arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let \(b(M)\), \(d(M)\), and \(r(M)\) denote the number of bases, the number of circuits, and the rank of a matroid \(M\), respectively. We prove that every nonempty simple binary matroid with no coloops satisfies \[ 2b(M)\ge(r(M)+1)d(M), \] with equality if and only if \(M\) is isomorphic to the Fano matroid. This confirms a conjecture recorded by Oxley in 1983. For the same class, we prove that deleting any element leaves at least as many bases as there are circuits in the original matroid: \(b(M\backslash e)\ge d(M)\) for every \(e\in E(M)\). We determine all equality cases and deduce a sharp linear lower bound for basis growth under successive series extensions. The main counting step is a joint estimate for the three largest possible circuit sizes, obtained from contraction-normalized fundamental-circuit counts and an exact folded-cube edge correspondence.

With a view toward applications in Riemannian geometry, we explore coloop splitting properties of regular matroids. Nienhaus showed by classification in rank four that a regular matroid has a cocircuit whose deletion yields two coloops unless the matroid takes a particular form. In the latter case, one can split off any element of the ground set as a coloop. We reprove this using Seymour's structure theorem for regular matroids and prove an extension to matroids of ranks five and six. As an application to Riemannian geometry, we prove that the torus symmetry assumption in a recent result of Mouillé, Nienhaus, and the second author can be relaxed from rank ten to rank nine.

The Merino-Welsh conjecture states that for a graph $G$ without loops and bridges we have $$\max(T_G(2,0),T_G(0,2))\geq T_G(1,1).$$ Later Jackson proved that for any matroid $M$ without loop and coloop we have $$T_M(3,0)T_M(0,3)\geq T_M(1,1)^2.$$ The value $3$ in this statement was improved to $2.9242$ by Beke, Csáji, Csikvári and Pituk. In this paper, we further improve on this result by showing that $$T_M(2.355,0)T_M(0,2.355)\geq T_M(1,1)^2.$$ We also prove that the Merino--Welsh conjecture is true for matroids $M$, where all circuits of $M$ and its dual $M^*$ have length between $\ell$ and $(\ell-2)^4$ for some $\ell\geq 6$.

The matroidal version of the Merino--Welsh conjecture states that the Tutte polynomial $T_M(x,y)$ of any matroid $M$ without loops and coloops satisfies that $$\max(T_M(2,0),T_M(0,2))\geq T_M(1,1).$$ Equivalently, if the Merino--Welsh conjecture is true for all matroids without loops and coloops, then the following inequalities are also satisfied for all matroids without loops and coloops: $$T_M(2,0)+T_M(0,2)\geq 2T_M(1,1),$$ and $$T_M(2,0)T_M(0,2)\geq T_M(1,1)^2.$$ We show a counter-example for these inequalities.

Contraction$^*$-depth is a matroid depth parameter analogous to tree-depth of graphs. We establish the matroid analogue of the classical graph theory result asserting that the tree-depth of a graph $G$ is the minimum height of a rooted forest whose closure contains $G$ by proving the following for every matroid $M$ (except the trivial case when $M$ consists of loops and coloops only): the contraction$^*$-depth of $M$ plus one is equal to the minimum contraction-depth of a matroid containing $M$ as a restriction.

We prove that the number of tropical critical points of an affine matroid (M,e) is equal to the beta invariant of M. Motivated by the computation of maximum likelihood degrees, this number is defined to be the degree of the intersection of the Bergman fan of (M,e) and the inverted Bergman fan of N=(M/e)*, where e is an element of M that is neither a loop nor a coloop. Equivalently, for a generic weight vector w on E-e, this is the number of ways to find weights (0,x) on M and y on N with x+y=w such that on each circuit of M (resp. N), the minimum x-weight (resp. y-weight) occurs at least twice. This answers a question of Sturmfels.

We generalize Forman's discrete Morse theory to the context of symmetric $Δ$-complexes. As an application, we prove that the coloop subcomplex of the link of the origin $LA^{\mathrm{trop},\mathrm{P}}_g$ in the moduli space of principally polarized tropical abelian varieties of dimension $g$ with respect to the perfect cone decomposition is contractible.

A set $S\subseteq 2^E$ of subsets of a finite set $E$ is \emph{powerful} if, for all $X\subseteq E$, the number of subsets of $X$ in $S$ is a power of 2. Each powerful set is associated with a non-negative integer valued function, which we call the rank function. Powerful sets were introduced by Farr and Wang as a generalisation of binary matroids, as the cocircuit space of a binary matroid gives a powerful set with the corresponding matroid rank function. In this paper we investigate how structural properties of a powerful set can be characterised in terms of its rank function. Powerful sets have four types of degenerate elements, including loops and coloops. We show that certain evaluations of the rank function of a powerful set determine the degenerate elements. We introduce powerful multisets and prove some fundamental results on them. We show that a powerful set corresponds to a binary matroid if and only if its rank function is subcardinal. This paper answers the two conjectures made by Farr and Wang in the affirmative.

A signed circuit cover of a signed graph is a natural analog of a circuit cover of a graph, and is equivalent to a covering of its corresponding signed-graphic matroid with circuits. It was conjectured that a signed graph whose signed-graphic matroid has no coloops has a 6-cover. In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds for signed Eulerian graphs.

This paper continues the study of combinatorial properties of binary functions --- that is, functions $f:2^E\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ such that $f(\emptyset)=1$, where $E$ is a finite set. Binary functions have previously been shown to admit families of transforms that generalise duality, including a trinity transform, and families of associated minor operations that generalise deletion and contraction, with both these families parameterised by the complex numbers. Binary function representations exist for graphs (via the indicator functions of their cutset spaces) and indeed arbitrary matroids (as shown by the author previously). In this paper, we characterise degenerate elements --- analogues of loops and coloops --- in binary functions, with respect to any pair of minor operations from our complex-parameterised family. We then apply this to study the relationship between binary functions and Tutte's alternating dimaps, which also support a trinity transform and three associated minor operations. It is shown that only the simplest alternating dimaps have binary representations of the form we consider, which seems to be the most direct type of representation. The question of whether there exist other, more sophisticated types of binary function representations for alternating dimaps is left open.

$q$-Matroids are defined on complemented modular support lattices. Minors of length 2 are of four types as in a "classical" matroid. Tutte polynomials $τ(x,y)$ of matroids are calculated either by recursion over deletion/contraction of single elements, by an enumeration of bases with respect to internal/external activities, or by substitution $x \to (x-1),\; y \to (y-1)$ in their rank generating functions $ρ(x,y)$. The $q$-analogue of the passage from a Tutte polynomial to its corresponding RGF is straight-forward, but the analogue of the reverse process $x \to (x-1),\; y \to (y-1)$ is more delicate. For matroids $M(S)$ on a set $S$, and relative to any linear order on the points, the concept of internal/external activity of a point relative to a basis gives rise to a partition of the underlying Boolean algebra $B(S)$ into a set of "prime-free" (or "structureless") minors, such minors being direct sums of loops and isthmi (coloops), with one such prime-free minor for each basis. What usually goes unnoticed is that each prime-free minor has a unique clopen flat. The latter property carries over to $q$-matroids, but each prime-free minor will contain many bases. So internal and external activity in $q$-matroids must be defined not for points relative to bases, but rather for coverings in the underlying complemented modular lattice. Following lattice paths from arbitrary subspaces $A$ along active coverings (downward for internally active, upward for externally active) will lead to the unique clopen subspace in the prime-free minor containing the subspace $A$. There are a number of interesting questions concerning $q$-matroids that remain unsolved.

A set $S\subseteq\{0,1\}^E$ of binary vectors, with positions indexed by $E$, is said to be a \textit{powerful code} if, for all $X\subseteq E$, the number of vectors in $S$ that are zero in the positions indexed by $X$ is a power of 2. By treating binary vectors as characteristic vectors of subsets of $E$, we say that a set $S\subseteq2^E$ of subsets of $E$ is a \textit{powerful set} if the set of characteristic vectors of sets in $S$ is a powerful code. Powerful sets (codes) include cocircuit spaces of binary matroids (equivalently, linear codes over $\mathbb{F}_2$), but much more besides. Our motivation is that, to each powerful set, there is an associated nonnegative-integer-valued rank function (by a construction of Farr), although it does not in general satisfy all the matroid rank axioms. In this paper we investigate the combinatorial properties of powerful sets. We prove fundamental results on special elements (loops, coloops, frames, near-frames, and stars), their associated types of single-element extensions, various ways of combining powerful sets to get new ones, and constructions of nonlinear powerful sets. We show that every powerful set is determined by its clutter of minimal nonzero members. Finally, we show that the number of powerful sets is doubly exponential, and hence that almost all powerful sets are nonlinear.

Let $M$ be a matroid without loops or coloops and let $T(M;x,y)$ be its Tutte polynomial. In 1999 Merino and Welsh conjectured that $$\max(T(M;2,0), T(M;0,2))\geq T(M;1,1)$$ holds for graphic matroids. Ten years later, Conde and Merino proposed a multiplicative version of the conjecture which implies the original one. In this paper we prove the multiplicative conjecture for the family of lattice path matroids (generalizing earlier results on uniform and Catalan matroids). In order to do this, we introduce and study particular lattice path matroids, called snakes, used as building bricks to indeed establish a strengthening of the multiplicative conjecture as well as a complete characterization of the cases in which equality holds.

Let AG(3,2)xU(1,1) denote the binary matroid obtained from the direct sum of AG(3,2) and a coloop by completing the 3-point lines between every element in AG(3,2) and the coloop. We prove that every internally 4-connected binary matroid that does not have a minor isomorphic to M(K5\e) is isomorphic to a minor of (AG(3,2)xU(1,1))*.

For a finite multigraph G, the reliability function of G is the probability R_G(q) that if each edge of G is deleted independantly with probability q then the remaining edges of G induce a connected spanning subgraph of G; this is a polynomial function of q. In 1992, Brown and Colbourn conjectured that for any connected multigraph G, if the complex number q is such that R_G(q)=0 then |q|<=1. We verify that this conjectured property of R_G(q) holds if G is a series-parallel network. The proof is by an application of the Hermite-Biehler Theorem and development of a theory of higher-order interlacing for polynomials with only real nonpositive zeros. We conclude by establishing some new inequalities which are satisfied by the f-vector of any matroid without coloops, and by discussing some stronger inequalities which would follow (in the cographic case) from the Brown-Colbourn Conjecture, and are hence true for cographic matroids of series-parallel networks.