arXiv++ Combinatorics

The bidirected cut relaxation is the characteristic representative of the bidirected relaxations ($\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$) which are a well-known class of equivalent LP-relaxations for the NP-hard Steiner Tree Problem in Graphs (STP). Although no general approximation algorithm based on $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ with an approximation ratio better than $2$ for STP is known, it is mostly preferred in integer programming as an implementation of STP, since there exists a formulation of compact size, which turns out to be very effective in practice. It is known that the integrality gap of $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ is at most $2$, and a long standing open question is whether the integrality gap is less than $2$ or not. The best lower bound so far is $\frac{36}{31} \approx 1.161$ proven by Byrka et al. [BGRS13]. Based on the work of Chakrabarty et al. [CDV11] about embedding STP instances into simplices by considering appropriate dual formulations, we improve on this result by constructing a new class of instances and showing that their integrality gaps tend at least to $\frac{6}{5} = 1.2$. More precisely, we consider the class of equivalent LP-relaxations $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$, that can be obtained by strengthening $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ by already known straightforward Steiner vertex degree constraints, and show that the worst case ratio regarding the optimum value between $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ and $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$ is at least $\frac{6}{5}$. Since $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$ is a lower bound for the hypergraphic relaxations ($\mathrm{\mathcal{HYP}}$), another well-known class of equivalent LP-relaxations on which the current best $(\ln(4) + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for STP by Byrka et al. [BGRS13] is based, this worst case ratio also holds for $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ and $\mathrm{\mathcal{HYP}}$.

Let $P$ be a set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, $B$ a bicoloring of $P$ and $\Oo$ a family of geometric objects (that is, intervals, boxes, balls, etc). An object from $\Oo$ is called balanced with respect to $B$ if it contains the same number of points from each color of $B$. For a collection $\B$ of bicolorings of $P$, a geometric system of unbiased representatives (G-SUR) is a subset $\Oo'\subseteq\Oo$ such that for any bicoloring $B$ of $\B$ there is an object in $\Oo'$ that is balanced with respect to $B$. We study the problem of finding G-SURs. We obtain general bounds on the size of G-SURs consisting of intervals, size-restricted intervals, axis-parallel boxes and Euclidean balls. We show that the G-SUR problem is NP-hard even in the simple case of points on a line and interval ranges. Furthermore, we study a related problem on determining the size of the largest and smallest balanced intervals for points on the real line with a random distribution and coloring. Our results are a natural extension to a geometric context of the work initiated by Balachandran et al. on arbitrary systems of unbiased representatives.

A combinatorial neural code $\mathscr C\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is convex if it arises as the intersection pattern of convex open subsets of $\mathbb R^d$. We relate the emerging theory of convex neural codes to the established theory of oriented matroids, both categorically and with respect to geometry and computational complexity. On the categorical side, we show that the map taking an acyclic oriented matroid to the code of positive parts of its topes is a faithful functor. We adapt the oriented matroid ideal introduced by Novik, Postnikov, and Sturmfels into a functor from the category of oriented matroids to the category of rings; then, we show that the resulting ring maps naturally to the neural ring of the matroid's neural code. For geometry and computational complexity, we show that a code has a realization with convex polytopes if and only if it lies below the code of a representable oriented matroid in the partial order of codes introduced by Jeffs. We show that previously published examples of non-convex codes do not lie below any oriented matroids, and we construct examples of non-convex codes lying below non-representable oriented matroids. By way of this construction, we can apply Mnëv-Sturmfels universality to show that deciding whether a combinatorial code is convex is NP-hard.

List k-Coloring (Li k-Col) is the decision problem asking if a given graph admits a proper coloring compatible with a given list assignment to its vertices with colors in {1,2,..,k}. The problem is known to be NP-hard even for k=3 within the class of 3-regular planar bipartite graphs and for k=4 within the class of chordal bipartite graphs. In 2015, Huang, Johnson and Paulusma asked for the complexity of Li 3-Col in the class of chordal bipartite graphs. In this paper we give a partial answer to this question by showing that Li k-Col is polynomial in the class of convex bipartite graphs. We show first that biconvex bipartite graphs admit a multichain ordering, extending the classes of graphs where a polynomial algorithm of Enright, Stewart and Tardos (2014) can be applied to the problem. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm to solve the Li k-Col in the calss of convex bipartite graphs. Finally we show how our algorithm can be modified to solve the more general Li H-Col problem on convex bipartite graphs.

The burning number of a graph was recently introduced by Bonato et al. Although they mention that the burning number generalises naturally to directed graphs, no further research on this has been done. Here, we introduce graph burning for directed graphs, and we study bounds for the corresponding burning number and the hardness of finding this number. We derive sharp bounds from simple algorithms and examples. The hardness question yields more surprising results: finding the burning number of a directed tree is NP-hard, but FPT; however, it is W[2]-complete for DAGs. Finally, we give a fixed-parameter algorithm to find the burning number of a digraph, with a parameter inspired by research in phylogenetic networks.

The concept of rainbow connection number of a graph was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 2008. Inspired by this concept, other concepts on colored version of connectivity in graphs were introduced, such as the monochromatic connection number by Caro and Yuster in 2011, the proper connection number by Borozan et al. in 2012, and the conflict-free connection number by Czap et al. in 2018, as well as some other variants of connection numbers later on. Chakraborty et al. proved that to compute the rainbow connection number of a graph is NP-hard. For a long time, it has been tried to fix the computational complexity for the monochromatic connection number, the proper connection number and the conflict-free connection number of a graph. However, it has not been solved yet. Only the complexity results for the strong version, i.e., the strong proper connection number and the strong conflict-free connection number, of these connection numbers were determined to be NP-hard. In this paper, we prove that to compute each of the monochromatic connection number, the proper connection number and the conflict free connection number for a graph is NP-hard. This solves a long standing problem in this field, asked in many talks of workshops and papers.

The availability of satellite communication systems is extremely limited by atmospheric impairments, such as rain (for radio frequencies) and cloud coverage (for optical frequencies). A solution to this problem is the site diversity technique, where a network of geographically distributed ground stations (GSs) can ensure, with high probability, that at least one GS is available for connection to the satellite at each time period. However, the installation of redundant GSs induces unnecessary additional costs for the network operator. In this context, we study an optimization problem that minimizes the number of required GSs, subject to availability constraints. First, the problem is transformed into a binary-integer-linear-programming (BILP) problem, which is proven to be NP-hard. Subsequently, we design a branch-and-bound (B&B) algorithm, with global-optimization guarantee, based on the linear-programming (LP) relaxation and a greedy method as well. Finally, numerical results show that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, and has low complexity in the average case.

We consider the problem of computing the strong rainbow connection number $src(G)$ for cactus graphs $G$ in which all cycles have odd length. We present a formula to calculate $src(G)$ for such odd cacti which can be evaluated in linear time, as well as an algorithm for computing the corresponding optimal strong rainbow edge coloring, with polynomial worst case run time complexity. Although computing $src(G)$ is NP-hard in general, previous work has demonstrated that it may be computed in polynomial time for certain classes of graphs, including cycles, trees and block clique graphs. This work extends the class of graphs for which $src(G)$ may be computed in polynomial time.

Properties of graphs that can be characterized by the spectrum of the adjacency matrix of the graph have been studied systematically recently. Motivated by the complexity of these properties, we show that there are such properties for which testing whether a graph has that property can be NP-hard (or belong to other computational complexity classes consisting of even harder problems). In addition, we discuss a possible spectral characterization of some well-known NP-hard problems. In particular, for every integer $k\geq 6$ we construct a pair of $k$-regular cospectral graphs, where one graph is Hamiltonian and the other one not.

Let $D$ be a directed graph cellularly embedded in a surface together with non-negative cost on its arcs. Given any integer circulation in $D$, we study the problem of finding a minimum-cost non-negative integer circulation in $D$ that is homologous over the integers to the given circulation. A special case of this problem arises in recent work on the stable set problem for graphs with bounded odd cycle packing number, in which the surface is non-orientable (Conforti et al., SODA'20). For orientable surfaces, polynomial-time algorithms have been obtained for different variants of this problem. We complement these results by showing that the convex hull of feasible solutions has a very simple polyhedral description. In contrast, only little seems to be known about the case of non-orientable surfaces. We show that the problem is strongly NP-hard for general non-orientable surfaces, and give the first polynomial-time algorithm for surfaces of fixed genus. For the latter, we provide a characterization of homology (over the integers) that allows us to recast the problem as a special integer program, which can be efficiently solved using proximity results and dynamic programming.

A coloring of the vertices of a connected graph is convex if each color class induces a connected subgraph. We address the convex recoloring (CR) problem defined as follows. Given a graph $G$ and a coloring of its vertices, recolor a minimum number of vertices of $G$ so that the resulting coloring is convex. This problem, known to be NP-hard even on paths, was firstly motivated by applications on perfect phylogenies. In this work, we study CR on general graphs from a polyhedral point of view. First, we introduce a full-dimensional polytope based on the idea of connected subgraphs, and present a class of valid inequalities with righthand side one that comprises all facet-defining inequalities with binary coefficients when the input graph is a tree. Moreover, we define a general class of inequalities with righthand side in $\{1, \ldots, k\}$, where $k$ is the amount of colors used in the initial coloring, and show sufficient conditions for validity and facetness of such inequalities. Finally, we report on computational experiments for an application on mobile networks that can be modeled by the polytope of CR on paths. We evaluate the potential of the proposed inequalities to reduce the integrality gaps.

Given a graph $G=(V(G), E(G))$, the size of a minimum dominating set, minimum paired dominating set, and a minimum total dominating set of a graph $G$ are denoted by $γ(G)$, $γ_{\rm pr}(G)$, and $γ_{t}(G)$, respectively. For a positive integer $k$, a $k$-packing in $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that for every pair of distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ in $S$, the distance between $u$ and $v$ is at least $k+1$. The $k$-packing number is the order of a largest $k$-packing and is denoted by $ρ_{k}(G)$. It is well known that $γ_{\rm pr}(G) \le 2γ(G)$. In this paper, we prove that it is NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G) = 2γ(G)$ even for bipartite graphs. We provide a simple characterization of trees with $γ_{\rm pr}(G) = 2γ(G)$, implying a polynomial-time recognition algorithm. We also prove that even for a bipartite graph, it is NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=γ_{t}(G)$. We finally prove that it is both NP-hard to determine whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=2ρ_{4}(G)$ and whether $γ_{\rm pr}(G)=2ρ_{3}(G)$.

The Balanced Connected Subgraph problem (BCS) was recently introduced by Bhore et al. (CALDAM 2019). In this problem, we are given a graph $G$ whose vertices are colored by red or blue. The goal is to find a maximum connected subgraph of $G$ having the same number of blue vertices and red vertices. They showed that this problem is NP-hard even on planar graphs, bipartite graphs, and chordal graphs. They also gave some positive results: BCS can be solved in $O(n^3)$ time for trees and $O(n + m)$ time for split graphs and properly colored bipartite graphs, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $m$ is the number of edges. In this paper, we show that BCS can be solved in $O(n^2)$ time for trees and $O(n^3)$ time for interval graphs. The former result can be extended to bounded treewidth graphs. We also consider a weighted version of BCS (WBCS). We prove that this variant is weakly NP-hard even on star graphs and strongly NP-hard even on split graphs and properly colored bipartite graphs, whereas the unweighted counterpart is tractable on those graph classes. Finally, we consider an exact exponential-time algorithm for general graphs. We show that BCS can be solved in $2^{n/2}n^{O(1)}$ time. This algorithm is based on a variant of Dreyfus-Wagner algorithm for the Steiner tree problem.

Given a flat-foldable origami crease pattern $G=(V,E)$ (a straight-line drawing of a planar graph on a region of the plane) with a mountain-valley (MV) assignment $μ:E\to\{-1,1\}$ indicating which creases in $E$ bend convexly (mountain) or concavely (valley), we may \emph{flip} a face $F$ of $G$ to create a new MV assignment $μ_F$ which equals $μ$ except for all creases $e$ bordering $F$, where we have $μ_F(e)=-μ(e)$. In this paper we explore the configuration space of face flips for a variety of crease patterns $G$ that are tilings of the plane, proving examples where $μ_F$ results in a MV assignment that is either never, sometimes, or always flat-foldable for various choices of $F$. We also consider the problem of finding, given two foldable MV assignments $μ_1$ and $μ_2$ of a given crease pattern $G$, a minimal sequence of face flips to turn $μ_1$ into $μ_2$. We find polynomial-time algorithms for this in the cases where $G$ is either a square grid or the Miura-ori, and show that this problem is NP-hard in the case where $G$ is the triangle lattice.

Circuit-augmentation algorithms are generalizations of the Simplex method, where in each step one is allowed to move along a fixed set of directions, called circuits, that is a superset of the edges of a polytope. We show that in the circuit-augmentation framework the greatest-improvement and Dantzig pivot rules are NP-hard, already for 0/1-LPs. Differently, the steepest-descent pivot rule can be carried out in polynomial time in the 0/1 setting, and the number of circuit augmentations required to reach an optimal solution according to this rule is strongly-polynomial for 0/1-LPs. The number of circuit augmentations has been of interest as a proxy for the number of steps in the Simplex method, and the circuit-diameter of polyhedra has been studied as a lower bound to the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Extending prior results, we show that for any polyhedron $P$ the circuit-diameter is bounded by a polynomial in the input bit-size of $P$. This is in contrast with the best bounds for the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. Interestingly, we show that the circuit-augmentation framework can be exploited to make novel conclusions about the classical Simplex method itself: In particular, as a byproduct of our circuit results, we prove that (i) computing the shortest (monotone) path to an optimal solution on the 1-skeleton of a polytope is NP-hard, and hard to approximate within a factor better than 2, and (ii) for $0/1$ polytopes, a monotone path of strongly-polynomial length can be constructed using steepest improving edges.

Configuration integer programs (IP) have been key in the design of algorithms for NP-hard high-multiplicity problems since the pioneering work of Gilmore and Gomory [Oper. Res., 1961]. Configuration IPs have a variable for each possible configuration, which describes a placement of items into a location, and whose value corresponds to the number of locations with that placement. In high multiplicity problems items come in types, and are represented succinctly by a vector of multiplicities; solving the configuration IP then amounts to deciding whether the input vector of multiplicities of items of each type can be decomposed into a given number of configurations. We make this implicit notion explicit by observing that the set of all input vectors decomposable into configurations forms a monoid, and solving the configuration IP is the Monoid Decomposition problem. Motivated by applications, we enrich this problem in two ways. First, sometimes each configuration additionally has an objective value, yielding an optimization problem of finding a "best" decomposition under the given objective. Second, there are often different types of configurations for different types of locations. The resulting problem is to optimize over decompositions of the input multiplicity vector into configurations of several types, and we call it Multitype Integer Monoid Optimization, or MIMO. We develop fast exact algorithms for various MIMO with few or many location types and with various objectives. Our algorithms build on a novel proximity theorem connecting the solutions of a certain configuration IP to those of its continuous relaxation. We then cast several fundamental scheduling and bin packing problems as MIMOs, and thereby obtain new or substantially faster algorithms for them. We complement our positive algorithmic results by hardness results.

We study the Maximum Bipartite Subgraph (MBS) problem, which is defined as follows. Given a set $S$ of $n$ geometric objects in the plane, we want to compute a maximum-size subset $S'\subseteq S$ such that the intersection graph of the objects in $S'$ is bipartite. We first give a simple $O(n)$-time algorithm that solves the MBS problem on a set of $n$ intervals. We also give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm that computes a near-optimal solution for the problem on circular-arc graphs. We show that the MBS problem is NP-hard on geometric graphs for which the maximum independent set is NP-hard (hence, it is NP-hard even on unit squares and unit disks). On the other hand, we give a PTAS for the problem on unit squares and unit disks. Moreover, we show fast approximation algorithms with small-constant factors for the problem on unit squares, unit disks and unit-height rectangles. Finally, we study a closely related geometric problem, called Maximum Triangle-free Subgraph (TFS), where the objective is the same as that of MBS except the intersection graph induced by the set $S'$ needs to be triangle-free only (instead of being bipartite).

Let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$, and let $S \subseteq V$. The \emph{open neighborhood} of $v \in V$, $N(v)$, is the set of vertices adjacent to $v$; the \emph{closed neighborhood} is given by $N[v] = N(v) \cup \{v\}$. The \emph{open neighborhood} of $S$, $N(S)$, is the union of the open neighborhoods of vertices in $S$, and the \emph{closed neighborhood} of $S$ is $N[S] = S \cup N(S)$. The sets $ \mathcal{P}^i(S), i \geq 0$, of vertices \emph{monitored} by $S$ at the $i^{\ {th}}$ step are given by $\mathcal{P}^0(S) = N[S]$ and $\mathcal{P}^{i+1}(S) = \mathcal{P}^i(S) \bigcup\left\{ w : \{ w \} = N[v] \backslash \mathcal{P}^i(S) \ { for some } v \in \mathcal{P}^i(S) \right\}$. If there exists $j$ such that $\mathcal{P}^j(S) = V$, then $S$ is called a \emph{power dominating set}, PDS, of $G$. We introduce and discuss the \emph{failed power domination number} of a graph $G$, $\barγ_p(G)$, the largest cardinality of a set that is not a PDS. We prove that $\barγ_p(G)$ is NP-hard to compute, determine graphs in which every vertex is a PDS, and compare $\barγ_p(G)$ to similar parameters.

Graph burning is a simple model for the spread of social influence in networks. The objective is to measure how quickly a fire (e.g., a piece of fake news) can be spread in a network. The burning process takes place in discrete rounds. In each round, a new fire breaks out at a selected vertex and burns it. Meanwhile, the old fires extend to their neighbours and burn them. A burning schedule selects where the new fire breaks out in each round, and the burning problem asks for a schedule that burns all vertices in a minimum number of rounds, termed the burning number of the graph. The burning problem is known to be NP-hard even when the graph is a tree or a disjoint set of paths. For connected graphs, it has been conjectured that burning takes at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ rounds. We approach the algorithmic study of graph burning from two directions. First, we consider graphs with minimum degree $δ$. We present an algorithm that burns any graph of size $n$ in at most $\sqrt{\frac{24n}{δ+1}}$ rounds. In particular, for dense graphs with $δ\in Θ(n)$, all vertices are burned in a constant number of rounds. More interestingly, even when $δ$ is a constant that is independent of the graph size, our algorithm answers the graph-burning conjecture in the affirmative by burning the graph in at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ rounds. Next, we consider burning graphs with bounded path-length or tree-length. These include many graph families including connected interval graphs and connected chordal graphs. We show that any graph with path-length $pl$ and diameter $d$ can be burned in $\lceil \sqrt{d-1} \rceil + pl$ rounds. Our algorithm ensures an approximation ratio of $1+o(1)$ for graphs of bounded path-length. We introduce another algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of $2+o(1)$ for burning graphs of bounded tree-length.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph minimizing the sum of given functions at vertices evaluated at their subgraph degrees. While the problem is NP-hard already for bipartite graphs when the functions are convex on one side and concave on the other, we show that when all functions are convex, the problem can be solved in polynomial time for any graph. We also provide polynomial time solutions for bipartite graphs with one side fixed for arbitrary functions, and for arbitrary graphs when all but a fixed number of functions are either nondecreasing or nonincreasing. We note that the general factor problem and the (l,u)-factor problem over a graph are special cases of our problem, as well as the intriguing exact matching problem. The complexity of the problem remains widely open, particularly for arbitrary functions over complete graphs.