arXiv++ Combinatorics

A \emph{Kempe chain} on colors $a$ and $b$ is a component of the subgraph induced by colors $a$ and $b$. A \emph{Kempe change} is the operation of interchanging the colors of some Kempe chain. For a list-assignment $L$ and an $L$-coloring $\varphi$, a Kempe change is \emph{$L$-valid} for $\varphi$ if performing the Kempe change yields another $L$-coloring. Two $L$-colorings are \emph{$L$-equivalent} if we can form one from the other by a sequence of $L$-valid Kempe changes. A \emph{degree-assignment} is a list-assignment $L$ such that $L(v)\ge d(v)$ for every $v\in V(G)$. Cranston and Mahmoud (\emph{Combinatorica}, 2023) asked: For which graphs $G$ and degree-assignment $L$ of $G$ is it true that all the $L$-colorings of $G$ are $L$-equivalent? We prove that for every 4-connected graph $G$ which is not complete and every degree-assignment $L$ of $G$, all $L$-colorings of $G$ are $L$-equivalent.

Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose $0 \leq ε\leq 1$, $G$ is a graph, $L$ is a list assignment for $G$, and $r$ is a function with non-empty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$ ($r$ is called a request of $L$). The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that $f(v) = r(v)$ for at least $ε|D|$ vertices in $D$. We say $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible if $(G,L',r')$ is $ε$-satisfiable whenever $L'$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$ and $r'$ is a request of $L'$. It was shown by Dvořák et al. that if $d+1$ is prime, $G$ is a $d$-degenerate graph, and $r$ is a request for $G$ with domain of size $1$, then $(G,L,r)$ is $1$-satisfiable whenever $L$ is a $(d+1)$-assignment. In this paper, we extend this result to all $d$ for bipartite $d$-degenerate graphs. The literature on flexible list coloring tends to focus on showing that for a fixed graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$ there exists an $ε> 0$ such that $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible, but it is natural to try to find the largest possible $ε$ for which $G$ is $(k,ε)$-flexible. In this vein, we improve a result of Dvořák et al., by showing $d$-degenerate graphs are $(d+2, 1/2^{d+1})$-flexible. In pursuit of the largest $ε$ for which a graph is $(k,ε)$-flexible, we observe that a graph $G$ is not $(k, ε)$-flexible for any $k$ if and only if $ε> 1/ ρ(G)$, where $ρ(G)$ is the Hall ratio of $G$, and we initiate the study of the list flexibility number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest $k$ such that $G$ is $(k,1/ ρ(G))$-flexible. We study relationships and connections between the list flexibility number, list chromatic number, list packing number, and degeneracy of a graph.

By a well-known theorem of Thomassen and a planar graph depicted by Voigt, we know that every planar graph is $5$-choosable, and the bound is tight. In 1999, Lam, Xu and Liu reduced $5$ to $4$ on $C_4$-free planar graphs. In the paper, by applying the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, we design an effective algorithm to deal with list coloring problems. At the same time, we prove that a planar graph $G$ is $4$-choosable if any two $4$-cycles having distance at least $5$ in $G$, which extends the result of Lam et al.

We survey work on coloring, list coloring, and painting squares of graphs; in particular, we consider strong edge-coloring. We focus primarily on planar graphs and other sparse classes of graphs.

The DP-coloring is a generalization of the list coloring, introduced by Dvořák and Postle. Let $\mathcal{H}=(L,H)$ be a cover of a graph $G$ and $P_{DP}(G,\mathcal{H})$ be the number of $\mathcal{H}$-colorings of $G$. The DP color function $P_{DP}(G,m)$ of $G$, introduced by Kaul and Mudrock, is the minimum value of $P_{DP}(G,\mathcal{H})$ where the minimum is taken over all possible $m$-fold covers $\mathcal{H}$ of $G$. For the family of $n$-vertex connected graphs, one can deduce that trees maximize the DP color function, from two results of Kaul and Mudrock. In this paper we obtain tight upper bounds for the DP color function of $n$-vertex $2$-connected graphs. Another concern in this paper is the canonical labeling in a cover. It is well known that if an $m$-fold cover $\mathcal{H}$ of a graph $G$ has a canonical labeling, then $P_{DP}(G,\mathcal{H})=P(G,m)$ in which $P(G,m)$ is the chromatic polynomial of $G$. However the converse statement of this conclusion is not always true. We give examples that for some $m$ and $G$, there exists an $m$-fold cover $\mathcal{H}$ of $G$ such that $P_{DP}(G,\mathcal{H})=P(G,m)$, but $\mathcal{H}$ has no canonical labelings. We also prove that when $G$ is a unicyclic graph or a theta graph, for each $m\geq 3$, if $P_{DP}(G,\mathcal{H})=P(G,m)$, then $\mathcal{H}$ has a canonical labeling.

We consider the following list coloring with separation problem: Given a graph $G$ and integers $a,b$, find the largest integer $c$ such that for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|= a$ for any vertex $v$ and $|L(u)\cap L(v)|\le c$ for any edge $uv$ of $G$, there exists an assignment $\varphi$ of sets of integers to the vertices of $G$ such that $\varphi(u)\subset L(u)$ and $|\varphi(v)|=b$ for any vertex $u$ and $\varphi(u)\cap \varphi(v)=\emptyset$ for any edge $uv$. Such a value of $c$ is called the separation number of $(G,a,b)$. Using a special partition of a set of lists for which we obtain an improved version of Poincaré's crible, we determine the separation number of the complete graph $K_n$ for some values of $a,b$ and $n$, and prove bounds for the remaining values.

A majority coloring of a directed graph is a vertex coloring in which each vertex has the same color as at most half of its out-neighbors. In this note we simplify some proof techniques and generalize previously known results on various generalizations of majority coloring. In particular, our unified and simplified approach works for paintability - an on-line analog of the list coloring.

It is known that, for any $k$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, the number of $L$-list colorings of $G$ is at least the number of the proper $k$-colorings of $G$ when $k>(m-1)/\ln(1+\sqrt{2})$. In this paper, we extend the Whitney's broken cycle theorem to $L$-colorings of signed graphs, by which we show that if $k> \binom{m}{3}+\binom{m}{4}+m-1$ then, for any $k$-assignment $L$, the number of $L$-colorings of a signed graph $Σ$ with $m$ edges is at least the number of the proper $k$-colorings of $Σ$. Further, if $L$ is $0$-free (resp., $0$-included) and $k$ is even (resp., odd), then the lower bound $\binom{m}{3}+\binom{m}{4}+m-1$ for $k$ can be improved to $(m-1)/\ln(1+\sqrt{2})$.

We introduce a new concept in graph coloring motivated by the popular Sudoku puzzle. Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph of order $n$ with chromatic number $χ(G)=k$ and let $S\subseteq V.$ Let $\mathscr C_0$ be a $k$-coloring of the induced subgraph $G[S].$ The coloring $\mathscr C_0$ is called an extendable coloring if $\mathscr C_0$ can be extended to a $k$-coloring of $G.$ We say that $\mathscr C_0$ is a Sudoku coloring of $G$ if $\mathscr C_0$ can be uniquely extended to a $k$-coloring of $G.$ The smallest order of such an induced subgraph $G[S]$ of $G$ which admits a Sudoku coloring is called the Sudoku number of $G$ and is denoted by $sn(G).$ In this paper we initiate a study of this parameter. We first show that this parameter is related to list coloring of graphs. In Section 2, basic properties of Sudoku coloring that are related to color dominating vertices, chromatic numbers and degree of vertices, are given. Particularly, we obtained necessary conditions for $\mathscr C_0$ being uniquely extendable, and for $\mathscr C_0$ being a Sudoku coloring. In Section 3, we determined the Sudoku number of various familes of graphs. Particularly, we showed that a connected graph $G$ has $sn(G)=1$ if and only if $G$ is bipartite. Consequently, every tree $T$ has $sn(T)=1$. Moreover, a graph $G$ with small chromatic number may have arbitrarily large Sudoku number. Extendable coloring and Sudoku coloring are nice tools for providing a $k$-coloring of $G$.

The List-3-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph $G$ and a list $L(v)\subseteq \{1,2,3\}$ of colors assigned to each vertex $v$ of $G$, whether $G$ admits a proper coloring $φ$ with $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, and the $3$-Coloring Problem is the List-$3$-Coloring Problem on instances with $L(v)=\{1,2,3\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. The List-$3$-Coloring Problem is a classical NP-complete problem, and it is well-known that while restricted to $H$-free graphs (meaning graphs with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$), it remains NP-complete unless $H$ is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of a path. However, the current state of art is far from proving this to be sufficient for a polynomial time algorithm; in fact, the complexity of the $3$-Coloring Problem on $P_8$-free graphs (where $P_8$ denotes the eight-vertex path) is unknown. Here we consider a variant of the List-$3$-Coloring Problem called the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem, where the input is an ordered graph, that is, a graph along with a linear order on its vertex set. For ordered graphs $G$ and $H$, we say $G$ is $H$-free if $H$ is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $G$ with the isomorphism preserving the linear order. We prove, assuming $H$ to be an ordered graph, a nearly complete dichotomy for the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free ordered graphs. In particular, we show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if $H$ has at most one edge, and remains NP-complete if $H$ has at least three edges. Moreover, in the case where $H$ has exactly two edges, we give a complete dichotomy when the two edges of $H$ share an end, and prove several NP-completeness results when the two edges of $H$ do not share an end, narrowing the open cases down to three very special types of two-edge ordered graphs.

In 1973, Erdős conjectured the existence of high girth $(n,3,2)$-Steiner systems. Recently, Glock, Kühn, Lo, and Osthus and independently Bohman and Warnke proved the approximate version of Erdős' conjecture. Just this year, Kwan, Sah, Sawhney, and Simkin proved Erdős' conjecture. As for Steiner systems with more general parameters, Glock, Kühn, Lo, and Osthus conjectured the existence of high girth $(n,q,r)$-Steiner systems. We prove the approximate version of their conjecture. This result follows from our general main results which concern finding perfect or almost perfect matchings in a hypergraph $G$ avoiding a given set of submatchings (which we view as a hypergraph $H$ where $V(H)=E(G)$). Our first main result is a common generalization of the classical theorems of Pippenger (for finding an almost perfect matching) and Ajtai, Komlós, Pintz, Spencer, and Szemerédi (for finding an independent set in girth five hypergraphs). More generally, we prove this for coloring and even list coloring, and also generalize this further to when $H$ is a hypergraph with small codegrees (for which high girth designs is a specific instance). Indeed, the coloring version of our result even yields an almost partition of $K_n^r$ into approximate high girth $(n,q,r)$-Steiner systems. Our main results also imply the existence of a perfect matching in a bipartite hypergraph where the parts have slightly unbalanced degrees. This has a number of applications; for example, it proves the existence of $Δ$ pairwise disjoint list colorings in the setting of Kahn's theorem; it also proves asymptotic versions of various rainbow matching results in the sparse setting (where the number of times a color appears could be much smaller than the number of colors) and even the existence of many pairwise disjoint rainbow matchings in such circumstances.

The concept of DP-coloring of a graph is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Multiple DP-coloring of graphs, as a generalization of multiple list coloring, was first studied by Bernshteyn, Kostochka and Zhu in 2019. This paper proves that planar graphs without 3-cycles and normally adjacent 4-cycles are $(7m, 2m)$-DP-colorable for every integer $m$. As a consequence, the strong fractional choice number of any planar graph without 3-cycles and normally adjacent 4-cycles is at most $7/2$.

Bernshteyn and Lee defined a new notion, weak degeneracy, which is slightly weaker than the ordinary degeneracy. It is proved that strictly $f$-degenerate transversal is a common generalization of list coloring, $L$-forested-coloring and DP-coloring. In this paper, we consider three classes of graphs, including planar graphs without any configuration in Fig. 2, toroidal graphs without any configuration in Fig. 5, and planar graphs without intersecting $5$-cycles. We give structural results for each class of graphs, and prove each structure is reducible for weakly $3$-degenerate and the existence of strictly $f$-degenerate transversals. As consequences, these three classes of graphs are weakly $3$-degenerate, and have a strictly $f$-degenerate transversal. Then these three classes of graph have DP-paint number at most four, and have list vertex arboricity at most two. This greatly improve all the results in [2-4, 11-13, 16-18, 22, 25, 32, 34]. Furthermore, the first and the third classes of graphs have Alon-Tarsi number at most four.

An $α,β$-Kempe swap in a properly colored graph interchanges the colors on some component of the subgraph induced by colors $α$ and $β$. Two $k$-colorings of a graph are $k$-Kempe equivalent if we can form one from the other by a sequence of Kempe swaps (never using more than $k$ colors). Las Vergnas and Meyniel showed that if a graph is $(k-1)$-degenerate, then each pair of its $k$-colorings are $k$-Kempe equivalent. Mohar conjectured the same conclusion for connected $k$-regular graphs. This was proved for $k=3$ by Feghali, Johnson, and Paulusma (with a single exception $K_2\square K_3$, also called the 3-prism) and for $k\ge 4$ by Bonamy, Bousquet, Feghali, and Johnson. In this paper we prove an analogous result for list-coloring. For a list-assignment $L$ and an $L$-coloring $\varphi$, a Kempe swap is called $L$-valid for $\varphi$ if performing the Kempe swap yields another $L$-coloring. Two $L$-colorings are called $L$-equivalent if we can form one from the other by a sequence of $L$-valid Kempe swaps. Let $G$ be a connected $k$-regular graph with $k\ge 3$. We prove that if $L$ is a $k$-assignment, then all $L$-colorings are $L$-equivalent (again with a single exception $K_2 \square K_3$). When $k\ge 4$, the proof is completely self-contained, so implies an alternate proof of the result of Bonamy et al. Our proofs rely on the following key lemma, which may be of independent interest. Let $H$ be a graph such that for every degree-assignment $L_H$ all $L_H$-colorings are $L_H$-equivalent. If $G$ is a connected graph that contains $H$ as an induced subgraph, then for every degree-assignment $L_G$ for $G$ all $L_G$-colorings are $L_G$-equivalent.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Formulas for chromatic polynomials of clique-gluings of graphs, a fundamental graph operation, are well-known, but the effect of such gluings on the DP color function is not well understood. In this paper we study the DP color function of $K_p$-gluings of graphs. Recently, Becker et. al. asked whether $P_{DP}(G,m) \leq (\prod_{i=1}^n P_{DP}(G_i,m))/\left( \prod_{i=0}^{p-1} (m-i) \right)^{n-1}$ whenever $m \geq p$, where the expression on the right is the DP-coloring analogue of the corresponding chromatic polynomial formula for a $K_p$-gluing, $G$, of $G_1, \ldots, G_n$. Becker et. al. showed this inequality holds when $p=1$. In this paper we show this inequality holds for edge-gluings ($p=2$). On the other hand, we show it does not hold for triangle-gluings ($p=3$), which also answers a question of Dong and Yang (2021). Finally, we show a relaxed version, based on a class of $m$-fold covers that we conjecture would yield the fewest DP-colorings for a given graph, of the inequality holds when $p \geq 3$.

We consider Kempe changes on the $k$-colorings of a graph on $n$ vertices. If the graph is $(k-1)$-degenerate, then all its $k$-colorings are equivalent up to Kempe changes. However, the sequence between two $k$-colorings that arises from the proof may be exponential in the number of vertices. An intriguing open question is whether it can be turned polynomial. We prove this to be possible under the stronger assumption that the graph has treewidth at most $k-1$. Namely, any two $k$-colorings are equivalent up to $O(kn^2)$ Kempe changes. We investigate other restrictions (list coloring, bounded maximum average degree, degree bounds). As a main result, we derive that given an $n$-vertex graph with maximum degree $Δ$, the $Δ$-colorings are all equivalent up to $O(n^2)$ Kempe changes, unless $Δ= 3$ and some connected component is a 3-prism.

Dvořák and Postle introduced the concept of DP-coloring to overcome some difficulties in list coloring. Sittitrai and Nakprasit combined DP-coloring and defective list coloring to define a new coloring -- relaxed DP-coloring. For relaxed DP-coloring, Sribunhung et al. proved that planar graphs without 4- and 7-cycles are DP-(0, 2, 2)-colorable. Li et al. proved that planar graphs without 4, 8-cycles or 4, 9-cycles are DP-(1, 1, 1)-colorable. Lu and Zhu proved that planar graphs without 4, 5-cycles, or 4, 6-cycles, or 4, 7-cycles are DP-(1, 1, 1)-colorable. In this paper, we show that planar graphs without 4, 6-cycles or 4, 8-cycles are DP-(0, 2, 2)-colorable.

Hadwiger's conjecture asserts that every graph without a $K_t$-minor is $(t-1)$-colorable. It is known that the exact version of Hadwiger's conjecture does not extend to list coloring, but it has been conjectured by Kawarabayashi and Mohar (2007) that there exists a constant $c$ such that every graph with no $K_t$-minor has list chromatic number at most $ct$. More specifically, they also conjectured that this holds for $c=\frac{3}{2}$. Refuting the latter conjecture, we show that the maximum list chromatic number of graphs with no $K_t$-minor is at least $(2-o(1))t$, and hence $c \ge 2$ in the above conjecture is necessary. This improves the previous best lower bound by Barát, Joret and Wood (2011), who proved that $c \ge \frac{4}{3}$. Our lower-bound examples are obtained via the probabilistic method.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Motivated by results related to list coloring Cartesian products of graphs, we initiate the study of the DP-chromatic number, $χ_{DP}$, of the same. We show that $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of the graph $H$. We focus on building tools for lower bound arguments for $χ_{DP}(G \square H)$ and use them to show the sharpness of the bound above and its various forms. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, is essential in the study of the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs, including the following question that extends the sharpness problem above and the classical result on gap between list chromatic number and chromatic number: given any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, what is the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{k,t})= χ_{DP}(G) + k$?

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an extensively studied notion in combinatorics since its introduction by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of the chromatic polynomial have been introduced and studied for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is not known if the list color function and the DP color function are chromatic-adherent. We show that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent by studying the DP color function of Generalized Theta graphs. The tools we develop along with the Rearrangement Inequality give a new method for determining the DP color function of all Theta graphs and the dual DP color function of all Generalized Theta graphs.