arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the $H$-chromatic symmetric functions $X_G^H$ (introduced in (arXiv:2011.06063) as a generalization of the chromatic symmetric function (CSF) $X_G$), which track homomorphisms from the graph $G$ to the graph $H$. We focus first on the case of self-chromatic symmetric functions (self-CSFs) $X_G^G$, making some progress toward a conjecture from (arXiv:2011.06063) that the self-CSF, like the normal CSF, is always different for different trees. In particular, we show that the self-CSF distinguishes trees from non-trees with just one exception, we check using Sage that it distinguishes all trees on up to 12 vertices, and we show that it determines the number of legs of a spider and the degree sequence of a caterpillar given its spine length. We also show that the self-CSF detects the number of connected components of a forest, again with just one exception. Then we prove some results about the power sum expansions for $H$-CSFs when $H$ is a complete bipartite graph, in particular proving that the conjecture from (arXiv:2011.06063) about $p$-monotonicity of $ω(X_G^H)$ for $H$ a star holds as long as $H$ is sufficiently large compared to $G$. We also show that the self-CSFs of complete multipartite graphs form a basis for the ring $Λ$ of symmetric functions, and we give some construction of bases for the vector space $Λ^n$ of degree $n$ symmetric functions using $H$-CSFs $X_G^H$ where $H$ is a fixed graph that is not a complete graph, answering a question from (arXiv:2011.06063) about whether such bases exist. However, we show that there generally do not exist such bases with $G$ fixed, even with loops, answering another question from (arXiv:2011.06063). We also define the $H$-chromatic polynomial as an analogue of the chromatic polynomial, and ask when it is the same for different graphs.

Promotion has been well-studied for rectangular standard Young tableaux, in which case the orbit lengths divide the total number of boxes and are described by a cyclic sieving phenomenon (CSP), but little is known about the orbit lengths for tableaux of general shape. We approach this problem by building a stable sequence of tableaux where we fix the bottom portion and add extra boxes to the first row to get $n$ total boxes, with $n$ varying. We show that for 2-row tableaux with a fixed bottom row, the orbit lengths are divisors of certain monic polynomials in $n$, with degree generally equal to the number of distinct lengths of runs of consecutive numbers in the bottom row. For the subsets of 2-row tableaux where all runs have the same length, we show that the orbit lengths are characterized by a CSP polynomial that is a slightly modified version of the major index generating function, like in the rectangle case. We also show that for any stable sequence of tableaux, the orbit lengths are linear in $n$ as long as all non-first-row entries differ from each other by at least 2, which asymptotically happens for almost all tableaux in the limit as $n\to\infty.$ We also calculate the orbit lengths for near-hook tableaux, which are divisors of certain linear or quadratic polynomials in $n$.

Cho and van Willigenburg (arXiv:1508.07670) and Alinaeifard, Wang, and van Willgenburg (arXiv:2010.00147) introduce multiplicative chromatic bases for the ring $Λ$ of symmetric functions, consisting of the chromatic symmetric functions (CSFs) of a sequence of connected graphs $G_1,G_2,\dots$ such that $G_n$ has total weight $n$, together with the CSFs of their disjoint unions. In arXiv:1707.04058, Tsujie introduces an alternative ring structure $\widetildeΛ$ on the vector space $Λ$ that makes CSFs multiply over joins instead of over disjoint unions. The $\widetilde{m}_λ$ basis, consisting of all CSFs of weighted cliques, is a multiplicative basis for $\widetildeΛ$, as is the $r_λ$ basis of complete multipartite graphs studied by Penaguiao (arXiv:1803.08824) and Crew and Spirkl (arXiv:2009.14141). We show that one can get more of these "cochromatic bases" (where the starting graphs are combined by joins instead of disjoint unions, hence forming a multiplicative basis for $\widetildeΛ$ instead of $Λ$) if and only if the starting graphs are edgeless. We also show that $\widetildeΛ$ is a Hopf algebra with the same coproduct as $Λ$, and that many of the chromatic bases for $Λ$ generated by cliques can be taken to their corresponding cochromatic bases via Hopf algebra isomorphisms $Λ\to \widetildeΛ.$ We also show that there is a single Hopf algebra morphism taking the CSFs of all unweighted triangle-free graphs to the CSFs of their complements, and we give several more conditions and examples for when one can or cannot find Hopf algebra maps taking the CSFs of certain graphs to the CSFs of their complements. Finally, we show that $K$-analogues of many of the above statements also hold if one instead uses the Kromatic symmetric function (KSF) defined by Crew, Pechenik, and Spirkl (arXiv:2301.02177).

The Kromatic symmetric function (KSF) $\overline{X}_G$ of a graph $G$ is a $K$-analogue introduced by Crew, Pechenik, and Spirkl in arXiv:2301.02177 of Stanley's chromatic symmetric function (CSF) $X_G$. The KSF is known to distinguish some pairs of graphs with the same CSF. The first author showed in arXiv:2403.15929 and arXiv:2502.21285 that the number of copies in $G$ of certain induced subgraphs can be determined given $\overline{X}_G$, and conjectured that $\overline{X}_G$ distinguishes all graphs. We disprove that conjecture by finding four pairs of 8-vertex graphs with equal KSF, as well as giving several ways to use existing graph pairs with equal KSF to construct larger graph pairs that also have equal KSF. On the other hand, we show that many of the graph pairs from the constructions of Orellana and Scott in arXiv:1308.6005 and of Aliste-Prieto, Crew, Spirkl, and Zamora in arXiv:2007.11042 of graphs with the same CSF are distinguished by the KSF, thus also giving some new examples of cases where the KSF is a stronger invariant than the CSF.

Several families of polynomials of combinatorial and representation theoretic interest (notably the Schur polynomials $s_λ$, Demazure characters $\mathfrak{D}_a$, and Demazure atoms $\mathfrak{A}_a$) can be defined in terms of divided difference operators. Hivert (2000) defines "fundamental analogues" of these divided difference operators, and Hivert and Hicks-Niese show in arXiv:2406.02420 that the polynomials that arise from those fundamental operators in analogous ways to the three families of polynomials above are respectively the fundamental quasisymmetric functions $F_a$ from (1984), the fundamental slides $\mathfrak{F}_a$ of Assaf and Searles from arXiv:1603.09744, and the fundamental particles $\mathfrak{P}_a$ of Searles from arXiv:1707.01172. Lascoux (2001) defines $K$-analogues of the divided difference operators, and in arXiv:1908.07364, Buciumas, Scrimshaw, and Weber show that the polynomials arising in corresponding ways from the $K$-theoretic divided difference operators are respectively the Grothendieck polynomials $\overline{s}_λ$, the combinatorial Lascoux polynomials $\overline{\mathfrak{D}}_a$ from arXiv:1611.08777, and the combinatorial Lascoux atoms $\overline{\mathfrak{A}}_a$ from arXiv:1611.08777, as conjectured by Monical in arXiv:1611.08777. We define $K$-analogues of Hivert's fundamental divided difference operators and show that the polynomials arising in the corresponding ways from our new operators are respectively the multifundamentals $\overline{F}_a$ of Lam and Pylyavskyy from arXiv:0705.2189, the fundamental glides $\overline{\mathfrak{F}}_a$ from of Pechenik and Searles from arXiv:1611.02545, and the kaons $\overline{\mathfrak{P}}_a$ of Monical, Pechenik, and Searles from arXiv:1806.03802.

In arXiv:2301.02177, Crew, Pechenik, and Spirkl defined the Kromatic symmetric function $\overline{X}_G$ as a $K$-analogue of Stanley's chromatic symmetric function $X_G$, and one question they asked was how $\overline{X}_G$ expands in their $\overline{p}_λ$ basis, which they defined as a $K$-analogue of the classic power sum basis $p_λ.$ In arXiv:2408.01395, we gave a formula that partially answered this question but did not explain the combinatorial significance of the coefficients. Here, we give combinatorial descriptions for the $\overline{p}$-coefficients of $\overline{X}_G$ and $ω(\overline{X}_G)$, lifting the $p$-expansion of $X_G$ in terms of acyclic orientations that was given by Bernardi and Nadeau in arXiv:1904.01262. We also propose an alternative $K$-analogue $\overline{p}'$ of the $p$-basis that gives slightly cleaner expansion formulas. Our expansions are based on Lyndon heaps, introduced by Lalonde (1995), which are representatives for certain equivalence classes of acyclic orientations on clan graphs of $G$. Additionally, we show that knowing $\overline{X}_G$ is equivalent to knowing the multiset of independence polynomials of induced subgraphs of $G$, which gives shorter proofs of all our results from arXiv:2403.15929 that $\overline{X}_G$ can be used to determine the number of copies in $G$ of certain induced subgraphs. We also give power sum expansions for the Kromatic quasisymmetric function $\overline{X}_G(q)$ defined by Marberg in arXiv:2312.16474 in the case where $G$ is the incomparability graph of a unit interval order.

As part of a program to develop $K$-theoretic analogues of combinatorially important polynomials, Monical, Pechenik, and Searles (2021) proved two expansion formulas $\overline{\mathfrak{A}}_a = \sum_b Q_b^a(β)\overline{\mathfrak{P}}_b$ and $\overline{\mathfrak{Q}}_a = \sum_b M_b^a(β)\overline{\mathfrak{F}}_b,$ where each of $\overline{\mathfrak{A}}_a$, $\overline{\mathfrak{P}}_a$, $\overline{\mathfrak{Q}}_a$ and $\overline{\mathfrak{F}}_a$ is a family of polynomials that forms a basis for $\mathbb{Z}[x_1,\dots,x_n][β]$ indexed by weak compositions $a,$ and $Q_b^a(β)$ and $M_b^a(β)$ are monomials in $β$ for each pair $(a,b)$ of weak compositions. The polynomials $\overline{\mathfrak{A}}_a$ are the Lascoux atoms, $\overline{\mathfrak{P}}_a$ are the kaons, $\overline{\mathfrak{Q}}_a$ are the quasiLascoux polynomials, and $\overline{\mathfrak{F}}_a$ are the glide polynomials; these are respectively the $K$-analogues of the Demazure atoms $\mathfrak{A}_a$, the fundamental particles $\mathfrak{P}_a$, the quasikey polynomials $\mathfrak{Q}_a$, and the fundamental slide polynomials $\mathfrak{F}_a$. Monical, Pechenik, and Searles conjectured that for any fixed $a,$ $\sum_b Q_b^a(-1), \sum_b M_b^a(-1) \in \{0,1\},$ where $b$ ranges over all weak compositions. We prove this conjecture using a sign-reversing involution.

The chromatic symmetric $X_G$ function is a symmetric function generalization of the chromatic polynomial of a graph, introduced by Stanley (1995). Stanley gave an expansion formula for $X_G$ in terms of the power sum symmetric functions $p_λ$ using the principle of inclusion-exclusion, and in arXiv:1904.01262, Bernardi and Nadeau gave an alternate $p$-expansion for $X_G$ in terms of acyclic orientations. In arXiv:2301.02177, Crew, Pechenik, and Spirkl defined the Kromatic symmetric function $\overline{X}_G$ as a $K$-theoretic analogue of $X_G$, constructed in the same way except that each vertex is assigned a nonempty set of colors such that adjacent vertices have nonoverlapping color sets. They defined a $K$-analogue $\overline{p}_λ$ of the power sum basis and computed the first few coefficients of the $\overline{p}$-expansion of $\overline{X}_G$ for some small graphs $G$. They conjectured that the $\overline{p}$-expansion always has integer coefficients and asked whether there is an explicit formula for these coefficients. In this note, we give a formula for the $\overline{p}$-expansion of $\overline{X}_G$, show two ways to compute the coefficients recursively (along with examples), and prove that the coefficients are indeed always integers. In a more recent paper arXiv:2502.21285, we use our formula from this note to give a combinatorial description of the $\overline{p}$-coefficients $[\overline{p}_λ]\overline{X}_G$ and a simple characterization of their signs in the case of unweighted graphs.

The chromatic symmetric function $X_G$ is a power series that encodes the proper colorings of a graph $G$ by assigning a variable to each color and a monomial to each coloring such that the power of a variable in a monomial is the number of times the corresponding color is used in the corresponding coloring. The chromatic symmetric homology $H_*(G)$ is a doubly graded family of $\mathbb{C}[\mathfrak{S}_n]$-modules that was defined by Sazdanović and Yip (2018) as a categorification of $X_G$. Chandler, Sazdanović, Stella, and Yip (2023) proved that $H_*(G)$ is a strictly stronger graph invariant than $X_G$, and they also computed or conjectured formulas for it in a number of special cases. We prove and extend some of their conjectured formulas for the case of star graphs, where one central vertex is connected to all other vertices and no other pairs of vertices are connected.

The chromatic symmetric function $X_G$ is a sum of monomials corresponding to proper vertex colorings of a graph $G$. Crew, Pechenik, and Spirkl (2023) recently introduced a $K$-theoretic analogue $\overline{X}_G$ called the Kromatic symmetric function, where each vertex is instead assigned a nonempty set of colors such that adjacent vertices have nonoverlapping color sets. $X_G$ does not distinguish all graphs, but a longstanding open question is whether it distinguishes all trees. We conjecture that $\overline{X}_G$ does distinguish all graphs. As evidence towards this conjecture, we show that $\overline{X}_G$ determines the number of copies in $G$ of certain induced subgraphs on 4 and 5 vertices as well as the number of induced subgraphs isomorphic to each graph consisting of a star plus some number of isolated vertices.

A balanced configuration of points on the sphere $S^2$ is a (finite) set of points which are in equilibrium if they act on each other according any force law dependent only on the distance between two points. The configuration is additionally group-balanced if for each point in a configuration $\mathcal{C}$, there is a symmetry of $\mathcal{C}$ fixing only that point and its antipode. Leech showed that these definitions are equivalent on the sphere $S^2$ by classifying all possible balanced configurations. On the other hand, Cohn, Elkies, Kumar, and Schürmann showed that for $n\geq 7,$ there are examples of balanced configurations in $S^{n-1}$ which are not group balanced. They also suggested extending the notion of balanced configurations to Euclidean space, and conjectured that at least in the case of the plane, all discrete balanced configurations in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are group-balanced. We verify a reformulation of this conjecture by providing a complete classification of the balanced configurations in $\mathbb{R}^2$ satisfying a certain minimal distance property.

Kochol (2021) gave a new expansion formula for the Tutte polynomial of a matroid using the notion of \emph{compatible sets}, and asked how this expansion relates to the internal-external activities formula. Here, we provide an answer, which is obtained as a special case of a generalized version of the expansion formula to Las Vergnas's trivariate Tutte polynomials of matroid perspectives. The same generalization to matroid perspectives and bijection with activities have been independently proven by Kochol (2022 and 2023) in parallel with this work, but using different methods. Kochol proves both results recursively using the contraction-deletion relations, whereas we give a more direct proof of the bijection and use that to deduce the compatible sets expansion formula from Las Vergnas's activities expansion.

Let $N_σ(π)$ denote the number of occurrences of a permutation pattern $σ\in S_k$ in a permutation $π\in S_n$. Gaetz and Ryba (2021) showed using partition algebras that the $d$-th moment $M_{σ,d,n}(π)$ of $N_σ$ on the conjugacy class of $π$ is given by a polynomial in $n,m_1,\dots,m_{dk}$, where $m_i$ denotes the number of $i$-cycles of $π$. They also showed that the coefficient $\langle χ^{λ[n]}, M_{σ,d,n}\rangle$ agrees with a polynomial $a_{σ,d}^λ(n)$ in $n$. This work is motivated by the conjecture that when $σ=\text{id}_k$ is the identity permutation, all of these coefficients are nonnegative. We directly compute closed forms for the polynomials $a_{\text{id}_k}^λ(n)$ in the cases $λ=(1),(1,1),$ and $(2)$, and use this to verify the positivity conjecture for those cases by showing that the polynomials are real-rooted with all roots less than $k$. We also study the case $a_σ^{(1)}(n)$, for which we give a formula for the polynomials and their leading coefficients.