arXiv++ Combinatorics

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, $χ_{_{DP}}(G)$, is the analogue of the chromatic number of $G$ in the DP context and is bounded above by the degeneracy of $G$ plus one. Over the last two years a plethora of authors have introduced variations on the notion of degeneracy and used these new ideas to give improved bounds on the DP-chromatic number of certain families of graphs. Fractional DP-coloring is a generalization of fractional list coloring introduced by Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu in 2019. In this paper we introduce two analogues of the degeneracy of a graph to the fractional context, each of which bound its fractional DP-chromatic number from above. We use these analogues to bound the fractional DP-chromatic number of a variety of graphs including unicyclic graphs, some complete bipartite graphs, and sparse graphs.

Let \( G \) be a graph of order \( n \) with maximum degree $Δ$, and let $P(G,x)$ denote its chromatic polynomial. We investigate several properties of $P(G,x)$ related to its derivatives and higher-order derivatives. First, we study the monotonicity of $P(G,x)/x^n$. Dong proved that $(x-1)^nP(G,x)\geq x^nP(G,x-1)$ for all real $x\geq n$. In particular, taking $x=n$ establishes the Bartels-Welsh ``shameful conjecture" that $P(G,n)/P(G,n-1)>e$. Fadnavis later showed that the same inequality holds for all real $x\geq 36Δ^{\frac{3}{2}}$. We improve this bound by proving that it already holds for all real $x\geq 10Δ^{\frac{3}{2}}$. We then consider a conjecture of Dong, Ge, Gong, Ning, Ouyang, and Tay asserting that \( \frac{d^k}{dx^k} \bigl( \ln[(-1)^n P(G, x)] \bigr) < 0 \) for all \( k \geq 2 \) and \( x \in (-\infty, 0) \). We establish this conjecture for all \( k \geq 2 \) and \( x\leq -2.99Δk \).

We introduce a quadratic form $Q$ on the space of functions on the gap poset $G$ of the numerical semigroup $\langle a,b\rangle$. We prove combinatorially that when evaluated on the indicator function of an upward closed subset $D$, this quadratic form precisely recovers the Gorsky--Mazin $\mathtt{dinv}$ statistic of $D$, viewed as a Young subdiagram of $G$. Furthermore, we prove Theorem~1.2 that when evaluated on a pair of subdiagrams of $G$, the symmetric bilinear form associated with $Q$ is equal to a novel cross-$\mathtt{dinv}$ statistic, which is nonnegative. Combining these, we prove the inequality \[ Q(\mathbf{n})\geq \dfrac{1}{|G|}\,\|\mathbf{n}\|_\infty^2\] if $\mathbf{n}$ is a real-valued decreasing function on $G$, showing an effective positive definiteness of $Q$ on the corresponding cone. Theorem~1.2, the main engine of the paper, was autoformalized in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.

LDPC codes have attracted significant attention because of their superior performance close to the Shannon limit. Elementary trapping sets are the main cause of the error floor phenomenon in LDPC codes. We consider typical graphs related to trapping sets, including theta graphs, dumbbell graphs, and short cycles with chords. Based on the Turán numbers of $θ(2,2,2)$, $θ(1,3,3)$ and $D(4,4;0)$, we prove that any $(a,b)$-ETS with $g=8$ variable-regular $γ$ satisfies the inequality $b\geq aγ-\frac{a(\sqrt{24a-23}-1)}{4}$, provided that any two 8-cycles in the Tanner graph do not share common variable node. In addition, we can also eliminate ETSs by removing certain short-cycle structures with chords. The minimum sizes of ETSs obtained through these methods are significantly increased. To assess practical impact , we analyze spectral radii of the ETSs and construct QC-LDPC codes to show frame error rates in the error floor region.

We study additive mixtures of Markov kernels of the form $A_α= αP + (1-α)G$, where $α\in [0,1]$, $P$ is a baseline sampler and $G$ is a Gibbs kernel induced by a partition of the state space. We first motivate the study of $A_α$, which can be interpreted as the projection of a lifted Markov chain. We then consider the minimisation of distance to stationarity under two objectives: the squared Frobenius norm and the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. For the Frobenius objective, we derive explicit trace formulas and identify a Cheeger-type functional that characterises optimal two-block partitions. This yields a structured combinatorial optimisation problem admitting a difference-of-submodular decomposition, enabling efficient approximation via majorisation-minimisation. We also obtain geometric decay rates governed by the absolute spectral gap of $P$. For the KL divergence, we establish convexity-based bounds showing that the divergence of $A_α$ is controlled by those of both $P$ and $G$, thereby reducing partition selection to the Gibbs component. Numerical experiments on the Curie-Weiss model demonstrate that suitable choice of both the partition and the parameter $α$ can significantly accelerate convergence in total variation distance. We observe a consistent trade-off between local exploration and global averaging, with intermediate values of $α$ achieving the best performance across regimes.

Stanley polyominoes are a subclass of parallelogram polyominoes in which each row begins strictly to the right of the beginning of the previous row and ends strictly to the right of the end of the previous row. In this paper, we derive generating functions for Stanley polyominoes based on the numbers of columns and rows, area, semiperimeter, and numbers of interior points and edges. We also establish combinatorial connections through bijections with other combinatorial structures such as Dyck paths, skew Ferrer diagrams, and peakless Motzkin paths. As a byproduct, we answer the open question of finding a bijection between parallelogram polyominoes of area $n$ and coin fountains with $n$ coins in the even-numbered rows and $n-k$ coins in the odd-numbered rows.

We study the first nonzero Steklov eigenvalue $λ_2(T,δΩ)$ of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on a finite tree $T$ with leaf boundary $δΩ$, under a constraint on the diameter $D$. He and Hua [Calc. Var. PDE, 2022] showed that $λ_2(T) \leq 2/D$ for any tree of diameter $D$, with the even-diameter equality case fully characterized. For odd $D$, the geometric picture underlying the sharp configurations has remained unclear beyond diameter three. We determine this picture completely for all odd diameters $D = 2r+1 \geq 5$. The sharp value of $λ_2$ is achieved on spider trees with nearly-equidistributed branch lengths, forming the family of \emph{generalized almost seesaw trees} $\mathrm{AS}(r,q+2,c,t)$, prescribed by the arithmetic of $n$ relative to $\lceil r/2 \rceil$. Together with the results of He-Hua and Lin-Zhao [Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 2025] for even diameters and diameter three, this completes the geometric classification for every diameter. The argument is based on a scalar root equation for one-center profiles, an inverse boundary quadratic form on boundary fluxes, and a reduction scheme from arbitrary trees to two-center profiles, and then to the one-center class. The inverse variational viewpoint may be regarded as a boundary analogue of the classical distance-matrix formalism for trees initiated by Graham and Lovász [Adv. Math., 1978].

The study of partial-twuality polynomials originates from the classical operations of geometric duality and Petrie duality on cellularly embedded graphs. These involutions generate the symmetric group $S_3$, and applying them to subsets of edges yields the notions of partial-(geometric) duality, partial-Petriality, and more generally, partial-twuality. In this paper, we generalize this theory of partial-twuality polynomials within the framework of matrix algebra. The key observation that the Euler genus of a bouquet under a partial-twuality can be expressed as a rank function of its adjacency matrix motivates and leads to the definition of a partial-twuality polynomial for an arbitrary square matrix over any field, thereby providing a universal algebraic counterpart to the topological polynomials. We then investigate basic properties of these polynomials, including product formulas, recursion relations, degrees, interpolation behaviors, and invariance and duality theorems under the matrix operations of pivoting and inversion. We conclude by posing some problems for further research.

We study real numbers defined by multidimensional automatic arrays weighted by multiplicatively independent bases. Let $a_1, \dots, a_r\geq 2$ be integers such that $\log a_1, \dots, \log a_r$ are $\mathbb Q$-linearly independent. Given bounded automatic sequences $(p_n(i))_{n\geq 0}$ with $i=1, \dots , r$ and a function $f:\mathbb Z^r\rightarrow \mathbb Z$, we consider the associated series $α= \sum_{n_1,\dots,n_r \geq 0} \frac{f(p_{n_1}(1),\dots,p_{n_r}(r))}{a_1^{n_1}\cdots a_r^{n_r}}$. Using combinatorial properties of automatic sequences and Schmidt's Subspace Theorem, we prove that $α$ is either rational or transcendental. This extends a result of Adamczewski and Bugeaud to the multidimensional setting.

The study of the combinatorics of the modular group and of Coxeter's friezes naturally leads to the investigation of a matrix equation, sometimes referred to as the Conway-Coxeter equation. The solutions of size $n$ of this equation, called $λ$-quiddities, are $n$-tuples of elements of a given ring $B$. A detailled understanding of these objects relies on the notion of irreducible solutions, from which all $λ$-quiddities can be reconstructed. One of the central questions that naturally arises in this context is whether the irreducible $λ$-quiddities over $B$ have bounded size, and, if so, how to determine such a bound. In this paper, we aim to list results that address this question in the case of polynomial rings $A[X]$ and $\mathbb{K}[X]$, where $A$ is a finite commutative unitary ring and $\mathbb{K}$ is a commutative field. Moreover, the stated results will also make it possible to treat easily many situations in which $A$ is infinite. Finally, we shall give a complete answer to the initial question for all rings of formal power series.

In the preceding decade, Andrews and Newman resurrected the concept of a `minimal excludant' of a partition ($mex$, for short), namely, the least positive missing integer in a partition. Subsequently, several authors have not only studied its generalizations, analogues and the like but also connected the mex to several important partition statistics. In the present paper, we study the set of missing positive integers as a whole, in two different classes of partitions, namely, unrestricted partitions and overpartitions. To be precise, a $missing \ integer$ is a positive integer that is less than the largest part of a partition and which does not occur as a part. In particular, we examine the number of partitions with a given number of missing integers, determine congruences for two pairs of functions associated to them, and propose three bias type inequality conjectures for these functions.

We provide a recursive construction of an acyclic matching (also known as a gradient vector field, an equivalent notion to a discrete Morse function) on the independence complex of a graph with a simplicial vertex using given acyclic matchings on the independence complexes of specific subgraphs. As an application, we determine the homotopy type of the independence complexes of the family of chordal graphs and of a class of graphs generalising the comparability graphs of grid posets in an algorithmic and combinatorial manner via discrete Morse theory, some of which were previously obtained by sophisticated homotopy theoretic techniques. Even when the homotopy type is not easily determinable, our construction may be applied to obtain a pre-processing framework for efficient homology computation.

We generalize the Abel--Hurwitz identities to an almost entirely noncommutative setting. Namely, let $V$ be a finite set of size $n$, and let $\mathbb{L}$ be any noncommutative ring. For each $s\in V$, let $x_{s}\in\mathbb{L}$. Set $x\left( S\right) :=\sum_{s\in S}x_{s}$ for any $S\subseteq V$. Let $X$ and $Y$ be two elements of $\mathbb{L}$ such that $X+Y$ lies in the center of $\mathbb{L}$. Then, we show that% \begin{align*} & \sum_{S\subseteq V}\left( X+x\left( S\right) \right) ^{\left\vert S\right\vert }\left( Y-x\left( S\right) \right) ^{n-\left\vert S\right\vert }=\sum_{\substack{i_{1},i_{2},\ldots,i_{k}\in V\text{ distinct}% }}\left( X+Y\right) ^{n-k}x_{i_{1}}x_{i_{2}}\cdots x_{i_{k}};\\ & \sum_{S\subseteq V}X\left( X+x\left( S\right) \right) ^{\left\vert S\right\vert -1}\left( Y-x\left( S\right) \right) ^{n-\left\vert S\right\vert }=\left( X+Y\right) ^{n};\\ & \sum_{S\subseteq V}X\left( X+x\left( S\right) \right) ^{\left\vert S\right\vert -1}\left( Y-x\left( S\right) \right) ^{n-\left\vert S\right\vert -1}\left( Y-x\left( V\right) \right) =\left( X+Y-x\left( V\right) \right) \left( X+Y\right) ^{n-1}. \end{align*} (Negative powers are understood to be cancelled by other factors.)

For positive integers $n$, $d$, $k$ and $h$, let $[n]^d$ be the $d$-dimensional grid of order $n$, and we refer to the equation $\sum_{i=1}^{h}x_{1,i}=\cdots =\sum_{i=1}^{h}x_{k,i}$ as the {\it $B_{k,h}$-equation}, where $x_{1,1}, \ldots, x_{1,h}, \ldots, x_{k,1}, \ldots, x_{k,h}$ are $kh$ points in $[n]^d$. In this paper, we study the rainbow Cameron-Erdős problem with respect to the $B_{k,h}$-equation. We obtain the asymptotic number of $r$-colorings of $[n]^d$ without rainbow solutions to the $B_{k,h}$-equation, and we show that the typical colorings with this property are $(kh-1)$-colorings. We also prove that among all subsets of $[n]^d$, $[n]^d$ is the unique subset admitting the maximum number of $r$-colorings without rainbow solutions to the $B_{k,h}$-equation. The case $d=1$ and $k=h=2$ of our result confirms a conjecture on Sidon sets by Lin, Wang and Zhou~[{\it European J. Combin.}, 2022]; the case $d=1$, $k=2$ and $h\geq 2$ of our result partly solves a problem concerning linear equations proposed by Cheng, Jing, Li, Wang and Zhou~[{\it J. Combin. Theory Ser. A}, 2023]; the case $d\geq 2$ and $k=h=2$ corresponds to colorings without rainbow (possibly degenerate) parallelograms, and this geometric perspective might be of independent interest. Our proof combines the hypergraph container method with a stability analysis and a deviation gain argument.

Set $[n]=\{1, 2, \ldots , n\}$. The hypergrid $[t]^n$ is the collection of functions $f: \ [n]\rightarrow [t]$. We equip it with the natural partial order by letting $f\leq g$ whenever $f(x)\leq g(x)$ holds for all $x\in [n]$. Given a poset $P$ which can be embedded as an induced subposet of $[t]^n$, the induced poset saturation function $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)$ denotes the minimum size of a subset of $[t]^n$ that is both induced $P$-free and induced $P$-saturated. We show that for all $t\geq 2$, $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)$ satisfies a dichotomy: for every poset $P$, either there exists a constant $C_P$ such that $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)=C_P$ for all $n$ sufficiently large, or $\mathrm{sat}^{\star}([t]^n, P)=Ω(\sqrt{n})$. We also show chains fall in the former part of the dichotomy, while posets with the unique twin cover property fall in the latter part. These contributions generalize a number of results obtained by various authors in the hypercube ($t=2$) setting; the transition to the hypergrid setting provides novel challenges, however, and requires some new ideas.

Let $d(\cdot)$ denote the natural density on the positive integers. We characterize all sets $A,B$ with positive density satisfying $d(A+B)=d(A)+d(B)$, under the assumption that the two sets are not both contained in a proper finite union of residue classes. This gives a new inverse theorem for Kneser's sumset inequality in the integers, and provides a partial answer to a long-standing open question of Erdős and Graham.

Large Language Model-based Hyper Heuristic (LHH) has recently emerged as an efficient way for automatic heuristic design. However, most existing LHHs just perform well in optimizing a single function within a pre-defined solver. Their single-layer evolution makes them not effective enough to write a competent complete solver. While some variants incorporate hyperparameter tuning or attempt to generate complex code through iterative local modifications, they still lack a high-level algorithmic modeling, leading to limited exploration efficiency. To address this, we reformulate heuristic design as a Bi-level Optimization problem and propose \textbf{BEAM} (Bi-level Memory-adaptive Algorithmic Evolution). BEAM's exterior layer evolves high-level algorithmic structures with function placeholders through genetic algorithm (GA), while the interior layer realizes these placeholders via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). We further introduce an Adaptive Memory module to facilitate complex code generation. To support the evaluation for complex code generation, we point out the limitations of starting LHHs from scratch or from code templates and introduce a Knowledge Augmentation (KA) Pipeline. Experimental results on several optimization problems demonstrate that BEAM significantly outperforms existing LHHs, notably reducing the optimality gap by 37.84\% on aggregate in CVRP hybrid algorithm design. BEAM also designs a heuristic that outperforms SOTA Maximum Independent Set (MIS) solver KaMIS.

The Sauer-Shelah-Perles Lemma is a cornerstone of combinatorics and learning theory, bounding the size of a binary hypothesis class in terms of its Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. For classes of functions over a $k$-ary alphabet, namely the multiclass setting, the Natarajan dimension has long served as an analogue of VC dimension, yet the corresponding Sauer-type bounds are suboptimal for alphabet sizes $k>2$. In this work, we establish a sharp Sauer inequality for multiclass and list prediction. Our bound is expressed in terms of the Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz (DS) dimension, and more generally with its extension, the list-DS dimension -- the combinatorial parameters that characterize multiclass and list PAC learnability. Our bound is tight for every alphabet size $k$, list size $\ell$, and dimension value, replacing the exponential dependence on $\ell$ in the Natarajan-based bound by the optimal polynomial dependence, and improving the dependence on $k$ as well. Our proof uses the polynomial method. In contrast to the classical VC case, where several direct combinatorial proofs are known, we are not aware of any purely combinatorial proof in the DS setting. This motivates several directions for future research, which are discussed in the paper. As consequences, we obtain improved sample complexity upper bounds for list PAC learning and for uniform convergence of list predictors, sharpening the recent results of Charikar et al.~(STOC~2023), Hanneke et al.~(COLT~2024), and Brukhim et al.~(NeurIPS~2024).

The Bell colouring graph $\mathcal{B}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the graph whose vertices are the partitions of the vertex set of $G$ into independent sets, with an edge between two partitions if and only if one can be obtained from the other by changing the part of a single vertex of $G$. Given a natural number $k$, the Bell $k$-colouring graph $\mathcal{B}_k(G)$ and the upper-Bell $k$-colouring graph $\mathcal{B}_{\geq k}(G)$ are the induced subgraphs of $\mathcal{B}(G)$ consisting of all partitions with at most $k$ parts and at least $k$ parts, respectively. We determine precisely when two finite graphs have isomorphic Bell colouring graphs. In particular, we show that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ with no vertices of degree $n-1$ is uniquely determined by its Bell colouring graph $\mathcal{B}(G)$, and by its upper-Bell colouring graph $\mathcal{B}_{\geq k}(G)$ if $k\leq n-2$. We also show that every $n$-vertex graph with maximum degree $Δ(G)< \frac{1}{9}n-\frac{1}{3}$ is uniquely determined by its Bell $k$-colouring graph $\mathcal{B}_k(G)$ if $k>χ(G)$. By taking graph complements, each of these results can be restated in terms of partitions into cliques.

The family of $(k,\ell)$-sparse graphs, introduced by Lorea, plays a central role in combinatorial optimization and has a wide range of applications, particularly in rigidity theory. A key algorithmic problem is to decide whether a given graph is $(k,\ell)$-sparse and, if not, to produce a vertex set certifying the failure of sparsity. While pebble game algorithms have long yielded $O(n^2)$-time recognition throughout the classical range $0 \leq \ell < 2k$, and $O(n^3)$-time algorithms in the extended range $2k \leq \ell < 3k$, substantially faster bounds were previously known only in a few special cases. We present new recognition algorithms for the parameter ranges $0 \le \ell \le k$, $k < \ell < 2k$, and $2k \leq \ell < 3k$. Our approach combines bounded-indegree orientations, reductions to rooted arc-connectivity, augmenting-path techniques, and a divide-and-conquer method based on centroid decomposition. This yields the first subquadratic, and in fact near-linear-time, recognition algorithms throughout the classical range when instantiated with the fastest currently available subroutines. Under purely combinatorial implementations, the running times become $O(n\sqrt n)$ for $0 \leq \ell \leq k$ and $O(n\sqrt{n\log n})$ for $k< \ell <2k$. For $2k \leq \ell < 3k$, we obtain an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm when $\ell \leq 2k+1$ and an $O(n^2\log n)$-time algorithm otherwise. In each case, the algorithm can also return an explicit violating set certifying that the input graph is not $(k,\ell)$-sparse.