arXiv++ Combinatorics

Quantum annealing is a novel type of analog computation that aims to use quantum mechanical fluctuations to search for optimal solutions of Ising problems. Quantum annealing in the Transverse Ising model, implemented on D-Wave QPUs, are available as cloud computing resources. In this article we report concise benchmarks across three generations of D-Wave quantum annealers, consisting of four different devices, for the NP-Hard combinatorial optimization problems unweighted maximum clique and unweighted maximum cut on random graphs. The Ising, or equivalently QUBO, formulation of these problems do not require auxiliary variables for order reduction, and their overall structure and weights are not highly complex, which makes these problems simple test cases to understand the sampling capability of current D-Wave quantum annealers. All-to-all minor embeddings of size $52$, with relatively uniform chain lengths, are used for a direct comparison across the Chimera, Pegasus, and Zephyr device topologies. A grid search over annealing times and the minor embedding chain strengths is performed in order to determine the level of reasonable performance for each device and problem type. Experiment metrics that are reported are approximation ratios for non-broken chain samples and chain break proportions. How fairly the quantum annealers sample optimal maximum cliques, for instances which contain multiple maximum cliques, is also quantified using entropy of the measured ground state distributions. The newest generation of quantum annealing hardware, which has a Zephyr hardware connectivity, performed the best overall with respect to approximation ratios and chain break frequencies.

The modular decomposition of a graph $G$ is a natural construction to capture key features of $G$ in terms of a labeled tree $(T,t)$ whose vertices are labeled as "series" ($1$), "parallel" ($0$) or "prime". However, full information of $G$ is provided by its modular decomposition tree $(T,t)$ only, if $G$ is a cograph, i.e., $G$ does not contain prime modules. In this case, $(T,t)$ explains $G$, i.e., $\{x,y\}\in E(G)$ if and only if the lowest common ancestor $\mathrm{lca}_T(x,y)$ of $x$ and $y$ has label "$1$". Pseudo-cographs, or, more general, GaTEx graphs $G$ are graphs that can be explained by labeled galled-trees, i.e., labeled networks $(N,t)$ that are obtained from the modular decomposition tree $(T,t)$ of $G$ by replacing the prime vertices in $T$ by simple labeled cycles. GaTEx graphs can be recognized and labeled galled-trees that explain these graphs can be constructed in linear time. In this contribution, we provide a novel characterization of GaTEx graphs in terms of a set $\mathfrak{F}_{\mathrm{GT}}$ of 25 forbidden induced subgraphs. This characterization, in turn, allows us to show that GaTEx graphs are closely related to many other well-known graph classes such as $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-reducible graphs, weakly-chordal graphs, perfect graphs with perfect order, comparability and permutation graphs, murky graphs as well as interval graphs, Meyniel graphs or very strongly-perfect and brittle graphs. Moreover, we show that every GaTEx graph as twin-width at most 1 and and provide linear-time algorithms to solve several NP-hard problems (clique, coloring, independent set) on GaTEx graphs by utilizing the structure of the underlying galled-trees they explain.

Minimizing the weight of an edge set satisfying parity constraints is a challenging branch of combinatorial optimization as witnessed by the binary hypergraph chapter of Alexander Schrijver's book ``Combinatorial Optimization" (Chapter 80). This area contains relevant graph theory problems including open cases of the Max Cut problem and some multiflow problems. We clarify the interconnections between some of these problems and establish three levels of difficulties. On the one hand, we prove that the Shortest Odd Path problem in undirected graphs without cycles of negative total weight and several related problems are NP-hard, settling a long-standing open question asked by Lovász (Open Problem 27 in Schrijver's book ``Combinatorial Optimization''). On the other hand, we provide an efficient algorithm to the closely related and well-studied Minimum-weight Odd $T$-Join problem for non-negative weights: our algorithm runs in FPT time parameterized by $c$, where $c$ is the number of connected components in some efficiently computed minimum-weight $T$-join. If negative weights are also allowed, then finding a minimum-weight odd $\{s,t\}$-join is equivalent to the Minimum-weight Odd $T$-Join problem for arbitrary weights, whose complexity is still only conjectured to be polynomial-time solvable. The analogous problems for digraphs are also considered.

An edge-weighted, vertex-capacitated graph G is called stable if the value of a maximum-weight capacity-matching equals the value of a maximum-weight fractional capacity-matching. Stable graphs play a key role in characterizing the existence of stable solutions for popular combinatorial games that involve the structure of matchings in graphs, such as network bargaining games and cooperative matching games. The vertex-stabilizer problem asks to compute a minimum number of players to block (i.e., vertices of G to remove) in order to ensure stability for such games. The problem has been shown to be solvable in polynomial-time, for unit-capacity graphs. This stays true also if we impose the restriction that the set of players to block must not intersect with a given specified maximum matching of G. In this work, we investigate these algorithmic problems in the more general setting of arbitrary capacities. We show that the vertex-stabilizer problem with the additional restriction of avoiding a given maximum matching remains polynomial-time solvable. Differently, without this restriction, the vertex-stabilizer problem becomes NP-hard and even hard to approximate, in contrast to the unit-capacity case. Finally, in unit-capacity graphs there is an equivalence between the stability of a graph, existence of a stable solution for network bargaining games, and existence of a stable solution for cooperative matching games. We show that this equivalence does not extend to the capacitated case.

This work revolves around the two following questions: Given a convex body $C\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, a positive integer $k$ and a finite set $S\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ (or a finite Borel measure $μ$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$), how many homothets of $C$ are required to cover $S$ if no homothet is allowed to cover more than $k$ points of $S$ (or have measure larger than $k$)? How many homothets of $C$ can be packed if each of them must cover at least $k$ points of $S$ (or have measure at least $k$)? We prove that, so long as $S$ is not too degenerate, the answer to both questions is $Θ_d(\frac{|S|}{k})$, where the hidden constant is independent of $d$. This is optimal up to a multiplicative constant. Analogous results hold in the case of measures. Then we introduce a generalization of the standard covering and packing densities of a convex body $C$ to Borel measure spaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and, using the aforementioned bounds, we show that they are bounded from above and below, respectively, by functions of $d$. As an intermediate result, we give a simple proof the existence of weak $ε$-nets of size $O(\frac{1}ε)$ for the range space induced by all homothets of $C$. Following some recent work in discrete geometry, we investigate the case $d=k=2$ in greater detail. We also provide polynomial time algorithms for constructing a packing/covering exhibiting the $Θ_d(\frac{|S|}{k})$ bound mentioned above in the case that $C$ is an Euclidean ball. Finally, it is shown that if $C$ is a square then it is NP-hard to decide whether $S$ can be covered using $\frac{|S|}{4}$ squares containing $4$ points each.

The main goal of this paper is to show that shellability is NP-hard for triangulated d-balls (this also gives hardness for triangulated d-manifolds/d-pseudomanifolds with boundary) as soon as d is at least 3. This extends our earlier work with Goaoc, Patáková and Wagner on hardness of shellability of 2-complexes and answers some questions implicitly raised by Danaraj and Klee in 1978 and explicitly mentioned by Santamaría-Galvis and Woodroofe. Together with the main goal, we also prove that collapsibility is NP-hard for 3-complexes embeddable in the 3-space, extending an earlier work of the second author and answering an open question mentioned by Cohen, Fasy, Miller, Nayyeri, Peng and Walkington; and that shellability is NP-hard for 2-complexes embeddable in the 3-space, answering another question of Santamaría-Galvis and Woodroofe (in a slightly stronger form than what is given by the main result).

We introduce the Red-Blue Separation problem on graphs, where we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ whose vertices are colored either red or blue, and we want to select a (small) subset $S \subseteq V$, called red-blue separating set, such that for every red-blue pair of vertices, there is a vertex $s \in S$ whose closed neighborhood contains exactly one of the two vertices of the pair. We study the computational complexity of Red-Blue Separation, in which one asks whether a given red-blue colored graph has a red-blue separating set of size at most a given integer. We prove that the problem is NP-complete even for restricted graph classes. We also show that it is always approximable in polynomial time within a factor of $2\ln n$, where $n$ is the input graph's order. In contrast, for triangle-free graphs and for graphs of bounded maximum degree, we show that Red-Blue Separation is solvable in polynomial time when the size of the smaller color class is bounded by a constant. However, on general graphs, we show that the problem is $W[2]$-hard even when parameterized by the solution size plus the size of the smaller color class. We also consider the problem Max Red-Blue Separation where the coloring is not part of the input. Here, given an input graph $G$, we want to determine the smallest integer $k$ such that, for every possible red-blue coloring of $G$, there is a red-blue separating set of size at most $k$. We derive tight bounds on the cardinality of an optimal solution of Max Red-Blue Separation, showing that it can range from logarithmic in the graph order, up to the order minus one. We also give bounds with respect to related parameters. For trees however we prove an upper bound of two-thirds the order. We then show that Max Red-Blue Separation is NP-hard, even for graphs of bounded maximum degree, but can be approximated in polynomial time within a factor of $O(\ln^2 n)$.

We consider the following problem: for a given graph $G$ and two integers $k$ and $d$, can we apply a fixed graph operation at most $k$ times in order to reduce a given graph parameter $π$ by at least $d$? We show that this problem is NP-hard when the parameter is the independence number and the graph operation is vertex deletion or edge contraction, even for fixed $d=1$ and when restricted to chordal graphs. We give a polynomial time algorithm for bipartite graphs when the operation is edge contraction, the parameter is the independence number and $d$ is fixed. Further, we complete the complexity dichotomy on $H$-free graphs when the parameter is the clique number and the operation is edge contraction by showing that this problem is NP-hard in $(C_3+P_1)$-free graphs even for fixed $d=1$. When the operation is edge deletion and the parameter is the chromatic number, we determine the computational complexity of the associated problem on cographs and complete multipartite graphs. Our results answer several open questions stated in [Diner et al., Theoretical Computer Science, 746, p. 49-72 (2012)].

Branched Optimal Transport (BOT) is a generalization of optimal transport in which transportation costs along an edge are subadditive. This subadditivity models an increase in transport efficiency when shipping mass along the same route, favoring branched transportation networks. We here study the NP-hard optimization of BOT networks connecting a finite number of sources and sinks in $\mathbb{R}^2$. First, we show how to efficiently find the best geometry of a BOT network for many sources and sinks, given a topology. Second, we argue that a topology with more than three edges meeting at a branching point is never optimal. Third, we show that the results obtained for the Euclidean plane generalize directly to optimal transportation networks on two-dimensional Riemannian manifolds. Finally, we present a simple but effective approximate BOT solver combining geometric optimization with a combinatorial optimization of the network topology.

We introduce a new graph-theoretic concept in the area of network monitoring. In this area, one wishes to monitor the vertices and/or the edges of a network (viewed as a graph) in order to detect and prevent failures. Inspired by two notions studied in the literature (edge-geodetic sets and distance-edge-monitoring sets), we define the notion of a monitoring edge-geodetic set (MEG-set for short) of a graph $G$ as an edge-geodetic set $S\subseteq V(G)$ of $G$ (that is, every edge of $G$ lies on some shortest path between two vertices of $S$) with the additional property that for every edge $e$ of $G$, there is a vertex pair $x, y$ of $S$ such that $e$ lies on all shortest paths between $x$ and $y$. The motivation is that, if some edge $e$ is removed from the network (for example if it ceases to function), the monitoring probes $x$ and $y$ will detect the failure since the distance between them will increase. We explore the notion of MEG-sets by deriving the minimum size of a MEG-set for some basic graph classes (trees, cycles, unicyclic graphs, complete graphs, grids, hypercubes, corona products...) and we prove an upper bound using the feedback edge set of the graph. We also show that determining the smallest size of an MEG-set of a graph is NP-hard, even for graphs of maximum degree at most~9.

In this work, for a given oriented graph $D$, we study its interval and hull numbers, respectively, in the oriented geodetic, P3 and P3* convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph D, and the oriented geodetic convexity, we prove that $ohng(D)\leq m(D)-n(D)+2$ and that there is at least one such that $ohng(D) = m(D)-n(D)$. We also determine exact values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allow us to deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute $ohnp(D)$ when the underlying graph of $D$ is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether $oing(D)\leq k$ or $ohng(D)\leq k$ is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by $k$, for some $i\in\mathbb{Z_+^*}$, then the same holds even if the underlying graph of $D$ is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether $ohnp(D)\leq k$ or $ohnps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic and its underlying graph is bipartite; that deciding whether $ohng(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if $D$ is acyclic; that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is NP-complete, even if $D$ has no directed cycles and the underlying graph of $D$ is a chordal bipartite graph; and that deciding whether $oinp(D)\leq k$ or $oinps(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if the underlying graph of $D$ is split. Finally, also argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented P3 and P3* convexities can be computed in cubic time for graphs of bounded clique-width by using Courcelle's theorem.

Avoidance games are games in which two players claim vertices of a hypergraph and try to avoid some structures. These games are studied since the introduction of the game of SIM in 1968, but only few complexity results are known on them. In 2001, Slany proved some partial results on Avoider-Avoider games complexity, and in 2017 Bonnet et al. proved that short Avoider-Enforcer games are Co-W[1]-hard. More recently, in 2022, Miltzow and Stojaković proved that these games are NP-hard. As these games corresponds to the misère version of the well-known Maker-Breaker games, introduced in 1963 and proven PSPACE-complete in 1978, one could expect these games to be PSPACE-complete too, but the question remained open since then. We prove here that both Avoider-Avoider and Avoider-Enforcer conventions are PSPACE-complete, and as a consequence of it that some particular Avoider-Enforcer games also are.

The basic goal of survivable network design is to construct low-cost networks which preserve a sufficient level of connectivity despite the failure or removal of a few nodes or edges. One of the most basic problems in this area is the $2$-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (2-ECSS): given an undirected graph $G$, find a $2$-edge-connected spanning subgraph $H$ of $G$ with the minimum number of edges (in particular, $H$ remains connected after the removal of one arbitrary edge). 2-ECSS is NP-hard and the best-known (polynomial-time) approximation factor for this problem is $4/3$. Interestingly, this factor was achieved with drastically different techniques by [Hunkenschr{ö}der, Vempala and Vetta '00,'19] and [Seb{ö} and Vygen, '14]. In this paper we present an improved $\frac{118}{89}+ε<1.326$ approximation for 2-ECSS. The key ingredient in our approach (which might also be helpful in future work) is a reduction to a special type of structured graphs: our reduction preserves approximation factors up to $6/5$. While reducing to 2-vertex-connected graphs is trivial (and heavily used in prior work), our structured graphs are "almost" 3-vertex-connected: more precisely, given any 2-vertex-cut $\{u,v\}$ of a structured graph $G=(V,E)$, $G[V\setminus \{u,v\}]$ has exactly 2 connected components, one of which contains exactly one node of degree $2$ in $G$.

A way to associate unweighted graphs from weighted ones is presented, such that linear stable equilibria of the Kuramoto homogeneous model associated to both graphs coincide, i.e., equilibria of the system $\dotθ_i = \sum_{j \sim i} \sin(θ_{j}-θ_j)$, where $i\sim j$ means vertices $i$ and $j$ are adjacent in the corresponding graph. As a consequence, the existence of linearly stable equilibrium is proved to be NP-Hard as conjectured by R. Taylor in 2015 and a new lower bound for the minimum degree that ensures synchronization is found.

We show that the eigenpolytopes of graphs are universal in the sense that every polytope, up to affine equivalence, appears as the eigenpolytope of some positively weighted graph. We next extend the theory of graphical designs, which are quadrature rules for graphs, to positively weighted graphs. Through Gale duality for polytopes, we show a bijection between graphical designs and the faces of eigenpolytopes. This bijection proves the existence of graphical designs with positive quadrature weights, and upper bounds the size of a minimal graphical design. Connecting this bijection with the universality of eigenpolytopes, we establish three complexity results: it is strongly NP-complete to determine if there is a graphical design smaller than the mentioned upper bound, it is NP-hard to find a smallest graphical design, and it is #P-complete to count the number of minimal graphical designs.

Quantum annealing is a type of analog computation that aims to use quantum mechanical fluctuations in search of optimal solutions of QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) or, equivalently, Ising problems. Since NP-hard problems can in general be mapped to Ising and QUBO formulations, the quantum annealing paradigm has the potential to help solve various NP-hard problems. Current quantum annealers, such as those manufactured by D-Wave Systems, Inc., have various practical limitations including the size (number of qubits) of the problem that can be solved, the qubit connectivity, and error due to the environment or system calibration, which can reduce the quality of the solutions. Typically, for an arbitrary problem instance, the corresponding QUBO (or Ising) structure will not natively embed onto the available qubit architecture on the quantum chip. Thus, in these cases, a minor embedding of the problem structure onto the device is necessary. However, minor embeddings on these devices do not always make use of the full sparse chip hardware graph, and a large portion of the available qubits stay unused during quantum annealing. In this work, we embed a disjoint random QUBO on the unused parts of the chip alongside the QUBO to be solved, which acts as an indicator of the solution quality of the device over time. Using experiments on three different D-Wave quantum annealers, we demonstrate that (i) long term trends in solution quality exist on the D-Wave device, and (ii) the unused qubits can be used to measure the current level of noise of the quantum system.

A metric basis in a graph $G$ is a smallest possible set $S$ of vertices of $G$, with the property that any two vertices of $G$ are uniquely recognized by using a vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. A strong metric basis is a variant of metric basis that represents a smallest possible set $S'$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices $x,y$ of $G$ are uniquely recognized by a vertex $v\in S'$ by using either a shortest $x-v$ path that contains $y$, or a shortest $y-v$ path that contains $x$. Given a graph $G$, there exist sometimes some vertices of $G$ such that they forcedly belong to every metric basis or to every strong metric basis of $G$. Such vertices are called (resp. strong) basis forced vertices in $G$. It is natural to consider finding them, in order to find a (strong) metric basis in a graph. However, deciding about the existence of these vertices in arbitrary graphs is in general an NP-hard problem, which makes desirable the problem of searching for (strong) basis forced vertices in special graph classes. This article centers the attention in the class of unicyclic graphs. It is known that a unicyclic graph can have at most two basis forced vertices. In this sense, several results aimed to classify the unicyclic graphs according to the number of basis forced vertices they have are given in this work. On the other hand, with respect to the strong metric bases, it is proved in this work that unicyclic graphs can have as many strong basis forced vertices as we would require. Moreover, some characterizations of the unicyclic graphs concerning the existence or not of such vertices are given in the exposition as well.

A jump is a pair of consecutive elements in an extension of a poset which are incomparable in the original poset. The arboreal jump number is an NP-hard problem that aims to find an arboreal extension of a given poset with minimum number of jumps. The contribution of this paper is twofold: (i)~a characterization that reveals a relation between the number of jumps of an arboreal order extension and the size of a partition of its elements that satisfy some structural properties of the covering graph; (ii)~a compact integer programming model and a heuristic to solve the arboreal jump number problem along with computational results comparing both strategies. The exact method provides an optimality certificate for 18 out of 41 instances with execution time limited to two hours. Furthermore, our heuristic was able to find good feasible solutions for all instances in less than three minutes.

Minimum flow decomposition (MFD) -- the problem of finding a minimum set of weighted source-to-sink paths that perfectly decomposes a flow -- is a classical problem in Computer Science, and variants of it are powerful models in different fields such as Bioinformatics and Transportation. Even on acyclic graphs, the problem is NP-hard, and most practical solutions have been via heuristics or approximations. While there is an extensive body of research on acyclic graphs, currently, there is no \emph{exact} solution on graphs with cycles. In this paper, we present the first ILP formulation for three natural variants of the MFD problem in graphs with cycles, asking for a decomposition consisting only of weighted source-to-sink paths or cycles, trails, and walks, respectively. On three datasets of increasing levels of complexity from both Bioinformatics and Transportation, our approaches solve any instance in under 10 minutes. Our implementations are freely available at github.com/algbio/MFD-ILP.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $C$ of unordered pairs of edges regarded as being in conflict, a stable spanning tree in $G$ is a set of edges $T$ inducing a spanning tree in $G$, such that for each $\left\lbrace e_i, e_j \right\rbrace \in C$, at most one of the edges $e_i$ and $e_j$ is in $T$. The existing work on Lagrangean algorithms to the NP-hard problem of finding minimum weight stable spanning trees is limited to relaxations with the integrality property. We exploit a new relaxation of this problem: fixed cardinality stable sets in the underlying conflict graph $H =(E,C)$. We find interesting properties of the corresponding polytope, and determine stronger dual bounds in a Lagrangean decomposition framework, optimizing over the spanning tree polytope of $G$ and the fixed cardinality stable set polytope of $H$ in the subproblems. This is equivalent to dualizing exponentially many subtour elimination constraints, while limiting the number of multipliers in the dual problem to $|E|$. It is also a proof of concept for combining Lagrangean relaxation with the power of MILP solvers over strongly NP-hard subproblems. We present encouraging computational results using a dual method that comprises the Volume Algorithm, initialized with multipliers determined by Lagrangean dual-ascent. In particular, the bound is within 5.5% of the optimum in 146 out of 200 benchmark instances; it actually matches the optimum in 75 cases. All of the implementation is made available in a free, open-source repository.