arXiv++ Combinatorics

Background. The supertree problem, i.e., the task of finding a common refinement of a set of rooted trees is an important topic in mathematical phylogenetics. The special case of a common leaf set $L$ is known to be solvable in linear time. Existing approaches refine one input tree using information of the others and then test whether the results are isomorphic. Results. A linear-time algorithm, LinCR, for constructing the common refinement $T$ of $k$ input trees with a common leaf set is proposed that explicitly computes the parent function of $T$ in a bottom-up approach. Conclusion. LinCR is simpler to implement than other asymptotically optimal algorithms for the problem and outperforms the alternatives in empirical comparisons. Availability. An implementation of LinCR in Python is freely available at https://github.com/david-schaller/tralda.

Phylogenetic networks represent evolutionary history of species and can record natural reticulate evolutionary processes such as horizontal gene transfer and gene recombination. This makes phylogenetic networks a more comprehensive representation of evolutionary history compared to phylogenetic trees. Stochastic processes for generating random trees or networks are important tools in evolutionary analysis, especially in phylogeny reconstruction where they can be utilized for validation or serve as priors for Bayesian methods. However, as more network generators are developed, there is a lack of discussion or comparison for different generators. To bridge this gap, we compare a set of phylogenetic network generators by profiling topological summary statistics of the generated networks over the number of reticulations and comparing the topological profiles.

Effects like selection in evolution as well as fertility inheritance in the development of populations can lead to a higher degree of asymmetry in evolutionary trees than expected under a null hypothesis. To identify and quantify such influences, various balance indices were proposed in the phylogenetic literature and have been in use for decades. However, so far no balance index was based on the number of \emph{symmetry nodes}, even though symmetry nodes play an important role in other areas of mathematical phylogenetics and despite the fact that symmetry nodes are a quite natural way to measure balance or symmetry of a given tree. The aim of this manuscript is thus twofold: First, we will introduce the \emph{symmetry nodes index} as an index for measuring balance of phylogenetic trees and analyze its extremal properties. We also show that this index can be calculated in linear time. This new index turns out to be a generalization of a simple and well-known balance index, namely the \emph{cherry index}, as well as a specialization of another, less established, balance index, namely \emph{Rogers' $J$ index}. Thus, it is the second objective of the present manuscript to compare the new symmetry nodes index to these two indices and to underline its advantages. In order to do so, we will derive some extremal properties of the cherry index and Rogers' $J$ index along the way and thus complement existing studies on these indices. Moreover, we used the programming language \textsf{R} to implement all three indices in the software package \textsf{symmeTree}, which has been made publicly available.

The question whether a partition $\mathcal{P}$ and a hierarchy $\mathcal{H}$ or a tree-like split system $\mathfrak{S}$ are compatible naturally arises in a wide range of classification problems. In the setting of phylogenetic trees, one asks whether the sets of $\mathcal{P}$coincide with leaf sets of connected components obtained by deleting some edges from the tree $T$ that represents $\mathcal{H}$ or $\mathfrak{S}$, respectively. More generally, we ask whether a refinement $T^*$ of $T$ exists such that $T^*$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are compatible in this sense. The latter is closely related to the question as to whether there exists a tree at all that is compatible with $\mathcal{P}$. We report several characterizations for (refinements of) hierarchies and split systems that are compatible with (systems of) partitions. In addition, we provide a linear-time algorithm to check whether refinements of trees and a given partition are compatible. The latter problem becomes NP-complete but fixed-parameter tractable if a system of partitions is considered instead of a single partition. In this context, we also explore the close relationship of the concept of compatibility and so-called Fitch maps.

In phylogenetics, it is important for the phylogenetic network model parameters to be identifiable so that the evolutionary histories of a group of species can be consistently inferred. However, as the complexity of the phylogenetic network models grows, the identifiability of network models becomes increasingly difficult to analyze. As an attempt to analyze the identifiability of network models, we check whether two networks are distinguishable. In this paper, we specifically study the distinguishability of phylogenetic network models associated with level-2 networks. Using an algebraic approach, namely using discrete Fourier transformation, we present some results on the distinguishability of some level-2 networks, which generalize earlier work on the distinguishability of level-1 networks. In particular, we study simple and semisimple level-2 networks. Simple and semisimple level-2 networks can be thought as generalizations of level-1 sunlet and cycle networks, respectively. Moreover, we also compare the varieties associated with semisimple level-2 and cycle networks.

Tropical geometry with the max-plus algebra has been applied to statistical learning models over tree spaces because geometry with the tropical metric over tree spaces has some nice properties such as convexity in terms of the tropical metric. One of the challenges in applications of tropical geometry to tree spaces is the difficulty interpreting outcomes of statistical models with the tropical metric. This paper focuses on combinatorics of tree topologies along a tropical line segment, an intrinsic geodesic with the tropical metric, between two phylogenetic trees over the tree space and we show some properties of a tropical line segment between two trees. Specifically we show that a probability of a tropical line segment of two randomly chosen trees going through the origin (the star tree) is zero if the number of leave is greater than four, and we also show that if two given trees differ only one nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) move, then the tree topology of a tree in the tropical line segment between them is the same tree topology of one of these given two trees with possible zero branch lengths.

Tree-child networks, one of the prominent network classes in phylogenetics, have been introduced for the purpose of modeling reticulate evolution. Recently, the first author together with Gittenberger and Mansouri (2019) showed that the number ${\rm TC}_{\ell,k}$ of tree-child networks with $\ell$ leaves and $k$ reticulation vertices has the first-order asymptotics \[ {\rm TC}_{\ell,k}\sim c_k\left(\frac{2}{e}\right)^{\ell}\ell^{\ell+2k-1},\qquad (\ell\rightarrow\infty). \] Moreover, they also computed $c_k$ for $k=1,2,$ and $3$. In this short note, we give a second approach to the above result which is based on a recent (algorithmic) approach for the counting of tree-child networks due to Cardona and Zhang (2020). This second approach is also capable of giving a simple, closed-form expression for $c_k$, namely, $c_k=2^{k-1}\sqrt{2}/k!$ for all $k\geq 0$.

Best match graphs (BMGs) are vertex-colored digraphs that naturally arise in mathematical phylogenetics to formalize the notion of evolutionary closest genes w.r.t. an a priori unknown phylogenetic tree. BMGs are explained by unique least resolved trees. We prove that the property of a rooted, leaf-colored tree to be least resolved for some BMG is preserved by the contraction of inner edges. For the special case of two-colored BMGs, this leads to a characterization of the least resolved trees (LRTs) of binary-explainable trees and a simple, polynomial-time algorithm for the minimum cardinality completion of the arc set of a BMG to reach a BMG that can be explained by a binary tree.

The modular decomposition of a symmetric map $δ\colon X\times X \to Υ$ (or, equivalently, a set of symmetric binary relations, a 2-structure, or an edge-colored undirected graph) is a natural construction to capture key features of $δ$ in labeled trees. A map $δ$ is explained by a vertex-labeled rooted tree $(T,t)$ if the label $δ(x,y)$ coincides with the label of the last common ancestor of $x$ and $y$ in $T$, i.e., if $δ(x,y)=t(\mathrm{lca}(x,y))$. Only maps whose modular decomposition does not contain prime nodes, i.e., the symbolic ultrametrics, can be exaplained in this manner. Here we consider rooted median graphs as a generalization to (modular decomposition) trees to explain symmetric maps. We first show that every symmetric map can be explained by "extended" hypercubes and half-grids. We then derive a a linear-time algorithm that stepwisely resolves prime vertices in the modular decomposition tree to obtain a rooted and labeled median graph that explains a given symmetric map $δ$. We argue that the resulting "tree-like" median graphs may be of use in phylogenetics as a model of evolutionary relationships.

Best match graphs (BMGs) are a class of colored digraphs that naturally appear in mathematical phylogenetics and can be approximated with the help of similarity measures between gene sequences, albeit not without errors. The corresponding graph editing problem can be used as a means of error correction. Since the arc set modification problems for BMGs are NP-complete, efficient heuristics are needed if BMGs are to be used for the practical analysis of biological sequence data. Since BMGs have a characterization in terms of consistency of a certain set of rooted triples, we consider heuristics that operate on triple sets. As an alternative, we show that there is a close connection to a set partitioning problem that leads to a class of top-down recursive algorithms that are similar to Aho's supertree algorithm and give rise to BMG editing algorithms that are consistent in the sense that they leave BMGs invariant. Extensive benchmarking shows that community detection algorithms for the partitioning steps perform best for BMG editing.

The mathematical analysis of random phylogenetic networks via analytic and algorithmic methods has received increasing attention in the past years. In the present work we introduce branching process methods to their study. This approach appears to be new in this context. Our main results focus on random level-$k$ networks with $n$ labelled leaves. Although the number of reticulation vertices in such networks is typically linear in $n$, we prove that their asymptotic global and local shape is tree-like in a well-defined sense. We show that the depth process of vertices in a large network converges towards a Brownian excursion after rescaling by $n^{-1/2}$. We also establish Benjamini--Schramm convergence of large random level-$k$ networks towards a novel random infinite network.

In a recent study, Bryant, Francis and Steel investigated the concept of \enquote{future-proofing} consensus methods in phylogenetics. That is, they investigated if such methods can be robust against the introduction of additional data like added trees or new species. In the present manuscript, we analyze consensus methods under a different aspect of introducing new data, namely concerning the discovery of new clades. In evolutionary biology, often formerly unresolved clades get resolved by refined reconstruction methods or new genetic data analyses. In our manuscript we investigate which properties of consensus methods can guarantee that such new insights do not disagree with previously found consensus trees, but merely refine them, a property termed \emph{monotonicity}. Along the lines of analyzing monotonicity, we also study two {established} supertree methods, namely Matrix Representation with Parsimony (MRP) and Matrix Representation with Compatibility (MRC), which have also been suggested as consensus methods in the literature. While we (just like Bryant, Francis and Steel in their recent study) unfortunately have to conclude some negative answers concerning general consensus methods, we also state some relevant and positive results concerning the majority rule ($\mathtt{MR}$) and strict consensus methods, which are amongst the most frequently used consensus methods. Moreover, we show that there exist infinitely many consensus methods which are monotonic and have some other desirable properties. \textbf{Keywords:} consensus tree, phylogenetics, majority rule, tree refinement, matrix representation with parsimony \textbf{MSC:} C92B05, 05C05

Recently it was shown that a certain class of phylogenetic networks, called level-$2$ networks, cannot be reconstructed from their associated distance matrices. In this paper, we show that they can be reconstructed from their induced shortest and longest distance matrices. That is, if two level-$2$ networks induce the same shortest and longest distance matrices, then they must be isomorphic. We further show that level-$2$ networks are reconstructible from their shortest distance matrices if and only if they do not contain a subgraph from a family of graphs. A generator of a network is the graph obtained by deleting all pendant subtrees and suppressing degree-$2$ vertices. We also show that networks with a leaf on every generator side is reconstructible from their induced shortest distance matrix, regardless of level.

2-colored best match graphs (2-BMGs) form a subclass of sink-free bi-transitive graphs that appears in phylogenetic combinatorics. There, 2-BMGs describe evolutionarily most closely related genes between a pair of species. They are explained by a unique least resolved tree (LRT). Introducing the concept of support vertices we derive an $O(|V|+|E|\log^2|V|)$-time algorithm to recognize 2-BMGs and to construct its LRT. The approach can be extended to also recognize binary-explainable 2-BMGs with the same complexity. An empirical comparison emphasizes the efficiency of the new algorithm.

Rooted triples, rooted binary phylogenetic trees on three leaves, are sufficient to encode rooted binary phylogenetic trees. That is, if $\mathcal T$ and $\mathcal T'$ are rooted binary phylogenetic $X$-trees that infers the same set of rooted triples, then $\mathcal T$ and $\mathcal T'$ are isomorphic. However, in general, this sufficiency does not extend to rooted binary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we show that trinets, phylogenetic network analogues of rooted triples, are sufficient to encode rooted binary orchard networks. Rooted binary orchard networks naturally generalise rooted binary tree-child networks. Moreover, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary orchard network from its set of trinets. As a consequence, this algorithm affirmatively answers a previously-posed question of whether there is a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary tree-child network from the set of trinets it infers.

Rooted phylogenetic networks provide a more complete representation of the ancestral relationship between species than phylogenetic trees when reticulate evolutionary processes are at play. One way to reconstruct a phylogenetic network is to consider its `ancestral profile' (the number of paths from each ancestral vertex to each leaf). In general, this information does not uniquely determine the underlying phylogenetic network. A recent paper considered a new class of phylogenetic networks called `orchard networks' where this uniqueness was claimed to hold. Here we show that an additional restriction on the network, that of being `stack-free', is required in order for the original uniqueness claim to hold. On the other hand, if the additional stack-free restriction is lifted, we establish an alternative result; namely, there is uniqueness within the class of orchard networks up to the resolution of vertices of high in-degree.

Recently, the perfect phylogeny model with persistent characters has attracted great attention in the literature. It is based on the assumption that complex traits or characters can only be gained once and lost once in the course of evolution. Here, we consider a generalization of this model, namely Dollo parsimony, that allows for multiple character losses. More precisely, we take a combinatorial perspective on the notion of Dollo-$k$ characters, i.e. traits that are gained at most once and lost precisely $k$ times throughout evolution. We first introduce an algorithm based on the notion of spanning subtrees for finding a Dollo-$k$ labeling for a given character and a given tree in linear time. We then compare persistent characters (consisting of the union of Dollo-0 and Dollo-1 characters) and general Dollo-$k$ characters. While it is known that there is a strong connection between Fitch parsimony and persistent characters, we show that Dollo parsimony and Fitch parsimony are in general very different. Moreover, while it is known that there is a direct relationship between the number of persistent characters and the Sackin index of a tree, a popular index of tree balance, we show that this relationship does not generalize to Dollo-$k$ characters. In fact, determining the number of Dollo-$k$ characters for a given tree is much more involved than counting persistent characters, and we end this manuscript by introducing a recursive approach for the former. This approach leads to a polynomial time algorithm for counting the number of Dollo-$k$ characters, and both this algorithm as well as the algorithm for computing Dollo-$k$ labelings are publicly available in the Babel package for BEAST 2.

A phylogenetic tree is a tree with a fixed set of leaves that has no vertices of degree two. In this paper, we axiomatically define four other discrete structures on the set of leaves. We prove that each of these structures is an equivalent representation of a phylogenetic tree.

We show a first-order asymptotics result for the number of galled networks with $n$ leaves. This is the first class of phylogenetic networks of {\it large} size for which an asymptotic counting result of such strength can be obtained. In addition, we also find the limiting distribution of the number of reticulation nodes of a galled networks with $n$ leaves chosen uniformly at random. These results are obtained by performing an asymptotic analysis of a recent approach of Gunawan, Rathin, and Zhang (2020) which was devised for the purpose of (exactly) counting galled networks. Moreover, an old result of Bender and Richmond (1984) plays a crucial role in our proofs, too.

Measures of phylogenetic balance, such as the Colless and Sackin indices, play an important role in phylogenetics. Unfortunately, these indices are specifically designed for phylogenetic trees, and do not extend naturally to phylogenetic networks (which are increasingly used to describe reticulate evolution). This led us to consider a lesser-known balance index, whose definition is based on a probabilistic interpretation that is equally applicable to trees and to networks. This index, known as the $B_2$ index, was first proposed by Shao and Sokal in 1990. Surprisingly, it does not seem to have been studied mathematically since. Likewise, it is used only sporadically in the biological literature, where it tends to be viewed as arcane. In this paper, we study mathematical properties of $B_2$ such as its expectation and variance under the most common models of random trees and its extremal values over various classes of phylogenetic networks. We also assess its relevance in biological applications, and find it to be comparable to that of the Colless and Sackin indices. Altogether, our results call for a reevaluation of the status of this somewhat forgotten measure of phylogenetic balance.