arXiv++ Combinatorics

The concept of mutual visibility in graphs, introduced recently, addresses a fundamental problem in Graph Theory concerning the identification of the largest set of vertices in a graph such that any two vertices have a shortest path connecting them, excluding internal vertices of the set. Originally motivated by some challenges in Computer Science related to robot navigation, the problem seeks to ensure unobstructed communication channels between navigating entities. The mutual-visibility problem involves determining a largest mutual-visibility set in a graph. The mutual-visibility number of a graph represents the cardinality of the largest mutual-visibility set. This concept has sparked significant research interest, leading to connections with classical combinatorial problems like the Zarankiewicz problem and Turán-type problems. In this paper, we consider practical limitations in network visibility and our investigation extends the original concept to $k$-distance mutual-visibility. In this case, a pair of vertices is considered $S$-visible if a shortest path of length at most $k$ exists, excluding internal vertices belonging to the set $S$. The $k$-distance mutual-visibility number represents the cardinality of a largest $k$-distance mutual-visibility set. We initiate the study of this new graph parameter. We prove that the associate decision problem belongs to the NP-complete class. We also give some properties and tight bounds, as well as, the exact value of such parameter for some particular non trivial graph classes.

Given a graph $G$, we say that an orientation $D$ of $G$ is a KT orientation if, for all $u, v \in V(D)$, there is at most one directed path (in any direction) between $u$ and $v$. Graphs that admit such orientations have been used by Kierstead and Trotter (1992), Carbonero, Hompe, Moore, and Spirkl (2023), Briański, Davies, and Walczak (2024), and Girão, Illingworth, Powierski, Savery, Scott, Tamitegami, and Tan (2024) to construct graphs with large chromatic number and small clique number that served as counterexamples to various conjectures. Motivated by this, we consider which graphs admit KT orientations (named after Kierstead and Trotter). In particular, we construct a graph family with small independence number (sublinear in the number of vertices) which admits a KT orientation. We show that the problem of determining whether a given graph admits a KT orientation is NP-complete, even if we restrict ourselves to planar graphs. Finally, we provide an algorithm to decide if a graph with maximum degree at most 3 admits a KT orientation, whereas, for graphs with maximum degree 4, the problem remains NP-complete.

In this paper, we count all non-isomorphic lattices on $n$ elements, containing four reducible elements and having nullity three. This work is in respect of Birkhoff's open problem (which is NP-complete) of counting all finite lattices on $n$ elements.

Given a (proper) vertex coloring $f$ of a graph $G$, say $f\colon V(G)\to \mathbb{N}$, the difference edge labelling induced by $f$ is a function $h\colon E(G)\to \mathbb{N}$ defined as $h(uv)=|f(u)-f(v)|$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$. A graceful coloring of $G$ is a vertex coloring $f$ of $G$ such that the difference edge labelling $h$ induced by $f$ is a (proper) edge coloring of $G$. A graceful coloring with range $\{1,2,\dots,k\}$ is called a graceful $k$-coloring. The least integer $k$ such that $G$ admits a graceful $k$-coloring is called the graceful chromatic number of $G$, denoted by $χ_g(G)$. We prove that $χ(G^2)\leq χ_g(G)\leq a(χ(G^2))$ for every graph $G$, where $a(n)$ denotes the $n$th term of the integer sequence A065825 in OEIS. We also prove that graceful coloring problem is NP-hard for planar bipartite graphs, regular graphs and 2-degenerate graphs. In particular, we show that for each $k\geq 5$, it is NP-complete to check whether a planar bipartite graph of maximum degree $k-2$ is graceful $k$-colorable. The complexity of checking whether a planar graph is graceful 4-colorable remains open.

We consider the problem of enumerating all minimal transversals (also called minimal hitting sets) of a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$. An equivalent formulation of this problem known as the \emph{transversal hypergraph} problem (or \emph{hypergraph dualization} problem) is to decide, given two hypergraphs, whether one corresponds to the set of minimal transversals of the other. The existence of a polynomial time algorithm to solve this problem is a long standing open question. In \cite{fredman_complexity_1996}, the authors present the first sub-exponential algorithm to solve the transversal hypergraph problem which runs in quasi-polynomial time, making it unlikely that the problem is (co)NP-complete. In this paper, we show that when one of the two hypergraphs is of bounded VC-dimension, the transversal hypergraph problem can be solved in polynomial time, or equivalently that if $\mathcal{H}$ is a hypergraph of bounded VC-dimension, then there exists an incremental polynomial time algorithm to enumerate its minimal transversals. This result generalizes most of the previously known polynomial cases in the literature since they almost all consider classes of hypergraphs of bounded VC-dimension. As a consequence, the hypergraph transversal problem is solvable in polynomial time for any class of hypergraphs closed under partial subhypergraphs. We also show that the proposed algorithm runs in quasi-polynomial time in general hypergraphs and runs in polynomial time if the conformality of the hypergraph is bounded, which is one of the few known polynomial cases where the VC-dimension is unbounded.

We introduce and study the pinnacle sets of a simple graph $G$ with $n$ vertices. Given a bijective vertex labeling $λ\,:\,V(G)\rightarrow [n]$, the label $λ(v)$ of vertex $v$ is a pinnacle of $(G, λ)$ if $λ(v)>λ(w)$ for all vertices $w$ in the neighborhood of $v$. The pinnacle set of $(G, λ)$ contains all the pinnacles of the labeled graph. A subset $S\subseteq[n]$ is a pinnacle set of $G$ if there exists a labeling $λ$ such that $S$ is the pinnacle set of $(G,λ)$. Of interest to us is the question: Which subsets of $[n]$ are the pinnacle sets of $G$? Our main results are as follows. We show that when $G$ is connected, $G$ has a size-$k$ pinnacle set if and only if $G$ has an independent set of the same size. Consequently, determining if $G$ has a size-$k$ pinnacle set and determining if $G$ has a particular subset $S$ as a pinnacle set are NP-complete problems. Nonetheless, we completely identify all the pinnacle sets of complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, cycles and paths. We also present two techniques for deriving new pinnacle sets from old ones that imply a typical graph has many pinnacle sets. Finally, we define a poset on all the size-$k$ pinnacle sets of $G$ and show that it is a join semilattice. If, additionally, the poset has a minimum element, then it is a distributive lattice. We conclude with some open problems for further study.

Given an (infinite) relational structure $\mathbb S$, we say that a finite structure $\mathbb C$ is a minimal finite factor of $\mathbb S$ if for every finite structure $\mathbb A$ there is a homomorphism $\mathbb S\to \mathbb A$ if and only if there is a homomorphism $\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{A}$. In this brief note we prove that if CSP($\mathbb S$) is in GMSNP, then $\mathbb S$ has a minimal finite factor $\mathbb C$, and moreover, CSP($\mathbb C$) reduces in polynomial time to CSP($\mathbb S$). We discuss two nice applications of this result. First, we see that if a finite promise constraint satisfaction problem PCSP($\mathbb A,\mathbb B$) has a tractable GMSNP sandwich, then it has a tractable finite sandwich. We also show that if $\mathbb G$ is a non-bipartite (possibly infinite) graph with finite chromatic number, and CSP($\mathbb G$) is in GMSNP, then CSP($\mathbb G$) in NP-complete, partially answering a question recently asked by Bodirsky and Guzmán-Pro.

Given a function $f\colon V(G) \to \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$ on a graph $G$, $AN(v)$ denotes the set of neighbors of $v \in V(G)$ that have positive labels under $f$. In 2021, Ahangar et al.~introduced the notion of $[k]$-Roman Dominating Function ([$k$]-RDF) of a graph $G$, which is a function $f\colon V(G) \to \{0,1,\ldots,k+1\}$ such that $\sum_{u \in N[v]}f(u) \geq k + |AN(v)|$ for all $v \in V(G)$ with $f(v)<k$. The weight of $f$ is $\sum_{v \in V(G)}f(v)$. The $[k]$-Roman domination number, denoted by $γ_{[kR]}(G)$, is the minimum weight of a $[k]$-RDF of $G$. The notion of [$k$]-RDF for $k=1$ has been extensively investigated in the scientific literature since 2004, when introduced by Cockayne et al. as Roman Domination. An independent [$k$]-Roman dominating function ([$k$]-IRDF) $f\colon V(G) \to \{0,1,\ldots,k+1\}$ of a graph $G$ is a [$k$]-RDF of $G$ such that the set of vertices with positive labels is an independent set. The independent [$k$]-Roman domination number of $G$ is the minimum weight of a [$k$]-IRDF of $G$ and is denoted by $i_{[kR]}(G)$. In this paper, we propose the study of independent [$k$]-Roman domination on graphs for arbitrary $k \geq 1$. We prove that, for all $k\geq 3$, the decision problems associated with $i_{[kR]}(G)$ and $γ_{[kR]}(G)$ are NP-complete for planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3. We also present lower and upper bounds for $i_{[kR]}(G)$. Moreover, we present lower and upper bounds for the parameter $i_{[kR]}(G)$ for two families of 3-regular graphs called generalized Blanuša snarks and Loupekine snarks.

Given a graph $G(V,E)$, a vertex subset $S$ of $G$ is called an open packing in $G$ if no pair of distinct vertices in $S$ have a common neighbour in $G$. The size of a largest open packing in $G$ is called the open packing number, $ρ^o(G)$, of $G$. It would be interesting to note that the open packing number is a lower bound for the total domination number in graphs with no isolated vertices [Henning and Slater, 1999]. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the decision problem OPEN PACKING tests whether $G$ has an open packing of size at least $k$. The optimization problem MAX-OPEN PACKING takes a graph $G$ as input and finds the open packing number of $G$. It is known that OPEN PACKING is NP-complete on split graphs (i.e., $\{2K_2,C_4,C_5\}$-free graphs) [Ramos et al., 2014]. In this work, we complete the study on the complexity (P vs NPC) of OPEN PACKING on $H$-free graphs for every graph $H$ with at least three vertices by proving that OPEN PACKING is (i) NP-complete on $K_{1,3}$-free graphs and (ii) polynomial time solvable on $(P_4\cup rK_1)$-free graphs for every $r\geq 1$. In the course of proving (ii), we show that for every $t\in {2,3,4}$ and $r\geq 1$, if G is a $(P_t\cup rK_1)$-free graph, then $ρ^o(G)$ is bounded above by a linear function of $r$. Moreover, we show that OPEN PACKING parameterized by solution size is W[1]-complete on $K_{1,3}$-free graphs and MAX-OPEN PACKING is hard to approximate within a factor of $n^{(\frac{1}{2}-δ)}$ for any $δ>0$ on $K_{1,3}$-free graphs unless P=NP. Further, we prove that OPEN PACKING is (a) NP-complete on $K_{1,4}$-free split graphs and (b) polynomial time solvable on $K_{1,3}$-free split graphs. We prove a similar dichotomy result on split graphs with degree restrictions on the vertices in the independent set of the clique-independent set partition of the split graphs.

The Grundy (or First-Fit) chromatic number of a graph $G=(V,E)$, denoted by $Γ(G)$ (or $χ_{_{\sf FF}}(G)$), is the maximum number of colors used by a First-Fit (greedy) coloring of $G$. To determine $Γ(G)$ is NP-complete for various classes of graphs. Also there exists a constant $c>0$ such that the Grundy number is hard to approximate within the ratio $c$. We first obtain an $\mathcal{O}(VE)$ algorithm to determine the Grundy number of block graphs i.e. graphs in which every biconnected component is complete subgraph. We prove that the Grundy number of a general graph $G$ with cut-vertices is upper bounded by the Grundy number of a block graph corresponding to $G$. This provides a reasonable upper bound for the Grundy number of graphs with cut-vertices. Next, define $Δ_2(G)={\max}_{u\in G}~ {\max}_{v\in N(u):d(v)\leq d(u)} d(v)$. We obtain an $\mathcal{O}(VE)$ algorithm to determine $Γ(G)$ for graphs $G$ whose girth $g$ is at least $2Δ_2(G)+1$. This algorithm provides a polynomial time approximation algorithm within ratio $\min \{1, (g+1)/(2Δ_2(G)+2)\}$ for $Γ(G)$ of general graphs $G$ with girth $g$.

We introduce a dense counterpart of graph degeneracy, which extends the recently-proposed invariant symmetric difference. We say that a graph has sd-degeneracy (for symmetric-difference degeneracy) at most $d$ if it admits an elimination order of its vertices where a vertex $u$ can be removed whenever it has a $d$-twin, i.e., another vertex $v$ such that at most $d$ vertices outside $\{u,v\}$ are neighbors of exactly one of $u, v$. The family of graph classes of bounded sd-degeneracy is a superset of that of graph classes of bounded degeneracy or of bounded flip-width, and more generally, of bounded symmetric difference. Unlike most graph parameters, sd-degeneracy is not hereditary: it may be strictly smaller on a graph than on some of its induced subgraphs. In particular, every $n$-vertex graph is an induced subgraph of some $O(n^2)$-vertex graph of sd-degeneracy 1. In spite of this and the breadth of classes of bounded sd-degeneracy, we devise $\tilde{O}(\sqrt n)$-bit adjacency labeling schemes for them, which are optimal up to the hidden polylogarithmic factor. This is attained on some even more general classes, consisting of graphs $G$ whose vertices bijectively map to the leaves of a tree $T$, where transversal edges and anti-edges added to $T$ define the edge set of $G$. We call such graph representations signed tree models as they extend the so-called tree models (or twin-decompositions) developed in the context of twin-width, by adding transversal anti-edges. While computing the degeneracy of an input graph can be done in linear time, we show that deciding whether its symmetric difference is at most 8 is co-NP-complete, and whether its sd-degeneracy is at most 1 is NP-complete.

Semispaces of a convexity space $(X,C)$ are maximal convex sets missing a point. The separation axiom $S_3$ asserts that any point $x_0\in X$ and any convex set $A$ not containing $x_0$ can be separated by complementary halfspaces (convex sets with convex complements) or, equivalently, that all semispaces are halfspaces. In this paper, we study $S_3$ for geodesic convexity in graphs and the structure of semispaces in $S_3$-graphs. We characterize $S_3$-graphs and their semispaces in terms of separation by halfspaces of vertices $x_0$ and special sets, called maximal $x_0$-proximal sets and in terms of convexity of their mutual shadows $x_0/K$ and $K/x_0$. In $S_3$-graphs $G$ satisfying the triangle condition (TC), maximal proximal sets are the pre-maximal cliques of $G$ (i.e., cliques $K$ such that $K\cup\{ x_0\}$ are maximal cliques). This allows to characterize the $S_3$-graphs satisfying (TC) in a structural way and to enumerate their semispaces efficiently. In case of meshed graphs (an important subclass of graphs satisfying (TC)), the $S_3$-graphs have been characterized by excluding five forbidden subgraphs. On the way of proving this result, we also establish some properties of meshed graphs, which maybe of independent interest. In particular, we show that any connected, locally-convex set of a meshed graph is convex. We also provide several examples of $S_3$-graphs, including the basis graphs of matroids. Finally, we consider the (NP-complete) halfspace separation problem, describe two methods of its solution, and apply them to particular classes of graphs and graph-convexities.

The computational complexity of tiling finite simply connected regions with a fixed set of tiles is studied in this paper. We show that the problem of tiling simply connected regions with a fixed set of $23$ Wang tiles is NP-complete. As a consequence, the problem of tiling simply connected regions with a fixed set of $111$ rectangles is NP-complete. Our results improve that of Igor Pak and Jed Yang by using fewer numbers of tiles. Notably in the case of Wang tiles, the number has decreased by more than one third from $35$ to $23$.

In this paper, we introduce the generic circular triangle-free graph $\mathbb C_3$ and propose a finite axiomatization of its first order theory. In particular, our main results show that a countable graph $G$ embeds into $\mathbb C_3$ if and only if it is a $\{K_3, K_1 + 2K_2, K_1+C_5, C_6\}$-free graph. As a byproduct of this result, we obtain a geometric characterization of finite $\{K_3, K_1 + 2K_2, K_1+C_5, C_6\}$-free graphs, and the (finite) list of minimal obstructions of unit Helly circular-arc graphs with independence number strictly less than three. The circular chromatic number $χ_c(G)$ is a refinement of the classical chromatic number $χ(G)$. We construct $\mathbb C_3$ so that a graph $G$ has circular chromatic number strictly less than three if and only if $G$ maps homomorphically to $\mathbb C_3$. We build on our main results to show that $χ_c(G) < 3$ if and only if $G$ can be extended to a $\{K_3, K_1 + 2K_2, K_1+C_5, C_6\}$-free graph, and in turn, we use this result to reprove an old characterization of $χ_c(G) < 3$ due to Brandt (1999). Finally, we answer a question recently asked by Guzmán-Pro, Hell, and Hernández-Cruz by showing that the problem of deciding for a given finite graph $G$ whether $χ_c(G) < 3$ is NP-complete.

The $3$-colourability problem is a well-known NP-complete problem and it remains NP-complete for $bull$-free graphs, where $bull$ is the graph consisting of $K_3$ with two pendant edges attached to two of its vertices. In this paper we study $3$-colourability of $(bull,H)$-free graphs for several graphs $H$. We show that these graphs are $3$-colourable or contain an induced odd wheel $W_{2p+1}$ for some $p\geq 2$ or a spindle graph $M_{3p+1}$ for some $p\geq 1$. Moreover, for all our results we can provide certifying algorithms that run in polynomial time.

In this paper we are interested in the fine-grained complexity of deciding whether there is a homomorphism from an input graph $G$ to a fixed graph $H$ (the $H$-Coloring problem). The starting point is that these problems can be viewed as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), and that (partial) polymorphisms of binary relations are of paramount importance in the study of complexity classes of such CSPs. Thus, we first investigate the expressivity of binary symmetric relations $E_H$ and their corresponding (partial) polymorphisms pPol($E_H$). For irreflexive graphs we observe that there is no pair of graphs $H$ and $H'$ such that pPol($E_H$) $\subseteq$ pPol($E_{H'}$), unless $E_{H'}= \emptyset$ or $H =H'$. More generally we show the existence of an $n$-ary relation $R$ whose partial polymorphisms strictly subsume those of $H$ and such that CSP($R$) is NP-complete if and only if $H$ contains an odd cycle of length at most $n$. Motivated by this we also describe the sets of total polymorphisms of nontrivial cliques, odd cycles, as well as certain cores, and we give an algebraic characterization of projective cores. As a by-product, we settle the Okrasa and Rzążewski conjecture for all graphs of at most 7 vertices.

Of a given bipartite graph $G = (V, E)$, it is elementary to construct a bipartition in time $O(|V| + |E|)$. For a given $k$-graph $H = H^{(k)}$ with $k \geq 3$ fixed, Lovász proved that deciding whether $H$ is bipartite is NP-complete. Let $\mathcal{B}_n$ denote the collection of all $[n]$-vertex bipartite $k$-graphs. We construct, of a given $H \in \mathcal{B}_n$, a bipartition in time averaging $O(n^k)$ over the class $\mathcal{B}_n$. We provide two proofs of our result. When $k = 3$, this result expedites one of Person and Schacht.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a simple undirected graph with no isolated vertex. A set $D_t\subseteq V$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if $(i)$ $D_t$ is a dominating set, and $(ii)$ the set $D_t$ induces a subgraph with no isolated vertex. The total dominating set of minimum cardinality is called the minimum total dominating set, and the size of the minimum total dominating set is called the total domination number ($γ_t(G)$). Given a graph $G$, the total dominating set (TDS) problem is to find a total dominating set of minimum cardinality. A Roman dominating function (RDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that each vertex $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V$ with $f(u)=2$. A RDF $f$ of a graph $G$ is said to be a total Roman dominating function (TRDF) if the induced subgraph of $V_1\cup V_2$ does not contain any isolated vertex, where $V_i=\{u\in V|f(u)=i\}$. Given a graph $G$, the total Roman dominating set (TRDS) problem is to minimize the weight, $W(f)=\sum_{u\in V} f(u)$, called the total Roman domination number ($γ_{tR}(G)$). In this paper, we are the first to show that the TRDS problem is NP-complete in unit disk graphs (UDGs). Furthermore, we propose a $7.17\operatorname{-}$ factor approximation algorithm for the TDS problem and a $6.03\operatorname{-}$ factor approximation algorithm for the TRDS problem in geometric unit disk graphs. The running time for both algorithms is notably bounded by $O(n\log{k})$, where $n$ represents the number of vertices in the given UDG and $k$ represents the size of the independent set in (i.e., $D$ and $V_2$ in TDS and TRDS problems, respectively) the given UDG.

A simple greedy algorithm to find a maximal independent set (MIS) in a graph starts with the empty set and visits every vertex, adding it to the set if and only if none of its neighbours are already in the set. In this paper, we consider (the complexity of decision problems related to) the generalisation of this MIS algorithm wherein any starting set is allowed. Two main approaches are leveraged. Firstly, we view the MIS algorithm as a sequential update of a Boolean network according to a permutation of the vertex set. Secondly, we introduce the concept of a constituency of a graph: a set of vertices that is dominated by an independent set. Recognizing a constituency is NP-complete, a fact we leverage repeatedly in our investigation. Our contributions are multiple: we establish that deciding whether all maximal independent sets can be reached from some configuration is coNP-complete; that fixing words (which reach a MIS from any starting configuration) and fixing permutations (briefly, permises) are coNP-complete to recognize; and that permissible graphs (graphs with a permis) are coNP-hard to recognize. We also exhibit large classes of permissible and non-permissible graphs, notably near-comparability graphs which may be of independent interest. Lastly, we extend our study to digraphs, where we search for kernels. Since the natural generalisation of our approach may not necessarily find a kernel, we introduce two further Boolean networks for digraphs: one always finds an independent set, and the other always finds a dominating set.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Let $w:V(G) \longrightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a weight function. Then $G$ is $w$-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. An edge $xy \in E(G)$ is relating if there exists an independent set $S$ such that both $S \cup \{x\}$ and $S \cup \{y\}$ are maximal independent sets in the graph. If $xy$ is relating then $w(x)=w(y)$ for every weight function $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered. Relating edges play an important role in investigating $w$-well-covered graphs. The decision problem whether an edge in a graph is relating is NP-complete. We prove that the problem remains NP-complete when the input is restricted to graphs without cycles of length $6$. This is an unexpected result because recognizing relating edges is known to be polynomially solvable for graphs without cycles of lengths $4$ and $6$, graphs without cycles of lengths $5$ and $6$, and graphs without cycles of lengths $6$ and $7$. A graph $G$ belongs to the class $W_2$ if every two pairwise disjoint independent sets in $G$ are included in two pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. It is known that if $G$ belongs to the class $W_2$, then it is well-covered. A vertex $v \in V(G)$ is shedding if for every independent set $S \subseteq V(G)-N[v]$, there exists a vertex $u \in N(v)$ such that $S \cup \{u\}$ is independent. Shedding vertices play an important role in studying the class $W_2$. Recognizing shedding vertices is co-NP-complete, even when the input is restricted to triangle-free graphs. We prove that the problem is co-NP-complete for graphs without cycles of length $6$.