arXiv++ Combinatorics

Bouc (1992) first studied the topological properties of $M_n$, the matching complex of the complete graph of order $n$, in connection with Brown complexes and Quillen complexes. Björner et al. (1994) showed that $M_n$ is homotopically $(ν_n-1)$-connected, where $ν_n=\lfloor{\frac{n+1}{3}}\rfloor-1$, and conjectured that this connectivity bound is sharp. Shareshian and Wachs (2007) settled the conjecture by inductively showing that the $ν_n$-dimensional homology group of $M_n$ is nontrivial, with Bouc's calculation of $H_1(M_7)$ serving as the pivotal base step. In general, the topology of $M_n$ is not very well-understood, even for a small $n$. In the present article, we look into the topology of $M_n$, and $M_7$ in particular, in the light of discrete Morse theory as developed by Forman (1998). We first construct a gradient vector field on $M_n$ (for $n \ge 5$) that doesn't admit any critical simplices of dimension up to $ν_n-1$, except one unavoidable $0$-simplex, which also leads to the aforementioned $(ν_n-1)$-connectedness of $M_n$ in a purely combinatorial way. However, for an efficient homology computation by discrete Morse theoretic techniques, we are required to work with a gradient vector field that admits a low number of critical simplices, and also allows an efficient enumeration of gradient paths. An optimal gradient vector field is one with the least number of critical simplices, but the problem of finding an optimal gradient vector field, in general, is an NP-hard problem (even for $2$-dimensional complexes). We improve the gradient vector field constructed on $M_7$ in particular to a much more efficient (near-optimal) one, and then with the help of this improved gradient vector field, compute the homology groups of $M_7$ in an efficient and algorithmic manner. We also augment this near-optimal gradient vector field to one that we conjecture to be optimal.

Phylogenetic networks are used to represent the evolutionary history of species. Recently, the new class of orchard networks was introduced, which were later shown to be interpretable as trees with additional horizontal arcs. This makes the network class ideal for capturing evolutionary histories that involve horizontal gene transfers. Here, we study the minimum number of additional leaves needed to make a network orchard. We demonstrate that computing this proximity measure for a given network is NP-hard and describe a tight upper bound. We also give an equivalent measure based on vertex labellings to construct a mixed integer linear programming formulation. Our experimental results, which include both real-world and synthetic data, illustrate the effectiveness of our implementation.

The qubit routing problem, also known as the swap minimization problem, is a (classical) combinatorial optimization problem that arises in the design of compilers of quantum programs. We study the qubit routing problem from the viewpoint of theoretical computer science, while most of the existing studies investigated the practical aspects. We concentrate on the linear nearest neighbor (LNN) architectures of quantum computers, in which the graph topology is a path. Our results are three-fold. (1) We prove that the qubit routing problem is NP-hard. (2) We give a fixed-parameter algorithm when the number of two-qubit gates is a parameter. (3) We give a polynomial-time algorithm when each qubit is involved in at most one two-qubit gate.

Roman domination is a well researched topic in graph theory. Recently two new variants of Roman domination, namely triple Roman domination and quadruple Roman domination problems have been introduced, to provide better defense strategies. However, triple Roman domination and quadruple Roman domination problems are NP-hard. In this paper, we have provided genetic algorithm for solving triple and quadruple Roman domination problems. Programming (ILP) formulations for triple Roman domination and quadruple Roman domination problems have been proposed. The proposed models are implemented using IBM CPLEX 22.1 optimization solvers and obtained results for random graphs generated using NetworkX Erdos-Renyi model.

In this paper, we study two graph convexity parameters: iteration time and general position number. The iteration time was defined in 1981 in the geodesic convexity, but its computational complexity was so far open. The general position number was defined in the geodesic convexity and proved NP-hard in 2018. We extend these parameters to any graph convexity and prove that the iteration number is NP-hard in the P3 convexity. We use this result to prove that the iteration time is also NP-hard in the geodesic convexity even in graphs with diameter two, a long standing open question. These results are also important since they are the last two missing NP-hardness results regarding the ten most studied graph convexity parameters in the geodesic and P3 convexities. We also prove that the general position number of the monophonic convexity is W[1]-hard (parameterized by the size of the solution) and $n^{1-\varepsilon}$-inapproximable in polynomial time for any $\varepsilon>0$ unless P=NP, even in graphs with diameter two. Finally, we also obtain FPT results on the general position number in the P3 convexity and we prove that it is W[1]-hard (parameterized by the size of the solution).

We prove that the computation of a combinatorial shortest path between two vertices of a graph associahedron, introduced by Carr and Devadoss, is NP-hard. This resolves an open problem raised by Cardinal. A graph associahedron is a generalization of the well-known associahedron. The associahedron is obtained as the graph associahedron of a path. It is a tantalizing and important open problem in theoretical computer science whether the computation of a combinatorial shortest path between two vertices of the associahedron can be done in polynomial time, which is identical to the computation of the flip distance between two triangulations of a convex polygon, and the rotation distance between two rooted binary trees. Our result shows that a certain generalized approach to tackling this open problem is not promising. As a corollary of our theorem, we prove that the computation of a combinatorial shortest path between two vertices of a polymatroid base polytope cannot be done in polynomial time unless P = NP. Since a combinatorial shortest path on the matroid base polytope can be computed in polynomial time, our result reveals an unexpected contrast between matroids and polymatroids.

A temporal graph is a graph in which edges are assigned a time label. Two nodes u and v of a temporal graph are connected one to the other if there exists a path from u to v with increasing edge time labels. We consider the problem of assigning time labels to the edges of a digraph in order to maximize the total reachability of the resulting temporal graph (that is, the number of pairs of nodes which are connected one to the other). In particular, we prove that this problem is NP-hard. We then conjecture that the problem is approximable within a constant approximation ratio. This conjecture is a consequence of the following graph theoretic conjecture: any strongly connected directed graph with n nodes admits an out-arborescence and an in-arborescence that are edge-disjoint, have the same root, and each spans $Ω$(n) nodes.

There is interesting internal structure in the nullspaces of graph and hypergraph adjacency matrices, especially for trees, bipartite graphs, and related combinatorial classes. The zero loci of nullvectors, i.e., their zero coordinates' indices, encode information about matchings, coverings, and edges' influence on rank. This set system is the lattice of flats of a ``kernel matroid'', a subsystem of which are the ``stalled'' sets closed under skew zero forcing (SZF), a graph percolation/infection model known to have connections with rank and nullity. For a wide variety of graphs, the lattice of SZF-closed sets is also a matroid, a fact which can be used to obtain a polynomial-time algorithm for computing the skew zero forcing number. This contrasts with the general case, where we show that the corresponding decision problem is NP-hard. We also define skew zero forcing for hypergraphs, and show that, for linear hypertrees, the poset of SZF-closed sets is dual to the lattice of ideals of the hypergraph's nullvariety; while, for complete hypergraphs, the SZF-closed sets and the zero loci of nullvectors are more loosely related.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph which minimizes the sum of given functions at vertices evaluated at their subgraph degrees. While the problem is NP-hard already when all functions are the same, we show that it can be solved for arbitrary functions in polynomial time over graphs of bounded treewidth. Its complexity remains widely open, in particular over complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs.

Our research deals with the optimization version of the set partition problem, where the objective is to minimize the absolute difference between the sums of the two disjoint partitions. Although this problem is known to be NP-hard and requires exponential time to solve, we propose a less demanding version of this problem where the goal is to find a locally optimal solution. In our approach, we consider the local optimality in respect to any movement of at most two elements. To accomplish this, we developed an algorithm that can generate a locally optimal solution in at most $O(N^2)$ time and $O(N)$ space. Our algorithm can handle arbitrary input precisions and does not require positive or integer inputs. Hence, it can be applied in various problem scenarios with ease.

Researchers and legislators alike continue the search for methods of drawing fair districting plans. A districting plan is a partition of a state's subdivisions (e.g. counties, voting precincts, etc.). By modeling these districting plans as graphs, they are easier to create, store, and operate on. Since graph partitioning with balancing populations is a computationally intractable (NP-hard) problem most attempts to solve them use heuristic methods. In this paper, we present a variant on the $k$-medoids algorithm where, given a set of initial medoids, we find a partition of the graph's vertices to admit a districting plan. We first use the $k$-medoids process to find an initial districting plan, then use local search strategies to fine-tune the results, such as reducing population imbalances between districts. We also experiment with coarsening the graph to work with fewer vertices. The algorithm is tested on Iowa and Florida using 2010 census data to evaluate the effectiveness.

We generalise the popular cops and robbers game to multi-layer graphs, where each cop and the robber are restricted to a single layer (or set of edges). We show that initial intuition about the best way to allocate cops to layers is not always correct, and prove that the multi-layer cop number is neither bounded from above nor below by any increasing function of the cop numbers of the individual layers. We determine that it is NP-hard to decide if $k$ cops are sufficient to catch the robber, even if every cop layer is a tree and a set of isolated vertices. However, we give a polynomial time algorithm to determine if $k$ cops can win when the robber layer is a tree. Additionally, we investigate a question of worst-case divisions of a simple graph into layers: given a simple graph $G$, what is the maximum number of cops required to catch a robber over all multi-layer graphs where each edge of $G$ is in at least one layer and all layers are connected? For cliques, suitably dense random graphs, and graphs of bounded treewidth, we determine this parameter up to multiplicative constants. Lastly we consider a multi-layer variant of Meyniel's conjecture, and show the existence of an infinite family of graphs whose multi-layer cop number is bounded from below by a constant times $n / \log n$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph.

By a well known theorem of Robbins, a graph $G$ has a strongly connected orientation if and only if $G$ is 2-edge-connected and it is easy to find, in linear time, either a cut edge of $G$ or a strong orientation of $G$. A result of Durand de Gevigny shows that for every $k\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to decide if a given graph $G$ has a $k$-strong orientation. Thomassen showed that one can check in polynomial time whether a given graph has a 2-strong orientation. This implies that for a given digraph $D$ we can determine in polynomial time whether we can reorient (=reverse) some arcs of $D=(V,A)$ to obtain a 2-strong digraph $D'=(V,A')$. This naturally leads to the question of determining the minimum number of such arcs to reverse before the resulting graph is 2-strong. In this paper we show that finding this number is NP-hard. If a 2-connected graph $G$ has no 2-strong orientation, we may ask how many of its edges we may orient so that the resulting mixed graph is still 2-strong. Similarly, we may ask for a 2-edge-connected graph $G$ how many of its edges we can orient such that the resulting mixed graph remains 2-arc-strong. We prove that when restricted to graphs satisfying suitable connectivity conditions, both of these problems are equivalent to finding the minimum number of edges we must double in a 2-edge-connected graph in order to obtain a 4-edge-connected graph. Using this, we show that all these three problems are NP-hard. Finally, we consider the operation of deorienting an arc $uv$ of a digraph $D$ meaning replacing it by an undirected edge between the same vertices. In terms of connectivity properties, this is equivalent to adding the opposite arc $vu$ to $D$. We prove that for every $\ell\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to find the minimum number of arcs to deorient in a digraph $D$ in order to obtain an $\ell$-strong digraph $D'$.

We call a (not necessarily properly) edge-colored graph edge-color-avoiding connected if after the removal of edges of any single color, the graph remains connected. For vertex-colored graphs, similar definitions of color-avoiding connectivity can be given. In this article, we investigate the problem of determining the maximum number of edges that can be removed from a color-avoiding connected graph so that it remains color-avoiding connected. First, we prove that this problem is NP-hard, then we give a polynomial-time approximation algorithm for it. To analyze the approximation factor of this algorithm, we determine the minimum number of edges of color-avoiding connected graphs on a given number of vertices and with a given number of colors. Furthermore, we also consider a generalization of edge-color-avoiding connectivity to matroids.

We investigate some graph parameters dealing with biindependent pairs $(A,B)$ in a bipartite graph $G=(V_1\cup V_2,E)$, i.e., pairs $(A,B)$ where $A\subseteq V_1$, $B\subseteq V_2$ and $A\cup B$ is independent. These parameters also allow to study bicliques in general graphs. When maximizing the cardinality $|A\cup B|$ one finds the stability number $α(G)$, well-known to be polynomial-time computable. When maximizing the product $|A|\cdot |B|$ one finds the parameter $g(G)$, shown to be NP-hard by Peeters (2003), and when maximizing the ratio $|A|\cdot |B|/|A\cup B|$ one finds $h(G)$, introduced by Vallentin (2020) for bounding product-free sets in finite groups. We show that $h(G)$ is an NP-hard parameter and, as a crucial ingredient, that it is NP-complete to decide whether a bipartite graph $G$ has a balanced maximum independent set. These hardness results motivate introducing semidefinite programming bounds for $g(G)$, $h(G)$, and $α_{\text{bal}}(G)$ (the maximum cardinality of a balanced independent set). We show that these bounds can be seen as natural variations of the Lovász $\vartheta$-number, a well-known semidefinite bound on $α(G)$. In addition we formulate closed-form eigenvalue bounds and we show relationships among them as well as with earlier spectral parameters by Hoffman, Haemers (2001) and Vallentin (2020).

This work studies the combinatorial optimization problem of finding an optimal core tensor shape, also called multilinear rank, for a size-constrained Tucker decomposition. We give an algorithm with provable approximation guarantees for its reconstruction error via connections to higher-order singular values. Specifically, we introduce a novel Tucker packing problem, which we prove is NP-hard, and give a polynomial-time approximation scheme based on a reduction to the 2-dimensional knapsack problem with a matroid constraint. We also generalize our techniques to tree tensor network decompositions. We implement our algorithm using an integer programming solver, and show that its solution quality is competitive with (and sometimes better than) the greedy algorithm that uses the true Tucker decomposition loss at each step, while also running up to 1000x faster.

We consider the classical minimum and maximum cut problems: find a partition of vertices of a graph into two disjoint subsets that minimize or maximize the sum of the weights of edges with endpoints in different subsets. It is known that if the edge weights are non-negative, then the min-cut problem is polynomially solvable, while the max-cut problem is NP-hard. We construct a partition of the positive orthant into convex cones corresponding to the characteristic cut vectors, similar to a normal fan of a cut polyhedron. A graph of a cone partition is a graph whose vertices are cones, and two cones are adjacent if and only if they have a common facet. We define adjacency criteria in the graphs of cone partitions for the min-cut and max-cut problems. Based on them, we show that for both problems the vertex degrees are exponential, and the graph diameter equals 2. These results contrast with the clique numbers of graphs of cone partitions, which are linear for the minimum cut problem and exponential for the maximum cut problem.

Many important problems in Bioinformatics (e.g., assembly or multi-assembly) admit multiple solutions, while the final objective is to report only one. A common approach to deal with this uncertainty is finding safe partial solutions (e.g., contigs) which are common to all solutions. Previous research on safety has focused on polynomially-time solvable problems, whereas many successful and natural models are NP-hard to solve, leaving a lack of "safety tools" for such problems. We propose the first method for computing all safe solutions for an NP-hard problem, minimum flow decomposition. We obtain our results by developing a "safety test" for paths based on a general Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation. Moreover, we provide implementations with practical optimizations aimed to reduce the total ILP time, the most efficient of these being based on a recursive group-testing procedure. Results: Experimental results on the transcriptome datasets of Shao and Kingsford (TCBB, 2017) show that all safe paths for minimum flow decompositions correctly recover up to 90% of the full RNA transcripts, which is at least 25% more than previously known safe paths, such as (Caceres et al. TCBB, 2021), (Zheng et al., RECOMB 2021), (Khan et al., RECOMB 2022, ESA 2022). Moreover, despite the NP-hardness of the problem, we can report all safe paths for 99.8% of the over 27,000 non-trivial graphs of this dataset in only 1.5 hours. Our results suggest that, on perfect data, there is less ambiguity than thought in the notoriously hard RNA assembly problem. Availability: https://github.com/algbio/mfd-safety

A $k$-dispersed labelling of a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices is a labelling of the vertices of $G$ by the integers $1, \dots , n$ such that $d(i,i+1) \geq k$ for $1 \leq i \leq n-1$. $DL(G)$ denotes the maximum value of $k$ such that $G$ has a $k$-dispersed labelling. In this paper, we study upper and lower bounds on $DL(G)$. Computing $DL(G)$ is NP-hard. However, we determine the exact values of $DL(G)$ for cycles, paths, grids, hypercubes and complete binary trees. We also give a product construction and we prove a degree-based bound.

Consider a distribution of pebbles on a graph. A pebbling move removes two pebbles from a vertex and place one at an adjacent vertex. A vertex is reachable under a pebble distribution if it has a pebble after the application of a sequence of pebbling moves. A pebble distribution is solvable if each vertex is reachable under it. The size of a pebble distribution is the total number of pebbles. The optimal pebbling number $π^*(G)$ is the size of the smallest solvable distribution. A $t$-restricted pebble distribution places at most $t$ pebbles at each vertex. The $t$-restricted optimal pebbling number $π_t^*(G)$ is the size of the smallest solvable $t$-restricted pebble distribution. We show that deciding whether $π^*_2(G)\leq k$ is NP-complete. We prove that $π_t^*(G)=π^*(G)$ if $δ(G)\geq \frac{2|V(G)|}{3}-1$ and we show infinitely many graphs which satisfies $δ(H)\approx \frac{1}{2}|V(H)|$ but $π_t^*(H)\neqπ^*(H)$, where $δ$ denotes the minimum degree.