arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ contains a graph $H$ as an induced minor if $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by vertex deletions and edge contractions. The class of $H$-induced-minor-free graphs generalizes the class of $H$-minor-free graphs, but unlike $H$-minor-free graphs, it can contain dense graphs. We show that if an $n$-vertex $m$-edge graph $G$ does not contain a graph $H$ as an induced minor, then it has a balanced vertex separator of size $O_{H}(\sqrt{m})$, where the $O_{H}(\cdot)$-notation hides factors depending on $H$. More precisely, our upper bound for the size of the balanced separator is $O(\min(|V(H)|^2, \log n) \cdot \sqrt{|V(H)|+|E(H)|} \cdot \sqrt{m})$. We give an algorithm for finding either an induced minor model of $H$ in $G$ or such a separator in randomized polynomial-time. We apply this to obtain subexponential $2^{O_{H}(n^{2/3} \log n)}$ time algorithms on $H$-induced-minor-free graphs for a large class of problems including maximum independent set, minimum feedback vertex set, 3-coloring, and planarization. For graphs $H$ where every edge is incident to a vertex of degree at most 2, our results imply a $2^{O_{H}(n^{2/3} \log n)}$ time algorithm for testing if $G$ contains $H$ as an induced minor. Our second main result is that there exists a fixed tree $T$, so that there is no $2^{o(n/\log^3 n)}$ time algorithm for testing if a given $n$-vertex graph contains $T$ as an induced minor unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our reduction also gives NP-hardness, which solves an open problem asked by Fellows, Kratochvíl, Middendorf, and Pfeiffer [Algorithmica, 1995], who asked if there exists a fixed planar graph $H$ so that testing for $H$ as an induced minor is NP-hard.

The burning number of a graph $G$ is the smallest number $b$ such that the vertices of $G$ can be covered by balls of radii $0, 1, \dots, b-1$. As computing the burning number of a graph is known to be NP-hard, even on trees, it is natural to consider polynomial time approximation algorithms for the quantity. The best known approximation factor in the literature is $3$ for general graphs and $2$ for trees. In this note we give a $2/(1-e^{-2})+\varepsilon=2.313\dots$-approximation algorithm for the burning number of general graphs, and a PTAS for the burning number of trees and forests. Moreover, we show that computing a $(\frac53-\varepsilon)$-approximation of the burning number of a general graph $G$ is NP-hard.

Given a finite, simple graph $G$, the $k$-component order edge connectivity of $G$ is the minimum number of edges whose removal results in a subgraph for which every component has order at most $k-1$. In general, determining the $k$-component order edge connectivity of a graph is NP-hard. We determine conditions on the vertex degrees of $G$ that can be used to imply a lower bound on the $k$-component order edge connectivity of $G$. We will discuss the process for generating such conditions for a lower bound of 1 or 2, and we explore how the complexity increases when the desired lower bound is 3 or more. In the process, we prove some related results about integer partitions.

The Graphical House Allocation problem asks: how can $n$ houses (each with a fixed non-negative value) be assigned to the vertices of an undirected graph $G$, so as to minimize the "aggregate local envy", i.e., the sum of absolute differences along the edges of $G$? This problem generalizes the classical Minimum Linear Arrangement problem, as well as the well-known House Allocation Problem from Economics, the latter of which has notable practical applications in organ exchanges. Recent work has studied the computational aspects of Graphical House Allocation and observed that the problem is NP-hard and inapproximable even on particularly simple classes of graphs, such as vertex disjoint unions of paths. However, the dependence of any approximations on the structural properties of the underlying graph had not been studied. In this work, we give a complete characterization of the approximability of the Graphical House Allocation problem. We present algorithms to approximate the optimal envy on general graphs, trees, planar graphs, bounded-degree graphs, bounded-degree planar graphs, and bounded-degree trees. For each of these graph classes, we then prove matching lower bounds, showing that in each case, no significant improvement can be attained unless P = NP. We also present general approximation ratios as a function of structural parameters of the underlying graph, such as treewidth; these match the aforementioned tight upper bounds in general, and are significantly better approximations for many natural subclasses of graphs. Finally, we present constant factor approximation schemes for the special classes of complete binary trees and random graphs.

Given a set $X$ of species, a phylogenetic tree is an unrooted binary tree whose leaves are bijectively labelled by $X$. Such trees can be used to show the way species evolve over time. One way of understanding how topologically different two phylogenetic trees are, is to construct a minimum-size agreement forest: a partition of $X$ into the smallest number of blocks, such that the blocks induce homeomorphic, non-overlapping subtrees in both trees. This comparison yields insight into commonalities and differences in the evolution of $X$ across the two trees. Computing a smallest agreement forest is NP-hard (Hein, Jiang, Wang and Zhang, Discrete Applied Mathematics 71(1-3), 1996). In this work we study the problem on caterpillars, which are path-like phylogenetic trees. We will demonstrate that, even if we restrict the input to this highly restricted subclass, the problem remains NP-hard and is in fact APX-hard. Furthermore we show that for caterpillars two standard reductions rules well known in the literature yield a tight kernel of size at most $7k$, compared to $15k$ for general trees (Kelk and Simone, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 33(3), 2019). Finally we demonstrate that we can determine if two caterpillars have an agreement forest with at most $k$ blocks in $O^*(2.49^k)$ time, compared to $O^*(3^k)$ for general trees (Chen, Fan and Sze, Theoretical Computater Science 562, 2015), where $O^*(.)$ suppresses polynomial factors.

Let $G$ be a graph, which represents a social network, and suppose each node $v$ has a threshold value $τ(v)$. Consider an initial configuration, where each node is either positive or negative. In each discrete time step, a node $v$ becomes/remains positive if at least $τ(v)$ of its neighbors are positive and negative otherwise. A node set $\mathcal{S}$ is a Target Set (TS) whenever the following holds: if $\mathcal{S}$ is fully positive initially, all nodes in the graph become positive eventually. We focus on a generalization of TS, called Timed TS (TTS), where it is permitted to assign a positive state to a node at any step of the process, rather than just at the beginning. We provide graph structures for which the minimum TTS is significantly smaller than the minimum TS, indicating that timing is an essential aspect of successful target selection strategies. Furthermore, we prove tight bounds on the minimum size of a TTS in terms of the number of nodes and maximum degree when the thresholds are assigned based on the majority rule. We show that the problem of determining the minimum size of a TTS is NP-hard and provide an Integer Linear Programming formulation and a greedy algorithm. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm by conducting experiments on various synthetic and real-world networks. We also present a linear-time exact algorithm for trees.

In the Metric Dimension problem, one asks for a minimum-size set $R$ of vertices such that for any pair of vertices of the graph, there is a vertex from $R$ whose two distances to the vertices of the pair are distinct. This problem has mainly been studied on undirected graphs and has gained a lot of attention in the recent years. We focus on directed graphs, and show how to solve the problem in linear time on digraphs whose underlying undirected graph (ignoring multiple edges) is a tree. This (non-trivially) extends a previous algorithm for oriented trees. We then extend the method to orientations of unicyclic graphs. We also give a fixed-parameter-tractable algorithm for digraphs when parameterized by the directed modular-width, extending a known result for undirected graphs. Finally, we show that Metric Dimension is NP-hard even on planar triangle-free acyclic digraphs of maximum degree 6.

One strategy for reconstruction of phylogenetic networks is to solve the phylogenetic network problem, which involves inferring phylogenetic trees first and subsequently computing the smallest phylogenetic network that displays all the trees. This approach capitalizes on exceptional tools available for inferring phylogenetic trees from biomolecular sequences. Since the vast space of phylogenetic networks poses difficulties in obtaining comprehensive sampling, the researchers switch their attention to inferring tree-child networks from multiple phylogenetic trees, where in a tree-child network each non-leaf node must have at least one child that is an indegree-one node. Two results are obtained: (1) The tree-child network inference problem for multiple line trees remains NP-hard by a reduction from the shortest common supersequence problem for permutations and proving that the latter is NP-hard. (2) The tree-child networks with the least reticulate nodes that display all the line trees are the same as that display all the binary trees, whose hybridization number is $Θ(n^3)$ for $n (> 7)$ taxa.

An independent vertex subset $S$ of the directed graph $G$ is a kernel if the set of out-neighbors of $S$ is $V(G)\setminus S$. An independent vertex subset $Q$ of $G$ is a quasi-kernel if the union of the first and second out-neighbors contains $V(G)\setminus S$ as a subset. Deciding whether a directed graph has a kernel is an NP-hard problem. In stark contrast, each directed graph has quasi-kernel(s) and one can be found in linear time. In this article, we will survey the results on quasi-kernel and their connection with kernels. We will focus on the small quasi-kernel conjecture which states that if the graph has no vertex of zero in-degree, then there exists a quasi-kernel of size not larger than half of the order of the graph. The paper also contains new proofs and some new results as well.

A geophylogeny is a phylogenetic tree (or dendrogram) where each leaf (e.g. biological taxon) has an associated geographic location (site). To clearly visualize a geophylogeny, the tree is typically represented as a crossing-free drawing next to a map. The correspondence between the taxa and the sites is either shown with matching labels on the map (internal labeling) or with leaders that connect each site to the corresponding leaf of the tree (external labeling). In both cases, a good order of the leaves is paramount for understanding the association between sites and taxa. We define several quality measures for internal labeling and give an efficient algorithm for optimizing them. In contrast, minimizing the number of leader crossings in an external labeling is NP-hard. On the positive side, we show that crossing-free instances can be solved in polynomial time and give a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm. Furthermore, optimal solutions can be found in a matter of seconds on realistic instances using integer linear programming. Finally, we provide several efficient heuristic algorithms and experimentally show them to be near optimal on real-world and synthetic instances.

In this paper, we introduce the following new concept in graph drawing. Our task is to find a small collection of drawings such that they all together satisfy some property that is useful for graph visualization. We propose investigating a property where each edge is not crossed in at least one drawing in the collection. We call such collection uncrossed. This property is motivated by a quintessential problem of the crossing number, where one asks for a drawing where the number of edge crossings is minimum. Indeed, if we are allowed to visualize only one drawing, then the one which minimizes the number of crossings is probably the neatest for the first orientation. However, a collection of drawings where each highlights a different aspect of a graph without any crossings could shed even more light on the graph's structure. We propose two definitions. First, the uncrossed number, minimizes the number of graph drawings in a collection, satisfying the uncrossed property. Second, the uncrossed crossing number, minimizes the total number of crossings in the collection that satisfy the uncrossed property. For both definitions, we establish initial results. We prove that the uncrossed crossing number is NP-hard, but there is an FPT algorithm parameterized by the solution size.

Horizontal gene transfer is an important contributor to evolution. According to Walter M.\ Fitch, two genes are xenologs if they are separated by at least one HGT. More formally, the directed Fitch graph has a set of genes is its vertices, and directed edges $(x,y)$ for all pairs of genes $x$ and $y$ for which $y$ has been horizontally transferred at least once since it diverged from the last common ancestor of $x$ and $y$. Subgraphs of Fitch graphs can be inferred by comparative sequence analysis. In many cases, however, only partial knowledge about the ``full'' Fitch graph can be obtained. Here, we characterize Fitch-satisfiable graphs that can be extended to a biologically feasible ``full'' Fitch graph and derive a simple polynomial-time recognition algorithm. We then proceed to showing that finding the Fitch graphs with total maximum (confidence) edge-weights is an NP-hard problem.

Given a population with dynamic pairwise connections, we ask if the entire population could be (indirectly) infected by a small group of $k$ initially infected individuals. We formalise this problem as the Temporal Reachability Dominating Set (TaRDiS}) problem on temporal graphs. We provide positive and negative parameterized complexity results in four different parameters: the number $k$ of initially infected, the lifetime $τ$ of the graph, the number of locally earliest edges in the graph, and the treewidth of the footprint graph $\mathcal{G}_\downarrow$. We additionally introduce and study the MaxMinTaRDiS problem, where the aim is to schedule connections between individuals so that at least $k$ individuals must be infected for the entire population to become fully infected. We classify three variants of the problem: Strict, Nonstrict, and Happy. We show these to be coNP-complete, NP-hard, and $Σ_2^P$-complete, respectively. Interestingly, we obtain hardness of the Nonstrict variant by showing that a natural restriction is exactly the well-studied Distance-3 Independent Set problem on static graphs.

The class of $\mathsf{Ga}$lled-$\mathsf{T}$ree $\mathsf{Ex}$plainable ($\mathsf{GaTEx}$) graphs has recently been discovered as a natural generalization of cographs. Cographs are precisely those graphs that can be uniquely represented by a rooted tree where the leaves correspond to the vertices of the graph. As a generalization, $\mathsf{GaTEx}$ graphs are precisely those that can be uniquely represented by a particular rooted acyclic network, called a galled-tree. This paper explores the use of galled-trees to solve combinatorial problems on $\mathsf{GaTEx}$ graphs that are, in general, NP-hard. We demonstrate that finding a maximum clique, an optimal vertex coloring, a perfect order, as well as a maximum independent set in $\mathsf{GaTEx}$ graphs can be efficiently done in linear time. The key idea behind the linear-time algorithms is to utilize the galled-trees that explain the $\mathsf{GaTEx}$ graphs as a guide for computing the respective cliques, colorings, perfect orders, or independent sets.

The Kronecker coefficients are the decomposition multiplicities of the tensor product of two irreducible representations of the symmetric group. Unlike the Littlewood--Richardson coefficients, which are the analogues for the general linear group, there is no known combinatorial description of the Kronecker coefficients, and it is an NP-hard problem to decide whether a given Kronecker coefficient is zero or not. In this paper, we show that standard machine-learning algorithms such as Nearest Neighbors, Convolutional Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees may be trained to predict whether a given Kronecker coefficient is zero or not. Our results show that a trained machine can efficiently perform this binary classification with high accuracy ($\approx 0.98$).

A directed graph $D$ is singly connected if for every ordered pair of vertices $(s,t)$, there is at most one path from $s$ to $t$ in $D$. Graph orientation problems ask, given an undirected graph $G$, to find an orientation of the edges such that the resultant directed graph $D$ has a certain property. In this work, we study the graph orientation problem where the desired property is that $D$ is singly connected. Our main result concerns graphs of a fixed girth $g$ and coloring number $c$. For every $g,c\geq 3$, the problem restricted to instances of girth $g$ and coloring number $c$, is either NP-complete or in P. As further algorithmic results, we show that the problem is NP-hard on planar graphs and polynomial time solvable distance-hereditary graphs.

A labelling of a graph is an assignment of labels to its vertex or edge sets (or both), subject to certain conditions, a well established concept. A labelling of a graph G of order n is termed a numbering when the set of integers {1,...,n} is used to label the vertices of G distinctly. A 2-path (a path with three vertices) in a vertex-numbered graph is said to be valid if the number of its middle vertex is smaller than the numbers of its endpoints. The problem of finding a vertex numbering of a given graph that optimises the number of induced valid 2-paths is studied, which is conjectured to be in the NP-hard class. The reported results for several graph classes show that apparently there are not one or more numbering patterns applicable to different classes of graphs, which requires the development of a specific numbering for each graph class under study.

An arborescence, which is a directed analogue of a spanning tree in an undirected graph, is one of the most fundamental combinatorial objects in a digraph. In this paper, we study arborescences in digraphs from the viewpoint of combinatorial reconfiguration, which is the field where we study reachability between two configurations of some combinatorial objects via some specified operations. Especially, we consider reconfiguration problems for time-respecting arborescences, which were introduced by Kempe, Kleinberg, and Kumar. We first prove that if the roots of the initial and target time-respecting arborescences are the same, then the target arborescence is always reachable from the initial one and we can find a shortest reconfiguration sequence in polynomial time. Furthermore, we show if the roots are not the same, then the target arborescence may not be reachable from the initial one. On the other hand, we show that we can determine whether the target arborescence is reachable form the initial one in polynomial time. Finally, we prove that it is NP-hard to find a shortest reconfiguration sequence in the case where the roots are not the same. Our results show an interesting contrast to the previous results for (ordinary) arborescences reconfiguration problems.

Given a matroid $M=(E,{\cal I})$, and a total ordering over the elements $E$, a broken circuit is a circuit where the smallest element is removed and an NBC independent set is an independent set in ${\cal I}$ with no broken circuit. The set of NBC independent sets of any matroid $M$ define a simplicial complex called the broken circuit complex which has been the subject of intense study in combinatorics. Recently, Adiprasito, Huh and Katz showed that the face of numbers of any broken circuit complex form a log-concave sequence, proving a long-standing conjecture of Rota. We study counting and optimization problems on NBC bases of a generic matroid. We find several fundamental differences with the independent set complex: for example, we show that it is NP-hard to find the max-weight NBC base of a matroid or that the convex hull of NBC bases of a matroid has edges of arbitrary large length. We also give evidence that the natural down-up walk on the space of NBC bases of a matroid may not mix rapidly by showing that for some family of matroids it is NP-hard to count the number of NBC bases after certain conditionings.

A broadcast on a connected graph G with vertex set V(G) is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0, 1, ..., \text{diam}(G)\}$ such that $f(v)\leq e(v)$ (the eccentricity of $v$) for all $v\in V$. A vertex $v$ is said to be broadcasting if $f(v)>0$, with the set of all such vertices denoted $V_f^+$. A vertex $u$ hears $f$ from $v\in V_f^+$ if $d_G(u, v)\leq f(v)$. The broadcast $f$ is hearing independent if no broadcasting vertex hears another. If, in addition, any vertex $u$ that hears $f$ from multiple broadcasting vertices satisfies $f(v)\leq d_G(u, v)$ for all $v\in V_f^+$, the broadcast is said to be boundary independent. The cost of $f$ is $σ(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$. The minimum cost of a maximal boundary independent broadcast on G, called the lower bn-independence number, is denoted $i_{bn}(G)$. The lower h-independence number $i_h(G)$ is defined analogously for hearing independent broadcasts. We prove that $i_{bn}(G)\leq i_h(G)$ for all G and show that $i_h(G)/i_{bn}(G)$ is bounded. For both parameters, we show that the lower bn-independence number (h-independence number) of a connected graph G equals the minimum lower bn-independence number (h-independence number) among those of its spanning trees. We further study the maximum cost of boundary independent broadcasts, denoted $α_{bn}(G)$. We show $α_{bn}(G)$ can be bounded in terms of the independence number $α(G)$, and prove that the maximum bn-independent broadcast problem is NP-hard by a reduction from the independent set problem to an instance of the maximum bn-independent broadcast problem. With particular interest in caterpillars, we investigate bounds on $α_{bn}(T)$ when T is a tree in terms of its order and the number of vertices of degree at least 3, known as the branch vertices of T. We conclude by describing a polynomial-time algorithm to determine $α_{bn}(T)$ for a given tree T.