FASP (FVSP), is to transform a given multi digraph $G=(V,E)$ into an acyclic graph by deleting as few arcs (vertices) as possible. Due to the results of Richard M. Karp in 1972 it is one of the classic NP-complete problems. An important contribution of this paper is that the subgraphs $G_{\mathrm{el}}(e)$, $G_{\mathrm{si}}(e)$ of all elementary cycles or simple cycles running through some arc $e \in E$, can be computed in $\mathcal{O}\big(|E|^2\big)$ and $\mathcal{O}(|E|^4)$, respectively. We use this fact and introduce the notion of the essential minor and isolated cycles, which yield a priori problem size reductions and in the special case of so called resolvable graphs an exact solution in $\mathcal{O}(|V||E|^3)$. We show that weighted versions of the FASP and FVSP possess a Bellman decomposition, which yields exact solutions using a dynamic programming technique in times $\mathcal{O}\big(2^{m}|E|^4\log(|V|)\big)$ and $\mathcal{O}\big(2^{n}Δ(G)^4|V|^4\log(|E|)\big)$, where $m \leq |E|-|V| +1$, $n \leq (Δ(G)-1)|V|-|E| +1$, respectively. The parameters $m,n$ can be computed in $\mathcal{O}(|E|^3)$, $\mathcal{O}(Δ(G)^3|V|^3)$, respectively and denote the maximal dimension of the cycle space of all appearing meta graphs, decoding the intersection behavior of the cycles. Consequently, $m,n$ equal zero if all meta graphs are trees. Moreover, we deliver several heuristics and discuss how to control their variation from the optimum. Summarizing, the presented results allow us to suggest a strategy for an implementation of a fast and accurate FASP/FVSP-SOLVER.

Given a graph G, the domination number gamma(G) of G is the minimum order of a set S of vertices such that each vertex not in S is adjacent to some vertex in S. Equivalently, label the vertices from {0, 1} so that the sum over each closed neighborhood is at least one; the minimum value of the sum of all labels, with this restriction, is the domination number. The fractional domination number gamma_f(G) is defined in the same way, except that the vertex labels are chosen from [0, 1]. Given an ordering of the vertex set of G, let gamma_g(G) be the approximation of the domination number by the standard greedy algorithm. Computing the domination number is NP-complete; however, we can bound gamma by these two more easily computed parameters: gamma_f(G) <= gamma(G) <= gamma_g(G). How good are these approximations? Using techniques from the theory of hypergraphs, one can show that, for every graph G of order n, gamma_g(G) / gamma_f(G) = O(log n). On the other hand, we provide examples of graphs for which gamma / gamma_f = Theta(log n) and graphs for which gamma_g / gamma = Theta(log n). Lastly, we use our examples to compare two bounds on gamma_g.

A conflict-free k-coloring of a graph assigns one of k different colors to some of the vertices such that, for every vertex v, there is a color that is assigned to exactly one vertex among v and v's neighbors. Such colorings have applications in wireless networking, robotics, and geometry, and are well-studied in graph theory. Here we study the natural problem of the conflict-free chromatic number chi_CF(G) (the smallest k for which conflict-free k-colorings exist). We provide results both for closed neighborhoods N[v], for which a vertex v is a member of its neighborhood, and for open neighborhoods N(v), for which vertex v is not a member of its neighborhood. For closed neighborhoods, we prove the conflict-free variant of the famous Hadwiger Conjecture: If an arbitrary graph G does not contain K_{k+1} as a minor, then chi_CF(G) <= k. For planar graphs, we obtain a tight worst-case bound: three colors are sometimes necessary and always sufficient. We also give a complete characterization of the computational complexity of conflict-free coloring. Deciding whether chi_CF(G)<= 1 is NP-complete for planar graphs G, but polynomial for outerplanar graphs. Furthermore, deciding whether chi_CF(G)<= 2 is NP-complete for planar graphs G, but always true for outerplanar graphs. For the bicriteria problem of minimizing the number of colored vertices subject to a given bound k on the number of colors, we give a full algorithmic characterization in terms of complexity and approximation for outerplanar and planar graphs. For open neighborhoods, we show that every planar bipartite graph has a conflict-free coloring with at most four colors; on the other hand, we prove that for k in {1,2,3}, it is NP-complete to decide whether a planar bipartite graph has a conflict-free k-coloring. Moreover, we establish that any general} planar graph has a conflict-free coloring with at most eight colors.

The star chromatic index of a multigraph $G$, denoted $χ'_{s}(G)$, is the minimum number of colors needed to properly color the edges of $G$ such that no path or cycle of length four is bi-colored. A multigraph $G$ is star $k$-edge-colorable if $χ'_{s}(G)\le k$. Dvořák, Mohar and Šámal [Star chromatic index, J. Graph Theory 72 (2013), 313--326] proved that every subcubic multigraph is star $7$-edge-colorable. They conjectured in the same paper that every subcubic multigraph should be star $6$-edge-colorable. In this paper, we first prove that it is NP-complete to determine whether $χ'_s(G)\le3$ for an arbitrary graph $G$. This answers a question of Mohar. We then establish some structure results on subcubic multigraphs $G$ with $δ(G)\le2$ such that $χ'_s(G)>k$ but $χ'_s(G-v)\le k$ for any $v\in V(G)$, where $k\in\{5,6\}$. We finally apply the structure results, along with a simple discharging method, to prove that every subcubic multigraph $G$ is star $6$-edge-colorable if $mad(G)<5/2$, and star $5$-edge-colorable if $mad(G)<24/11$, respectively, where $mad(G)$ is the maximum average degree of a multigraph $G$. This partially confirms the conjecture of Dvořák, Mohar and Šámal.

Let $M$ be a real $r\times c$ matrix and let $k$ be a positive integer. In the column subset selection problem (CSSP), we need to minimize the quantity $\|M-SA\|$, where $A$ can be an arbitrary $k\times c$ matrix, and $S$ runs over all $r\times k$ submatrices of $M$. This problem and its applications in numerical linear algebra are being discussed for several decades, but its algorithmic complexity remained an open issue. We show that CSSP is NP-complete.

A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is a vertex mapping f from the vertex set of G to the vertex set of H such that there is an edge between vertices f(u) and f(v) of H whenever there is an edge between vertices u and v of G. The H-Colouring problem is to decide whether or not a graph G allows a homomorphism to a fixed graph H. We continue a study on a variant of this problem, namely the Surjective H-Colouring problem, which imposes the homomorphism to be vertex-surjective. We build upon previous results and show that this problem is NP-complete for every connected graph H that has exactly two vertices with a self-loop as long as these two vertices are not adjacent. As a result, we can classify the computational complexity of Surjective H-Colouring for every graph H on at most four vertices.

Let $S$ be a set of integers. A graph G is said to have the S-property if there exists an S-edge-weighting $w : E(G) \rightarrow S$ such that any two adjacent vertices have different sums of incident edge-weights. In this paper we characterise all bridgeless bipartite graphs and all trees without the $\{0,1\}$-property. In particular this problem belongs to P for these graphs while it is NP-complete for all graphs.

A complete graph is the graph in which every two vertices are adjacent. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, the complete width of $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that there exist $k$ independent sets $\mathtt{N}_i\subseteq V$, $1\le i\le k$, such that the graph $G'$ obtained from $G$ by adding some new edges between certain vertices inside the sets $\mathtt{N}_i$, $1\le i\le k$, is a complete graph. The complete width problem is to decide whether the complete width of a given graph is at most $k$ or not. In this paper we study the complete width problem. We show that the complete width problem is NP-complete on $3K_2$-free bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on $2K_2$-free bipartite graphs and on $(2K_2,C_4)$-free graphs. As a by-product, we obtain the following new results: the edge clique cover problem is NP-complete on $\overline{3K_2}$-free co-bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on $C_4$-free co-bipartite graphs and on $(2K_2, C_4)$-free graphs. We also give a characterization for $k$-probe complete graphs which implies that the complete width problem admits a kernel of at most $2^k$ vertices. This provides another proof for the known fact that the edge clique cover problem admits a kernel of at most $2^k$ vertices. Finally we determine all graphs of small complete width $k\le 3$.

A greyscale $f$ of a graph $G(V,E)$ is a mapping from $V$ to the interval $[0,1]$ such that $\{0, 1\} \subseteq Im(f)$. This function $f$ induces another mapping $\widehat{f}$ on $E$ by assigning to each edge the non-negative difference of the values of $f$ on its vertices. The contrast vector $cont(G,f)$ is defined as the vector $(\widehat{f}(e_1), \widehat{f}(e_2), \ldots, \widehat{f}(e_m))$ for all edges $e_i$ of $G$ in such a way that $\widehat{f}(e_i) \leq \widehat{f}(e_{i+1})$ for $i= 1, 2, \dots, m-1$. The concept of maximum contrast vector is presented by using the lexicographical ordering in the set of contrast vectors of all possible greyscales defined on $G$ and a greyscale that gives rise to a maximum contrast vector is named maximum contrast greyscale. The relation between finding the maximum contrast vector for the graph $G$ and the chromatic number of $G$ is established. Thus the maximum contrast problem is an NP-complete problem. However, the set of values of any maximum contrast greyscale for any graph is bounded by a finite set which is given. Several methods to compute the maximum contrast vector with some restrictions in are collected in this paper.

A triangle decomposition of a graph $G$ is a partition of the edges of $G$ into triangles. Two necessary conditions for $G$ to admit such a decomposition are that $|E(G)|$ is a multiple of three and that the degree of any vertex in $G$ is even; we call such graphs tridivisible. Kirkman's work on Steiner triple systems established that for $G \simeq K_n$, $G$ admits a triangle decomposition precisely when $G$ is tridivisible. In 1970, Nash-Williams conjectured that tridivisiblity is also sufficient for "almost-complete" graphs, which for this talk's purposes we interpret as any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with $δ(G) \geq (1 -ε)n, E(G) \geq (1 - ξ)\binom{n}{2}$ for some appropriately small constants $ε, ξ$. Nash-Williams conjectured that $ε= ξ=1/4$ would suffice; in 1991, Gustavsson demonstrated in his dissertation that $ε= ξ< 10^{-24}$ suffices for all $n \equiv 3, 9 \mod 18$, and in 2015 Keevash's work on the existence conjecture for combinatorial designs established that some value of $ε$ existed for any $n$. In this paper, we prove that for any $ε< \frac{1}{432}$, there is a constant $ξ$ such that any $G$ with $δ(G) \geq (1 - ε)n$ and $|E(G)| \geq (1 - ξ)\binom{n}{2}$ admits such a decomposition, and offer an algorithm that explicitly constructs such a triangulation. Moreover, we note that our algorithm runs in polynomial time on such graphs. (This last observation contrasts with Holyer's result that finding triangle decompositions in general is a NP-complete problem.)

The chromatic number of signed graphs is defined recently. The coloring and clique problem of interval graphs has been studied and polynomial time algorithms are established. Here we consider these problems for signed interval graphs and prove that the coloring problem of signed interval graphs is NP-complete whereas their ordinary clique problem is in P. We also study the complexity of further related problems.

Let $G$ be a graph without 4-cycles and 5-cycles. We show that the problem to determine whether $G$ is $(0,k)$-colorable is NP-complete for each positive integer $k.$ Moreover, we construct non-$(1,k)$-colorable planar graphs without 4-cycles and 5-cycles for each positive integer $k.$ Finally, we prove that $G$ is $(d_1,d_2)$-colorable where $(d_1,d_2)=(4,4), (3,5),$ and $(2,9).$

The set splittability problem is the following: given a finite collection of finite sets, does there exits a single set that contains exactly half the elements from each set in the collection? (If a set has odd size, we allow the floor or ceiling.) It is natural to study the set splittability problem in the context of combinatorial discrepancy theory and its applications, since a collection is splittable if and only if it has discrepancy $\leq1$. We introduce a natural generalization of splittability problem called the $p$-splittability problem, where we replace the fraction $\frac12$ in the definition with an arbitrary fraction $p\in(0,1)$. We first show that the $p$-splittability problem is NP-complete. We then give several criteria for $p$-splittability, including a complete characterization of $p$-splittability for three or fewer sets ($p$ arbitrary), and for four or fewer sets ($p=\frac12$). Finally we prove the asymptotic prevalence of splittability over unsplittability in an appropriate sense.

We study the half-integral $k$-Directed Disjoint Paths Problem ($\tfrac12$kDDPP) in highly strongly connected digraphs. The integral kDDPP is NP-complete even when restricted to instances where $k=2$, and the input graph is $L$-strongly connected, for any $L\geq 1$. We show that when the integrality condition is relaxed to allow each vertex to be used in two paths, the problem becomes efficiently solvable in highly connected digraphs (even with $k$ as part of the input). Specifically, we show that there is an absolute constant $c$ such that for each $k\geq 2$ there exists $L(k)$ such that $\tfrac12$kDDPP is solvable in time $O(|V(G)|^c)$ for a $L(k)$-strongly connected directed graph $G$. As the function $L(k)$ grows rather quickly, we also show that $\tfrac12$kDDPP is solvable in time $O(|V(G)|^{f(k)})$ in $(36k^3+2k)$-strongly connected directed graphs. We also show that for each $ε<1$ deciding half-integral feasibility of kDDPP instances is NP-complete when $k$ is given as part of the input, even when restricted to graphs with strong connectivity $εk$.

The paper presents an algorithm for minimum vertex cover problem, which is an NP-Complete problem. The algorithm computes a minimum vertex cover of each input simple graph. Tested by the attached MATLAB programs, Stage 1 of the algorithm is applicable to, i.e., yields a proved minimum vertex cover for, about 99.99% of the tested 610,000 graphs of order 16 and 99.67% of the tested 1,200 graphs of order 32, and Stage 2 of the algorithm is applicable to all of the above tested graphs. All of the tested graphs are randomly generated graphs of random "edge density" or in other words, random probability of each edge. It is proved that Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the algorithm run in $O(n^{5+logn})$ and $O(n^{3(5+logn)/2})$ time respectively, where $n$ is the order of input graph. Because there is no theoretical proof yet that Stage 2 is applicable to all graphs, further stages of the algorithm are proposed, which are in a general form that is consistent with Stages 1 and 2.