arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

connected graph

2681 papers tagged with this keyword
2017-05-29
On the regularity of edge ideal of graphs
Let $G$ be a graph with $n$ vertices, $S=\mathbb{K}[x_1,\dots,x_n]$ be the polynomial ring in $n$ variables over a field $\mathbb{K}$ and $I(G)$ denote the edge ideal of $G$. For every collection $\mathcal{H}$ of connected graphs with $K_2\in \mathcal{H}$, we introduce the notions of $\ind-match_{\mathcal{H}}(G)$ and $\min-match_{\mathcal{H}}(G)$. It will be proved that the inequalities $\ind-match_{\{K_2, C_5\}}(G)\leq{\rm reg}(S/I(G))\leq\min-match_{\{K_2, C_5\}}(G)$ are true. Moreover, we show that if $G$ is a Cohen--Macaulay graph with girth at least five, then ${\rm reg}(S/I(G))=\ind-match_{\{K_2, C_5\}}(G)$. Furthermore, we prove that if $G$ is a paw--free and doubly Cohen--Macaulay graph, then ${\rm reg}(S/I(G))=\ind-match_{\{K_2, C_5\}}(G)$ if and only if every connected component of $G$ is either a complete graph or a $5$-cycle graph. Among other results, we show that for every doubly Cohen--Macaulay simplicial complex, the equality ${\rm reg}(\mathbb{K}[Δ])={\rm dim}(\mathbb{K}[Δ])$ holds.
2017-05-28 v4
Proof of a local antimagic conjecture
Published in Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 20 no. 1, Graph Theory (June 4, 2018) dmtcs:3887 • View Publication • BIB
An antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2$ admits an antimagic labelling. Recently, two sets of authors (Arumugam, Premalatha, Bača \& Semaničová-Feňovčíková (2017), and Bensmail, Senhaji \& Lyngsie (2017)) independently introduced the weaker notion of a local antimagic labelling, where only adjacent vertices must be distinguished. Both sets of authors conjectured that any connected graph other than $K_2$ admits a local antimagic labelling. We prove this latter conjecture using the probabilistic method. Thus the parameter of local antimagic chromatic number, introduced by Arumugam et al., is well-defined for every connected graph other than $K_2$ .
2017-05-24 v3
Packing parameters in graphs: New bounds and a solution to an open problem
Published in Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2019 • View Publication • BIB
In this paper, we investigate the packing parameters in graphs. By applying the Mantel's theorem, We give upper bounds on packing and open packing numbers of triangle-free graphs along with characterizing the graphs for which the equalities hold and exhibit sharp Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for packing numbers. We also solve the open problem of characterizing all connected graphs with $ρ_{o}(G)=n-ω(G)$ posed in [S. Hamid and S. Saravanakumar, {\em Packing parameters in graphs}, Discuss Math. Graph Theory, 35 (2015), 5--16].
2017-05-23
Two bounds for generalized $3$-connectivity of Cartesian product graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
The generalized $k$-connectivity $κ_{k}(G)$ of a graph $G$, which was introduced by Chartrand et al.(1984) is a generalization of the concept of vertex connectivity. Let $G$ and $H$ be nontrivial connected graphs. Recently, Li et al. gave a lower bound for the generalized $3$-connectivity of the Cartesian product graph $G \square H$ and proposed a conjecture for the case that $H$ is $3$-connected. In this paper, we give two different forms of lower bounds for the generalized $3$-connectivity of Cartesian product graphs. The first lower bound is stronger than theirs, and the second confirms their conjecture.
Nordhaus-Gaddum-type theorem for conflict-free connection number of graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
An edge-colored graph $G$ is \emph{conflict-free connected} if, between each pair of distinct vertices, there exists a path containing a color used on exactly one of its edges. The \emph{conflict-free connection number} of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $cfc(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ conflict-free connected. In this paper, we determine all trees $T$ of order $n$ for which $cfc(T)=n-t$, where $t\geq 1$ and $n\geq 2t+2 $. Then we prove that $1\leq cfc(G)\leq n-1$ for a connected graph $G$, and characterize the graphs $G$ with $cfc(G)=1,n-4,n-3,n-2,n-1$, respectively. Finally, we get the Nordhaus-Gaddum-type theorem for the conflict-free connection number of graphs, and prove that if $G$ and $\overline{G}$ are connected, then $4\leq cfc(G)+cfc(\overline{G})\leq n$ and $4\leq cfc(G)\cdot cfc(\overline{G})\leq2(n-2)$, and moreover, $cfc(G)+cfc(\overline{G})=n$ or $cfc(G)\cdot cfc(\overline{G})=2(n-2)$ if and only if one of $G$ and $\overline{G}$ is a tree with maximum degree $n-2$ or a $P_5$, and the lower bounds are sharp.
2017-05-21
More results on the distance (signless) Laplacian eigenvalues of graphs
Let $G$ be a connected graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. Let $Tr(G)$ be the diagonal matrix of vertex transmissions of $G$ and $D(G)$ be the distance matrix of $G$. The distance Laplacian matrix of $G$ is defined as $\mathcal{L}(G)=Tr(G)-D(G)$. The distance signless Laplacian matrix of $G$ is defined as $\mathcal{Q}(G)=Tr(G)+D(G)$. In this paper, we give a lower bound on the distance Laplacian spectral radius in terms of $D_1$, as a consequence, we show that $\partial_1^L(G)\geq n+\lceil\frac{n}ω\rceil$ where $ω$ is the clique number of $G$. Furthermore, we give some graft transformations, by using them, we characterize the extremal graph attains the maximum distance spectral radius in terms of $n$ and $ω$. Moreover, we also give bounds on the distance signless Laplacian eigenvalues of $G$, and give a confirmation on a conjecture due to Aouchiche and Hansen.
Conflict-free vertex-connections of graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
A path in a vertex-colored graph is called \emph{conflict free} if there is a color used on exactly one of its vertices. A vertex-colored graph is said to be \emph{conflict-free vertex-connected} if any two vertices of the graph are connected by a conflict-free path. This paper investigates the question: For a connected graph $G$, what is the smallest number of colors needed in a vertex-coloring of $G$ in order to make $G$ conflict-free vertex-connected. As a result, we get that the answer is easy for $2$-connected graphs, and very difficult for connected graphs with more cut-vertices, including trees.
2017-05-17
Sharp bounds for the Randic index of graphs with given minimum and maximum degree
The Randi{\' c} index of a graph $G$, written $R(G)$, is the sum of $\frac 1{\sqrt{d(u)d(v)}}$ over all edges $uv$ in $E(G)$. %let $R(G)=\sum_{uv \in E(G)} \frac 1{\sqrt{d(u)d(v)}}$, which is called the Randi{\' c} index of it. Let $d$ and $D$ be positive integers $d < D$. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is a graph with minimum degree $d$ and maximum degree $D$, then $R(G) \ge \frac{\sqrt{dD}}{d+D}n$; equality holds only when $G$ is an $n$-vertex $(d,D)$-biregular. Furthermore, we show that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex connected graph with minimum degree $d$ and maximum degree $D$, then $R(G) \le \frac n2- \sum_{i=d}^{D-1}\frac 12 \left( \frac 1{\sqrt{i}} - \frac 1{\sqrt{i+1}}\right)^2$; it is sharp for infinitely many $n$, and we characterize when equality holds in the bound.
Conflict-free connection numbers of line graphs
Published • View Publication • BIB
A path in an edge-colored graph is called \emph{conflict-free} if it contains at least one color used on exactly one of its edges. An edge-colored graph $G$ is \emph{conflict-free connected} if for any two distinct vertices of $G$, there is a conflict-free path connecting them. For a connected graph $G$, the \emph{conflict-free connection number} of $G$, denoted by $cfc(G)$, is defined as the minimum number of colors that are required to make $G$ conflict-free connected. In this paper, we investigate the conflict-free connection numbers of connected claw-free graphs, especially line graphs. We first show that for an arbitrary connected graph $G$, there exists a positive integer $k$ such that $cfc(L^k(G))\leq 2$. Secondly, we get the exact value of the conflict-free connection number of a connected claw-free graph, especially a connected line graph. Thirdly, we prove that for an arbitrary connected graph $G$ and an arbitrary positive integer $k$, we always have $cfc(L^{k+1}(G))\leq cfc(L^k(G))$, with only the exception that $G$ is isomorphic to a star of order at least~$5$ and $k=1$. Finally, we obtain the exact values of $cfc(L^k(G))$, and use them as an efficient tool to get the smallest nonnegative integer $k_0$ such that $cfc(L^{k_0}(G))=2$.
2017-05-15
Relationship between the distinguishing index, minimum degree and maximum degree of graphs
Let $δ$ and $Δ$ be the minimum and the maximum degree of the vertices of a simple connected graph $G$, respectively. The distinguishing index of a graph $G$, denoted by $D'(G)$, is the least number of labels in an edge labeling of $G$ not preserved by any non-trivial automorphism. Motivated by a conjecture by Pilśniak (2017) that implies that for any $2$-connected graph $D'(G) \leq \lceil \sqrt{Δ(G)}\rceil +1$, we prove that for any graph $G$ with $δ\geq 2$, $D'(G) \leq \lceil \sqrt[δ]{Δ}\rceil +1$. Also, we show that the distinguishing index of $k$-regular graphs is at most $2$, for any $k\geq 5$.
2017-05-08 v2
On degree sum conditions for 2-factors with a prescribed number of cycles
Published • View Publication • BIB
For a vertex subset $X$ of a graph $G$, let $Δ_{t}(X)$ be the maximum value of the degree sums of the subsets of $X$ of size $t$. In this paper, we prove the following result: Let $k$ be a positive integer, and let $G$ be an $m$-connected graph of order $n \ge 5k - 2$. If $Δ_{2}(X) \ge n$ for every independent set $X$ of size $\lceil m/k \rceil+1$ in $G$, then $G$ has a 2-factor with exactly $k$ cycles. This is a common generalization of the results obtained by Brandt et al. [Degree conditions for 2-factors, J. Graph Theory 24 (1997) 165-173] and Yamashita [On degree sum conditions for long cycles and cycles through specified vertices, Discrete Math. 308 (2008) 6584-6587], respectively.
2017-05-06
Proper vertex connection and graph operations
Published • View Publication • BIB
A path in a vertex-colored graph is a {\it vertex-proper path} if any two internal adjacent vertices differ in color. A vertex-colored graph is {\it proper vertex $k$-connected} if any two vertices of the graph are connected by $k$ disjoint vertex-proper paths of the graph. For a $k$-connected graph $G$, the {\it proper vertex $k$-connection number} of $G$, denoted by $pvc_{k}(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors required to make $G$ proper vertex $k$-connected. A vertex-colored graph is {\it strong proper vertex-connected}, if for any two vertices $u,v$ of the graph, there exists a vertex-proper $u$-$v$ geodesic. For a connected graph $G$, the {\it strong proper vertex-connection number} of $G$, denoted by $spvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors required to make $G$ strong proper vertex-connected. In this paper, we study the proper vertex $k$-connection number and the strong proper vertex-connection number on the join of two graphs, the Cartesian, lexicographic, strong and direct product, and present exact values or upper bounds for these operations of graphs.
2017-05-06
Total proper connection and graph operations
Published • View Publication • BIB
A graph is said to be {\it total-colored} if all the edges and vertices of the graph are colored. A path in a total-colored graph is a {\it total proper path} if $(i)$ any two adjacent edges on the path differ in color, $(ii)$ any two internal adjacent vertices on the path differ in color, and $(iii)$ any internal vertex of the path differs in color from its incident edges on the path. A total-colored graph is called {\it total-proper connected} if any two vertices of the graph are connected by a total proper path of the graph. For a connected graph $G$, the {\it total proper connection number} of $G$, denoted by $tpc(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors required to make $G$ total-proper connected. In this paper, we study the total proper connection number for the graph operations. We find that $3$ is the total proper connection number for the join, the lexicographic product and the strong product of nearly all graphs. Besides, we study three kinds of graphs with one factor to be traceable for the Cartesian product as well as the permutation graphs of the star and traceable graphs. The values of the total proper connection number for these graphs are all $3$.
2017-05-03 v2
Topological containment of the 5-clique minus an edge in 4-connected graphs
The topological containment problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable for any fixed pattern graph $H$, but good characterisations have been found for only a handful of non-trivial pattern graphs. The complete graph on five vertices, $K_5$, is one pattern graph for which a characterisation has not been found. The discovery of such a characterisation would be of particular interest, due to the Hajós Conjecture. One step towards this may be to find a good characterisation of graphs that do not topologically contain the simpler pattern graph $K_5^-$, obtained by removing a single edge from $K_5$. This paper makes progress towards achieving this, by showing that every 4-connected graph must contain a $K_5^-$-subdivision.
Graham's pebbling conjecture on Cartesian product of the middle graphs of even cycles
A pebbling move on a graph $G$ consists of taking two pebbles off one vertex and placing one on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of a graph $G$, denoted by $f(G)$, is the least integer $n$ such that, however $n$ pebbles are located on the vertices of $G$, we can move one pebble to any vertex by a sequence of pebbling moves. Let $M(G)$ be the middle graph of $G$. For any connected graphs $G$ and $H$, Graham conjectured that $f(G\times H)\leq f(G)f(H)$. In this paper, we give the pebbling number of some graphs and prove that Graham's conjecture holds for the middle graphs of some even cycles.
2017-04-28 v4
Generating simple near-bipartite bricks
Published • View Publication • BIB
A brick is a $3$-connected graph such that the graph obtained from it by deleting any two distinct vertices has a perfect matching. A brick $G$ is near-bipartite if it has a pair of edges $α$ and $β$ such that $G-\{α,β\}$ is bipartite and matching covered; examples are $K_4$ and the triangular prism $\overline{C_6}$. The significance of near-bipartite bricks arises from the theory of ear decompositions of matching covered graphs. The object of this paper is to establish a generation procedure which is specific to the class of simple near-bipartite bricks. In particular, we prove that every simple near-bipartite brick $G$ has an edge $e$ so that the graph obtained from $G-e$ by contracting each edge that is incident with a vertex of degree two is also a simple near-bipartite brick, unless $G$ belongs to any of eight well-defined infinite families. This is a refinement of the brick generation theorem of Norine and Thomas (Generating Bricks, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 2007) which is appropriate for the restricted class of near-bipartite bricks. Earlier, the first author (Generating near-bipartite bricks, J. Graph Theory, 2019) proved a similar generation theorem for (not necessarily simple) near-bipartite bricks; we deduce our main result from this theorem. Our proof is based on the strategy of Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2008) and uses several of their techniques and results. The results presented here also appear in the Ph.D. thesis of the first author.
2017-04-24
T-joins in infinite graphs as edge-disjoint system of paths matching the vertices in $ T $
We characterize the class of infinite connected graphs $ G $ for which there exists a $ T $-join for any choice of an infinite $ T \subseteq V(G) $. We also show that the following well-known fact remains true in the infinite case. If $ G $ is connected and does not contain a $ T $-join, then it will if we either remove an arbitrary vertex from $ T $ or add any new vertex to $ T $.
2017-04-22
$A_α$-spectrum of a graph obtained by copies of a rooted graph and applications
Given a connected graph $R$ on $r$ vertices and a rooted graph $H,$ let $R\{H\}$ be the graph obtained from $r$ copies of $H$ and the graph $R$ by identifying the root of the $i-th$ copy of $H$ with the $i-th$ vertex of $R$. Let $0\leqα\leq1,$ and let \[ A_α(G)=αD(G)+(1-α)A(G) \] where $D(G)$ and $A(G)$ are the diagonal matrix of the vertex degrees of $G$ and the adjacency matrix of $G$, respectively. A basic result on the $A_α-$ spectrum of $R\{H\}$ is obtained. This result is used to prove that if $H=B_{k}$ is a generalized Bethe tree on $k$ levels, then the eigenvalues of $A_α(R\{B_{k}\})$ are the eigenvalues of symmetric tridiagonal matrices of order not exceeding $k$; additionally, the multiplicity of each eigenvalue is determined. Finally, applications to a unicyclic graph are given, including an upper bound on the $α-$ spectral radius in terms of the largest vertex degree and the largest height of the trees obtained by removing the edges of the unique cycle in the graph.
2017-04-20
Independent transversal domination number of a graph
Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph. A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is a {\it dominating set} of $G$ if every vertex in $V\setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex of $S$. The {\it domination number} of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the cardinality of a minimum dominating set of $G$. Furthermore, a dominating set $S$ is an {\it independent transversal dominating set} of $G$ if it intersects every maximum independent set of $G$. The {\it independent transversal domination number} of $G$, denoted by $γ_{it}(G)$, is the cardinality of a minimum independent transversal dominating set of $G$. In 2012, Hamid initiated the study of the independent transversal domination of graphs, and posed the following two conjectures: Conjecture 1. If $G$ is a non-complete connected graph on $n$ vertices, then $γ_{it}(G)\leq\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$. Conjecture 2. If G is a connected bipartite graph, then $γ_{it}(G)$ is either $γ(G)$ or $γ(G)+1$. We show that Conjecture 1 is not true in general. Very recently, Conjecture 2 is partially verified to be true by Ahangar, Samodivkin, Yero. Here, we prove the full statement of Conjecture 2. In addition, we give a correct version of a theorem of Hamid. Finally, we answer a problem posed by Martínez, Almira, and Yero on the independent transversal total domination of a graph.
2017-04-11
On graphs with $m(\partial^L_1)=n-3$
Let $\partial^L_1\ge\partial^L_2\ge\cdots\ge\partial^L_n$ be the distance Laplacian eigenvalues of a connected graph $G$ and $m(\partial^L_i)$ the multiplicity of $\partial^L_i$. It is well known that the graphs with $m(\partial^L_1)=n-1$ are complete graphs. Recently, the graphs with $m(\partial^L_1)=n-2$ have been characterized by Celso et al. In this paper, we completely determine the graphs with $m(\partial^L_1)=n-3$.