arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1964, Erdős, Hajnal and Moon introduced a saturation version of Turán's classical theorem in extremal graph theory. In particular, they determined the minimum number of edges in a $K_r$-free, $n$-vertex graph with the property that the addition of any further edge yields a copy of $K_r$. We consider analogues of this problem in other settings. We prove a saturation version of the Erdős-Szekeres theorem about monotone subsequences and saturation versions of some Ramsey-type theorems on graphs and Dilworth-type theorems on posets. We also consider semisaturation problems, wherein we allow the family to have the forbidden configuration, but insist that any addition to the family yields a new copy of the forbidden configuration. In this setting, we prove a semisaturation version of the Erdős-Szekeres theorem on convex $k$-gons, as well as multiple semisaturation theorems for sequences and posets.

In this paper we relate t-designs to a forbidden configuration problem in extremal set theory. Let 1_t 0_l denote a column of t 1's on top of l 0's. We assume t>l. Let q. (1_t 0_l) denote the (t+l)xq matrix consisting of t rows of q 1's and l rows of q 0's. We consider extremal problems for matrices avoiding certain submatrices. Let A be a (0,1)-matrix forbidding any (t+l)x(λ+2) submatrix (λ+2). (1_t 0_l) . Assume A is m-rowed and only columns of sum t+1,t+2,... ,m-l are allowed to be repeated. Assume that A has the maximum number of columns subject to the given restrictions. Assume m is sufficiently large. Then A has each column of sum 0,1,... ,t and m-l+1,m-l+2,..., m exactly once and, given the appropriate divisibility condition, the columns of sum t+1 correspond to a t-design with block size t+1 and parameter λand there are no other columns. The proof derives a basic upper bound on the number of columns of A by a pigeonhole argument and then a careful argument, for large m, reduces the bound by a substantial amount down to the value given by design based constructions. We extend in a few directions.

Let 1_k 0_l denote the (k+l)\times 1 column of k 1's above l 0's. Let q. (1_k 0_l) $ denote the (k+l)xq matrix with q copies of the column 1_k0_l. A 2-design S_λ(2,3,v) can be defined as a vx(λ/3)\binom{v}{2} (0,1)-matrix with all column sums equal 3 and with no submatrix (λ+1).(1_20_0). Consider an mxn matrix A with all column sums in {3,4,... ,m-1}. Assume m is sufficiently large (with respect to λ) and assume that A has no submatrix which is a row permutation of (λ+1). (1_2 0_1). Then we show the number of columns in A is at most (λ)/3)\binom{m}{3} with equality for A being the columns of column sum 3 corresponding to the triples of a 2-design S_λ(2,3,m). A similar results holds for(λ+1). (1_2 0_2). Define a matrix to be simple if it is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. Given two matrices A, F, we define A to have F as a configuration if and only if some submatrix of A is a row and column permutation of F. Given m, let forb(m,q.(1_k 0_l)) denote the maximum number of possible columns in a simple m-rowed matrix which has no configuration q.(1_k 0_l). For m sufficiently large with respect to q, we compute exact values for forb(m,q.(1_1 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_2)). In the latter two cases, we use a construction of Dehon (1983) of simple triple systems S_λ(2,3,v) for λ>1. Moreover for l=1,2, simple mxforb(m,q.(1_2 0_l)) matrices with no configuration q.(1_2 0_l) must arise from simple 2-designs S_λ(2,3,m) of appropriate λ. The proofs derive a basic upper bound by a pigeonhole argument and then use careful counting and Turan's bound, for large m, to reduce the bound. For small m, the larger pigeonhole bounds are sometimes the exact bound. There are intermediate values of m for which we do not know the exact bound.

This article discusses some recent trends in Ramsey theory on infinite structures. Trees and their Ramsey theory have been vital to these investigations. The main ideas behind the author's recent method of trees with coding nodes are presented, showing how they can be useful both for coding structures with forbidden configurations as well as those with none. Using forcing as a tool for finite searches has allowed the development of Ramsey theory on such trees, leading to solutions for finite big Ramsey degrees of Henson graphs as well as infinite dimensional Ramsey theory of copies of the Rado graph. Possible future directions for applications of these methods are discussed.

DP-coloring was introduced by Dvořák and Postle as a generalization of list coloring and signed coloring. A new coloring, strictly $f$-degenerate transversal, is a further generalization of DP-coloring and $L$-forested-coloring. In this paper, we present some structural results on planar and toroidal graphs with forbidden configurations, and establish some sufficient conditions for the existence of strictly $f$-degenerate transversal based on these structural results. Consequently, (i) every toroidal graph without subgraphs isomorphic to the configurations in Fig.2 is DP-$4$-colorable, and has list vertex arboricity at most $2$, (ii) every toroidal graph without $4$-cycles is DP-$4$-colorable, and has list vertex arboricity at most $2$, (iii) every planar graph without subgraphs isomorphic to the configurations in Fig.3 is DP-$4$-colorable, and has list vertex arboricity at most $2$. These results improve upon previous results on DP-$4$-coloring [Discrete Math. 341~(7) (2018) 1983--1986; Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 43~(3) (2020) 2271--2285] and (list) vertex arboricity [Discrete Math. 333 (2014) 101--105; Int. J. Math. Stat. 16~(1) (2015) 97--105; Iranian Math. Soc. 42~(5) (2016) 1293--1303].

We investigate the connections between patterns in permutations and forbidden configurations in restricted elections, first discovered by Lackner and Lackner, in order to enhance the approach initiated by the two mentioned authors. More specifically, our achievements are essentially two. First, we define a new type of domain restriction, called enriched group-separable. Enriched group-separable elections are a subset of group-separable elections, which describe a special, still natural, situation that can arise in the context of group-separability. The exact enumeration of group-separable elections has been very recently determined by Karpov. Here we give a recursive characterization for enriched group-separable elections, from which we are able to find a recurrence relation and a closed formula expressing their number. Our second achievement is a generalization of a result of Lackner and Lackner, concerning the connection between permutation patterns and forbidden configurations with 3 voters. Our result relates forbidden configurations with the strong order on pairs of permutations, a notion which is still largely undeveloped, and suggests a potential approach for the determination of upper bounds for restricted elections whose forbidden configurations contains at least one configuration with 3 voters.

Parent-identifying schemes provide a way to identify causes from effects for some information systems such as digital fingerprinting and group testing. In this paper, we consider combinatorial structures for parent-identifying schemes. First, we establish an equivalent relationship between parent-identifying schemes and forbidden configurations. Based on this relationship, we derive probabilistic existence lower bounds for two related combinatorial structures, that is, $t$-parent-identifying set systems ($t$-IPPS) and $t$-multimedia parent-identifying codes ($t$-MIPPC), which are used in broadcast encryption and multimedia fingerprinting respectively. The probabilistic lower bound for the maximum size of a $t$-IPPS has the asymptotically optimal order of magnitude in many cases, and that for $t$-MIPPC provides the asymptotically optimal code rate when $t=2$ and the best known asymptotic code rate when $t\geq 3$. Furthermore, we analyze the structure of $2$-IPPS and prove some bounds for certain cases.

The local properties problem of Erdős and Shelah generalizes many Ramsey problems and some distinct distances problems. In this work, we derive a variety of new bounds for the local properties problem and its variants. We do this by continuing to develop the color energy technique --- a variant of the concept of additive energy from Additive Combinatorics. In particular, we generalize the concept of color energy to higher color energies, and combine these with Extremal Graph Theory results about graphs with no cycles or subdivisions of size $k$.

An $r$-matrix is a matrix with symbols in $\{0,1,\ldots,r-1\}$. A matrix is simple if it has no repeated columns. Let ${\cal F}$ be a finite set of $r$-matrices. Let $\hbox{forb}(m,r,{\cal F})$ denote the maximum number of columns possible in a simple $r$-matrix $A$ that has no submatrix which is a row and column permutation of any $F\in{\cal F}$. Many investigations have involved $r=2$. For general $r$, $\hbox{forb}(m,r,{\cal F})$ is polynomial in $m$ if and only if for every pair $i,j\in\{0,1,\ldots,r-1\}$ there is a matrix in ${\cal F}$ whose entries are only $i$ or $j$. Let ${\cal T}_{\ell}(r)$ denote the following $r$-matrices. For a pair $i,j\in\{0,1,\ldots,r-1\}$ we form four $\ell\times\ell$ matrices namely the matrix with $i$'s on the diagonal and $j$'s off the diagonal and the matrix with $i$'s on and above the diagonal and $j$'s below the diagonal and the two matrices with the roles of $i,j$ reversed. Anstee and Lu determined that $\hbox{forb}(m,r,{\cal T}_{\ell}(r))$ is a constant. Let ${\cal F}$ be a finite set of 2-matrices. We ask if $\hbox{forb}(m,r,{\cal T}_{\ell}(3)\backslash {\cal T}_{\ell}(2)\cup {\cal F})$ is $Θ(\hbox{forb}(m,2,{\cal F}))$ and settle this in the affirmative for some cases including most 2-columned $F$.

An $r$-matrix is a matrix with symbols in $\{0,1,\dots,r-1\}$. A matrix is simple if it has no repeated columns. Let the support of a matrix $F$, $\text{supp}(F)$ be the largest simple matrix such that every column in $\text{supp}(F)$ is in $F$. For a family of $r$-matrices $\mathcal{F}$, we define $\text{forb}(m,r,\mathcal{F})$ as the maximum number of columns of an $m$-rowed, $r$-matrix $A$ such that $F$ is not a row-column permutation of $A$ for all $F \in \mathcal{F}$. While many results exist for $r=2$, there are fewer for larger numbers of symbols. We expand on the field of forbidding matrices with $r$-symbols, introducing a new construction for lower bounds of the growth of $\text{forb}(m,r,\mathcal{F})$ (with respect to $m$) that is applicable to matrices that are either not simple or have a constant row. We also introduce a new upper bound restriction that helps with avoiding non-simple matrices, limited either by the asymptotic bounds of the support, or the size of the forbidden matrix, whichever is larger. Continuing the trend of upper bounds, we represent a well-known technique of standard induction as a graph, and use graph theory methods to obtain asymptotic upper bounds. With these techniques we solve multiple, previously unknown, asymptotic bounds for a variety of matrices. Finally, we end with block matrices, or matrices with only constant row, and give bounds for all possible cases.

We study the following family of problems: Given a set of $n$ points in convex position, what is the maximum number triangles one can create having these points as vertices while avoiding certain sets of forbidden configurations. As forbidden configurations we consider all 8 ways in which a pair of triangles in such a point set can interact. This leads to 256 extremal Turán-type questions. We give nearly tight (within a $\log n$ factor) bounds for 248 of these questions and show that the remaining 8 questions are all asymptotically equivalent to Stein's longstanding tripod packing problem.

Upper bounds to the size of a family of subsets of an n-element set that avoids certain configurations are proved. These forbidden configurations can be described by inclusion patterns and some sets having the same size. Our results are closely related to the forbidden subposet problems, where the avoided configurations are described solely by inclusions.

This paper contains an extensive combinatorial analysis of the single-peaked domain restriction and investigates the likelihood that an election is single-peaked. We provide a very general upper bound result for domain restrictions that can be defined by certain forbidden configurations. This upper bound implies that many domain restrictions (including the single-peaked restriction) are very unlikely to appear in a random election chosen according to the Impartial Culture assumption. For single-peaked elections, this upper bound can be refined and complemented by a lower bound that is asymptotically tight. In addition, we provide exact results for elections with few voters or candidates. Moreover, we consider the Pólya urn model and the Mallows model and obtain lower bounds showing that single-peakedness is considerably more likely to appear for certain parameterizations.

Balogh and Bollobás [{\em Combinatorica 25, 2005}] prove that for any $k$ there is a constant $f(k)$ such that any set system with at least $f(k)$ sets reduces to a $k$-star, an $k$-costar or an $k$-chain. They proved $f(k)<(2k)^{2^k}$. Here we improve it to $f(k)<2^{ck^2}$ for some constant $c>0$. This is a special case of the following result on the multi-coloured forbidden configurations at 2 colours. Let $r$ be given. Then there exists a constant $c_r$ so that a matrix with entries drawn from $\{0,1,...,r-1\}$ with at least $2^{c_rk^2}$ different columns will have a $k\times k$ submatrix that can have its rows and columns permuted so that in the resulting matrix will be either $I_k(a,b)$ or $T_k(a,b)$ (for some $a\ne b\in \{0,1,..., r-1\}$), where $I_k(a,b)$ is the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s on the diagonal and $b$'s else where, $T_k(a,b)$ the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s below the diagonal and $b$'s elsewhere. We also extend to considering the bound on the number of distinct columns, given that the number of rows is $m$, when avoiding a $t k\times k$ matrix obtained by taking any one of the $k \times k$ matrices above and repeating each column $t$ times. We use Ramsey Theory.

In 1958, Hill conjectured that the minimum number of crossings in a drawing of $K_n$ is exactly $Z(n) = \frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\right\rfloor$. Generalizing the result by Ábrego et al. for 2-page book drawings, we prove this conjecture for plane drawings in which edges are represented by $x$-monotone curves. In fact, our proof shows that the conjecture remains true for $x$-monotone drawings of $K_n$ in which adjacent edges may cross an even number of times, and instead of the crossing number we count the pairs of edges which cross an odd number of times. We further discuss a generalization of this result to shellable drawings, a notion introduced by Ábrego et al. We also give a combinatorial characterization of several classes of $x$-monotone drawings of complete graphs using a small set of forbidden configurations. For a similar local characterization of shellable drawings, we generalize Carathéodory's theorem to simple drawings of complete graphs.

Let F be a hypergraph and let forb(m,F) denote the maximum number of edges a hypergraph with m vertices can have if it doesn't contain F as a subhypergraph. A conjecture of Anstee and Sali predicts the asymptotic behaviour of forb(m,F) for fixed F. In this paper we prove that even finding this predicted asymptotic behaviour is an NP-hard problem, meaning that if the Anstee-Sali conjecture were true, finding the asymptotics of forb(m,F) would be NP-hard.

We identify three 3-graphs on five vertices each missing in all known extremal configurations for Turan's (3,4)-problem and prove Turan's conjecture for 3-graphs that are additionally known not to contain any induced copies of these 3-graphs. Our argument is based on an (apparently) new technique of "indirect interpretation" that allows us to retrieve additional structure from hypothetical counterexamples to Turan's conjecture, but in rather loose and limited sense. We also include two miscellaneous calculations in flag algebras that prove similar results about some other additional forbidden subgraphs.

Observers in different inertial frames can see a set of spacelike separated events as occurring in different orders. Various restrictions are studied on the possible orderings of events that can be observed. In 1+1-dimensional spacetime {(1 2 3), (2 3 1), (3 1 2)} is a disallowed set of permutations. In 3+1-dimensional spacetime, any four different permutations on the ordering of n events can be seen by four different observers, and there is a set of four events such that any of the 4!=24 possible orderings can be observed in some inertial reference frame. A more complicated problem is that of five observers and five events, where of the 7,940,751 choices of five distinct elements from S_5 (containing the identity), all but at most one set of permutations can be realized, and it is shown that this remaining case is impossible. For six events and five observers, it is shown that there are at least 7970 cases that are unrealizable, of which at least 294 do not come from the forbidden configuration of five events.

Let $u\in\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ be nilpotent. The variety of $u$-stable complete flags is called the Springer fiber over $u$. Its irreducible components are parameterized by a set of standard Young tableaux. The Richardson (resp. Bala-Carter) components of Springer fibers correspond to the Richardson (resp. Bala-Carter) elements of the symmetric group, through Robinson-Schensted correspondence. Every Richardson component is isomorphic to a product of standard flag varieties. On the contrary, the Bala-Carter components are very susceptible to be singular. First, we characterize the singular Bala-Carter components in terms of two minimal forbidden configurations. Next, we introduce two new families of components, wider than the families of Bala-Carter components and Richardson components, and both in duality via the tableau transposition. The components in the first family are characterized by the fact that they have a dense orbit of special type under the action of the stabilizer of $u$, whereas all components in the second family are iterated fiber bundles over projective spaces.

Let $\mathcal{Q}_n$ be the $n$-dimensional hypercube: the graph with vertex set $\{0,1\}^n$ and edges between vertices that differ in exactly one coordinate. For $1\leq d\leq n$ and $F\subseteq \{0,1\}^d$ we say that $S\subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ is \emph{$F$-free} if every embedding $i:\{0,1\}^d\to \{0,1\}^n$ satisfies $i(F)\not\subseteq S$. We consider the question of how large $S\subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ can be if it is $F$-free. In particular we generalise the main prior result in this area, for $F=\{0,1\}^2$, due to E.A. Kostochka and prove a local stability result for the structure of near-extremal sets. We also show that the density required to guarantee an embedded copy of at least one of a family of forbidden configurations may be significantly lower than that required to ensure an embedded copy of any individual member of the family. Finally we show that any subset of the $n$-dimensional hypercube of positive density will contain exponentially many points from some embedded $d$-dimensional subcube if $n$ is sufficiently large.