arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $\mathcal B=\mathcal B_{k,n,p}$ be a random collection of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ where each possible set is present independently with probability $p$. Let $\cal E_{\mathcal B}$ be the event that $\mathcal B$ defines the set of bases of a matroid. We prove that If $p= 1-\frac{c_n}{(k(n-k)\binom nk)^{1/2}}$ where $0\leq c_n\leq \infty$, then \[ \lim_{n\to\infty}\Pr[\cal E_{\cal B}\mid |\cal B|\geq2]=\begin{cases}1&c_n\to0.\\e^{-c^2}&c_n\to c.\\0&c_n\to \infty.\end{cases}\] In addition, we identify a condition preventing the occurence of $\cal E_{\cal B}$ and prove a hitting time version for the occurence of $\cal B$. We also prove that when $\cal E_{\mathcal B}$ occurs, $\mathcal B$ defines a sparse paving matroid w.h.p. In addition, study a greedy algorithm that produces a random matroid defined by a collection of hyperplanes. We use this to improve the estimates in \cite{HPV} on $\log m(n,k),\log p(n,k), \log s(n,k)$ where $ m(n, k), p(n, k), s(n, k)$ denote the number of matroids, paving matroids, and sparse paving matroids (respectively) of rank $k$ on $[n]$. Our improvement lies in that we can deal with $k$ growing slowly with $n$ as opposed to $k=O(1)$ in \cite{HPV}. More generally, we obtain estimates for the number of matchings in nearly-regular hypergraphs with small codegree, which may be of independent interest.

We determine the full nim-value structure of additive subtraction games in the {\em primitive quadratic} regime. The problem appears in Winning Ways by Berlekamp et al. in 1982; it includes a closed formula, involving Beatty-type {\em bracket expressions} on rational moduli, for determining the P-positions, but to the best of our knowledge, a complete proof of this claim has not yet appeared in the literature; Miklós and Post (2024) established outcome-periodicity, but without reference to that closed formula. The primitive quadratic case captures the source of the quadratic complexity of the problem, a claim supported by recent research in the dual setting of sink subtraction with Bhagat et al. This study focuses on a number theoretic solution involving the classical closed formula, and we establish that each nim-value sequence resides on a linear shift of the classical P-positions.

The M-polynomial provides a unifying framework for a wide class of degree-based topological indices. Despite its structural importance, general methods for computing the M-polynomial under graph constructions remain limited. In this paper, explicit formulas, and compact ones whenever possible, for the M-polynomial under different graph products whose vertex sets are the Cartesian product of the factors are developed. The products studied are the direct, the Cartesian, the strong, the lexicographic, the symmetric-difference, the disjunction, and the Sierpiński product. The obtained formulas yield a unified structural description of how vertex-degree interactions propagate under graph constructions and extend existing results for degree-based indices at the polynomial level.

Let $G$ be a graph, $S \subseteq V(G)$ be a vertex set in $G$ and $r$ be a positive integer. The distance $r$-independence number of $S$ is the size of the largest subset $I \subseteq S$ such that no pair $u$, $v$ of vertices in $I$ have a path on at most $r$ edges between them in $G$. It has been conjectured [Chudnovsky et al., arXiv, 2025] that for every positive integer $t$ there exist positive integers $c$, $d$ such that every graph $G$ that excludes both the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$ and the grid $\boxplus_t$ as an induced minor has a tree decomposition in which every bag has (distance $1$) independence number at most $c(\log n)^d$. We prove a weaker version of this conjecture where every bag of the tree decomposition has distance $16(\log n + 1)$-independence number at most $c(\log n)^d$. On the way we also prove a version of the conjecture where every bag of the decomposition has distance $8$-independence number at most $2^{c (\log n)^{1-(1/d)}}$.

We study the problem of finding an acyclic orientation of an undirected graph with constrained in-degree parities specified by a subset T of vertices. An orientation is called T -odd if a vertex v has odd in-degree if and only if v P T . While the unconstrained parity orientation problem is polynomial (Chevalier et al. (1983)), imposing acyclicity makes it more challenging, and its complexity remains an open question. Szegedy and Szegedy ( 2006) proposed a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for this problem, but it is not known whether it belongs to co-NP. Furthermore, Gravier et al. (2025) showed the problem becomes NP-complete on partially directed graphs, even when restricted to planar cubic graphs. We identify three necessary conditions for the existence of acyclic T -odd orientation: a global parity condition P, and two conditions S and S ensuring the existence of potential sources and sinks. Following the work of Frank and Kiraly (2002), we define graph classes containing the graphs for which a given subset of the necessary conditions P, S and S is also sufficient for the existence of an acyclic T -odd orientation. We establish the inclusion relationships between these classes. We complete the study of these classes by a characterization of the solvable instances for Cartesian products of paths and cycles. The proofs of these results are all constructive, so that acyclic T -odd orientations can be built in polynomial time whenever they exist. We use these families, along with cliques, to demonstrate the strictness of the class inclusions in our hierarchy.

We give a short and self-contained proof of Delahan's theorem stating that every simple graph on $n$ vertices occurs as an induced subgraph of a Steinhaus graph on $\frac{n(n-1)}{2}+1$ vertices. This new proof is obtained by considering the notion of generating index sets for Steinhaus triangles.

In this paper, we study an abelian-type property of infinite words called well distributed occurrences, or WELLDOC for short. An infinite word $w$ on a $d$-ary alphabet has the WELLDOC property if, for each factor $u$ of $w$, positive integer $m$, and vector $v\in \mathbb{N}^d$, there is an occurrence of $u$ such that the Parikh vector of the prefix of $w$ preceding such occurrence is congruent to $v$ modulo $m$. The Parikh vector of a finite word $v$ on an alphabet has its $i$-th component equal to the number of occurrences of the $i$-th letter in $v$. We provide a criterion of the WELLDOC property for words generated by morphisms.

A digraph consisting of a set of vertices $V$ and a set of arcs $E$ is called an interval digraph if there exists a family of closed intervals $\{I_u,J_u\}_{u \in V}$ such that $uv$ is an arc if and only if the intersection of $I_u$ and $J_v$ is non-empty. Interval digraphs naturally generalize interval graphs, by extending the classical interval intersection model to directed graphs. Several subclasses of interval digraphs have been studied in the literature-such as balanced, chronological and catch interval digraphs-each characterized by admitting interval representations that satisfy specific restrictions. Among these, interval nest digraphs are the ones that admit an interval representation in which $J_u$ is contained in $I_u$ for all vertices $u$ of $V$. In this work, we provide a complete characterization of interval nest digraphs in terms of vertex linear orderings with forbidden patterns, which we call nest orderings. This result completes the picture of vertex-ordering characterizations among the main subclasses of interval digraphs.

We systematically determine circular chromatic index of small graphs and multigraphs with maximum degree $4$, $5$, $6$ (and also their number for a given small order). We construct several infinite families of such graphs with circular chromatic index in the set $\{Δ+ 1/2, Δ+ 2/3, Δ+ 3/4$, $Δ+ 1\}$. Our results refute edge-connectivity variants of the ``Upper Gap Conjecture'' (about the non-existence of graphs with circular chromatic index just below $Δ+ 1$).

We investigate the domination polynomial of the co-maximal graph $Γ(\mathbb{Z}_n)$ related to the ring of integers modulo $n$. Explicit formulas are derived for \( n = p^{n_1} \) and \( n = p^{n_1}q^{n_2} \), demonstrating that the resulting polynomials exhibit unimodality and log-concavity. For general $n$, we present structural expressions that connect $D(Γ(\mathbb{Z}_n),x)$ to appropriate induced subgraphs. Finally, we examine domination roots and establish bounds for their moduli using the Eneström--Kakeya theorem.

We study a family of weighted Max-Cut instances on the complete graph $K_n$ in which edge weights decrease geometrically in lexicographic order: the $i$-th edge has weight $r^{N-i}$ where $N=\binom{n}{2}$. For $r\ge 2$, the lexicographically first cut is optimal; for $r=1$, all edges have equal weight and the balanced partition wins. In this paper we study the intermediate regime $1< r <2$. The geometric weighting makes early edges dominant and singles out the $k$-isolated cuts $C_k=\{1,\dots,k\}\mid\{k+1,\dots,n\}$ as natural candidates for optimality. For each $n$ and $k\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor-1$, we define threshold polynomials $P^{n,k}(r)$ whose unique roots $r_k(n)\in(1,2)$ determine when $C_k$ and $C_{k+1}$ exchange dominance. We prove that, for fixed $n$, these thresholds are strictly decreasing in $k$ and that $r_k(n)\to 1$ as $n\to\infty$. As our main result, we show that for $r\in(r_k(n),r_{k-1}(n))$ the cut $C_k$ achieves maximum weight among all isolated cuts, yielding a sharp phase diagram for the isolated-cut family. We conjecture that isolated cuts are globally optimal among all $2^{n-1}$ cuts when $n\ge 7$; all counterexamples for small $n$ are characterized completely, and extensive computations for $n\le 100$ support the conjecture.

The general position problem in graphs seeks the largest set of vertices such that no three vertices lie on a common geodesic. Its counting refinement, the general position polynomial $ψ(G)$, asks for all such possible sets. In this paper, We describe general position sets for several classes of graphs and provide explicit formulas for the general position polynomials of complete multipartite graphs. We specialize to balanced complete multipartite graphs and show that for part size $r\le 4$, the polynomial $ψ(K_{r,\dots,r})$ is log-concave and unimodal for all numbers of parts, while for larger $r$, counterexamples show that these properties fail. Finally, we analyze the corona $G\circ K_1$ and prove that unimodality of $ψ(G)$ is retained for numerous natural classes (paths, edgeless graphs, combs). This contributes to an open problem, but the general case remains unknown. Our findings support the parallel between general position polynomials and classical position-type parameters, and identify balanced multipartite graphs and coronas as promising testbeds for additional research.

We introduce a general framework for positional games in which players score points by claiming a prescribed portion of each winning set, extending the notion of scoring Maker-Breaker games. In the scoring variant, Maker gains a point by fully claiming a winning set, while Breaker aims to minimize Maker's total score. In this paper, we generalize these models for all k-uniform positional games by fixing an integer threshold s in {1,2,..., k} so that a player scores a point whenever she claims at least s elements of a winning set of size k. We refer to this class as s-of-k games. Such formulation allows for a flexible description of scoring objectives that appear in both theoretical models and real-life board games. We further investigate the impact of strategy restrictions on the achievable score. In particular, we analyze s-of-k games both under optimal play, where the score is denoted by SC, and under the additional constraint that Maker is restricted to a pairing strategy. The corresponding score in this setting is denoted by SC_2. While the unrestricted score captures the standard notion of optimal play in scoring positional games, the pairing-restricted score allows us to observe Maker's loss incurred by limiting her to these standard strategies. We comprehensively study s-of-k games played on regular grids, which provide a natural and uniform setting for illustrating the general framework. After developing several general tools for the analysis of both scores, we complement them by a number of ad-hoc strategies tailored for particular cases of these games, to obtain both upper and lower bounds for the two scores on triangular, square, rhombus and hexagonal grids.

The toughness of a graph $G$ is defined as the largest real number $t$ such that for any set $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that $G-S$ is disconnected, $S$ has at least $t$ times more elements than $G-S$ has components (unless $G$ is complete, in which case the toughness is defined to be infinite). A graph is said to be minimally tough if deleting any edge decreases the toughness. It is an open question whether there exists a minimally tough non-complete chordal graph with toughness exceeding $1$. We initiate the study of minimally tough graphs in the larger class of weakly chordal graphs. We obtain complete classifications of minimally tough graphs in the following subclasses of weakly chordal graphs: co-chordal graphs whose complement has diameter at least $3$, net-free co-chordal graphs, complements of forests, $P_4$-free graphs, and complete multipartite graphs. Our approach leads to simple proofs of two results on minimally tough graphs due to Dallard, Fernández, Katona, Milanič, and Varga.

Consider an undirected graph whose edges are labeled invertibly in a group. When does every Eulerian trail from one fixed vertex to another have the same label? We give a precise structural answer to this question. Essentially, we show that each ``$3$-connected part'' is labeled over a group which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ for some $k$. We also show that the algorithmic problem admits a polynomial-time reduction to the word problem for the group.

In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbors. A subset $S$ of vertices of $G$ is a double dominating set of $G$ if every vertex is dominated by at least two vertices in $S$. The double domination number $γ_{\times 2}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of $G$. In this paper, we prove that, for a maximal outerplanar graph $G$, the double domination number $γ_{\times 2}(G)$ is at most $(n+k)/2$, where $k$ is the number of pairs of consecutive vertices on the outer cycle but at distance at least 3. Although this bound was previously proposed by Abd Aziz, Rad and Kamarulhaili (A note on the double domination number in maximal outerplanar and planar graphs, RAIRO Operations Research, 56 (2022) 3367--3371), their proof was found to be incomplete. In this paper we establish the validity of this result by providing a complete proof.

The all-terminal reliability of a graph $G$ is the probability that $G$ remains connected when each edge fails independently with probability $p$. For fixed $n$ and $m$, the uniformly most reliable problem asks which graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges maximizes reliability for all $p \in [0,1]$. Although such graphs do not always exist, optimal graphs in the regime $p \to 0$ always do and are determined by the structure of their minimal cut sets. We establish a structural characterization of graphs that are most reliable near $p=0$. Our results partially resolve a conjecture of Bourel et al., showing that, under suitable conditions, regular graphs with maximal girth are optimal. Extending this analysis to graphs with fixed redundancy $r=m-(n-1)$ and sufficiently large $n$, we show that the most reliable graphs are obtained by subdividing the most reliable cubic graphs with $2(r-1)$ vertices. The general conjecture remains open. Unlike previous results, which resolved only small redundancy cases or very dense regimes, our approach yields a substantial extension of the known range. We determine the unique cubic candidates for uniformly most reliable graphs for all redundancy levels $m-n \le 19$, and prove the non-existence of uniformly most reliable graphs for several infinite families with fixed redundancy and asymptotically large $n$. These results significantly enlarge both the candidate class and the range of provable non-existence.

The \textsc{Dominating Set} problem is a classical and extensively studied topic in graph theory and theoretical computer science. In this paper, we examine the algorithmic complexity of several well-known exact-distance variants of domination, namely \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination}. Let $G$ be a graph and let $r \geq 2$ be an integer. A set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is an \emph{$r$-hop dominating set} if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus S$ is at distance exactly $r$ from some vertex of $S$. Similarly, $S$ is an \emph{$r$-step dominating set} if every vertex of $G$ lies at distance exactly $r$ from at least one vertex of $S$. An \emph{$r$-hop Roman dominating function} on $G$ is a function $f \colon V(G)\to\{0,1,2\}$ such that for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u$ at distance exactly $r$ from $v$ with $f(u)=2$. The \emph{weight} of $f$ is defined as $f(V)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. The \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} (respectively, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}) problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop dominating set (respectively, $r$-step dominating set) of size at most $k$, while the \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop Roman dominating function of weight at most $k$. It is known that for every $r\ge 2$, the problems \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} are \textsc{NP}-complete. First we prove that for all $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} is \textsc{W[2]}-complete. Furthermore, for every $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination} and \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} remain \textsc{W[2]}-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. Unless the ETH fails, none of these problems admits an algorithm running in time $2^{o(n+m)}$ on graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges.

For a graph $G$, let $c_1(G)$ be the largest distortion necessary to embed any shortest-path metric on $G$ into $\ell_1$, and for any natural number $n,m\in\mathbb{N}$, denote $K_{n,m}$ as the complete bipartite graph. In this note, we caculate the value of $c_1(K_{2,n})$, more precisely we prove $c_1(K_{2,n})=\frac{3k-2}{2k-1}$ where $k=\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$.

Local complement is a graph operation formalized by Bouchet which replaces the neighborhood of a chosen vertex with its edge-complement. This operation induces an equivalence relation on graphs; determining the size of the resulting equivalence classes is a challenging problem in general. Bouchet obtained formulas only for paths and cycles, and brute-force methods are limited to very small graphs. In this work, we extend these results by deriving explicit formulas for several broad families of distance-hereditary graphs, including complete multipartite graphs, clique-stars, and repeater graphs. Our approach uses a technique known as split decomposition to establish upper bounds on equivalence class sizes, and we prove these bounds are tight through a combinatorial enumeration of the graphs' decomposed structure up to symmetry.