arXiv++ Combinatorics

Eternal domination is a process in which a set of guards occupying a dominating set on a graph protects against an infinite sequence of attacks. After a vertex is attacked, one guard must move along an edge to the attacked vertex and each of the remaining guards may move along an edge so that the guards again occupy a dominating set on the graph and can defend the next attack. The minimum number of guards needed in a graph $Γ$ is the eternal domination number, denoted by $γ_{\mathrm{all}}^\infty(Γ)$. In this paper, we show that the eternal domination number of a vertex-transitive graph with an efficient dominating set is equal to its domination number. We show that a Cayley graph on a generalized dihedral group whose connection set contains few or many reflections is efficiently dominated. Then, we provide an infinite family of connected Cayley graphs for which $γ_{\mathrm{all}}^{\infty}(Γ) = γ(Γ)+1$, generalizing a result of [Braga et al., J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 96 (2016), 13--22]. Finally, we build an infinite family of connected Cayley graphs with $γ_{\mathrm{all}}^\infty(Γ) \geq γ(Γ)+2$.

Given a finite group $R$, we investigate the base size of the action of the automorphism group of $R$ on the lattice of subgroups of $R$. Our main result shows that this base size is $1$ if and only if $R$ is cyclic. Our motivation arises from a conjecture of Babai on the problem of representing groups as automorphism groups of lattices with a bounded number of orbits.

We explicitly determine all CI-groups with respect to ternary relational structures that have the form $C \times D$, where $C$ is cyclic and $D$ is either a dicyclic group whose order is not divisible by $3$ or a dihedral group. Such groups are also CI-groups with respect to graphs and digraphs.

We give a Hilton-Milner Theorem for the $r$-independent sets in the graph that is the union of copies of $K_k$. That is, we determine the maximum intersecting families of $r$-independent sets in this graph, subject to the condition that the sets in a family do not all share a common element. As a by-product, we also find a tight upper bound for the sum of sizes of a pair of cross intersecting families made up of the same objects. We apply our theorem to find the largest intersecting family of $r$-independent sets in a family of graphs called ``depth-two claws". This confirms the Holroyd--Talbot conjecture for depth-two claws, extending previous results on these graphs (which covered cases where $r$ was relatively small compared to the number of vertices) to all possible values of $r$.

In this paper we introduce a new way of measuring the robustness of Erdős--Ko--Rado (EKR) Theorems on permutation groups. EKR-type results can be viewed as results about the independence numbers of certain corresponding graphs, namely the derangement graphs, and random subgraphs of these graphs have been used to measure the robustness of these extremal results. In the context of permutation groups, the derangement graphs are Cayley graphs on the permutation group in question. We propose studying extremal properties of subgraphs of derangement graphs, that are themselves Cayley graphs of the group, to measure robustness. We present a variety of results about the robustness of the EKR property of various permutation groups using this new measure.

A Walecki tournament is any tournament that can be formed by choosing an orientation for each of the Hamilton cycles in the Walecki decomposition of a complete graph on an odd number of vertices. In this paper, we show that if some arc in a Walecki tournament on at least $7$ vertices lies in exactly one directed triangle, then there is a vertex of the tournament (the vertex typically labelled $*$ in the decomposition) that is fixed under every automorphism of the tournament. Furthermore, any isomorphism between such Walecki tournaments maps the vertex labelled $*$ in one to the vertex labelled $*$ in the other. We also show that among Walecki tournaments with a signature of even length $2k$, of the $2^{2k}$ possible signatures, at least $2^k$ produce tournaments that have an arc that lies in a unique directed triangle (and therefore to which our result applies).

The Erdős--Ko--Rado (EKR) theorem and its generalizations can be viewed as classifications of maximum independent sets in appropriately defined families of graphs, such as the Kneser graph $K(n,k)$. In this paper, we investigate the independence number of random spanning subraphs of two other families of graphs whose maximum independent sets satisfy an EKR-type characterization: the derangement graph on the set of permutations in $\mathrm{Sym}(n)$ and the derangement graph on the set $\mathcal{M}_{n}$ of perfect matchings in the complete graph $\mathcal{K}_{2n}$. In both cases, we show there is a sharp threshold probability for the event that the independence number of a random spanning subgraph is equal to that of the original graph. As a useful tool to aid our computations, we obtain a Friedgut--Kalai--Naor (FKN) type theorem on sparse boolean functions whose domain is the vertex set of $\mathcal{M}_{n}$. In particular, we show that boolean functions whose Fourier transforms are highly concentrated on the first two irreducible modules in the $\mathrm{Sym}(2n)$ module $\mathbb{C}[\mathcal{M}_{n}]$, is close to being the characteristic function of a union of maximum independent sets in the derangement graph on perfect matchings.

Let $k$ be odd, and $n$ an odd multiple of $3$. We prove that $C_k \rtimes C_8$ and $(C_n \times C_3)\rtimes C_8$ do not have the Directed Cayley Isomorphism (DCI) property. When $k$ is also prime, $C_k \rtimes C_8$ had previously been proved to have the Cayley Isomorphism (CI) property. To the best of our knowledge, the groups $C_p \rtimes C_8$ (where $p$ is an odd prime) are only the second known infinite family of groups that have the CI property but do not have the DCI property. This also shows that no group with an element of order $8$ has the DCI property.

Let $R$ be a group and let $S$ be a subset of $R$. The Haar graph $\mathrm{Haar}(R,S)$ of $R$ with connection set $S$ is the graph having vertex set $R\times\{-1,1\}$, where two distinct vertices $(x,-1)$ and $(y,1)$ are declared to be adjacent if and only if $yx^{-1}\in S$. The name Haar graph was coined by Tomaž Pisanski in one of the first investigations on this class of graphs. For every $g\in R$, the mapping $ρ_g:(x,\varepsilon)\mapsto (xg,\varepsilon)$, $\forall (x,\varepsilon)\in R\times\{-1,1\}$, is an automorphism of $\mathrm{Haar}(R,S)$. In particular, the set $\hat{R}:=\{ρ_g\mid g\in R\}$ is a subgroup of the automorphism group of $\mathrm{Haar}(R,S)$ isomorphic to $R$. In the case that the automorphism group of $\mathrm{Haar}(R,S)$ equals $\hat{R}$, the Haar graph $\mathrm{Haar}(R,S)$ is said to be a Haar graphical representation of the group $R$. Answering a question of Feng, Kovács, Wang, and Yang, we classify the finite groups admitting a Haar graphical representation. Specifically, we show that every finite group admits a Haar graphical representation, with abelian groups and ten other small groups as the only exceptions. Our work on Haar graphs allows us to improve a 1980 result of Babai concerning representations of groups on posets, achieving the best possible result in this direction. An improvement to Babai's related result on representations of groups on distributive lattices follows.

A group has the (D)CI ((Directed) Cayley Isomorphism) property, or more commonly is a (D)CI group, if any two Cayley (di)graphs on the group are isomorphic via a group automorphism. That is, $G$ is a (D)CI group if whenever $\rm{Cay}(G,S)\cong \rm{Cay}(G,T)$, there is some $δ\in \rm{Aut}(G)$ such that $S^δ=T$. (For the CI property, we only require this to be true if $S$ and $T$ are closed under inversion.) Suppose $p,q,r$ are distinct odd primes. We show that $D_{2pqr}$ is a DCI group. We present this result in the more general context of dihedral groups of squarefree order; some of our results apply to any such group, and may be useful in future toward showing that all dihedral groups of squarefree order are DCI groups.

A necessary condition for a Cayley digraph Cay$(R,S)$ to be a regular representation is that there are no non-trivial group automorphisms of $R$ that fix $S$ setwise. A group is DRR-detecting or GRR-detecting if this condition is also sufficient for all Cayley digraphs or graphs on the group, respectively. In this paper, we determine precisely which groups of squarefree order are DRR-detecting, and which are GRR-detecting.

A Cayley graph Cay$(G;S)$ has the CI (Cayley Isomorphism) property if for every isomorphic graph Cay$(G;T)$, there is a group automorphism $α$ of $G$ such that $S^α=T$. The DCI (Directed Cayley Isomorphism) property is defined analogously on digraphs. A group $G$ is a CI-group if every Cayley graph on $G$ has the CI property, and is a DCI-group if every Cayley digraph on $G$ has the DCI property. Since a graph is a special type of digraph, this means that every DCI-group is a CI-group, and if a group is not a CI-group then it is not a DCI-group, but there are well-known examples of groups that are CI-groups but not DCI-groups. In 2009, Spiga showed that $\mathbb Z_3^8$ is not a DCI-group, by producing a digraph that does not have the DCI property. He also showed that $\mathbb Z_3^5$ is a DCI-group (and therefore also a CI-group). Until recently the question of whether there are elementary abelian $3$-groups that are not CI-groups remained open. In a recent preprint with Dave Witte Morris, we showed that $\mathbb Z_3^{10}$ is not a CI-group. In this paper we show that with slight modifications, the underlying undirected graph of order $3^8$ described by Spiga is does not have the CI property, so $\mathbb Z_3^8$ is not a CI-group.

A finite group $G$ is a "non-DCI group" if there exist subsets $S_1$ and $S_2$ of $G$, such that the associated Cayley digraphs $C\overrightarrow{ay}(G;S_1)$ and $C\overrightarrow{ay}(G;S_2)$ are isomorphic, but no automorphism of $G$ carries $S_1$ to $S_2$. Furthermore, $G$ is a "non-CI group" if the subsets $S_1$ and $S_2$ can be chosen to be closed under inverses, so we have undirected Cayley graphs $Cay(G;S_1)$ and $Cay(G;S_2)$. We show that if $p$ is a prime number, and the elementary abelian $p$-group $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^r$ is a non-DCI group, then $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^{r+3}$ is a non-CI group. In most cases, we can also show that $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^{r+2}$ is a non-CI group. In particular, from Pablo Spiga's proof that $(\mathbb{Z}_p)^8$ is a non-DCI group, we conclude that $(\mathbb{Z}_3)^{10}$ is a non-CI group. This is the first example of a non-CI elementary abelian $3$-group.

In this article, we study the order and structure of the largest induced forests in some families of graphs. First we prove a variation of the ratio bound that gives an upper bound on the order of the largest induced forest in a graph. Next we define a \textsl{canonical induced forest} to be a forest that is formed by adding a vertex to a coclique and give several examples of graphs where the maximal forest is a canonical induced forest. These examples are all distance-regular graphs with the property that the Delsarte-Hoffman ratio bound for cocliques holds with equality. We conclude with some examples of related graphs where there are induced forests that are larger than a canonical forest.

A number of authors have studied the question of when a graph can be represented as a Cayley graph on more than one nonisomorphic group. In this paper we give conditions for when a Cayley graph on an abelian group can be represented as a Cayley graph on a generalized dihedral group, and conditions for when the converse is true.

Given three positive integers $n,a,b$ with $n=ab$, we determine the base size of the symmetric group and of the alternating group of degree $n$ in their action on the set of partitions into $b$ parts having cardinality $a$.

A generalized Petersen graph $GP(n,k)$ is a regular cubic graph on $2n$ vertices (the parameter $k$ is used to define some of the edges). It was previously shown (Ball et al., 2015) that the cop number of $GP(n,k)$ is at most $4$, for all permissible values of $n$ and $k$. In this paper we prove that the cop number of "most" generalized Petersen graphs is exactly $4$. More precisely, we show that unless $n$ and $k$ fall into certain specified categories, then the cop number of $GP(n,k)$ is $4$. The graphs to which our result applies all have girth $8$. In fact, our argument is slightly more general: we show that in any cubic graph of girth at least $8$, unless there exist two cycles of length $8$ whose intersection is a path of length $2$, then the cop number of the graph is at least $4$. Even more generally, in a graph of girth at least $9$ and minimum valency $δ$, the cop number is at least $δ+1$.

We show that if $n=7k/i$ with $i \in \{1,2,3\}$ then the cop number of the generalised Petersen graph $GP(n,k)$ is $4$, with some small previously-known exceptions. It was previously proved by Ball et al. (2015) that the cop number of any generalised Petersen graph is at most $4$. The results in this paper explain all of the known generalised Petersen graphs that actually have cop number $4$ but were not previously explained by Morris et al. in a recent preprint, and places them in the context of infinite families. (More precisely, the preprint by Morris et al. explains all known generalised Petersen graphs with cop number $4$ and girth $8$, while this paper explains those that have girth $7$.)

We determine two new infinite families of Cayley graphs that admit colour-preserving automorphisms that do not come from the group action. By definition, this means that these Cayley graphs fail to have the CCA (Cayley Colour Automorphism) property, and the corresponding infinite families of groups also fail to have the CCA property. The families of groups consist of the direct product of any dihedral group of order $2n$ where $n \ge 3$ is odd, with either itself, or the cyclic group of order $n$. In particular, this family of examples includes the smallest non-CCA group that had not fit into any previous family of known non-CCA groups.

A number of authors have studied the question of when a graph can be represented as a Cayley graph on more than one nonisomorphic group. The work to date has focussed on a few special situations: when the groups are $p$-groups; when the groups have order $pq$; when the Cayley graphs are normal; or when the groups are both abelian. In this paper, we construct two infinite families of graphs, each of which is Cayley on an abelian group and a nonabelian group. These families include the smallest examples of such graphs that had not appeared in other results.