arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the List $k$-Coloring problem we are given a graph whose every vertex is equipped with a list, which is a subset of $\{1,\ldots,k\}$. We need to decide if $G$ admits a proper coloring, where every vertex receives a color from its list. The complexity of the problem in classes defined by forbidding induced subgraphs is a widely studied topic in algorithmic graph theory. Recently, Hajebi, Li, and Spirkl [SIAM J. Discr. Math. 38 (2024)] initiated the study of List $3$-Coloring in ordered graphs, i.e., graphs with fixed linear ordering of vertices. Forbidding ordered induced subgraphs allows us to investigate the boundary of tractability more closely. We continue this direction of research, focusing mostly on the case of List $4$-Coloring. We present several algorithmic and hardness results, which altogether provide an almost complete dichotomy for classes defined by forbidding one fixed ordered graph: our investigations leave one minimal open case.

We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of a complete graph of order $n$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b})$. At the 2024 Sparse Graphs Coalition's Workshop on algebraic, extremal, and structural methods and problems in graph colouring, Mudrock presented the following question: For each positive integer $a$, does $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b}) = n+a$ if and only if $b \geq (n+a-1)!^a/(a-1)!^a$? In this paper, we show the answer to this question is yes by studying $χ_{\ell}(H \square K_{a,b})$ when $H$ is strongly chromatic-choosable (a special form of vertex criticality) with the help of the list color function and analytic inequalities such as that of Karamata. Our result can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known result that $χ_{\ell}(K_{a,b}) = 1+a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$.

We study relations between three interrelated notions of graph (list) coloring: single conflict coloring, adapted list coloring and choosability with separation (with $1$ overlapping color between lists of adjacent vertices), and their respective invariants single conflict chromatic number $χ_{\nleftrightarrow}$, adaptable choosability $ch_{ad}$ and separation choosability $ch_{sep}$. We investigate graphs with small values of these invariants, and construct explicit families of graphs $G$ with $χ_{\nleftrightarrow}(G) = ch_{ad}(G) > ch_{sep}(G)$, as well as where all three invariants are equal. Furthermore, we consider planar graphs and investigate for which triples $(a,b,c)$, there is a planar graph $G$ with $(ch_{sep}(G), ch_{ad}(G), χ_{\nleftrightarrow}(G)) = (a,b,c)$. Throughout the paper we pose many questions on these graph coloring parameters, and discuss connections to related coloring invariants such as adapted coloring.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that $φ(v) \in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ and $v$ has a color that appears precisely once at its neighborhood for every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for any $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. For a non-negative integer $k$, we say that $G$ is \emph{proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable} if $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable where $f$ is a mapping with $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. Motivated by degree-choosability of graphs, we investigate the proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs, especially for cases $k=1,2,3$. As the 5-cycle is not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and it is the only such graph we know, it is possible that every connected graph other than the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and thus every graph is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable. To support these, we show that every connected graph with maximum degree at most 3 distinct from the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable, and that $S(G)$ is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable for every graph $G$, where $S(G)$ is a graph obtained from $G$ by subdividing each edge once. Furthermore, by adapting the technique of DP-colorings, we prove that every graph with maximum degree at most $4$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable.

In 2002, Vu conjectured that graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ and maximum codegree at most $ζΔ$ have chromatic number at most $(ζ+o(1))Δ$. Despite its importance, the conjecture has remained widely open. The only direct progress so far has been obtained in the ``dense regime,'' when $ζ$ is close to $1$, by Hurley, de Verclos, and Kang. In this paper we provide the first progress in the sparse regime $ζ\ll 1$, the case of primary interest to Vu. We show that there exists $ζ_0 > 0$ such that for all $ζ\in [\log^{-32}Δ,ζ_0]$, the following holds: if $G$ is a graph with maximum degree $Δ$ and maximum codegree at most $ζΔ$, then $χ(G) \leq (ζ^{1/32} + o(1))Δ$. We derive this from a more general result that assumes only that the common neighborhood of any $s$ vertices is bounded rather than the codegrees of pairs of vertices. Our more general result also extends to the list coloring setting, which is of independent interest.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a well-studied generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The following sharp bound on the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$ is known: $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $χ_{DP}(G)$ is the DP-chromatic number of $G$ and $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of $H$. We seek to understand when $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t})$ is far from its chromatic number: $χ(G \square K_{l,t}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$ in the case that $G$ is a $k$-critical graph with $χ_{DP}(G)=k$. In particular, we have $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t}) \leq k + l$, and for fixed $l$ we wish to find the smallest $t$ for which this upper bound is achieved. This can be viewed as an extension of the classic result that the list chromatic number of $K_{l,t}$ is $l+1$ if and only if $t \geq l^l$. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides a concept and tool that is useful for making progress on this problem.

For a fixed graph $H$, in the List $H$-Coloring problem, we are given a graph $G$ along with list $L(v) \subseteq V(H)$ for every $v \in V(G)$, and we have to determine if there exists a list homomorphism $\varphi$ from $(G,L)$ to $H$, i.e., an edge preserving mapping $\varphi: V(G)\to V(H)$ that satisfies $\varphi(v)\in L(v)$ for every $v\in V(G)$. Note that if $H$ is the complete graph on $q$ vertices, the problem is equivalent to List $q$-Coloring. We investigate the kernelization properties of List $H$-Coloring parameterized by the vertex cover number of $G$: given an instance $(G,L)$ and a vertex cover of $G$ of size $k$, can we reduce $(G,L)$ to an equivalent instance $(G',L')$ of List $H$-Coloring where the size of $G'$ is bounded by a low-degree polynomial $p(k)$ in $k$? This question has been investigated previously by Jansen and Pieterse [Algorithmica 2019], who provided an upper bound, which turns out to be optimal if $H$ is a complete graph, i.e., for List $q$-Coloring. This result was one of the first applications of the method of kernelization via bounded-degree polynomials. We define two new integral graph invariants, $c^*(H)$ and $d^*(H)$, with $d^*(H) \leq c^*(H) \leq d^*(H)+1$, and show that for every graph $H$, List $H$-Coloring -- has a kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k^{c^*(H)})$ vertices, -- admits no kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^{d^*(H)-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. -- Furthermore, if $c^*(H) > d^*(H)$, then there is a kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k^{c^*(H)-\varepsilon})$ vertices where $\varepsilon \geq 2^{1-c^*(H)}$. Additionally, we show that for some classes of graphs, including powers of cycles and graphs $H$ where $Δ(H) \leq c^*(H)$ (which in particular includes cliques), the bound $d^*(H)$ is tight, using the polynomial method. We conjecture that this holds in general.

Chromatic-choosablility is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number is equal to its list chromatic number. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a positive integer $k$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In this paper, we study enumerative chromatic-choosability. A graph $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \in \mathbb{N}$. We completely determine the graphs of chromatic number two that are enumeratively chromatic-choosable. We construct examples of graphs that are chromatic-choosable but fail to be enumeratively-chromatic choosable, and finally, we explore a conjecture as to whether for every graph $G$, there is a $p \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and $K_p$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable. The techniques we use to prove results are diverse and include probabilistic ideas and ideas from DP (or correspondence)-coloring.

The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,k)$, it equals the number of proper $k$-colorings of graph $G$. Enumerative analogues of the chromatic polynomial of a graph have been introduced for two well-studied generalizations of ordinary coloring, namely, list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); and DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, k) \leq P_\ell(G,k) \leq P(G,k) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,k)$. In 2000, Dong settled a conjecture of Bartels and Welsh from 1995 known as the Shameful Conjecture by proving that for any $n$-vertex graph $G$, $P(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $k \geq n-1$. In contrast, for infinitely many positive integers $n$, Seymour (1997) gave an example of an $n$-vertex graph for which the above inequality does not hold for some $k = Θ(n/ \log n)$. In this paper, we consider analogues of Dong's result for list and DP color functions. Specifically, in contrast to the chromatic polynomial, we prove that for any $n$-vertex graph $G$, $P_{\ell}(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{\ell}(G,k)/k^n$ and $P_{DP}(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{DP}(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$. For the dual DP analogue of these inequalities, we show that there is a graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}^*(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n < P_{DP}^*(G,k)/k^n$, and we prove $P_{DP}^*(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{DP}^*(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $k \geq n-1$ when $G$ is an $n$-vertex complete bipartite graph.

Suppose $G$ is a graph and $L$ is a list assignment for $G$. A request of $L$ is a function $r$ with nonempty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$. The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that $f(v) = r(v)$ for at least $ε|D|$ vertices in $D$. We say $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible if $(G,L',r')$ is $ε$-satisfiable whenever $L'$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$ and $r'$ is a request of $L'$. It is known that a graph $G$ is not $(k, ε)$-flexible for any $k$ if and only if $ε> 1/ ρ(G)$ where $ρ(G)$ is the Hall ratio of $G$. The list flexibility number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, is the smallest $k$ such that $G$ is $(k,1/ ρ(G))$-flexible. A fundamental open question on list flexibility numbers asks: Is there a graph with list flexibility number greater than its coloring number? In this paper, we show that the list flexibility number of any complete multipartite graph $G$ is at most the coloring number of $G$. We also initiate the study of list epsilon flexibility functions of complete bipartite graphs which was first suggested by Kaul, Mathew, Mudrock, and Pelsmajer in 2024. Specifically, we completely determine the list epsilon flexibility function of $K_{m,n}$ when $m \in \{1,2\}$ and establish some additional bounds for small $m$. Our proofs reveal a connection to list coloring complete bipartite graphs with asymmetric list sizes which is a topic that was explored by Alon, Cambie, and Kang in 2021.

Defective coloring (also known as relaxed or improper coloring) is a generalization of proper coloring defined as follows: for $d \in \mathbb{N}$, a coloring of a graph is $d$-defective if every vertex is colored the same as at most $d$ of its neighbors. We investigate defective coloring of planar graphs in the context of correspondence coloring, a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle. First we show there exists a planar graph that is not $3$-defective $3$-correspondable, strengthening a recent result of Cho, Choi, Kim, Park, Shan, and Zhu. Then we construct a planar graph that is $1$-defective $3$-correspondable but not $4$-correspondable, thereby extending a recent result of Ma, Xu, and Zhu from list coloring to correspondence coloring. Finally we show all outerplanar graphs are $3$-defective $2$-correspondence colorable, with 3 defects being best possible.

A proper vertex coloring of a graph is equitable if the sizes of all color classes differ by at most $1$. For a list assignment $L$ of $k$ colors to each vertex of an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$ from their lists such that no color is used more than $\lceil n/k\rceil$ times. Call a graph equitably $k$-choosable if it has an equitable $L$-coloring for every $k$-list assignment $L$. A graph $G$ is $(a,b)$-sparse if for every $A\subseteq V(G)$, the number of edges in the subgraph $G[A]$ of $G$ induced by $A$ is at most $a|A|+b$. Our first main result is that every $(\frac{7}{6},\frac{1}{3})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $3$-colorable and equitably $3$-choosable. This is sharp. Our second main result is that every $(\frac{5}{4},\frac{1}{2})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $4$-colorable and equitably $4$-choosable. This is also sharp. One of the tools in the proof is the new notion of strongly equitable (SE) list coloring. This notion is both stronger and more natural than equitable list coloring; and our upper bounds are for SE list coloring.

The classic enumerative functions for counting colorings of a graph $G$, such as the chromatic polynomial $P(G,k)$, do so under the assumption that the given graph is labeled. In 1985, Hanlon defined and studied the chromatic polynomial for an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$. Determining $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ amounts to counting colorings under the action of automorphisms of $\mathcal{G}$. In this paper, we consider the problem of counting list colorings of unlabeled graphs. We extend Hanlon's definition to the list context and define the unlabeled list color function, $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k)$, of an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$. In this context, we pursue a fundamental question whose analogues have driven much of the research on counting list colorings and its generalizations: For a given unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, does $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k) = P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ when $k$ is large enough? We show the answer to this question is yes for a large class of unlabeled graphs that include point-determining graphs (also known as twin-free graphs, irreducible graphs, and mating graphs).

Alon and Krivelevich conjectured that if $G$ is a bipartite graph of maximum degree $Δ$, then the choosability (or list chromatic number) of $G$ satisfies $χ_{\ell}(G) = O \left ( \log Δ\right )$. Currently, the best known upper bound for $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is $(1 + o(1)) \fracΔ{\log Δ}$, which also holds for the much larger class of triangle-free graphs. We prove that for $\varepsilon = 10^{-3}$, every bipartite graph $G$ of sufficiently large maximum degree $Δ$ satisfies $χ_{\ell}(G) < (\frac{4}{5} -\varepsilon) \fracΔ{\log Δ}$. This improved upper bound suggests that list coloring is fundamentally different for bipartite graphs than for triangle-free graphs and hence gives a step toward solving the conjecture of Alon and Krivelevich.

We consider the flexible list coloring problem, in which we have a graph $G$, a color list assignment $L:V(G) \rightarrow 2^{\mathbb N}$, and a set $U \subseteq V(G)$ of vertices such that each $u \in U$ has a preferred color $p(u) \in L(u)$. Given a constant $\varepsilon > 0$, the problem asks for an $L$-coloring of $G$ in which at least $\varepsilon |U|$ vertices in $U$ receive their preferred color. We use a method of reducible subgraphs to approach this problem. We develop a vertex-partitioning tool that, when used with a new reducible subgraph framework, allows us to define large reducible subgraphs. Using this new tool, we show that if $G$ has maximum average degree less than $\frac{11}{3}$, a list $L(v)$ of size $4$ at each $v \in V(G)$, and a set $U \subseteq V(G)$ of vertices with preferred colors, then there exists an $L$-coloring of $G$ for which at least $2^{-145} |U|$ vertices of $U$ receive their preferred color.

We prove a generalization of the well-known Bondy-Bopanna-Siegel Lemma to DP-colorings from a class of correspondence assignments which we call derangement assignments. Since DP-colorings from derangement assignments generalize zero-free list colorings of signed graphs, this yields an orientation theorem for zero-free signed list colorings, as well.

It is known that in matroids the difference between the chromatic number and the fractional chromatic number is smaller than 1, and that the list chromatic number is equal to the chromatic number. We investigate the gap within these pairs of parameters for hypergraphs that are the intersection of a given number k of matroids. We prove that in such hypergraphs the list chromatic number is at most k times the chromatic number and at most 2k-1 times the maximum chromatic number among the k matroids. We study the relationship between three polytopes associated with k-sets of matroids, and connect them to bounds on the fractional chromatic number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. This also connects to bounds on the matroidal matching and covering number of the intersection of the members of the k-set. The tools used are in part topological.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of chromatic polynomials have been introduced for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, list color functions (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, DP color functions (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, dual DP color functions (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. In 2022 (improving on older results) Dong and Zhang showed that for any graph $G$, $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq |E(G)|-1$. Consequently, the list color function of a graph is a polynomial for sufficiently large $m$. One of the most important and longstanding open questions on DP color functions asks: for every graph $G$ is there an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to the analogue of this question for dual DP color functions is no. Our proof reveals a connection between a dual DP color function and the balanced chromatic polynomial of a signed graph introduced by Zaslavsky in 1982.

The 2-distance coloring of a graph $G$ is equivalent to the proper coloring of its square graph $G^2$, it is a special distance labeling problem. DP-coloring (or "Correspondence coloring") was introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2018, to answer a conjecture of list coloring proposed by Borodin. In recent years, many researches pay attention to the DP-coloring of planar graphs with some restriction in cycles. We study the DP-coloring of the square of subcubic graphs in terms of maximum average degree $\rm{mad}(G)$, and by the discharging method, we showed that: for a subcubic graph $G$, if $\rm{mad}(G)<9/4$, then $G^2$ is DP-5-colorable; if $\rm{mad}(G)<12/5$, then $G^2$ is DP-6-colorable. And the bound in the first result is sharp.

The online list coloring game is a two-player graph-coloring game played on a graph $G$ as follows. On each turn, a Lister reveals a new color $c$ at some subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of uncolored vertices, and then a Painter chooses an independent subset of $S$ to which to assign $c$. As the game is played, the revealed colors at each vertex $v \in V(G)$ form a color set $L(v)$, often called a list. The paintability of $G$ measures the minimum value $k$ for which Painter has a strategy to complete a coloring of $G$ in such a way that $|L(v)| \leq k$ for each vertex $v \in V(G)$. The paintability of a graph is an upper bound for its list chromatic number, or choosability. The online list coloring game is a special case of the DP-painting game, which is defined similarly using the setting of DP-coloring. In the DP-painting game, the Lister reveals correspondence covers of a graph $G$ rather than colors, and the Painter chooses independent subsets of these covers. The DP-painting game has a parameter known as DP-paintability which is analogous to paintability. In this paper, we consider upper bounds for the paintability and DP-paintability of a graph $G$ with large maximum degree $Δ$ and chromatic number at most some fixed value $r$. We prove that the paintability of $G$ is at most $\left(1 - \frac{1}{4r+1} \right ) Δ+ 2$ and that the DP-paintability of $G$ is at most $Δ- Ω( \sqrt{Δ\log Δ})$. We prove our first upper bound using Alon-Tarsi orientations, and we prove our second upper bound by considering the strict type-$3$ degeneracy parameter recently introduced by Zhou, Zhu, and Zhu.