arXiv++ Combinatorics

An influential 1989 result of Naddef shows that the diameters of $0/1$-polytopes are at most their dimension. This was extended shortly after by Kleinschmidt and Onn to any lattice polytope in $[0,k]^{d}$, where they showed a bound of at most $dk$. Naddef's argument easily extends to the monotone setting motivated by the simplex method, where one requires paths to increase with respect to a linear objective function. However, the Kleinschmidt-Onn argument does not. In fact, no argument in the 30 years since has managed to fill that gap. Prior to this work, it remained open whether the monotone diameter is bounded by a polynomial in $d$ and $k$ with no lower bounds suggesting any separation between the worst-case diameter and worst-case monotone diameter. Linear upper bounds hold for $k=1$ and $k=2$. However, we exhibit a sharp threshold for this question at $k = 3$ by constructing for each $d \geq 1$ a lattice polytope in $[0,3]^{6d}$ with monotone diameter at least $2^{d}-1$. In particular, the polynomial bound does not hold. Furthermore, we show that Naddef's result does not extend to the unbounded setting by exhibiting a family of unbounded polyhedra with $0/1$-vertices and diameter exponential in their dimension.

Greedy algorithms efficiently approximate combinatorial optimization problems, but their guarantees weaken when feasibility couples combinatorial structure with global physical constraints. We study monotone nondecreasing supermodular minimization over the bases of a graphic greedoid under physics-induced constraints. We model physics-informed selection using a look-ahead oracle that identifies candidates extendable to a feasible basis, yielding the Conditioned Sequential Greedy Algorithm. We derive a closed-form approximation bound, which we call the price of feasibility, based on the variability of oracle-restricted candidate sets and a probabilistic correction for unobserved elements. As a case study, we show that FORWARD, an algorithm for multi-source radial network reconfiguration, instantiates this framework. Numerical results demonstrate the tightness of the bound and quantify the feasibility-optimality trade-off.

Fourier-Motzkin elimination computes an inequality description of the projection of a polyhedron onto a subset of its coordinates by eliminating one variable at a time. It is used in several areas of optimisation and computer science, and it is a standard way of obtaining the entropic constraints of a causal structure, where the marginalisation over the latent variables produces such a projection. Its limitation is the growth of the intermediate systems of inequalities, which can be doubly exponential in the number of eliminated variables even though the projection itself grows only as a single exponential. In practice the computational overload of the method therefore depends on two choices: how the redundant inequalities are removed after each step, and the order in which the variables are eliminated. We consider both. We first show, by an explicit example, that Imbert's redundancy test cannot be interleaved with redundancy removal by linear programming. We show that the two methods, however, can be combined soundly if the derivation records used by Imbert's test are re-initialised after every step at which linear programming is used. We then propose a rule for choosing the elimination order of the variables that gives a significant computational advantage, however, at the cost of increased resource usage. We demonstrate this advantage on some random polytopes, where the rule reduces the running time by factors of between 6 and 25 compared with the same elimination under a fixed order. For entropic descriptions of causal structures, with more than 250 inequalities and more than 100 variables to eliminate, our rule keeps the number of inequalities handled at each step one to two orders of magnitude lower than a fixed order.

We study several $k$-fold generalizations of the Lovász theta function associated with the maximum $k$-colorable induced subgraph problem. The first is the Narasimhan--Manber parameter $\vartheta_k$. We prove that, for graphs whose adjacency matrix belongs to a homogeneous partially coherent algebra, this parameter is recovered by the theta number of the Cartesian product with the complete graph on $k$ vertices. This class includes distance-regular and $1$-walk-regular graphs, and thus our result generalizes a theorem by Sinjorgo and Sotirov (2022) for graphs that are vertex- and edge-transitive. We introduce a new parameter $\varphi_k$ obtained from orthonormal representations of graphs and show the inequality $\varphi_k \leq \vartheta_k$. For both parameters, we study the smallest $k$ for which the parameter is equal to the number of vertices; these saturation parameters yield lower bounds on the chromatic number. We determine which vertex-weighted versions of these parameters are gauges, and discuss a natural definition for the $k$-fold theta body of a graph. We conclude with open questions comparing $\vartheta_k$, $\varphi_k$, $\vartheta(G\square K_k)$, and related convexifications.

The Job Sequencing and Tool Switching Problem (SSP) is a well-known combinatorial optimization problem arising in the context of flexible manufacturing. Since the seminal work of Tang and Denardo (1988), the SSP has received significant attention in the literature, leading to the development of numerous exact and heuristic approaches. Despite these efforts, several benchmark instances proposed decades ago and containing only 20 jobs have remained unsolved to proven optimality. In this work, we propose an exact algorithm for the SSP, namely the Combinatorial Branch-and-Bound (C-B\&B) algorithm, which combines two distinct branch-and-bound algorithms, each introducing novel features compared with the existing literature. The former relies on a new branching scheme designed to reduce the size of the implicit enumeration tree, together with a collection of new bounding functions. The latter builds on the branching scheme introduced by Laporte et al. (2004) and strengthens it with a new bounding function and two dominance rules. Within C-B\&B, these exact algorithms are complemented by a preprocessing phase that incorporates a new branch-and-bound-based heuristic capable of rapidly generating a high-quality initial incumbent solution. Extensive computational experiments show that C-B\&B represents a strong breakthrough over previously published approaches, proving optimality for more instances with significantly less computational effort and closing several benchmark instances that have remained open for decades.

We develop a few calculus rules to compute or lower bound the facial distance of a polytope. We illustrate our calculus rules on various popular polytopes. In particular, we provide a provide a lower bound on the facial distance of the Birkhoff polytope.

We classify the facial exposedness of completely positive cones over symmetric cones in terms of the rank of the associated Euclidean Jordan algebras. The completely positive cones are facially exposed when the rank is at most $2$, but are not facially exposed when the rank is at least $5$. Facial exposedness is not completely determined by the rank when the rank is $3$ or $4$, but we provide a characterization in each case. The resulting classification of facial exposedness in fact agrees with the corresponding classification of spectrahedrality for completely positive cones.

In 1971, Mason conjectured that the numbers of independent sets of fixed size in a matroid constitute an ultra log-concave sequence. In 2020, this conjecture was proven by Brändén and Huh and independently by Anari, Liu, Gharan and Vinzant. Recently, this result was extended to $M^\natural$-concave functions. In this note, we make the next step by proving it for $M_2^\natural$-concave functions. This shows the same property for the intersection of any pair of matroids (which itself may not be a matroid). Furthermore, we show that this can not be further extended to the intersections of three matroids by including a counterexample of partition matroids.

Discrete Convex Analysis (DCA) is a discrete analog of continuous convex analysis, originally proposed as a unified theoretical framework for efficiently solvable combinatorial optimization problems. Recently, DCA has proven to be a powerful tool across diverse fields, ranging from operations research to economics and pure mathematics. Motivated by the broad applicability of DCA, this paper establishes a unified theory of discrete convex analysis over discrete structures arising from classical root systems, extending the usual setting of the integer lattice, which essentially corresponds to type A. We adopt the vertex set of the Euclidean Coxeter complex as the primal discrete domain for L-convexity, and the root lattice as the dual discrete domain for M-convexity. Using the associated polyhedral structures, we formulate L- and M-convex functions together with notions of integrality determined by the root system. We show that local optimality guarantees global optimality for these functions. Furthermore, we establish that integral L-convex functions and integral M-convex functions correspond one-to-one via the discrete Fenchel--Legendre conjugate, thereby extending the conjugacy in the original DCA from type A to all classical root systems.

Dorbec et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 27 (2013)] conjectured that, for all integers $k\geq1$ and $r\geq3$, every connected $r$-regular graph $G$ of order $n$, other than $K_{r,r}$, satisfies $γ_{P,k}(G)\leq n/(r+1)$. After disproving this conjecture, Chen et al.[Graphs Combin., 38 (2022)] proposed a corresponding conjecture for claw-free regular graphs. In this paper, we prove this conjecture: for integers $k\geq\ell\geq1$, every connected claw-free $(k+\ell+1)$-regular graph $G$ of order $n$ satisfies $γ_{P,k}(G)\leq n/(k+\ell+2)$, and this bound is tight. Moreover, without the claw-free assumption, we show that, for each fixed integer $k\geq1$, the supremum of $γ_{P,k}(G)/\lvert V(G)\rvert$ over all connected $r$-regular graphs $G$ is asymptotic to $(\ln r)/r$ as $r\to\infty$.

A convex polygon is called small if its diameter is at most one. Reinhardt proved the universal perimeter bound $\mathrm{perim}(P) \leq U_n := 2n\sin(π/(2n))$, and the bound is attained whenever $n$ has a nontrivial odd divisor. The remaining power-of-two cases have resisted exact solution beyond $n=8$. This paper presents computer-assisted proof candidates for the first three open cases, $n=16,32,64$. In each case, the candidate theorem asserts uniqueness of the maximizing congruence class. The proof architecture is common to all three cases: pass to the difference body $P-P$; encode its reconstruction by a sign code; prove that every global maximizer is saturated, so all difference-body vertices lie on the unit circle; localize every competitive configuration near the regular angle vector; exhaustively screen the sign codes using exact arithmetic; eliminate all nonwinning dihedral orbits; and prove uniqueness inside the winning code by strong convexity and a quantitative KKT argument. The exact certificates cover $2^{15}$ normalized codes for $n=16$, $2^{31}$ normalized codes for $n=32$, and all $2^{64}$ half-codes for $n=64$, leaving respectively $16$, $96$, and $896$ survivors before orbit elimination. The accompanying source package contains the verifiers, recorded outputs, and separate computational cross-checks. These results have not yet received independent human expert review and are therefore deliberately presented as proof candidates rather than literature-established theorems.

The degree sequence optimization problem is to find a subgraph of a given graph which maximizes the sum over all vertices of a given function evaluated at the subgraph degree of that vertex. Here we study this problem and its complexity for quadratic functions. In particular, we introduce the critical roots of a graph, and show they define intervals over which the optimal value of the problem, as the quadratic root varies, is convex piecewise affine.

In this paper, we build upon the analysis initiated by Gennadiy Averkov \& Matthias Schymura (2022) and establish that the number of distinct columns of a $Δ$-modular matrix $A \in \mathbb{Z}^{m \times n}$ of rank $m$ is $O(m^3 Δ)$, thereby improving the earlier bound of $O(m^4 Δ)$. Recall that a matrix is called $Δ$-modular if the maximum absolute value of every $m \times m$ minor is exactly $Δ$.

Symmetric Numerical Three-Dimensional Matching (SN3DM) asks whether three disjoint labeled classes with identical weight multisets can be partitioned into class-transversal triples of one common target sum. Its theme is role recovery under marginal symmetry: identical numerical catalogues force the asymmetric source roles to be reconstructed from incidence structure alone. This tutorial develops three complementary hardness results for that symmetry restriction. Part I gives a unary-polynomial reduction from N3DM. Source roles become ports in one common occurrence set, a uniquely forced filler system reserves one main incidence per port, bipartite edge coloring restores the output-class labels, and a no-carry mixed-radix encoding packs four coordinates into positive integers. Hence SN3DM is strongly NP-complete. Part II studies Max-SN3DM, for which strong NP-hardness alone does not exclude a PTAS. Two numerical compilers lift Petrank's perfect-completeness gap for bounded 3DM to unary Max-N3DM, and a defect-stability lemma shows that a symmetric matching of size 13n - d yields a source matching of size at least n - 21d, where n is the multiset cardinality, and d is a symmetric defect. Hence, for some epsilon > 0, it is NP-hard to separate perfect instances from those of optimum at most (1- epsilon) times perfect, so no PTAS exists unless P = NP. Every maximal legal triple matching is a 3-approximation, placing the problem in APX. Part III supplies the approximation-preserving reduction Part II does not claim. An exact pair compiler and a one-live-port separation map degree-three Maximum 3DM to unary Max-SN3DM with OPT(Max-SN3DM) = Gamma + OPT(Max-3DM) for a fixed offset Gamma and one-for-one optimum-error transfer. The L-reduction has constants alpha = 764 and beta = 1, so Max-SN3DM is APX-complete. The two are incomparable; worked yes / no instances audit each construction.

We prove that every positive rational number has eventually greedy best Egyptian underapproximations, both when repetitions of the denominators are allowed and when the denominators are required to be distinct. This answers affirmatively a problem originating with Erdős and Graham and later revisited by Nathanson, and yields an application concerning the maximal asymptotic growth of denominators in unit fraction series converging to certain rational numbers. We reformulate the question as an optimal control problem for a dynamical system, construct an appropriate payoff function, and study properties of the associated Bellman function. We also answer another question of Nathanson by constructing an irrational number with unique and greedy best Egyptian underapproximations.

The Kemeny rule aggregates rankings by minimizing their total Kendall-tau distance from an aggregate order. We prove that Kemeny Score is NP-complete for exactly three unweighted rankings, even when every candidate pair is split $2$-to-$1$. On the same profiles, the winner, unique-winner, and possible- and necessary-precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, while recognizing a Kemeny-optimal or uniquely Kemeny-optimal aggregate is coNP-complete. The hard instances induce tournaments of majority dimension exactly $3$. The reduction also determines the exact maximum-cut value from the optimal Kemeny score and recovers a maximum cut from any Kemeny-optimal aggregate. For every fixed $q\geq3$ and $\lceil q/2\rceil\leq s\leq q$, minimum pairwise support $s$ yields a sharp dichotomy: the score problem is NP-complete, the winner and precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, and the recognition problems are coNP-complete when $3s\leq2q$; for $3s>2q$, the majority tournament is transitive and its unique topological order is the unique Kemeny-optimal aggregate. Exact support $s$ suffices in the hard case when $s>q/2$, and supports in ${s,s+1}$ suffice when $s=q/2$. These results give complete fixed-profile-size classifications and transfer to Slater orders, permutation medians, and maximum-likelihood central rankings in the Mallows model. Finally, a six-copy construction proves NP-completeness of both Kemeny Score and Kendall--Tau Center for three pairwise-equidistant rankings that still split every pair $2$-to-$1$. For $N$ output candidates, their common distance is $\frac23\binom N2$, the largest possible for an equidistant triple. The construction gives affine formulas for both optimal values, characterizes all Kemeny-optimal output orders, and shows that the output has a unique Kemeny-optimal order and a unique center exactly when the input has a unique Kemeny-optimal order.

In an incomplete round robin tournament, teams play against different sets of opponents. Given varying strengths of the teams, this raises a fairness issue. We establish the complexity of determining whether a fair draw exists under various scenarios involving the presence of pots (i.e., strength based groups of teams), teams coming from the same association, connectivity requirements, and others. We also show experimentally how fair incomplete round robin tournaments can be generated.

We introduce ideal Gårding polynomials, a convexity-enhanced subclass of Gårding polynomials whose Gårding components are recursively convex under partial differentiation. This class strictly contains real stable polynomials and, after translation and homogenization, lies in the Lorentzian class. Our main result is that ideal Gårding polynomials still admit a robust structure theory despite this additional convexity: they are preserved under polarization, satisfy natural closure properties, and support a linear preserver theory. A key contribution of this paper is a universal model for univariate Gårding polynomials, described by monotone root sequences and equivalently by volume polynomials of Pitman--Stanley polytopes. We establish quotient concavity, and Newton--Maclaurin type inequalities, which leads to the polarization theorem, and suggests further connections with convex geometry and Lorentzian polynomials.

We study Heilbronn's triangle problem in the unit right triangle, where $n$ points are placed to maximize the smallest of the $\binom{n}{3}$ triangle areas they span. We prove a boundary-structure result: unless all three vertices are occupied, some optimal configuration with $n \ge 5$ has at least four points on the boundary, one edge carrying two of them. With the affine $S_3$ symmetry this fixes four boundary points and $n$ orientation variables in a mixed-integer model that certifies global optimality for all $n \le 8$, including $n = 7, 8$, where no proof was previously available, closing gaps left by grid search and by branch-and-bound. For $n \le 7$ we obtain exact optima with explicit configurations. For $n = 8$ the optimum is conjectured to be the real root of a septic obtained by Chen, Zeng and Zhou, which our reconstruction confirms to $250$ digits. We show its Galois group is $S_7$, so on that conjecture no expression in radicals exists.

In 1992, Billera and Sturmfels introduced coherent monotone paths on polytopes as part of their description of the fiber polytope construction, and later in 1994 showed with Kapranov that these coherent monotone paths capture the topology of the space of all monotone paths, paths from a minimum to a maximum, in the directed graph of a polytope with orientation induced by a linear function. Those results motivate the following analog of the polynomial Hirsch conjecture: Does there always exist a coherent monotone path of polynomial length on a polytope for any choice of orientation induced by a linear function? We show this is not the case by exhibiting a family of polytopes and corresponding linear functions for which every coherent monotone path is exponentially long. As applications, we strengthen longstanding results pertaining to lower bounds for the shadow simplex method, geometric transversals in discrete geometry, and parametric linear optimization.