arXiv++ Combinatorics

Spanning trees are an important primitive in many data analysis tasks, when a data set needs to be summarized in terms of its "skeleton", or when a tree-shaped graph over all observations is required for downstream processing. Popular definitions of spanning trees include the minimum spanning tree and the optimum distance spanning tree, a.k.a. the minimum routing cost tree. When searching for the shortest spanning tree but admitting additional branching points, even shorter spanning trees can be realized: Steiner trees. Unfortunately, both minimum spanning and Steiner trees are not robust with respect to noise in the observations; that is, small perturbations of the original data set often lead to drastic changes in the associated spanning trees. In response, we make two contributions when the data lies in a Euclidean space: on the theoretical side, we introduce a new optimization problem, the "(branched) central spanning tree", which subsumes all previously mentioned definitions as special cases. On the practical side, we show empirically that the (branched) central spanning tree is more robust to noise in the data, and as such is better suited to summarize a data set in terms of its skeleton. We also propose a heuristic to address the NP-hard optimization problem, and illustrate its use on single cell RNA expression data from biology and 3D point clouds of plants.

The Circuit diameter of polytopes was introduced by Borgwardt, Finhold and Hemmecke as a fundamental tool for the study of circuit augmentation schemes for linear programming and for estimating combinatorial diameters. Determining the complexity of computing the circuit diameter of polytopes was posed as an open problem by Sanità as well as by Kafer, and was recently reiterated by Borgwardt, Grewe, Kafer, Lee and Sanità. In this paper, we solve this problem by showing that computing the circuit diameter of a polytope given in halfspace-description is strongly NP-hard. To prove this result, we show that computing the combinatorial diameter of the perfect matching polytope of a bipartite graph is NP-hard. This complements a result by Sanità (FOCS 2018) on the NP-hardness of computing the diameter of fractional matching polytopes and implies the new result that computing the diameter of a $\{0,1\}$-polytope is strongly NP-hard, which may be of independent interest. In our second main result, we give a precise graph-theoretic description of the monotone diameter of perfect matching polytopes and use this description to prove that computing the monotone (circuit) diameter of a given input polytope is strongly NP-hard as well.

Graph isomorphism, subgraph isomorphism, and maximum common subgraphs are classical well-investigated objects. Their (parameterized) complexity and efficiently tractable cases have been studied. In the present paper, for a given set of forests, we study maximum common induced subforests and minimum common induced superforests. We show that finding a maximum subforest is NP-hard already for two subdivided stars while finding a minimum superforest is tractable for two trees but NP-hard for three trees. For a given set of $k$ trees, we present an efficient greedy $\left(\frac{k}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{k}\right)$-approximation algorithm for the minimum superforest problem. Finally, we present a polynomial time approximation scheme for the maximum subforest problem for any given set of forests.

For a fixed graph $H$, in the graph homomorphism problem, denoted by $Hom(H)$, we are given a graph $G$ and we have to determine whether there exists an edge-preserving mapping $\varphi: V(G) \to V(H)$. Note that $Hom(C_3)$, where $C_3$ is the cycle of length $3$, is equivalent to $3$-Coloring. The question whether $3$-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable on diameter-$2$ graphs is a well-known open problem. In this paper we study the $Hom(C_{2k+1})$ problem on bounded-diameter graphs for $k\geq 2$, so we consider all other odd cycles than $C_3$. We prove that for $k\geq 2$, the $Hom(C_{2k+1})$ problem is polynomial-time solvable on diameter-$(k+1)$ graphs -- note that such a result for $k=1$ would be precisely a polynomial-time algorithm for $3$-Coloring of diameter-$2$ graphs. Furthermore, we give subexponential-time algorithms for diameter-$(k+2)$ graphs. We complement these results with a lower bound for diameter-$(2k+2)$ graphs -- in this class of graphs the $Hom(C_{2k+1})$ problem is NP-hard and cannot be solved in subexponential-time, unless the ETH fails. Finally, we consider another direction of generalizing $3$-Coloring on diameter-$2$ graphs. We consider other target graphs $H$ than odd cycles but we restrict ourselves to diameter $2$. We show that if $H$ is triangle-free, then $Hom(H)$ is polynomial-time solvable on diameter-$2$ graphs.

In this paper, we study a dynamic analogue of the Path Cover problem, which can be solved in polynomial-time in directed acyclic graphs. A temporal digraph has an arc set that changes over discrete time-steps, if the underlying digraph (the union of all the arc sets) is acyclic, then we have a temporal DAG. A temporal path is a directed path in the underlying digraph, such that the time-steps of arcs are strictly increasing along the path. Two temporal paths are temporally disjoint if they do not occupy any vertex at the same time. A temporal (resp. temporally disjoint) path cover is a collection of (resp. temporally disjoint) temporal paths that covers all vertices. In this paper, we study the computational complexities of the problems of finding a temporal (disjoint) path cover with minimum cardinality, denoted as Temporal Path Cover (TPC) and Temporally Disjoint Path Cover (TD-PC). We show that both problems are NP-hard even when the underlying DAG is planar, bipartite, subcubic, and there are only two arc-disjoint time-steps. Moreover, TD-PC remains NP-hard even on temporal oriented trees. In contrast, we show that TPC is polynomial-time solvable on temporal oriented trees by a reduction to Clique Cover for (static undirected) weakly chordal graphs (a subclass of perfect graphs for which Clique Cover admits an efficient algorithm). This highlights an interesting algorithmic difference between the two problems. Although it is NP-hard on temporal oriented trees, TD-PC becomes polynomial-time solvable on temporal oriented lines and temporal rooted directed trees. We also show that TPC (resp. TD-PC) admits an XP (resp. FPT) time algorithm with respect to parameter tmax + tw, where tmax is the maximum time-step, and tw is the treewidth of the underlying static undirected graph.

A subset $S$ of vertices in a graph $G=(V, E)$ is a Dominating Set if each vertex in $V(G)\setminus S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. Chellali et al. in 2013, by restricting the number of neighbors in $S$ of a vertex outside $S$, introduced the concept of $[1,j]$-dominating set. A set $D \subseteq V$ of a graph $G = (V, E)$ is called a $[1,j]$-Dominating Set of $G$ if every vertex not in $D$ has at least one neighbor and at most $j$ neighbors in $D$. The Minimum $[1,j]$-Domination problem is the problem of finding the minimum $[1,j]$-dominating set $D$. Given a positive integer $k$ and a graph $G = (V, E)$, the $[1,j]$-Domination Decision problem is to decide whether $G$ has a $[1,j]$-dominating set of cardinality at most $k$. A polynomial-time algorithm was obtained in split graphs for a constant $j$ in contrast to the Dominating Set problem which is NP-hard for split graphs. This result motivates us to investigate the effect of restriction $j$ on the complexity of $[1,j]$-domination problem on various classes of graphs. Although for $j\geq 3$, it has been proved that the minimum of classical domination is equal to minimum $[1,j]$-domination in interval graphs, the complexity of finding the minimum $[1,2]$-domination in interval graphs is still outstanding. In this paper, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm for computing a minimum $[1,2]$-dominating set on interval graphs by a dynamic programming technique. Next, on the negative side, we show that the minimum $[1,2]$-dominating set problem on circle graphs is $NP$-complete.

A common subgraph of two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ is a graph that is isomorphic to subgraphs of $G_1$ and $G_2$. In the largest common subgraph problem the task is to determine a common subgraph for two given graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ that is of maximum possible size ${\rm lcs}(G_1,G_2)$. This natural problem generalizes the well-studied graph isomorphism problem, has many applications, and remains NP-hard even restricted to unions of paths. We present a simple $4$-approximation algorithm for forests, and, for every fixed $ε\in (0,1)$, we show that, for two given forests $F_1$ and $F_2$ of order at most $n$, one can determine in polynomial time a common subgraph $F$ of $F_1$ and $F_2$ with at least ${\rm lcs}(F_1,F_2)-εn$ edges. Restricted to instances with ${\rm lcs}(F_1,F_2)\geq cn$ for some fixed positive $c$, this yields a polynomial time approximation scheme. Our approach relies on the approximation of the given forests by structurally simpler forests that are composed of copies of only $O(\log (n))$ different starlike rooted trees and iterative quantizations of the options for the solutions.

This paper explores the application of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models in solving the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) through Quantum Annealing algorithms and Graph Neural Networks. Quantum Annealing (QA), a quantum-inspired optimization method that exploits quantum tunneling to escape local minima, is used to solve QUBO formulations of TSP instances on Coherent Ising Machines (CIMs). The paper also presents a novel approach where QUBO is employed as a loss function within a GNN architecture tailored for solving TSP efficiently. By leveraging GNN's capability to learn graph representations, this method finds approximate solutions to TSP with improved computational time compared to traditional exact solvers. The paper details how to construct a QUBO model for TSP by encoding city visits into binary variables and formulating constraints that guarantee valid tours. It further discusses the implementation of QUBO-based Quantum Annealing algorithm for TSP (QQA-TSP) and its feasibility demonstration using quantum simulation platforms. In addition, it introduces a Graph Neural Network solution for TSP (QGNN-TSP), which learns the underlying structure of the problem and produces competitive solutions via gradient descent over a QUBO-based loss function. The experimental results compare the performance of QQA-TSP against state-of-the-art classical solvers such as dynamic programming, Concorde, and Gurobi, while also presenting empirical outcomes from training and evaluating QGNN-TSP on various TSP datasets. The study highlights the promise of combining deep learning techniques with quantum-inspired optimization methods for solving NP-hard problems like TSP, suggesting future directions for enhancing GNN architectures and applying QUBO frameworks to more complex combinatorial optimization tasks.

In this study, we introduce an innovative deep learning framework that employs a transformer model to address the challenges of mixed-integer programs, specifically focusing on the Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem (CLSP). Our approach, to our knowledge, is the first to utilize transformers to predict the binary variables of a mixed-integer programming (MIP) problem. Specifically, our approach harnesses the encoder decoder transformer's ability to process sequential data, making it well-suited for predicting binary variables indicating production setup decisions in each period of the CLSP. This problem is inherently dynamic, and we need to handle sequential decision making under constraints. We present an efficient algorithm in which CLSP solutions are learned through a transformer neural network. The proposed post-processed transformer algorithm surpasses the state-of-the-art solver, CPLEX and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) in solution time, optimal gap, and percent infeasibility over 240K benchmark CLSP instances tested. After the ML model is trained, conducting inference on the model, reduces the MIP into a linear program (LP). This transforms the ML-based algorithm, combined with an LP solver, into a polynomial-time approximation algorithm to solve a well-known NP-Hard problem, with almost perfect solution quality.

The Ekeland-Hofer-Zehnder capacity (EHZ capacity) is a fundamental symplectic invariant of convex bodies. We show that computing the EHZ capacity of polytopes is NP-hard. For this we reduce the feedback arc set problem in bipartite tournaments to computing the EHZ capacity of simplices.

The Bellman-Ford algorithm for single-source shortest paths repeatedly updates tentative distances in an operation called relaxing an edge. In several important applications a non-adaptive (oblivious) implementation is preferred, which means fixing the entire sequence of relaxations upfront, independently of the edge-weights. Such an implementation performs, in a dense graph on $n$ vertices, $(1 + o(1))n^3$ relaxations. An improvement by Yen from 1970 reduces the number of relaxations by a factor of two. We show that no further constant-factor improvements are possible, and every non-adaptive deterministic algorithm based on relaxations must perform $(\frac{1}{2} - o(1))n^3$ steps. This improves an earlier lower bound of Eppstein of $(\frac{1}{6} - o(1))n^3$. Given that a non-adaptive randomized variant of Bellman-Ford with at most $(\frac{1}{3} + o(1))n^3$ relaxations (with high probability) is known, our result implies a strict separation between deterministic and randomized strategies, answering an open question of Eppstein. On the complexity side, we show that deciding whether a given relaxation sequence is guaranteed to yield correct distances is NP-hard, even with the complete graph as input.

In this paper, we introduce a class of graphs which we call average hereditary graphs. Many graphs that occur in the usual graph theory applications belong to this class of graphs. Many popular types of graphs fall under this class, such as regular graphs, trees and other popular classes of graphs. The paper aims to explore some interesting properties regarding colorings average hereditary graphs. We prove a new upper bound for the chromatic number of a graph in terms of its maximum average degree and show that this bound is an improvement on previous bounds. From this, we show a relationship between the average degree and the chromatic number of an average hereditary graph. We then show that even with new bound, the graph 3-coloring problem remains NP-hard when the input is restricted to average hereditary graphs. We provide an equivalent condition for a graph to be average hereditary, through which we show that we can decide if a given graph is average hereditary in polynomial time.

The exact distance $t$-power of a graph $G$, $G^{[\sharp t]}$, is a graph which has the same vertex set as $G$, with two vertices adjacent in $G^{[\sharp t]}$ if and only if they are at distance exactly $t$ in the original graph $G$. We study the clique number of this graph, also known as the $t$-equidistant number. We show that it is NP-hard to determine the $t$-equidistant number of a graph, and that in fact, it is NP-hard to approximate it within a constant factor. We also investigate how the $t$-equidistant number relates to another distance-based graph parameter; the $t$-independence number. In particular, we show how large the gap between both parameters can be. The hardness results motivate deriving eigenvalue bounds, which compare well against a known general bound. In addition, the tightness of the proposed eigenvalue bounds is studied.

The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) is one of the most extensively researched and widely applied combinatorial optimization problems. It is NP-hard even in the symmetric and metric case. Building upon elaborate research, state-of-the-art exact solvers such as CONCORDE can solve TSP instances with several ten thousand vertices. A key ingredient for these integer programming approaches are fast heuristics to find a good initial solution, in particular the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun (LKH) heuristic. For instances with few hundred vertices heuristics like LKH often find an optimal solution. In this work we develop variations of LKH that perform significantly better on large instances. LKH repeatedly improves an initially random tour by exchanging edges along alternating circles. Thereby, it respects several criteria designed to quickly find alternating circles that give a feasible improvement of the tour. Among those criteria, the positive gain criterion stayed mostly untouched in previous research. It requires that, while constructing an alternating circle, the total gain has to be positive after each pair of edges. We relax this criterion carefully leading to improvement steps hitherto undiscovered by LKH. We confirm this improvement experimentally via extensive simulations on various benchmark libraries for TSP. Our computational study shows that for large instances our method is on average 13% faster than the latest version of LKH.

Given a graph $G$, a cost function on the non-edges of $G$, and an integer $d$, the problem of finding a cheapest globally rigid supergraph of $G$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is NP-hard for $d\geq 1$. For this problem, which is a common generalization of several well-studied graph augmentation problems, no approximation algorithm has previously been known for $d\geq 2$. Our main algorithmic result is a 5-approximation algorithm in the $d=2$ case. We achieve this by proving numerous new structural results on rigid graphs and globally linked vertex pairs. In particular, we show that every rigid graph in $\mathbb{R}^2$ has a tree-like structure, which conveys all the information regarding its globally rigid augmentations. Our results also yield a new, simple solution to the minimum cardinality version (where the cost function is uniform) for rigid input graphs, a problem which is known to be solvable in polynomial time.

A unified framework for the Expander Mixing Lemma for irregular graphs using adjacency eigenvalues is presented, as well as two new versions of it. While the existing Expander Mixing Lemmas for irregular graphs make use of the notion of volume (the sum of degrees within a vertex set), we instead propose to use the Perron eigenvector entries as vertex weights, which is a way to regularise the graph. This provides a new application of weight partitions of graphs. The new Expander Mixing Lemma versions are then applied to obtain several eigenvalue bounds for NP-hard parameters such as the zero forcing number, the vertex integrity and the routing number of a graph.

We consider cost allocation for set covering problems. We allocate as much cost to the elements (players) as possible without violating the group rationality condition (no subset of players pays more than covering this subset would cost), and so that the excess vector is lexicographically maximized. This is identical to the well-known nucleolus if the core of the corresponding cooperative game is nonempty, i.e., if some optimum fractional cover is integral. In general, we call this the 'happy nucleolus'. Like for the nucleolus, the excess vector contains an entry for every subset of players, not only for the sets in the given set covering instance. Moreover, it is NP-hard to compute a single entry because this requires solving a set covering problem. Nevertheless, we give an explicit family of at most $mn$ subsets, each with a trivial cover (by a single set), such that the happy nucleolus is always completely determined by this proxy excess vector; here $m$ and $n$ denote the number of sets and the number of players in our set covering instance. We show that this is the unique minimal such family in a natural sense. While computing the nucleolus for set covering is NP-hard, our results imply that the happy nucleolus can be computed in polynomial time.

The Grundy number of a graph is the minimum number of colors needed to properly color the graph using the first-fit greedy algorithm regardless of the initial vertex ordering. Computing the Grundy number of a graph is an NP-Hard problem. There is a characterization in terms of induced subgraphs: a graph has a Grundy number at least k if and only if it contains a k-atom. In this paper, using properties of the matching polynomial, we determine the smallest possible largest eigenvalue of a k-atom. With this result, we present an upper bound for the Grundy number of a graph in terms of the largest eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix. We also present another upper bound using the largest eigenvalue and the size of the graph. Our bounds are asymptotically tight for some infinite families of graphs and provide improvements on the known bounds for the Grundy number of sparse random graphs.

We prove the following variant of Levi's Enlargement Lemma: for an arbitrary arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ of $x$-monotone pseudosegments in the plane and a pair of points $a,b$ with distinct $x$-coordinates and not on the same pseudosegment, there exists a simple $x$-monotone curve with endpoints $a,b$ that intersects every curve of $\mathcal{A}$ at most once. As a consequence, every simple monotone drawing of a graph can be extended to a simple monotone drawing of a complete graph. We also show that extending an arrangement of cylindrically monotone pseudosegments is not always possible; in fact, the corresponding decision problem is NP-hard.

Estimating the linear dimensionality of a data set in the presence of noise is a common problem. However, data may also be corrupted by monotone nonlinear distortion that preserves the ordering of matrix entries but causes linear methods for estimating rank to fail. In light of this, we consider the problem of computing \emph{underlying rank}, which is the lowest rank consistent with the ordering of matrix entries, and \emph{monotone rank}, which is the lowest rank consistent with the ordering within columns. We show that each matrix of monotone rank $d$ corresponds to a point arrangement and a hyperplane arrangement in $\mathbb R^{d}$, and that the ordering within columns of the matrix can be used to recover information about these arrangements. Using Radon's theorem and the related concept of the VC dimension, we can obtain lower bounds on the monotone rank of a matrix. However, we also show that the monotone rank of a matrix can exceed these bounds. In order to obtain better bounds on monotone rank, we develop the connection between monotone rank estimation and oriented matroid theory. Using this connection, we show that monotone rank is difficult to compute: the problem of deciding whether a matrix has monotone rank two is already NP-hard. However, we introduce an "oriented matroid completion" problem as a combinatorial relaxation of the monotone rank problem and show that checking whether a set of sign vectors has matroid completion rank two is easy.