arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the Gorenstein property for phylogenetic group-based models. We prove that for the groups $\mathbb Z_3$ and $\mathbb Z_2\times \mathbb Z_2$ and trivalent trees the associated polytopes are always Gorenstein extending the results of Buczyńska and Wiśniewski for the group $\mathbb Z_2$.

Most data in genome-wide phylogenetic analysis (phylogenomics) is essentially multidimensional, posing a major challenge to human comprehension and computational analysis. Also, we can not directly apply statistical learning models in data science to a set of phylogenetic trees since the space of phylogenetic trees is not Euclidean. In fact, the space of phylogenetic trees is a tropical Grassmannian in terms of max-plus algebra. Therefore, to classify multi-locus data sets for phylogenetic analysis, we propose tropical support vector machines (SVMs). Like classical SVMs, a tropical SVM is a discriminative classifier defined by the tropical hyperplane which maximizes the minimum tropical distance from data points to itself in order to separate these data points into sectors (half-spaces) in the tropical projective torus. Both hard margin tropical SVMs and soft margin tropical SVMs can be formulated as linear programming problems. We focus on classifying two categories of data, and we study a simpler case by assuming the data points from the same category ideally stay in the same sector of a tropical separating hyperplane. For hard margin tropical SVMs, we prove the necessary and sufficient conditions for two categories of data points to be separated, and we show an explicit formula for the optimal value of the feasible linear programming problem. For soft margin tropical SVMs, we develop novel methods to compute an optimal tropical separating hyperplane. Computational experiments show our methods work well. We end this paper with open problems.

Tree shape statistics are important for investigating evolutionary mechanisms mediating phylogenetic trees. As a step towards bridging shape statistics between rooted and unrooted trees, we present a comparison study on two subtree statistics known as numbers of cherries and pitchforks for the proportional to distinguishable arrangements (PDA) and the Yule-Harding-Kingman (YHK) models. Based on recursive formulas on the joint distribution of the number of cherries and that of pitchforks, it is shown that cherry distributions are log-concave for both rooted and unrooted trees under these two models. Furthermore, the mean number of cherries and that of pitchforks for unrooted trees converge respectively to those for rooted trees under the YHK model while there exists a limiting gap of 1/4 for the PDA model. Finally, the total variation distances between the cherry distributions of rooted and those of unrooted trees converge for both models. Our results indicate that caution is required for conducting statistical analysis for tree shapes involving both rooted and unrooted trees.

While every rooted binary phylogenetic tree is determined by its set of displayed rooted triples, such a result does not hold for an arbitrary rooted binary phylogenetic network. In particular, there exist two non-isomorphic rooted binary temporal normal networks that display the same set of rooted triples. Moreover, without any structural constraint on the rooted phylogenetic networks under consideration, similarly negative results have also been established for binets and trinets which are rooted subnetworks on two and three leaves, respectively. Hence, in general, piecing together a rooted phylogenetic network from such a set of small building blocks appears insurmountable. In contrast to these results, in this paper, we show that a rooted binary normal network is determined by its sets of displayed caterpillars (particular type of subtrees) on three and four leaves. The proof is constructive and realises a polynomial-time algorithm that takes the sets of caterpillars on three and four leaves displayed by a rooted binary normal network and, up to isomorphism, reconstructs this network.

A tree-based network $N$ on $X$ is called universal if every phylogenetic tree on $X$ is a base tree for $N$. Recently, binary universal tree-based networks have attracted great attention in the literature and their existence has been analyzed in various studies. In this note, we extend the analysis to non-binary networks and show that there exist both a rooted and an unrooted non-binary universal tree-based network with $n$ leaves for all positive integers $n$.

The burning number of a graph was recently introduced by Bonato et al. Although they mention that the burning number generalises naturally to directed graphs, no further research on this has been done. Here, we introduce graph burning for directed graphs, and we study bounds for the corresponding burning number and the hardness of finding this number. We derive sharp bounds from simple algorithms and examples. The hardness question yields more surprising results: finding the burning number of a directed tree is NP-hard, but FPT; however, it is W[2]-complete for DAGs. Finally, we give a fixed-parameter algorithm to find the burning number of a digraph, with a parameter inspired by research in phylogenetic networks.

We find a Thron-type continued fraction (T-fraction) for the ordinary generating function of the Ward polynomials, as well as for some generalizations employing a large (indeed infinite) family of independent indeterminates. Our proof is based on a bijection between super-augmented perfect matchings and labeled Schröder paths, which generalizes Flajolet's bijection between perfect matchings and labeled Dyck paths.

Phylogenetic networks are important for the study of evolution. The number of methods to find such networks is increasing, but most such methods can only reconstruct small networks. To find bigger networks, one can attempt to combine small networks. In this paper, we study the {\sc Network Hybridization} problem, a problem of combining networks into another network with low complexity. We characterize this complexity via a restricted problem, {\sc Tree-child Network Hybridization}, and we present an FPT algorithm to efficiently solve this restricted problem.

Modelling the substitution of nucleotides along a phylogenetic tree is usually done by a hidden Markov process. This allows to define a distribution of characters at the leaves of the trees and one might be able to obtain polynomial relationships among the probabilities of different characters. The study of these polynomials and the geometry of the algebraic varieties defined by them can be used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. However, not all points in these algebraic varieties have biological sense. In this paper, we explore the extent to which adding semi-algebraic conditions arising from the restriction to parameters with statistical meaning can improve existing methods of phylogenetic reconstruction. To this end, our aim is to compute the distance of data points to algebraic varieties and to the stochastic part of these varieties. Computing these distances involves optimization by nonlinear programming algorithms. We use analytical methods to find some of these distances for quartet trees evolving under the Kimura 3-parameter or the Jukes-Cantor models. Numerical algebraic geometry and computational algebra play also a fundamental role in this paper.

In 2019, Yoshida et al. introduced a notion of tropical principal component analysis (PCA). The output is a tropical polytope with a fixed number of vertices that best fits the data. We here apply tropical PCA to dimension reduction and visualization of data sampled from the space of phylogenetic trees. Our main results are twofold: the existence of a tropical cell decomposition into regions of fixed tree topology and the development of a stochastic optimization method to estimate the tropical PCA using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. This method performs well with simulation studies, and it is applied to three empirical datasets: Apicomplexa and African coelacanth genomes as well as sequences of hemagglutinin for influenza from New York.

A phylogenetic network is a graph-theoretical tool that is used by biologists to represent the evolutionary history of a collection of species. One potential way of constructing such networks is via a distance-based approach, where one is asked to find a phylogenetic network that in some way represents a given distance matrix, which gives information on the evolutionary distances between present-day taxa. Here, we consider the following question. For which~$k$ are unrooted level-$k$ networks uniquely determined by their distance matrices? We consider this question for shortest distances as well as for the case that the multisets of all distances is given. We prove that level-$1$ networks and level-$2$ networks are reconstructible from their shortest distances and multisets of distances, respectively. Furthermore we show that, in general, networks of level higher than~$1$ are not reconstructible from shortest distances and that networks of level higher than~$2$ are not reconstructible from their multisets of distances.

Phylogenetic networks are generalizations of phylogenetic trees that allow the representation of reticulation events such as horizontal gene transfer or hybridization, and can also represent uncertainty in inference. A subclass of these, tree-based phylogenetic networks, have been introduced to capture the extent to which reticulate evolution nevertheless broadly follows tree-like patterns. Several important operations that change a general phylogenetic network have been developed in recent years, and are important for allowing algorithms to move around spaces of networks; a vital ingredient in finding an optimal network given some biological data. A key such operation is the Nearest Neighbor Interchange, or NNI. While it is already known that the space of unrooted phylogenetic networks is connected under NNI, it has been unclear whether this also holds for the subspace of tree-based networks. In this paper we show that the space of unrooted tree-based phylogenetic networks is indeed connected under the NNI operation. We do so by explicitly showing how to get from one such network to another one without losing tree-basedness along the way. Moreover, we introduce some new concepts, for instance ``shoat networks'', and derive some interesting aspects concerning tree-basedness. Last, we use our results to derive an upper bound on the size of the space of tree-based networks.

Identifiability is a crucial property for a statistical model since distributions in the model uniquely determine the parameters that produce them. In phylogenetics, the identifiability of the tree parameter is of particular interest since it means that phylogenetic models can be used to infer evolutionary histories from data. In this paper we introduce a new computational strategy for proving the identifiability of discrete parameters in algebraic statistical models that uses algebraic matroids naturally associated to the models. We then use this algorithm to prove that the tree parameters are generically identifiable for 2-tree CFN and K3P mixtures. We also show that the $k$-cycle phylogenetic network parameter is identifiable under the K2P and K3P models.

Semi-directed networks provide a graphical structure for describing the evolutionary history of organisms in the presence of hybridization. We introduce two algorithms for reconstructing semi-directed level-1 phylogenetic networks from their complete set of 4-leaf subnetworks, known as quarnets. The sequential algorithm begins with a single quarnet and adds one leaf at a time until the entire network has been reconstructed. The cherry-blob algorithm is a novel approach inspired by cherry-picking techniques on trees

Phylogenetic networks generalize phylogenetic trees, and have been introduced in order to describe evolution in the case of transfer of genetic material between coexisting species. There are many classes of phylogenetic networks, which can all be modeled as families of graphs with labeled leaves. In this paper, we focus on rooted and unrooted level-k networks and provide enumeration formulas (exact and asymptotic) for rooted and unrooted level-1 and level-2 phylogenetic networks with a given number of leaves. We also prove that the distribution of some parameters of these networks (such as their number of cycles) are asymptotically normally distributed. These results are obtained by first providing a recursive description (also called combinatorial specification) of our networks, and by next applying classical methods of enumerative, symbolic and analytic combinatorics.

Consider a finite set $E$. Assume that each $e \in E$ has a "weight" $w \left(e\right) \in \mathbb{R}$ assigned to it, and any two distinct $e, f \in E$ have a "distance" $d \left(e, f\right) = d \left(f, e\right) \in \mathbb{R}$ assigned to them, such that the distances satisfy the ultrametric triangle inequality $d(a,b)\leqslant \max \left\{d(a,c),d(b,c)\right\}$. We look for a subset of $E$ of given size with maximum perimeter (where the perimeter is defined by summing the weights of all elements and their pairwise distances). We show that any such subset can be found by a greedy algorithm (which starts with the empty set, and then adds new elements one by one, maximizing the perimeter at each step). We use this to define numerical invariants, and also to show that the maximum-perimeter subsets of all sizes form a strong greedoid, and the maximum-perimeter subsets of any given size are the bases of a matroid. This essentially generalizes the "$P$-orderings" constructed by Bhargava in order to define his generalized factorials, and is also similar to the strong greedoid of maximum diversity subsets in phylogenetic trees studied by Moulton, Semple and Steel. We further discuss some numerical invariants of $E, w, d$ stemming from this construction, as well as an analogue where maximum-perimeter subsets are replaced by maximum-perimeter tuples (i.e., elements can appear multiple times).

Phylogenetic trees are often constructed by using a metric on the set of taxa that label the leaves of the tree. While there are a number of methods for constructing a tree using a given metric, such trees will only display the metric if it satisfies the so-called "four point condition", established by Buneman in 1971. While this condition guarantees that a unique tree will display the metric, meaning that the distance between any two leaves can be found by adding the distances on arcs in the path between the leaves, it doesn't exclude the possibility that a phylogenetic network might also display the metric. This possibility was recently pointed out and "tree-metrized" networks --- that display a tree metric --- with a single reticulation were characterized. In this paper, we show that in the case of HGT (horizontal gene transfer) networks, in fact there are tree-metrized networks containing many reticulations.

A rearrangement operation makes a small graph-theoretical change to a phylogenetic network to transform it into another one. For unrooted phylogenetic trees and networks, popular rearrangement operations are tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) and prune and regraft (PR) (called subtree prune and regraft (SPR) on trees). Each of these operations induces a metric on the sets of phylogenetic trees and networks. The TBR-distance between two unrooted phylogenetic trees $T$ and $T'$ can be characterised by a maximum agreement forest, that is, a forest with a minimum number of components that covers both $T$ and $T'$ in a certain way. This characterisation has facilitated the development of fixed-parameter tractable algorithms and approximation algorithms. Here, we introduce maximum agreement graphs as a generalisations of maximum agreement forests for phylogenetic networks. While the agreement distance -- the metric induced by maximum agreement graphs -- does not characterise the TBR-distance of two networks, we show that it still provides constant-factor bounds on the TBR-distance. We find similar results for PR in terms of maximum endpoint agreement graphs.

The problem of realizing finite metric spaces in terms of weighted graphs has many applications. For example, the mathematical and computational properties of metrics that can be realized by trees have been well-studied and such research has laid the foundation of the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from evolutionary distances. However, as trees may be too restrictive to accurately represent real-world data or phenomena, it is important to understand the relationship between more general graphs and distances. In this paper, we introduce a new type of metric called a cactus metric, that is, a metric that can be realized by a cactus graph. We show that, just as with tree metrics, a cactus metric has a unique optimal realization. In addition, we describe an algorithm that can recognize whether or not a metric is a cactus metric and, if so, compute its optimal realization in $O(n^3)$ time, where $n$ is the number of points in the space.

The set of ultrametrics on $[n]$ nodes that are $\ell^\infty$-nearest to a given dissimilarity map forms a $(\max,+)$ tropical polytope. Previous work of Bernstein has given a superset of the set containing all the phylogenetic trees that are extreme rays of this polytope. In this paper, we show that Bernstein's necessary condition of tropical extreme rays is sufficient only for $n=3$ but not for $n\geq 4$. Our proof relies on the exterior description of this tropical polytope, together with the tangent hypergraph techniques for extremality characterization. The sufficiency of the case $n=3$ is proved by explicitly finding all extreme rays through the exterior description. Meanwhile, an inductive construction of counterexamples is given to show the insufficiency for $n\geq 4$.