arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given two phylogenetic trees with the $\{1, \ldots, n\}$ leaf-set the maximum agreement subtree problem asks what is the maximum size of the subset $A \subseteq \{1, \ldots, n\}$ such that the two trees are equivalent when restricted to $A$. The long-standing extremal version of this problem focuses on the smallest number of leaves, $\mathrm{mast}(n)$, on which any two (binary and unrooted) phylogenetic trees with $n$ leaves must agree. In this work we prove that this number grows asymptotically as $Θ(\log n)$; thus closing the enduring gap between the lower and upper asymptotic bounds on $\mathrm{mast}(n)$.

Network reconstruction lies at the heart of phylogenetic research. Two well studied classes of phylogenetic networks include tree-child networks and level-$k$ networks. In a tree-child network, every non-leaf node has a child that is a tree node or a leaf. In a level-$k$ network, the maximum number of reticulations contained in a biconnected component is $k$. Here, we show that level-$k$ tree-child networks are encoded by their reticulate-edge-deleted subnetworks, which are subnetworks obtained by deleting a single reticulation edge, if $k\geq 2$. Following this, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for uniquely reconstructing such networks from their reticulate-edge-deleted subnetworks. Moreover, we show that this can even be done when considering subnetworks obtained by deleting one reticulation edge from each biconnected component with $k$ reticulations.

In 2001 Allen and Steel showed that, if subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied to two unrooted phylogenetic trees, the reduced trees will have at most 28k taxa where k is the TBR (Tree Bisection and Reconnection) distance between the two trees. Here we reanalyse Allen and Steel's kernelization algorithm and prove that the reduced instances will in fact have at most 15k-9 taxa. Moreover we show, by describing a family of instances which have exactly 15k-9 taxa after reduction, that this new bound is tight. These instances also have no common clusters, showing that a third commonly-encountered reduction rule, the cluster reduction, cannot further reduce the size of the kernel in the worst case. To achieve these results we introduce and use "unrooted generators" which are analogues of rooted structures that have appeared earlier in the phylogenetic networks literature. Using similar argumentation we show that, for the minimum hybridization problem on two rooted trees, 9k-2 is a tight bound (when subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied) and 9k-4 is a tight bound (when, additionally, the cluster reduction has been applied) on the number of taxa, where k is the hybridization number of the two trees.

Attempting to recognize a tree inside a phylogenetic network is a fundamental undertaking in evolutionary analysis. In the last few years, therefore, tree-based phylogenetic networks, which are defined by a spanning tree called a subdivision tree, have attracted attention of theoretical biologists. However, the application of such networks is still not easy, due to many problems whose time complexities are not clearly understood. In this paper, we provide a general framework for solving those various old or new problems from a coherent perspective, rather than analyzing the complexity of each individual problem or developing an algorithm one by one. More precisely, we establish a structure theorem that gives a way to canonically decompose any rooted binary phylogenetic network N into maximal zig-zag trails that are uniquely determined, and use it to characterize the set of subdivision trees of N in the form of a direct product, in a way reminiscent of the structure theorem for finitely generated Abelian groups. From the main results, we derive a series of linear time and linear time delay algorithms for the following problems: given a rooted binary phylogenetic network N, 1) determine whether or not N has a subdivision tree and find one if there exists any; 2) measure the deviation of N from being tree-based; 3) compute the number of subdivision trees of N; 4) list all subdivision trees of N; and 5) find a subdivision tree to maximize or minimize a prescribed objective function. All algorithms proposed here are optimal in terms of time complexity. Our results do not only imply and unify various known results, but also answer many open questions and moreover enable novel applications, such as the estimation of a maximum likelihood tree underlying a tree-based network. The results and algorithms in this paper still hold true for a special class of rooted non-binary phylogenetic networks.

Head moves are a type of rearrangement moves for phylogenetic networks. They have mostly been studied as part of more encompassing types of moves, such as rSPR moves. Here, we study head moves as a type of moves on themselves. We show that the tiers ($k>0$) of phylogenetic network space are connected by local head moves. Then we show tail moves and head moves are closely related: sequences of tail moves can be converted to sequences of head moves and vice versa, changing the length by at most a constant factor. Because the tiers of network space are connected by rSPR moves, this gives a second proof of the connectivity of these tiers. Furthermore, we show that these tiers have small diameter by reproving the connectivity a third time. As the head move neighbourhood is in general small, this makes head moves a good candidate for local search heuristics. Finally we prove that finding the shortest sequence of head moves between two networks is NP-hard.

There is a long tradition of the axiomatic study of consensus methods in phylogenetics that satisfy certain desirable properties. One recently-introduced property is associative stability, which is desirable because it confers a computational advantage, in that the consensus method only needs to be computed "pairwise". In this paper, we introduce a phylogenetic consensus method that satisfies this property, in addition to being "regular". The method is based on the introduction of a partial order on the set of rooted phylogenetic trees, itself based on the notion of a hierarchy-preserving map between trees. This partial order may be of independent interest. We call the method "lattice consensus", because it takes the unique maximal element in a lattice of trees defined by the partial order. Aside from being associatively stable, lattice consensus also satisfies the property of being Pareto on rooted triples, answering in the affirmative a question of Bryant et al (2017). We conclude the paper with an answer to another question of Bryant et al, showing that there is no regular extension stable consensus method for binary trees.

Recently, so-called treebased phylogenetic networks have gained considerable interest in the literature, where a treebased network is a network that can be constructed from a phylogenetic tree, called the base tree, by adding additional edges. The main aim of this manuscript is to provide some sufficient criteria for treebasedness by reducing phylogenetic networks to related graph structures. While it is generally known that deciding whether a network is treebased is NP-complete, one of these criteria, namely edgebasedness, can be verified in linear time. Surprisingly, the class of edgebased networks is closely related to a well-known family of graphs, namely the class of generalized series parallel graphs, and we will explore this relationship in full detail. Additionally, we introduce further classes of treebased networks and analyze their relationships.

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees allowing for the representation of non-treelike evolutionary events such as hybridization. Typically, such networks have been analyzed based on their `level', i.e. based on the complexity of their 2-edge-connected components. However, recently the question of how `treelike' a phylogenetic network is has become the center of attention in various studies. This led to the introduction of \emph{tree-based networks}, i.e. networks that can be constructed from a phylogenetic tree, called the \emph{base tree}, by adding additional edges. While the concept of tree-basedness was originally introduced for rooted phylogenetic networks, it has recently also been considered for unrooted networks. In the present study, we compare and contrast findings obtained for unrooted \emph{binary} tree-based networks to unrooted \emph{non-binary} networks. In particular, while it is known that up to level 4 all unrooted binary networks are tree-based, we show that in the case of non-binary networks, this result only holds up to level 3.

In 2016, Hasebe and Tsujie gave a recursive characterization of the set of induced $N$-free and bowtie-free posets; Misanantenaina and Wagner studied these orders further, naming them "$\mathcal{V}$-posets". Here we offer a new characterization of $\mathcal{V}$-posets by introducing a property we refer to as autonomy. A poset $\cP$ is said to be autonomous if there exists a directed acyclic graph $D$ (with adjacency matrix $U$) whose transitive closure is $\cP$, with the property that any total ordering of the vertices of $D$ so that Gaussian elimination of $U^TU$ proceeds without row swaps is a linear extension of $\cP$. Autonomous posets arise from the theory of pressing sequences in graphs, a problem with origins in phylogenetics. The pressing sequences of a graph can be partitioned into families corresponding to posets; because of the interest in enumerating pressing sequences, we investigate when this partition has only one block, that is, when the pressing sequences are all linear extensions of a single autonomous poset. We also provide an efficient algorithm for recognition of autonomy using structural information and the forbidden subposet characterization, and we discuss a few open questions that arise in connection with these posets.

In biology, a phylogenetic tree is a tool to represent the evolutionary relationship between species. Unfortunately, the classical Schröder tree model is not adapted to take into account the chronology between the branching nodes. In particular, it does not answer the question: how many different phylogenetic stories lead to the creation of n species and what is the average time to get there? In this paper, we enrich this model in two distinct ways in order to obtain two ranked tree models for phylogenetics, i.e. models coding chronology. For that purpose, we first develop a model of (strongly) increasing Schröder trees, symbolically described in the classical context of increasing labeling. Then we introduce a generalization for the labeling with some unusual order constraint in Analytic Combinatorics (namely the weakly increasing trees). Although these models are direct extensions of the Schröder tree model, it appears that they are also in one-to-one correspondence with several classical combinatorial objects. Through the paper, we present these links, exhibit some parameters in typical large trees and conclude the studies with efficient uniform samplers.

One of the main aims of phylogenetics is the reconstruction of the correct evolutionary tree when data concerning the underlying species set are given. These data typically come in the form of DNA, RNA or protein alignments, which consist of various characters (also often referred to as sites). Often, however, tree reconstruction methods based on criteria like maximum parsimony may fail to provide a unique tree for a given dataset, or, even worse, reconstruct the `wrong' tree (i.e. a tree that differs from the one that generated the data). On the other hand it has long been known that if the alignment consists of all the characters that correspond to edges of a particular tree, i.e. they all require exactly $k=1$ substitution to be realized on that tree, then this tree will be recovered by maximum parsimony methods. This is based on Buneman's theorem in mathematical phylogenetics. It is the goal of the present manuscript to extend this classic result as follows: We prove that if an alignment consists of all characters that require exactly $k=2$ substitutions on a particular tree, this tree will always be the unique maximum parsimony tree (and we also show that this can be generalized to characters which require at most $k=2$ substitutions). In particular, this also proves a conjecture based on a recently published observation by Goloboff et al. affirmatively for the special case of $k=2$.

The metric space of phylogenetic trees defined by Billera, Holmes, and Vogtmann, which we refer to as BHV space, provides a natural geometric setting for describing collections of trees on the same set of taxa. However, it is sometimes necessary to analyze collections of trees on non-identical taxa sets (i.e., with different numbers of leaves), and in this context it is not evident how to apply BHV space. Davidson et al. recently approached this problem by describing a combinatorial algorithm extending tree topologies to regions in higher dimensional tree spaces, so that one can quickly compute which topologies contain a given tree as partial data. In this paper, we refine and adapt their algorithm to work for metric trees to give a full characterization of the subspace of extensions of a subtree. We describe how to apply our algorithm to define and search a space of possible supertrees and, for a collection of tree fragments with different leaf sets, to measure their compatibility.

The minimal number of rooted subtree prune and regraft (rSPR) operations needed to transform one phylogenetic tree into another one induces a metric on phylogenetic trees - the rSPR-distance. The rSPR-distance between two phylogenetic trees $T$ and $T'$ can be characterised by a maximum agreement forest; a forest with a minimum number of components that covers both $T$ and $T'$. The rSPR operation has recently been generalised to phylogenetic networks with, among others, the subnetwork prune and regraft (SNPR) operation. Here, we introduce maximum agreement graphs as an explicit representations of differences of two phylogenetic networks, thus generalising maximum agreement forests. We show that maximum agreement graphs induce a metric on phylogenetic networks - the agreement distance. While this metric does not characterise the distances induced by SNPR and other generalisations of rSPR, we prove that it still bounds these distances with constant factors.

Phylogenetic trees are the fundamental mathematical representation of evolutionary processes in biology. They are also objects of interest in pure mathematics, such as algebraic geometry and combinatorics, due to their discrete geometry. Although they are important data structures, they face the significant challenge that sets of trees form a non-Euclidean phylogenetic tree space, which means that standard computational and statistical methods cannot be directly applied. In this work, we explore the statistical feasibility of a pure mathematical representation of the set of all phylogenetic trees based on tropical geometry for both descriptive and inferential statistics, and unsupervised and supervised machine learning. Our exploration is both theoretical and practical. We show that the tropical geometric phylogenetic tree space endowed with a generalized Hilbert projective metric exhibits analytic, geometric, and topological properties that are desirable for theoretical studies in probability and statistics and allow for well-defined questions to be posed. We illustrate the statistical feasibility of the tropical geometric perspective for phylogenetic trees with an example of both a descriptive and inferential statistical task. Moreover, this approach exhibits increased computational efficiency and statistical performance over the current state-of-the-art, which we illustrate with a real data example on seasonal influenza. Our results demonstrate the viability of the tropical geometric setting for parametric statistical and probabilistic studies of sets of phylogenetic trees.

Phylogenetic networks are rooted directed acyclic graphs that represent evolutionary relationships between species whose past includes reticulation events such as hybridisation and horizontal gene transfer. To search the space of phylogenetic networks, the popular tree rearrangement operation rooted subtree prune and regraft (rSPR) was recently generalised to phylogenetic networks. This new operation - called subnet prune and regraft (SNPR) - induces a metric on the space of all phylogenetic networks as well as on several widely-used network classes. In this paper, we investigate several problems that arise in the context of computing the SNPR-distance. For a phylogenetic tree $T$ and a phylogenetic network $N$, we show how this distance can be computed by considering the set of trees that are embedded in $N$ and then use this result to characterise the SNPR-distance between $T$ and $N$ in terms of agreement forests. Furthermore, we analyse properties of shortest SNPR-sequences between two phylogenetic networks $N$ and $N'$, and answer the question whether or not any of the classes of tree-child, reticulation-visible, or tree-based networks isometrically embeds into the class of all phylogenetic networks under SNPR.

We give a combinatorial description of the toric ideal of invariants of the Cavender-Farris-Neyman model with a molecular clock (CFN-MC) on a rooted binary phylogenetic tree and prove results about the polytope associated to this toric ideal. Key results about the polyhedral structure include that the number of vertices of this polytope is a Fibonacci number, the facets of the polytope can be described using the combinatorial "cluster" structure of the underlying rooted tree, and the volume is equal to an Euler zig-zag number. The toric ideal of invariants of the CFN-MC model has a quadratic Groebner basis with squarefree initial terms. Finally, we show that the Ehrhart polynomial of these polytopes, and therefore the Hilbert series of the ideals, depends only on the number of leaves of the underlying binary tree, and not on the topology of the tree itself. These results are analogous to classic results for the Cavender-Farris-Neyman model without a molecular clock. However, new techniques are required because the molecular clock assumption destroys the toric fiber product structure that governs group-based models without the molecular clock.

The Colless index is one of the most popular and natural balance indices for bifurcating phylogenetic trees, but it makes no sense for multifurcating trees. In this paper we propose a family of Colless-like balance indices $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$, which depend on a dissimilarity $D$ and a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, that generalize the Colless index to multifurcating phylogenetic trees. We provide two functions $f$ such that the most balanced phylogenetic trees according to the corresponding indices $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$ are exactly the fully symmetric ones. Next, for each one of these two functions $f$ and for three popular dissimilarities $D$ (the variance, the standard deviation, and the mean deviation from the median), we determine the range of values of $\mathfrak{C}_{D,f}$ on the sets of phylogenetic trees with a given number $n$ of leaves. We end the paper by assessing the performance of one of these indices on TreeBASE and using it to show that the trees in this database do not seem to follow either the uniform model for multifurcating trees or the $α$-$γ$-model, for any values of $α$ and $γ$.

The tight-span of a finite metric space is a polytopal complex that has appeared in several areas of mathematics. In this paper we determine the polytopal structure of the tight-span of a totally split decomposable (finite) metric. Totally split-decomposable metrics are a generalization of tree-metrics and have importance within phylogenetics. In previous work, we showed that the cells of the tight-span of such a metric are zonotopes that are polytope isomorphic to either hypercubes or rhombic dodecahedra. Here, we extend these results and show that the tight-spanof a totally split-decomposable metric can be broken up into a canonical collection of polytopal complexes whose polytopal structures can be directly determined from the metric. This allows us to also completely determine the polytopal structure of the tight-span of a totally split-decomposable metric in a very direct way.We anticipate that our improved understanding of this structure may ultimately lead to improved techniques for phylogenetic inference.

Phylogenetic networks are becoming of increasing interest to evolutionary biologists due to their ability to capture complex non-treelike evolutionary processes. From a combinatorial point of view, such networks are certain types of rooted directed acyclic graphs whose leaves are labelled by, for example, species. A number of mathematically interesting classes of phylogenetic networks are known. These include the biologically relevant class of stable phylogenetic networks whose members are defined via certain "fold-up" and "un-fold" operations that link them with concepts arising within the theory of, for example, graph fibrations. Despite this exciting link, the structural complexity of stable phylogenetic networks is still relatively poorly understood. Employing the popular tree-based, reticulation-visible, and tree-child properties which allow one to gauge this complexity in one way or another, we provide novel characterizations for when a stable phylogenetic network satisfies either one of these three properties.

In recent decades, phylogenetic networks have become a standard tool in modeling evolutionary processes. Nevertheless, basic combinatorial questions about them are still largely open. For instance, even the asymptotic counting problem for the class of phylogenetic networks and subclasses is unsolved. In this paper, we propose a method based on generating functions to count networks with few reticulation vertices for two subclasses which are important in applications: tree-child networks and normal networks. In particular, our method can be used to completely solve the asymptotic counting problem for these network classes when the number of reticulation vertices remains fixed and the network size tends to infinity.