arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

graph

34489 papers tagged with this keyword
2000-12-19 v2
Transitive permutation groups of prime-squared degree
Published in Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 16 (2002) 43-69 • View PublicationBIB
We explicitly determine all of the transitive groups of degree p-squared, p a prime, whose Sylow p-subgroup is not the wreath product of two cyclic groups of order p. Furthermore, we provide a general description of the transitive groups of degree p-squared whose Sylow p-subgroup is such a wreath product, and explicitly determine most of them. As applications, we solve the Cayley Isomorphism problem for Cayley objects of an abelian group of order p-squared, explicitly determine the full automorphism group of Cayley graphs of abelian groups of order p-squared, and find all nonnormal Cayley graphs of order p-squared.
2000-12-18 v2
Counting Paths in Graphs
Published in Enseign. Math. 45 (1999) 83-131 • Search Publication
We give a simple combinatorial proof of a formula that extends a result by Grigorchuk (rediscovered by Cohen) relating cogrowth and spectral radius of random walks. Our main result is an explicit equation determining the number of `bumps' on paths in a graph: in a $d$-regular (not necessarily transitive) non-oriented graph let the series $G(t)$ count all paths between two fixed points weighted by their length $t^{length}$, and $F(u,t)$ count the same paths, weighted as $u^{number of bumps}t^{length}$. Then one has $$F(1-u,t)/(1-u^2t^2) = G(t/(1+u(d-u)t^2))/(1+u(d-u)t^2).$$ We then derive the circuit series of `free products' and `direct products' of graphs. We also obtain a generalized form of the Ihara-Selberg zeta function.
2000-12-06
Hamilton Circuits in Graphs and Directed Graphs
We give polynomial-time algorithms for obtaining hamilton circuits in random graphs, G, and random directed graphs, D. If n is finite, we assume that G or D contains a hamilton circuit. If G is an arbitrary graph containing a hamilton circuit, we conjecture that Algorithm G always obtains a hamilton circuit in polynomial time.
On the chromatic roots of generalized theta graphs
Published in J. Combin. Theory B 83, 272-297 (2001) • View PublicationBIB
The generalized theta graph Θ_{s_1,...,s_k} consists of a pair of endvertices joined by k internally disjoint paths of lengths s_1,...,s_k \ge 1. We prove that the roots of the chromatic polynomial $pi(Θ_{s_1,...,s_k},z) of a k-ary generalized theta graph all lie in the disc |z-1| \le [1 + o(1)] k/\log k, uniformly in the path lengths s_i. Moreover, we prove that Θ_{2,...,2} \simeq K_{2,k} indeed has a chromatic root of modulus [1 + o(1)] k/\log k. Finally, for k \le 8 we prove that the generalized theta graph with a chromatic root that maximizes |z-1| is the one with all path lengths equal to 2; we conjecture that this holds for all k.
2000-11-22 v2
Examples and counterexamples for Perles' conjecture
Published • View PublicationBIB
The combinatorial structure of a d-dimensional simple convex polytope can be reconstructed from its abstract graph [Blind & Mani 1987, Kalai 1988]. However, no polynomial/efficient algorithm is known for this task, although a polynomially checkable certificate for the correct reconstruction was found by [Joswig, Kaibel & Koerner 2000]. A much stronger certificate would be given by the following characterization of the facet subgraphs, conjectured by M. Perles: ``The facet subgraphs of the graph of a simple d-polytope are exactly all the (d-1)-regular, connected, induced, non-separating subgraphs'' [Perles 1970]. We give examples for the validity of Perles conjecture: In particular, it holds for the duals of cyclic polytopes, and for the duals of stacked polytopes. On the other hand, we identify a topological obstruction that must be present in any counterexample to Perles' conjecture; thus, starting with a modification of ``Bing's house'', we construct explicit 4-dimensional counterexamples.
2000-11-21
Bipartite graphs with uniquely restricted maximum matchings and their corresponding greedoids
Published • View PublicationBIB
A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum size. S is a local maximum stable set if it is a maximum stable set of the subgraph of G spanned by the union of S and N(S), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S. A matching M is uniquely restricted if its saturated vertices induce a subgraph which has a unique perfect matching, namely M itself. One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr., working as a useful sufficient local optimality condition for the weighted maximum stable set problem, ensures that any local maximum stable set of G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of G. In one of our previous papers it is proven that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we obtain a generalization of this assertion claiming that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a bipartite graph G is a greedoid if and only if all maximum matchings of G are uniquely restricted.
2000-11-06
Small Maximal Independent Sets and Faster Exact Graph Coloring
Published in J. Graph Algorithms & Applications 7(2):131-140, 2003 • View PublicationBIB
We show that, for any n-vertex graph G and integer parameter k, there are at most 3^{4k-n}4^{n-3k} maximal independent sets I \subset G with |I| <= k, and that all such sets can be listed in time O(3^{4k-n} 4^{n-3k}). These bounds are tight when n/4 <= k <= n/3. As a consequence, we show how to compute the exact chromatic number of a graph in time O((4/3 + 3^{4/3}/4)^n) ~= 2.4150^n, improving a previous O((1+3^{1/3})^n) ~= 2.4422^n algorithm of Lawler (1976).
2000-11-02 v4
Recurrence of Distributional Limits of Finite Planar Graphs
Published in Electron.J.Probab.6:1-13,2001 • View PublicationBIB
Suppose that $G_j$ is a sequence of finite connected planar graphs, and in each $G_j$ a special vertex, called the root, is chosen randomly-uniformly. We introduce the notion of a distributional limit $G$ of such graphs. Assume that the vertex degrees of the vertices in $G_j$ are bounded, and the bound does not depend on $j$. Then after passing to a subsequence, the limit exists, and is a random rooted graph $G$. We prove that with probability one $G$ is recurrent. The proof involves the Circle Packing Theorem. The motivation for this work comes from the theory of random spherical triangulations.
2000-10-25
The critical group of a directed graph
The critical group K(G) of a directed graph G=(V,E) is the cokernel of the transpose of the Laplacian matrix of G acting on the integer lattice Z^V. For undirected graphs G, this has been considered by Bacher, de la Harpe, and Nagnibeda, and by Biggs. We prove several things, among which are: K(G/p) is a subgroup of K(G) when p is an equitable partition and G is strongly connected; for undirected graphs, the torsion subgroup of K(G) depends only on the graphic matroid of G; and, the `dollar game' of Biggs can be generalized to give a combinatorial interpretation for the elements of K(G), when G is strongly connected.
2000-10-04
Quasi-isometries between non-locally-finite graphs and structure trees
We prove several criteria for quasi-isometry between non-locally-finite graphs and their structure trees. Results of Möller in \cite{moeller92ends2} for locally finite and transitive graphs are generalized. We also give a criterion which describes quasi-isometry by how edge-ends are split up by the cuts of a structure tree.
2000-10-03 v2
End compactifications in non-locally-finite graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
There are different definitions of ends in non-locally-finite graphs which are all equivalent in the locally finite case. We prove the compactness of the end-topology that is based on the principle of removing finite sets of vertices and give a proof of the compactness of the end-topology that is constructed by the principle of removing finite sets of edges. For the latter case there exists already a proof in \cite{cartwright93martin}, which only works on graphs with countably infinite vertex sets and in contrast to which we do not use the Theorem of Tychonoff. We also construct a new topology of ends that arises from the principle of removing sets of vertices with finite diameter and give applications that underline the advantages of this new definition.
2000-09-28
Toward the Rectilinear Crossing Number of $K_n$: New Drawings, Upper Bounds, and Asymptotics
Published in Discrete Mathematics. 262(1-3):59-77. 2003 • View PublicationBIB
Scheinerman and Wilf (1994) assert that `an important open problem in the study of graph embeddings is to determine the rectilinear crossing number of the complete graph K_n.' A rectilinear drawing of K_n is an arrangement of n vertices in the plane, every pair of which is connected by an edge that is a line segment. We assume that no three vertices are collinear, and that no three edges intersect in a point unless that point is an endpoint of all three. The rectilinear crossing number of K_n is the fewest number of edge crossings attainable over all rectilinear drawings of K_n. For each n we construct a rectilinear drawing of K_n that has the fewest number of edge crossings and the best asymptotics known to date. Moreover, we give some alternative infinite families of drawings of K_n with good asymptotics. Finally, we mention some old and new open problems.
2000-09-22
The Rectilinear Crossing Number of K_10 is 62
Published in Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 8(1):R23 1-30. 2001 • View PublicationBIB
A drawing of a graph G in the plane is said to be a rectilinear drawing of G if the edges are required to be line segments (as opposed to Jordan curves). We assume no three vertices are collinear. The rectilinear crossing number of G is the fewest number of edge crossings attainable over all rectilinear drawings of G. Thanks to Richard Guy, exact values of the rectilinear crossing number of K_n, the complete graph on n vertices, for n = 3,...,9, are known (Guy 1972, White and Beinke 1978, Finch 2000, Sloanes A014540). Since 1971, thanks to the work of David Singer (1971, Gardiner 1986), the rectilinear crossing number of K_10 has been known to be either 61 or 62, a deceptively innocent and tantalizing statement. The difficulty of determining the correct value is evidenced by the fact that Singer's result has withstood the test of time. In this paper we use a purely combinatorial argument to show that the rectilinear crossing number of K_10 is 62. Moreover, using this result, we improve an asymptotic lower bound for a related problem. Finally, we close with some new and old open questions that were provoked, in part, by the results of this paper, and by the tangled history of the problem itself.
2000-08-31 v2
Computing and Sampling Restricted Vertex Degree Subgraphs and Hamiltonian Cycles
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a bipartite graph embedded in a plane (or $n$-holed torus). Two subgraphs of $G$ differ by a {\it $Z$-transformation} if their symmetric difference consists of the boundary edges of a single face---and if each subgraph contains an alternating set of the edges of that face. For a given $φ: V \mapsto \mathbb Z^+$, $S_φ$ is the set of subgraphs of $G$ in which each $v\in V$ has degree $φ(v)$. Two elements of $S_φ$ are said to be adjacent if they differ by a $Z$-transformation. We determine the connected components of $S_φ$ and assign a {\it height function} to each of its elements. If $φ$ is identically two, and $G$ is a grid graph, $S_φ$ contains the partitions of the vertices of $G$ into cycles. We prove that we can always apply a series of $Z$-transformations to decrease the total number of cycles provided there is enough ``slack'' in the corresponding height function. This allows us to determine in polynomial time the minimal number of cycles into which $G$ can be partitioned provided $G$ has a limited number of non-square faces. In particular, we determine the Hamiltonicity of polyomino graphs in $O(|V|^2)$ steps. The algorithm extends to $n$-holed-torus-embedded graphs that have grid-like properties. We also provide Markov chains for sampling and approximately counting the Hamiltonian cycles of $G$.
2000-08-07
Regions of linearity, Lusztig cones and canonical basis elements for the quantized enveloping algebra of type A_4
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let U_q be the quantum group associated to a Lie algebra g of rank n. The negative part U^- of U has a canonical basis B with favourable properties, introduced by Kashiwara and Lusztig. The approaches of Kashiwara and Lusztig lead to a set of alternative parametrizations of the canonical basis, one for each reduced expression for the longest word in the Weyl group of g. We show that if g is of type A_4 there are close relationships between the Lusztig cones, canonical basis elements and the regions of linearity of reparametrization functions arising from the above parametrizations. A graph can be defined on the set of simplicial regions of linearity with respect to adjacency, and we further show that this graph is isomorphic to the graph with vertices given by the reduced expressions of the longest word of the Weyl group modulo commutation and edges given by long braid relations. Keywords: Quantum group, Lie algebra, Canonical basis, Tight monomials, Weyl group, Piecewise-linear functions.
2000-08-03 v3
Alternating sign matrices and tournaments
Published in Adv. Appl. Math. 27 (2001), 318--335 • View PublicationBIB
We settle a question of Bressoud concerning the existence of an explicit bijection from a class of oriented square-ice graphs to a class of tournaments. We give an algorithm constructing such a bijection.
2000-08-01
The Intersection of All Maximum Stable Sets of a Tree and its Pendant Vertices
Published • View PublicationBIB
A stable set in a graph G is a set of mutually non-adjacent vertices, alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set of G, and core(G) is the intersection of all its maximum stable sets. In this paper we demonstrate that in a tree T, of order n greater than 1, any stable set of size greater or equal to n/2 contains at least one pendant vertex. Hence, we deduce that any maximum stable set in a tree contains at least one pendant vertex. Our main finding is the theorem claiming that if T does not own a perfect matching, then at least two pendant vertices an even distance apart belong to core(T). While it is proved by Levit and Mandrescu that if G is a connected bipartite graph of order at least 2, then the size of core(G) is different from 1, our new statement reveals an additional structure of the intersection of all maximum stable sets of a tree. The above assertions give refining of one result of Hammer, Hansen and Simeone, stating that if a graph G is of order less than 2*alpha(G), then core(G) is non-empty, and also of a result of Jamison, Gunter, Hartnel and Rall, and Zito, saying that for a tree T of order at least two, the size of core(G) is different from 1.
2000-07-26
Morse theory on graphs
Let $Γ$ be a finite d-valent graph and G an n-dimensional torus. An ``action'' of G on $Γ$ is defined by a map, $α$, which assigns to each oriented edge e of $Γ$ a one-dimensional representation of G (or, alternatively, a weight, $α_e$, in the weight lattice of G). For the assignment, $e \to α_e$, to be a schematic description of a ``G-action'', these weights have to satisfy certain compatibility conditions: the GKM axioms. We attach to $(Γ, α)$ an equivariant cohomology ring, $H_G(Γ)=H(Γ,α)$. By definition this ring contains the equivariant cohomology ring of a point, $\SS(\fg^*) = H_G(pt)$, as a subring, and in this paper we will use graphical versions of standard Morse theoretical techniques to analyze the structure of $H_G(Γ)$ as an $\SS(\fg^*)$-module.
2000-07-14
Convergence of zeta functions of graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
The $L^2$-zeta function of an infinite graph Y (defined previously in a ball around zero) has an analytic extension. For a tower of finite graphs covered by Y, the normalized zeta functions of the finite graphs converge to the $L^2$-zeta function of Y.
2000-05-27
Stochastic monotonicity and realizable monotonicity
Published • View PublicationBIB
We explore and relate two notions of monotonicity, stochastic and realizable, for a system of probability measures on a common finite partially ordered set (poset) S when the measures are indexed by another poset A. We give counterexamples to show that the two notions are not always equivalent, but for various large classes of S we also present conditions on the poset A that are necessary and sufficient for equivalence. When A = S, the condition that the cover graph of S have no cycles is necessary and sufficient for equivalence. This case arises in comparing applicability of the perfect sampling algorithms of Propp and Wilson and the first author of the present paper.