arXiv++ Combinatorics

An elimination tree of a connected graph $G$ is a rooted tree on the vertices of $G$ obtained by choosing a root $v$ and recursing on the connected components of $G-v$ to obtain the subtrees of $v$. The graph associahedron of $G$ is a polytope whose vertices correspond to elimination trees of $G$ and whose edges correspond to tree rotations, a natural operation between elimination trees. These objects generalize associahedra, which correspond to the case where $G$ is a path. Ito et al. [ICALP 2023] recently proved that the problem of computing distances on graph associahedra is NP-hard. In this paper we prove that the problem, for a general graph $G$, is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the distance $k$. Prior to our work, only the case where $G$ is a path was known to be fixed-parameter tractable. To prove our result, we use a novel approach based on a marking scheme that restricts the search to a set of vertices whose size is bounded by a (large) function of $k$.

We study the complexity of a class of promise graph homomorphism problems. For a fixed graph H, the H-colouring problem is to decide whether a given graph has a homomorphism to H. By a result of Hell and Nešetřil, this problem is NP-hard for any non-bipartite loop-less graph H. Brakensiek and Guruswami [SODA 2018] conjectured the hardness extends to promise graph homomorphism problems as follows: fix a pair of non-bipartite loop-less graphs G, H such that there is a homomorphism from G to H, it is NP-hard to distinguish between graphs that are G-colourable and those that are not H-colourable. We confirm this conjecture in the cases when both G and H are 4-colourable. This is a common generalisation of previous results of Khanna, Linial, and Safra [Comb. 20(3): 393-415 (2000)] and of Krokhin and Opršal [FOCS 2019]. The result is obtained by combining the algebraic approach to promise constraint satisfaction with methods of topological combinatorics and equivariant obstruction theory.

Eternal vertex cover is the following two-player game between a defender and an attacker on a graph. Initially, the defender positions k guards on k vertices of the graph; the game then proceeds in turns between the defender and the attacker, with the attacker selecting an edge and the defender responding to the attack by moving some of the guards along the edges, including the attacked one. The defender wins a game on a graph G with k guards if they have a strategy such that, in every round of the game, the vertices occupied by the guards form a vertex cover of G, and the attacker wins otherwise. The eternal vertex cover number of a graph G is the smallest number k of guards allowing the defender to win and Eternal Vertex Cover is the problem of computing the eternal vertex cover number of the given graph. We study this problem when restricted to the well-known class of series-parallel graphs. In particular, we prove that Eternal Vertex Cover can be solved in linear time when restricted to melon graphs, a proper subclass of series-parallel graphs. Moreover, we also conjecture that this problem is NP-hard on series-parallel graphs.

Parameterized Sequential Decision Making (Para-SDM) framework models a wide array of network design applications spanning supply-chain, transportation, and sensor networks. These problems entail sequential multi-stage optimization characterized by states, control actions, and cost functions dependent on designable parameters. The challenge is to determine both the sequential decision policy and parameters simultaneously to minimize cumulative stagewise costs. Many Para-SDM problems are NP-hard and often necessitate time-varying policies. Existing algorithms tackling finite-horizon time-varying Para-SDM problems struggle with scalability when faced with a large number of states. Conversely, the sole algorithm addressing infinite-horizon Para-SDM assumes time (stage)-invariance, yielding stationary policies. However, this approach proves scalable for time-invariant problems by leveraging deep neural networks to learn optimal stage-invariant state-action value functions, enabling handling of large-scale scenarios. This article proposes a novel approach that reinterprets finite-horizon, time-varying Para-SDM problems as equivalent time-invariant problems through topography lifting. Our method achieves nearly identical results to the time-varying solution while exhibiting improved performance times in various simulations, notably in the small cell network problem. This fresh perspective on Para-SDM problems expands the scope of addressable issues and holds promise for future scalability through the integration of learning methods.

A framework (a straight-line embedding of a graph into a normed space allowing edges to cross) is globally rigid if any other framework with the same edge lengths with respect to the chosen norm is an isometric copy. We investigate global rigidity in polyhedral normed spaces: normed spaces where the unit ball is a polytope. We first provide a deterministic algorithm for checking whether or not a framework in a polyhedral normed space is globally rigid. After showing that determining if a framework is globally rigid is NP-Hard, we then provide necessary conditions for global rigidity for generic frameworks. We obtain stronger results for generic frameworks in $\ell_\infty^d$ (the vector space $\mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with the $\ell_\infty$ metric) including an exact characterisation of global rigidity when $d=2$, and an easily-computable sufficient condition for global rigidity using edge colourings. Our 2-dimensional characterisation also has a surprising consequence: Hendrickson's global rigidity condition fails for generic frameworks in $\ell_\infty^2$.

We develop a structural approach to simultaneous embeddability in temporal sequences of graphs, inspired by graph minor theory. Our main result is a classification theorem for 2-connected temporal sequences: we identify five obstruction classes and show that every 2-connected temporal sequence is either simultaneously embeddable or admits a sequence of improvements leading to an obstruction. This structural insight leads to a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding the simultaneous embeddability of 2-connected temporal sequences. The restriction to 2-connected sequences is necessary, as the problem is NP-hard for connected graphs, while trivial for 3-connected graphs. As a consequence, our framework also resolves the rooted-tree SEFE problem, a natural extension of the well-studied sunflower SEFE. More broadly, our results demonstrate the applicability of graph minor techniques to evolving graph structures and provide a foundation for future algorithmic and structural investigations in temporal graph theory.

Independently posed by Behzad and Vizing, the Total Coloring Conjecture asserts that the total chromatic number of a simple connected graph $G$ is either $Δ(G)+1$ or $Δ(G)+2$, where $Δ(G)$ is the largest degree of any vertex of $G$. To decide whether a cubic graph $G$ has total chromatic number $Δ(G)+1$, even for bipartite cubic graphs, is NP-hard. The resulting problems and research persist even for total colorings that are equitable, namely with the cardinalities of the color classes differing at most by 1. Williams and Holroyd gave a new condition to solve total coloring problems via the introduction of semi-total colorings. We focus on how to obtain equitable total colorings of symmetric cubic graphs and cage graphs by means of a variation of Kempe'a 1879 graph-coloring algorithm. Such variation takes semi-total colorings to equitable ones.

We introduce achievement positional games, a convention for positional games which encompasses the Maker-Maker and Maker-Breaker conventions. We consider two hypergraphs, one red and one blue, on the same vertex set. Two players, Left and Right, take turns picking a previously unpicked vertex. Whoever first fills an edge of their color, blue for Left or red for Right, wins the game (draws are possible). We establish general properties of such games. In particular, we show that a lot of principles which hold for Maker-Maker games generalize to achievement positional games. We also study the algorithmic complexity of deciding whether Left has a winning strategy as first player when all blue edges have size at mot $p$ and all red edges have size at most $q$. This problem is in P for $p,q \leq 2$, but it is NP-hard for $p \geq 3$ and $q=2$, coNP-complete for $p=2$ and $q \geq 3$, and PSPACE-complete for $p,q \geq 3$. A consequence of this last result is that, in the Maker-Maker convention, deciding whether the first player has a winning strategy on a hypergraph of rank 4 after one round of (non-optimal) play is PSPACE-complete.

The \emph{interestingness score} of a directed path $Π= e_1, e_2, e_3, \dots, e_\ell$ in an edge-weighted directed graph $G$ is defined as $\texttt{score}(Π) := \sum_{i=1}^\ell w(e_i) \cdot \log{(i+1)}$, where $w(e_i)$ is the weight of the edge $e_i$. We consider two optimization problems that arise in the analysis of Mapper graphs, which is a powerful tool in topological data analysis. In the IP problem, the objective is to find a collection $\mathcal{P}$ of edge-disjoint paths in $G$ with the maximum total interestingness score. %; that is, two raised to the power of the sum of the weights of the paths in $\mathcal{P}$. For $k \in \mathbb{N}$, the $k$-IP problem is a variant of the IP problem with the extra constraint that each path in $\mathcal{P}$ must have exactly $k$ edges. Kalyanaraman, Kamruzzaman, and Krishnamoorthy (Journal of Computational Geometry, 2019) claim that both IP and $k$-IP (for $k \geq 3$) are NP-complete. We point out some inaccuracies in their proofs. Furthermore, we show that both problems are NP-hard in directed acyclic graphs.

Inspired by a common technique for shuffling a deck of cards on a table without riffling, we formalize the pile shuffle and investigate its capabilities as a sorting device. Our study is novel in that we consider pile shuffle in three variations: (1) using queue-like piles, (2) using stack-like piles, and (3) using a heterogeneous mixture of those two pile types, either given or decided during the shuffle by the dealer herself. We first characterize the sortable permutations of one or more sequential rounds of pile shuffle, under constraints on the number and types of piles to be used, and then derive formulas to obtain a sorting shuffle of a given permutation on the minimum number of piles, efficiently, whenever feasible. In the process, we present an interesting mathematical interpretation of any multi-round shuffle on fixed-type piles, as a single-round shuffle on a generally larger number of fixed-type ``virtual piles''; we confirm that repetition augments the power of pile shuffle exponentially, in that $m$ piles over $T$ rounds enjoys the capacity of $m^T$ piles in a single round. Finally, we motivate a forthcoming companion paper in which we prove that dealer choice -- where the dealer is allowed to choose the types of the piles during the shuffle -- makes deciding feasibility of sort NP-Hard for some variants of multi-round pile shuffle; proof is by a novel reduction from Boolean satisfiability (SAT).

In a digraph $D$, an arc $e=(x,y) $ in $D$ is considered transitive if there is a path from $x$ to $y$ in $D- e$. A digraph is transitive-free if it does not contain any transitive arc. In the Transitive-free Vertex Deletion (TVD) problem, the goal is to find at most $k$ vertices $S$ such that $D-S$ has no transitive arcs. In our work, we study a more general version of the TVD problem, denoted by $\ell$-Relaxed Transitive-free Vertex Deletion ($\ell$-RTVD), where we look for at most $k$ vertices $S$ such that $D-S$ has no more than $\ell$ transitive arcs. We explore $\ell$-RTVD on various well-known graph classes of digraphs such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), planar DAGs, $α$-bounded digraphs, tournaments, and their multiple generalizations such as in-tournaments, out-tournaments, local tournaments, acyclic local tournaments, and obtain the following results. Although the problem admits polynomial-time algorithms in tournaments, $α$-bounded digraphs, and acyclic local tournaments for fixed values of $\ell$, it remains NP-hard even in planar DAGs with maximum degree 6. In the parameterized realm, for $\ell$-RTVD on in-tournaments and out-tournaments, we obtain polynomial kernels parameterized by $k+\ell$ for bounded independence number. But the problem remains fixed-parameter intractable on DAGs when parameterized by $k$.

For a digraph $G$, a set $F\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be a feedback vertex set (FVS) if $G-F$ is acyclic. The problem of finding a smallest FVS is NP-hard. We present a matrix scaling technique for finding feedback vertex sets in un-weighted directed graphs that runs in $O(|F|\log(|V|)|V|^{2})$ time. Our technique is empirically shown to produce smaller feedback vertex sets than other known heuristics and in a shorter amount of time.

We characterize the words that can be mapped to arbitrarily high powers by injective morphisms. For all other words, we prove a linear upper bound for the highest power that they can be mapped to, and this bound is optimal up to a constant factor if there is no restriction on the size of the alphabet. We also prove that, for any integer $n \geq 2$, deciding whether a given word can be mapped to an $n$th power by a nonperiodic morphism is NP-hard and in PSPACE, and so is deciding whether a given word can be mapped to a nonprimitive word by a nonperiodic morphism.

Recently, there has been interest in representing single graphs by multiple drawings; for example, using graph stories, storyplans, or uncrossed collections. In this paper, we apply this idea to orthogonal graph drawing. Due to the orthogonal drawing style, we focus on 4-graphs, that is, graphs of maximum degree 4. We restrict ourselves to plane graphs, that is, planar graphs whose embedding is fixed. Our goal is to represent any plane 4-graph $G$ by an unbent collection, that is, a collection of orthogonal drawings of $G$ that adhere to the embedding of $G$ and ensure that each edge of $G$ is drawn without bends in at least one of the drawings. We investigate two objectives. First, we consider minimizing the number of drawings in an unbent collection. We prove that every plane 4-graph can be represented by a collection with at most three drawings, which is tight. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for a graph to admit an unbent collection of size $2$. Second, we consider minimizing the total number of bends over all drawings in an unbent collection. We show that this problem is NP-hard and give a 3-approximation algorithm. For the special case of plane triconnected cubic graphs, we show how to compute minimum-bend collections in linear time.

In recent years, much attention has been placed on the complexity of graph homomorphism problems when the input is restricted to ${\mathbb P}_k$-free and ${\mathbb P}_k$-subgraph-free graphs. We consider the directed version of this research line, by addressing the questions, is it true that digraph homomorphism problems CSP$({\mathbb H})$ have a P versus NP-complete dichotomy when the input is restricted to $\vec{\mathbb P}_k$-free (resp.\ $\vec{\mathbb P}_k$-subgraph-free) digraphs? Our main contribution in this direction shows that if CSP$({\mathbb H})$ is NP-complete, then there is a positive integer $N$ such that CSP$({\mathbb H})$ remains NP-hard even for $\vec{\mathbb P}_N$-subgraph-free digraphs. Moreover, it remains NP-hard for acyclic $\vec{\mathbb P}_N$-subgraph-free digraphs, and becomes polynomial-time solvable for $\vec{\mathbb P}_{N-1}$-subgraph-free acyclic digraphs. We then verify the questions above for digraphs on three vertices and a family of smooth tournaments. We prove these results by establishing a connection between $\mathbb F$-(subgraph)-free algorithmics and constraint satisfaction theory. On the way, we introduce restricted CSPs, i.e., problems of the form CSP$({\mathbb H})$ restricted to yes-instances of CSP$({\mathbb H}')$ -- these were called restricted homomorphism problems by Hell and Nešetřil. Another main result of this paper presents a P versus NP-complete dichotomy for these problems. Moreover, this complexity dichotomy is accompanied by an algebraic dichotomy in the spirit of the finite domain CSP dichotomy.

In the Hunters and Rabbit game, $k$ hunters attempt to shoot an invisible rabbit on a given graph $G$. In each round, the hunters select $k$ vertices to shoot at, while the rabbit moves along an edge of $G$. The hunters win if, at any point, the rabbit is shot. The hunting number of $G$, denoted $h(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $k$ hunters have a winning strategy regardless of the rabbit's moves. The computational complexity of determining $h(G)$ has been one of the longest-standing open questions about the game. Our first main contribution resolves this by proving that computing $h(G)$ is NP-hard, even for bipartite simple graphs. We further show that the problem remains NP-hard even when $h(G) = O(n^ε)$ or when $n - h(G) = O(n^ε)$, where $n$ is the order of $G$. In addition, we prove that it is NP-hard to approximate $h(G)$ additively within $O(n^{1-ε})$. When a time limit $l$ is imposed on the hunting process, we show that computing $h(G)$ remains NP-hard for any $l \ge 2$ bounded by a polynomial in $n$. On the positive side, we present a polynomial-time $l$-factor approximation algorithm for computing the hunting number with time limit $l$, and we show that $h(G)$ can be computed in polynomial time for bipartite graphs when only two time slots are allowed ($l = 2$). Finally, we provide a forbidden-subgraph characterization of graphs with loops that satisfy $h(G) = 1$, extending a known characterization for simple graphs.

The soft capacitated facility location problem (SCFLP) is a classic combinatorial optimization problem, with its variants widely applied in the fields of operations research and computer science. In the SCFLP, given a set $\mathcal{F}$ of facilities and a set $\mathcal{D}$ of clients, each facility has a capacity and an open cost, allowing to open multiple times, and each client has a demand. This problem is to find a subset of facilities in $\mathcal{F}$ and connect each client to the facilities opened, such that the total cost including open cost and connection cost is minimied. SCFLP is a NP-hard problem, which has led to a focus on approximation algorithms. Based on this, we consider a variant, that is, soft capacitated facility location problem with submodular penalties (SCFLPSP), which allows some clients not to be served by accepting the penalty cost. And we consider the integer splittable case of demand, that is, the demand of each client is served by multiple facilities with the integer service amount by each facility. Based on LP-rounding, we propose a $(λR+4)$-approximation algorithm, where $R=\frac{\max_{i \in \mathcal{F} }f_i}{\min_{i \in \mathcal{F} }f_i},λ=\frac{R+\sqrt{R^2+8R}}{2R}$. In particular, when the open cost is uniform, the approximation ratio is 6.

Local Irregularity Conjecture states that every simple connected graph, except special cacti, can be decomposed into at most three locally irregular graphs, i.e., graphs in which adjacent vertices have different degrees. The connected minimization problem, finding the minimum number $k$ such that a graph can be decomposed into $k$ locally irregular graphs, is known to be NP-hard in general (Baudon, Bensmail, and Sopena, 2015). This naturally raises interest in the study of related problems. Among others, the concept of local irregularity was defined for digraphs in several different ways. In this paper we present the following new methods of defining a locally irregular digraph. The first one, weak local irregularity, is based on distinguishing adjacent vertices by indegree-outdegree pairs, and the second one, strong local irregularity, asks for different balanced degrees (i.e., difference between the outdegree and the indegree of a vertex) of adjacent vertices. For both of these irregularities, we define locally irregular decompositions and colorings of digraphs. We discuss relation of these concept to others, which were studied previously, and provide related conjectures on the minimum number of colors in weak and strong locally irregular colorings. We support these conjectures with new results, using the chromatic and structural properties of digraphs and their skeletons (Eulerian and symmetric digraphs, orientations of regular graphs, cacti, etc.).

For a fixed graph $F$, let $ex_F(G)$ denote the size of the largest $F$-free subgraph of $G$. Computing or estimating $ex_F(G)$ for various pairs $F,G$ is one of the central problems in extremal combinatorics. It is thus natural to ask how hard is it to compute this function. Motivated by an old problem of Yannakakis from the 80's, Alon, Shapira and Sudakov [ASS'09] proved that for every non-bipartite graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Addressing a conjecture of Ailon and Alon (2007), we prove a hypergraph analogue of this theorem, showing that for every $k \geq 3$ and every non-$k$-partite $k$-graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Furthermore, we conjecture that our hardness result can be extended to all $k$-graphs $F$ other than a matching of fixed size. If true, this would give a precise characterization of the $k$-graphs $F$ for which computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard, since we also prove that when $F$ is a matching of fixed size, $ex_F(G)$ is computable in polynomial time. This last result can be considered an algorithmic version of the celebrated Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem. The proof of [ASS'09] relied on a variety of tools from extremal graph theory, one of them being Turán's theorem. One of the main challenges we have to overcome in order to prove our hypergraph extension is the lack of a Turán-type theorem for $k$-graphs. To circumvent this, we develop a completely new graph theoretic approach for proving such hardness results.

The problem of realizing a given degree sequence by a multigraph can be thought of as a relaxation of the classical degree realization problem (where the realizing graph is simple). This paper concerns the case where the realizing multigraph is required to be bipartite. The problem of characterizing sequences that can be realized by a bipartite graph has two variants. In the simpler one, termed BDR$^P$, the partition of the sequence into two sides is given as part of the input. A complete characterization for realizability in this variant was given by Gale and Ryser over sixty years ago. However, the variant where the partition is not given, termed BDR, is still open. For bipartite multigraph realizations, there are also two variants. For BDR$^P$, where the partition is given as part of the input, a characterization was known for determining whether there is a multigraph realization whose underlying graph is bipartite, such that the maximum number of copies of an edge is at most $r$. We present a characterization for determining if there is a bipartite multigraph realization such that the total number of excess edges is at most $t$. We show that optimizing these two measures may lead to different realizations, and that optimizing by one measure may increase the other substantially. As for the variant BDR, where the partition is not given, we show that determining whether a given (single) sequence admits a bipartite multigraph realization is NP-hard. Moreover, we show that this hardness result extends to any graph family which is a sub-family of bipartite graphs and a super-family of paths. On the positive side, we provide an algorithm that computes optimal realizations for the case where the number of balanced partitions is polynomial, and present sufficient conditions for the existence of bipartite multigraph realizations that depend only on the largest degree of the sequence.