arXiv++ Combinatorics

Identifiability of the discrete tree parameter is a key property for phylogenetic models since it is necessary for statistically consistent estimation of the tree from sequence data. Algebraic methods have proven to be very effective at showing that tree and network parameters of phylogenetic models are identifiable, especially when the underlying models are group-based. However, since group-based models are time-reversible, only the unrooted tree topology is identifiable and the location of the root is not. In this note we show that the rooted tree parameter of the Cavender-Farris-Neyman Model with a Molecular Clock is generically identifiable by using the invariants of the model which were characterized by Coons and Sullivant.

Phylogenetic trees are frequently used to model evolution. Such trees are typically reconstructed from data like DNA, RNA, or protein alignments using methods based on criteria like maximum parsimony (amongst others). Maximum parsimony has been assumed to work well for data with only few state changes. Recently, some progress has been made to formally prove this assertion. For instance, it has been shown that each binary phylogenetic tree $T$ with $n \geq 20k$ leaves is uniquely defined by the set $A_k(T)$, which consists of all characters with parsimony score $k$ on $T$. In the present manuscript, we show that the statement indeed holds for all $n \geq 4k$, thus drastically lowering the lower bound for $n$ from $20k$ to $4k$. However, it has been known that for $n \leq 2k$ and $k \geq 3$, it is not generally true that $A_k(T)$ defines $T$. We improve this result by showing that the latter statement can be extended from $n \leq 2k$ to $n \leq 2k+2$. So we drastically reduce the gap of values of $n$ for which it is unknown if trees $T$ on $n$ taxa are defined by $A_k(T)$ from the previous interval of $[2k+1,20k-1]$ to the interval $[2k+3,4k-1]$. Moreover, we close this gap completely for the nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) neighborhood of $T$ in the following sense: We show that as long as $n\geq 2k+3$, no tree that is one NNI move away from $T$ (and thus very similar to $T$) shares the same $A_k$-alignment.

Let $G$ be an undirected graph. We say that $G$ contains a ladder of length $k$ if the $2 \times (k+1)$ grid graph is an induced subgraph of $G$ that is only connected to the rest of $G$ via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in $G$ are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

The space of phylogenetic trees arises naturally in tropical geometry as the tropical Grassmannian. Tropical geometry therefore suggests a natural notion of a tropical path between two trees, given by a tropical line segment in the tropical Grassmannian. It was previously conjectured that tree topologies along such a segment change by a combinatorial operation known as Nearest Neighbor Interchange (NNI). We provide counterexamples to this conjecture, but prove that changes in tree topologies along the tropical line segment are either NNI moves or "four clade rearrangement" moves for generic trees. In addition, we show that the number of NNI moves occurring along the tropical line segment can be as large as $n^2$, but the average number of moves when the two endpoint trees are chosen at random is $O(n (\log n)^4)$. This is in contrast with $O(n \log n)$, the average number of NNI moves needed to transform one tree into another.

Semi-directed phylogenetic networks have recently emerged as a class of phylogenetic networks sitting between rooted (directed) and unrooted (undirected) phylogenetic networks as they contain both directed as well as undirected edges. While the spaces of rooted phylogenetic networks and unrooted phylogenetic networks have been analyzed in recent years and various rearrangement moves to traverse these spaces have been introduced, the results do not immediately carry over to semi-directed phylogenetic networks. Here, we propose a simple rearrangement move for semi-directed phylogenetic networks, called cut edge transfer (CET), and show that the space of semi-directed level-$1$ networks with precisely $k$ reticulations is connected under CET. This level-$1$ space is currently the predominantly used search space for most algorithms that reconstruct semi-directed phylogenetic networks. Hence, every semi-directed level-$1$ network with a fixed number of reticulations and leaf set can be reached from any other such network by a sequence of CETs. By introducing two additional moves, CET$^+$ and CET$^-$, that allow for the addition or deletion of reticulations, we then establish connectedness for the space of all semi-directed phylogenetic networks on a fixed leaf set. As a byproduct of our results for semi-directed phylogenetic networks, we also show that the space of rooted level-$1$ networks with a fixed number of reticulations and leaf set is connected under CET, when translated into the rooted setting.

Phylogenetic networks are a special type of graph which generalize phylogenetic trees and that are used to model non-treelike evolutionary processes such as recombination and hybridization. In this paper, we consider {\em unrooted} phylogenetic networks, i.e. simple, connected graphs $\mathcal{N}=(V,E)$ with leaf set $X$, for $X$ some set of species, in which every internal vertex in $\mathcal{N}$ has degree three. One approach used to construct such phylogenetic networks is to take as input a collection $\mathcal{P}$ of phylogenetic trees and to look for a network $\mathcal{N}$ that contains each tree in $\mathcal{P}$ and that minimizes the quantity $r(\mathcal{N}) = |E|-(|V|-1)$ over all such networks. Such a network always exists, and the quantity $r(\mathcal{N})$ for an optimal network $\mathcal{N}$ is called the hybrid number of $\mathcal{P}$. In this paper, we give a new characterization for the hybrid number in case $\mathcal{P}$ consists of two trees. This characterization is given in terms of a cherry picking sequence for the two trees, although to prove that our characterization holds we need to define the sequence more generally for two forests. Cherry picking sequences have been intensively studied for collections of rooted phylogenetic trees, but our new sequences are the first variant of this concept that can be applied in the unrooted setting. Since the hybrid number of two trees is equal to the well-known tree bisection and reconnection distance between the two trees, our new characterization also provides an alternative way to understand this important tree distance.

In the context of reconstructing phylogenetic networks from a collection of phylogenetic trees, several characterisations and subsequently algorithms have been established to reconstruct a phylogenetic network that collectively embeds all trees in the input in some minimum way. For many instances however, the resulting network also embeds additional phylogenetic trees that are not part of the input. However, little is known about these inferred trees. In this paper, we explore the relationships among all phylogenetic trees that are embedded in a given phylogenetic network. First, we investigate some combinatorial properties of the collection P of all rooted binary phylogenetic trees that are embedded in a rooted binary phylogenetic network N. To this end, we associated a particular graph G, which we call rSPR graph, with the elements in P and show that, if |P|=2^k, where k is the number of vertices with in-degree two in N, then G has a Hamiltonian cycle. Second, by exploiting rSPR graphs and properties of hypercubes, we turn to the well-studied class of rooted binary level-1 networks and give necessary and sufficient conditions for when a set of rooted binary phylogenetic trees can be embedded in a level-1 network without inferring any additional trees. Lastly, we show how these conditions translate into a polynomial-time algorithm to reconstruct such a network if it exists.

We study a parametric version of the Fermat-Weber problem with respect to an asymmetric distance function, which occurs naturally in tropical geometry. Our results yield a method for constructing phylogenetic supertrees.

Graph invariants are a useful tool in graph theory. Not only do they encode useful information about the graphs to which they are associated, but complete invariants can be used to distinguish between non-isomorphic graphs. Polynomial invariants for graphs such as the well-known Tutte polynomial have been studied for several years, and recently there has been interest to also define such invariants for phylogenetic networks, a special type of graph that arises in the area of evolutionary biology. Recently Liu gave a complete invariant for (phylogenetic) trees. However, the polynomial invariants defined thus far for phylogenetic networks that are not trees require vertex labels and either contain a large number of variables, or they have exponentially many terms in the number of reticulations. This can make it difficult to compute these polynomials and to use them to analyse unlabelled networks. In this paper, we shall show how to circumvent some of these difficulties for rooted cactuses and cactuses. As well as being important in other areas such as operations research, rooted cactuses contain some common classes of phylogenetic networks such phylogenetic trees and level-1 networks. More specifically, we define a polynomial $F$ that is a complete invariant for the class of rooted cactuses without vertices of indegree 1 and outdegree 1 that has 5 variables, and a polynomial $Q$ that is a complete invariant for the class of rooted cactuses that has 6 variables \vince{whose degree can be bounded linearly in terms of the size of the rooted cactus}. We also explain how to extend the $Q$ polynomial to define a complete invariant for leaf-labelled rooted cactuses as well as (unrooted) cactuses.

We describe a kernel of size 9k-8 for the NP-hard problem of computing the Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance k between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We achieve this by extending the existing portfolio of reduction rules with three novel new reduction rules. Two of the rules are based on the idea of topologically transforming the trees in a distance-preserving way in order to guarantee execution of earlier reduction rules. The third rule extends the local neighbourhood approach introduced in (Kelk and Linz, Annals of Combinatorics 24(3), 2020) to more global structures, allowing new situations to be identified when deletion of a leaf definitely reduces the TBR distance by one. The bound on the kernel size is tight up to an additive term. Our results also apply to the equivalent problem of computing a Maximum Agreement Forest (MAF) between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We anticipate that our results will be more widely applicable for computing agreement-forest based dissimilarity measures.

Fermat-Weber points with respect to an asymmetric tropical distance function are studied. It turns out that they correspond to the optimal solutions of a transportation problem. The results are applied to obtain a new method for computing consensus trees in phylogenetics. This method has several desirable properties; e.g., it is Pareto and co-Pareto on rooted triplets.

Rooted acyclic graphs appear naturally when the phylogenetic relationship of a set $X$ of taxa involves not only speciations but also recombination, horizontal transfer, or hybridization, that cannot be captured by trees. A variety of classes of such networks have been discussed in the literature, including phylogenetic, level-1, tree-child, tree-based, galled tree, regular, or normal networks as models of different types of evolutionary processes. Clusters arise in models of phylogeny as the sets $\mathtt{C}(v)$ of descendant taxa of a vertex $v$. The clustering system $\mathscr{C}_N$ comprising the clusters of a network $N$ conveys key information on $N$ itself. In the special case of rooted phylogenetic trees, $T$ is uniquely determined by its clustering system $\mathscr{C}_T$. Although this is no longer true for networks in general, it is of interest to relate properties of $N$ and $\mathscr{C}_N$. Here, we systematically investigate the relationships of several well-studied classes of networks and their clustering systems. The main results are correspondences of classes of networks and clustering system of the following form: If $N$ is a network of type $\mathbb{X}$, then $\mathcal{C}_N$ satisfies $\mathbb{Y}$, and conversely if $\mathscr{C}$ is a clustering system satisfying $\mathbb{Y}$ then there is network $N$ of type $\mathbb{X}$ such that $\mathscr{C}\subseteq\mathscr{C}_N$.This, in turn, allows us to investigate the mutual dependencies between the distinct types of networks in much detail.

A rooted phylogenetic network is a directed acyclic graph with a single root, whose sinks correspond to a set of species. As such networks are useful for representing the evolution of species that have undergone reticulate evolution, there has been great interest in developing the theory behind and algorithms for constructing them. However, unlike evolutionary trees, these networks can be highly non-planar, which can make them difficult to visualise and interpret. Here we investigate properties of planar rooted phylogenetic networks and algorithms for deciding whether or not rooted networks have certain special planarity properties. In particular, we introduce three natural subclasses of planar rooted phylogenetic networks and show that they form a hierarchy. In addition, for the well-known level-k networks, we show that level-1, -2, -3 networks are always outer, terminal, and upward planar, respectively, and that level-4 networks are not necessarily planar. Finally, we show that a regular network is terminal planar if and only if it is pyramidal. Our results make use of the highly developed field of planar digraphs, and we believe that the link between phylogenetic networks and planar graphs should prove useful in future for developing new approaches to both construct and visualise phylogenetic networks.

In evolutionary studies it is common to use phylogenetic trees to represent the evolutionary history of a set of species. However, in case the transfer of genes or other genetic information between the species or their ancestors has occurred in the past, a tree may not provide a complete picture of their history. In such cases,tree-based phylogenetic networks can provide a useful, more refined representation of the species evolution. Such a network is essentially a phylogenetic tree with some arcs added between the tree edges so as to represent reticulate events such as gene transfer. Even so, this model does not permit the representation of evolutionary scenarios where reticulate events have taken place between different subfamilies or lineages of species. To represent such scenarios, in this paper we introduce the notion of a forest-based phylogenetic network, that is, a collection of leaf-disjoint phylogenetic trees on a set of species with arcs added between the edges of distinct trees within the collection. Forest-based networks include the recently introduced class of overlaid species forests which are used to model introgression. As we shall see, even though the definition of forest-based networks is closely related to that of tree-based networks, they lead to new mathematical theory which complements that of tree-based networks. As well as studying the relationship of forest-based networks with other classes of phylogenetic networks, such as tree-child networks and universal tree-based networks, we present some characterizations of some special classes of forest-based networks. We expect that our results will be useful for developing new models and algorithms to understand reticulate evolution, such as gene transfer between collections of bacteria that live in different environments.

Early literature on genome rearrangement modelling views the problem of computing evolutionary distances as an inherently combinatorial one. In particular, attention was given to estimating distances using the minimum number of events required to transform one genome into another. In hindsight, this approach is analogous to early methods for inferring phylogenetic trees from DNA sequences such as maximum parsimony -- both are motivated by the principle that the true distance minimises evolutionary change, and both are effective if this principle is a true reflection of reality. Recent literature considers genome rearrangement under statistical models, continuing this parallel with DNA-based methods; the goal here is to use model-based methods (for example maximum likelihood techniques) to compute distance estimates that incorporate the large number of rearrangement paths that can transform one genome into another. Crucially, this approach requires one to decide upon a set of feasible rearrangement events and, in this paper, we focus on characterising well-motivated models for signed, uni-chromosomal circular genomes, where the number of regions remains fixed. Since rearrangements are often mathematically described using permutations, we isolate the sets of permutations representing rearrangements that are biologically reasonable in this context, for example inversions and translocations. We provide precise mathematical expressions for these rearrangements, and then describe them in terms of the set of cuts made in the genome when they are applied. We directly compare cuts to breakpoints, and use this concept to count the distinct rearrangement actions which apply a given number of cuts. Finally, we provide some examples of rearrangement models, and include a discussion of some questions that arise when defining plausible models.

Invariants for complicated objects such as those arising in phylogenetics, whether they are invariants as matrices, polynomials, or other mathematical structures, are important tools for distinguishing and working with such objects. In this paper, we generalize a complete polynomial invariant on trees to a class of phylogenetic networks called separable networks, which will include orchard networks. Networks are becoming increasingly important for their ability to represent reticulation events, such as hybridization, in evolutionary history. We provide a function from the space of internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks, a more generic graph structure than phylogenetic networks where the reticulations are also labelled, to a polynomial ring. We prove that the separability condition allows us to characterize, via the polynomial, the phylogenetic networks with the same number of leaves and same number of reticulations by considering their internally labelled versions. While the invariant for trees is a polynomial in Z[x_1,..., x_n,y] where n is the number of leaves, the invariant for internally multi-labelled phylogenetic networks is an element of Z[x_1,..., x_n,lambda_1,...,lambda_r,y], where r is the number of reticulations in the network. When the networks are considered without leaf labels the number of variables reduces to r+2.

The edge-product space of phylogenetic trees is a regular CW complex whose maximal closed cells correspond to trivalent trees with leaves labeled by a finite set $X$. The face poset of this cell decomposition is isomorphic to the Tuffley poset, a poset of labeled forests, with a unique minimum adjoined. We show that the edge-product space of phylogenetic trees is gallery-connected. We then use combinatorial properties of the Tuffley poset and a related graph known as NNI-tree space to show that, although open intervals of the Tuffley poset were proven to be shellable by Gill, Linusson, Moulton, and Steel, the edge-product space is not shellable.

A graph $G$ is a pairwise compatibility graph (PCG) if there exists an edge-weighted tree and an interval $I$, such that each leaf of the tree is a vertex of the graph, and there is an edge $\{ x, y \}$ in $G$ if and only if the weight of the path in the tree connecting $x$ and $y$ lies within the interval $I$. Originating in phylogenetics, PCGs are closely connected to important graph classes like leaf-powers and multi-threshold graphs, widely applied in bioinformatics, especially in understanding evolutionary processes. In this paper we introduce two natural generalizations of the PCG class, namely $k$-OR-PCG and $k$-AND-PCG, which are the classes of graphs that can be expressed as union and intersection, respectively, of $k$ PCGs. These classes can be also described using the concepts of the covering number and the intersection dimension of a graph in relation to the PCG class. We investigate how the classes of OR-PCG and AND-PCG are related to PCGs, $k$-interval-PCGs and other graph classes known in the literature. In particular, we provide upper bounds on the minimum $k$ for which an arbitrary graph $G$ belongs to $k$-interval-PCGs, $k$-OR-PCG or $k$-AND-PCG classes. For particular graph classes we improve these general bounds. Moreover, we show that, for every integer $k$, there exists a bipartite graph that is not in the $k$-interval-PCGs class, proving that there is no finite $k$ for which the $k$-interval-PCG class contains all the graphs. This answers an open question of Ahmed and Rahman from 2017. Finally, using a Ramsey theory argument, we show that for any $k$, there exists graphs that are not in $k$-AND-PCG, and graphs that are not in $k$-OR-PCG.

Horizontal gene transfer events partition a gene tree $T$ and thus, its leaf set into subsets of genes whose evolutionary history is described by speciation and duplication events alone. Indirect phylogenetic methods can be used to infer such partitions $\mathcal{P}$ from sequence similarity or evolutionary distances without any a priory knowledge about the underlying tree $T$. In this contribution, we assume that such a partition $\mathcal{P}$ of a set of genes $X$ is given and that, independently, an estimate $T$ of the original gene tree on $X$ has been derived. We then ask to what extent $T$ and the xenology information, i.e., $\mathcal{P}$ can be combined to determine the horizontal transfer edges in $T$. We show that for each pair of genes $x$ and $y$ with $x,y$ being in different parts of $\mathcal{P}$, it can be decided whether there always exists or never exists a horizontal gene transfer in $T$ along the path connecting $y$ and the most recent common ancestor of $x$ and $y$. This problem is equivalent to determining the presence or absence of the directed edge $(x,y)$ in so-called Fitch graphs; a more fine-grained version of graphs that represent the dependencies between the sets in $\mathcal{P}$. We then consider the generalization to insufficiently resolved gene trees and show that analogous results can be obtained. We show that the classification of $(x,y)$ can be computed in constant time after linear-time preprocessing. Using simulated gene family histories, we observe empirically that the vast majority of horizontal transfer edges in the gene tree $T$ can be recovered unambiguously.

We introduce a correspondence between phylogenetic trees and Brauer diagrams, inspired by links between binary trees and matchings described by Diaconis and Holmes (1998). This correspondence gives rise to a range of semigroup structures on the set of phylogenetic trees, and opens the prospect of many applications. We furthermore extend the Diaconis-Holmes correspondence from binary trees to non-binary trees and to forests, showing for instance that the set of all forests is in bijection with the set of partitions of finite sets.