arXiv++ Combinatorics

We give a short, self-contained, and easily verifiable proof that determining the outerthickness of a general graph is NP-hard. This resolves a long-standing open problem on the computational complexity of outerthickness. Moreover, our hardness result applies to a more general covering problem $P_F$, defined as follows. Fix a proper graph class $F$ whose membership is decidable. Given an undirected simple graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to cover the edge set $E(G)$ by at most $k$ subsets $E_1,\ldots,E_k$ such that each subgraph $(V(G),E_i)$ belongs to $F$. Note that if $F$ is monotone (in particular, when $F$ is the class of all outerplanar graphs), any such cover can be converted into an edge partition by deleting overlaps; hence, in this case, covering and partitioning are equivalent. Our result shows that for every proper graph class $F$ whose membership is decidable and that satisfies all of the following conditions: (a) $F$ is closed under topological minors, (b) $F$ is closed under $1$-sums, and (c) $F$ contains a cycle of length $3$, the problem $P_F$ is NP-hard for every fixed integer $k\ge 3$. In particular: For $F$ equal to the class of all outerplanar graphs, our result settles the long-standing open problem on the complexity of determining outerthickness. For $F$ equal to the class of all planar graphs, our result complements Mansfield's NP-hardness result for the thickness, which applies only to the case $k=2$. It is also worth noting that each of the three conditions above is necessary. If $F$ is the class of all eulerian graphs, then cond. (a) fails. If $F$ is the class of all pseudoforests, then cond. (b) fails. If $F$ is the class of all forests, then cond. (c) fails. For each of these three classes $F$, the problem $P_F$ is solvable in polynomial time for every fixed integer $k\ge 3$, showing that none of the three conditions can be dropped.

A rectangular floorplan is a partition of a rectangle into smaller rectangles such that no four rectangles meet at a single point. Rectangular floorplans arise naturally in a variety of applications, including VLSI design, architectural layout, and cartography, where efficient and flexible spatial subdivisions are required. A central concept in this domain is that of area-universality: a floorplan (or more generally, a rectangular layout) is area-universal if, for any assignment of target areas to its constituent rectangles, there exists a combinatorially equivalent layout that realizes these areas. In this paper, we investigate the structural conditions under which an outerplanar graph admits an area-universal rectangular layout. We establish a necessary and sufficient condition for area-universality in this setting, thereby providing a complete characterization of admissible outerplanar graphs. Furthermore, we present an algorithmic construction that guarantees that the resulting layout is always area-universal.

Since its introduction as a Maker-Breaker positional game by Duchêne et al. in 2020, the Maker-Breaker domination game has become one of the most studied positional games on vertices. In this game, two players, Dominator and Staller, alternately claim an unclaimed vertex of a given graph G. If at some point the set of vertices claimed by Dominator is a dominating set, she wins; otherwise, i.e. if Staller manages to isolate a vertex by claiming all its closed neighborhood, Staller wins. Given a graph G and a first player, Dominator or Staller must have a winning strategy. We are interested in the computational complexity of determining which player has such a strategy. This problem is known to be PSPACE-complete on bipartite graphs of bounded degree and split graphs; polynomial on cographs, outerplanar graphs, and block graphs; and in NP for interval graphs. In this paper, we consider the parameterized complexity of this game. We start by considering as a parameter the number of moves of both players. We prove that for the general framework of Maker-Breaker positional games in hypergraphs, determining whether Breaker can claim a transversal of the hypergraph in k moves is W[2]-complete, in contrast to the problem of determining whether Maker can claim all the vertices of a hyperedge in k moves, which is known to be W[1]-complete since 2017. These two hardness results are then applied to the Maker-Breaker domination game, proving that it is W[2]-complete to decide if Dominator can dominate the graph in k moves and W[1]-complete to decide if Staller can isolate a vertex in k moves. Next, we provide FPT algorithms for the Maker-Breaker domination game parameterized by the neighborhood diversity, the modular width, the P4-fewness, the distance to cluster, and the feedback edge number.

We provide two constructions for $t$ edge-disjoint maximal outerplanar graphs on every number of $n \geq 4t$ vertices. The bound on the minimum number of vertices is tight. These constructions yield the existence of optimal outerthickness-$t$ graphs for every $t \in \mathbb{N}$. While one of the constructions works for all values of $t$ and extends graphs from Guy and Nowakowski (1990), the other one holds only for powers of $2$, but yields graphs with maximum degree logarithmic in the number of vertices. Thus, the latter may be helpful in tackling the open question of determining the outerthickness of all complete graphs.

Outerplanar Turán problem has received considerable attention recently. We study the spectral version via $Q$-index. We determine the unique graph that maximizes the $Q$-index among all $n$-vertex connected outerplanar graphs which are respectively forbidden to contain: (i) a fixed cycle; and (ii) the disjoint union of paths of a given order.

For a finite collection of connected graphs $\mathcal{F}$, the $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $\ell$, deciding whether $G$ contains a vertex set of size at most $\ell$ whose removal results in an $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graph. We lift the existence of (approximate) polynomial kernels for $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION by the solution size to (approximate) polynomial kernels parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to graphs of bounded elimination distance to $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graphs. This results in exact polynomial kernels for every family $\mathcal{F}$ that contains a planar graph, and an approximate polynomial kernel for PLANAR VERTEX DELETION. Moreover, combining our result with a previous lower bound, we obtain the following infinite set of dichotomies, assuming $NP \not\subseteq coNP/poly$: for any finite set $\mathcal{F}$ of biconnected graphs on at least three vertices containing a planar graph, and any minor-closed class of graphs $\mathcal{C}$, $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to $\mathcal{C}$ if and only if $\mathcal{C}$ has bounded elimination distance to $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graphs. For instance, this yields dichotomies for CACTUS VERTEX DELETION, OUTERPLANAR VERTEX DELETION, and TREEWIDTH-$t$ VERTEX DELETION for every integer $t \geq 0$. Prior to our work, such dichotomies were only known for the particular cases of VERTEX COVER and FEEDBACK VERTEX SET. Our approach builds on the techniques developed by Jansen and Pieterse [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2020] and also uses adaptations of some of the results by Jansen, de Kroon, and Wlodarczyk [STOC 2021].

We consider the problem of finding a Hamiltonian path or cycle with precedence constraints in the form of a partial order on the vertex set. We study the complexity for graph width parameters for which the ordinary problems $\mathsf{Hamiltonian\ Path}$ and $\mathsf{Hamiltonian\ Cycle}$ are in $\mathsf{FPT}$. In particular, we focus on parameters that describe how many vertices and edges have to be deleted to become a member of a certain graph class. We show that the problems are $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard for such restricted cases as vertex distance to path and vertex distance to clique. We complement these results by showing that the problems can be solved in $\mathsf{XP}$ time for vertex distance to outerplanar and vertex distance to block. Furthermore, we present some $\mathsf{FPT}$ algorithms, e.g., for edge distance to block. Additionally, we prove para-$\mathsf{NP}$-hardness when considered with the edge clique cover number.

A proper $s$-coloring of an $n$-vertex graph is \emph{equitable} if every color class has size $\lfloor{n/s}\rfloor$ or $\lceil{n/s}\rceil$. A necessary condition to have an equitable $s$-coloring is that every vertex $v$ appears in an independent set of size at least $\lfloor{n/s}\rfloor$. That is $\min_{v\in V(G)}α_v\ge \lfloor{n/s}\rfloor$. Various authors showed that when $G$ is a tree and $s\ge 3$ this obvious necessary condition is also sufficient. Kierstead, Kostochka, and Xiang asked whether this result holds more generally for all outerplanar graphs. We show that the answer is No when $s=3$, but that the answer is Yes when $s\ge 6$. The case $s\in\{4,5\}$ remains open. We also prove an analogous result for planar graphs, with a necessary and sufficient hypothesis. Fix $s\ge 40$. Let $G$ be a planar graph, and let $w_0,w_1$ be its $2$ vertices with largest degrees. If there exist disjoint independent sets $I_0, I_1$ such that $|I_0|=\lfloor{n/s}\rfloor$ and $|I_1| = \lfloor{(n+1)/s}\rfloor$ and $w_0,w_1\in I_0\cup I_1$, then $G$ has an equitable $s$-coloring.

A proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of $G$ if for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G$, there is a color $c$ such that $|φ^{-1}(c)\cap N_G(v)|=1$. As an analogy to degree-choosability of graphs, the authors recently, in a previous paper, introduced the notion of proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|\geq d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ such that $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we show that every connected outerplanar graph other than the $5$-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. This bound is tight in the sense that there are infinitely many connected outerplanar graphs that are not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+1)$-choosable. We conclude the paper with two questions for further work.

Assume $G$ is a graph, $(v_1,\ldots,v_k)$ is a sequence of distinct vertices of $G$, and $(a_1,\ldots,a_k)$ is an integer sequence with $a_i \in \{1,2\}$. We say $G$ is \emph{$(a_1,\ldots,a_k)$-list extendable} (respectively, \emph{$(a_1,\ldots,a_k)$-AT extendable}) with respect to $(v_1,\ldots,v_k)$ if $G$ is $f$-choosable (respectively, $f$-AT), where $f(v_i)=a_i $ for $i \in \{1,\ldots, k\}$, and $f(v)=3$ for $v \in V(G) \setminus \{v_1,\ldots, v_k\}$. Hutchinson proved that if $G$ is an outerplanar graph, then $G$ is $(2,2)$-list extendable with respect to $(x,y)$ for any vertices $x,y$. We strengthen this result and prove that if $G$ is a $K_4$-minor-free graph, then $G$ is $(2,2)$-AT extendable with respect to $(x,y)$ for any vertices $x,y$. Then we characterize all triples $(x,y,z)$ of a $K_4$-minor-free graph $G$ for which $G$ is $(2,2,2)$-AT extendable (as well as $(2,2,2)$-list extendable) with respect to $(x,y,z)$. We also characterize the pairs $(x,y)$ of a $K_4$-minor-free graph $G$ for which $G$ is $(2,1)$-AT extendable (as well as $(2,1)$-list extendable) with respect to $(x,y)$. Moreover, we characterize all triples $(x,y,z)$ of a 3-colorable graph $G$ with its maximum average degree less than $\frac{14}{5}$ for which $G$ is $(2,2,2)$-AT extendable with respect to $(x,y,z)$.

Let $A$ be a finite commutative ring with unity $1 \neq 0.$ An ideal of $A$ is said to be essential if it has a non-zero intersection with every non-zero ideal of $A.$ The essential graph of $A$ is a simple undirected graph whose vertex set consists of all non-zero zero-divisors of $A.$ Two different vertices $u$ and $v$ are connected by an edge precisely when the ideal formed by the annihilator of their product $uv$ is essential in $A.$ This paper examines the minimal embeddings of the line graph of the essential graph of $A$ into orientable surfaces as well as non-orientable surfaces. Our results include a complete classification of finite commutative rings for which the line graphs of their essential graphs is planar, outerplanar or have genus or crosscap number at most two. We also characterize all such non-local rings for which the line graph of their zero-divisor graph is outerplanar.

We study embeddings of graphs with bounded treewidth or bounded simple treewidth into the undirected graph underlying the directed product of two directed graphs. If the factors have bounded maximum indegrees, then the product graph has bounded maximum indegree and therefore is sparse. We prove that every graph of simple treewidth $k$ is contained in (ignoring edge directions) the directed product of directed graphs $\vec H_1$ and $\vec H_2$, with $Δ^-(\vec H_1), Δ^-(\vec H_2) \leq k-1 $ and $\text{tw}(H_1), \text{tw}(H_2) \leq k-1$. Further, we show that this treewidth bound is best possible. Several corollaries follow from our results: every outerplanar graph is contained in the directed product of trees with maximum indegree $1$, and every planar graph with treewidth $3$ is contained in a directed product of graphs with treewidth $2$ and maximum indegree $2$. However, for graphs of treewidth $k$, we prove a negative result: for any integers $s, t, k \geq 1$, there is a graph $G$ with treewidth $k$ not contained in the directed product of $\vec H_1$ and $\vec H_2$ for any directed graphs $\vec H_1$ and $\vec H_2$ with $Δ^-(\vec H_1) \leq s$, $Δ^-(\vec H_2) \leq t$, and $\text{tw}(H_1), \text{tw}(H_2) \leq k-1$. This result stands in stark contrast to the strong product case, where Liu, Norin and Wood [arXiv:2410.20333] proved that the optimal lower bound on the factors is about half the treewidth.

We give a series of new lower bounds on the minimum number of vertices required by a graph to contain every graph of a given family as induced subgraph. In particular, we show that this induced-universal graph for $n$-vertex planar graphs must have at least $10.52n$ vertices. We also show that the number of conflicting graphs to consider in order to beat this lower bound is at least $137$. In other words, any family of less than $137$ planar graphs of $n$ vertices has an induced-universal graph with less than $10.52n$ vertices, stressing the difficulty in beating such lower bounds. Similar results are developed for other graph families, including but not limited to, trees, outerplanar graphs, series-parallel graphs, $K_{3,3}$-minor free graphs. As a byproduct, we show that any family of $t$ graphs of $n$ vertices having small chromatic number and sublinear pathwidth, like any proper minor-closed family, has an induced-universal graph with less than $\frac{15}{7} \sqrt{t} \cdot n$ vertices. This is achieved by making a bridge between equitable colorings, combinatorial designs, and path-decompositions.

The localization game is a variant of the game of Cops and Robber in which the robber is invisible and moves between adjacent vertices, but the cops can probe any $k$ vertices of the graph to obtain the distance between probed vertices and the robber. The localization number of a graph is the minimum $k$ needed for cops to be able to locate the robber in finite time. The localization capture time is the number of rounds needed for cops to win. The localization capture time conjecture claims that there exists a constant $C$ such that the localization number of every connected graph on $n$ vertices is at most $Cn$. While it is known that the conjecture holds for trees, in this paper we significantly improve the known upper bound for the localization capture time of trees. We also prove the conjecture for a subclass of outerplanar graphs and present a generalization of the localization game that appears useful for making further progress towards the conjecture.

Let $G$ be a finite, connected graph and $v$ a vertex of $G$. The average distance and the eccentricity of $v$ in $G$ are defined as the arithmetic mean and the maximum, respectively, of the distances from $v$ to all other vertices of $G$. The proximity of $G$ and the radius of $G$ are defined as the minimum of the average distances and the eccentricities over all vertices of $G$. In this paper, we establish an upper bound on the proximity of a $2$-connected outerplanar graphs in terms of order and maximum face length. This bound is sharp apart from a small additive constant. It is known that the radius of a maximal outerplanar graph is at most $\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor +1$. In the second part of this paper we show that this bound on the radius holds for a much larger subclass of outerplanar graphs, for all $2$-connected outerplanar graphs of order $n$ whose maximum face length does not exceed $\frac{n+2}{4}$.

Let $G$ be a connected graph. The average distance of a vertex $v$ of $G$ is the arithmetic mean of the distances from $v$ to all other vertices of $G$. The proximity and remoteness of $G$ are defined as the minimum and maximum, respectively, of the average distances of the vertices of $G$. It was shown by Aouchiche and Hansen [Proximity and remoteness in graphs: bounds and conjectures, Networks 58 no.\ 2 (2011)] that for a connected graph of order $n$, the difference between remoteness and proximity and the difference between radius and proximity are bounded from above by about $\frac{n}{4}$, and the difference between diameter and proximity is bounded from above by about $\frac{3}{4}n$. In this paper, we show that all three bounds can be improved significantly for maximal planar graphs, and for graphs of given connectivity. We show that in maximal planar graphs the above bound on the difference between radius and proximity can be improved to about $\frac{1}{12}n$, and further to about $\frac{1}{16}n$ and $\frac{1}{20}n$ if the graphs is, in addition, $4$-connected or $5$-connected, respectively. Similar improvements are shown for quadrangulations, and for maximal outerplanar graphs. We further show that the above bound on the difference between remoteness and proximity can be improved to about $\frac{1}{4κ}n$ if $G$ is $κ$-connected. Finally, we improve the bound on the difference between diameter and proximity to about $\frac{3}{4κ}n$ if $G$ is $κ$-connected. We present graphs that demonstrate that our bounds are either sharp, or sharp apart from an additive constant, even if restricted to planar graphs.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. A set $L\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V(G) \setminus L$ has pairwise distinct open neighborhoods in $L$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set and a locating set of $G$. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{LD}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality among all locating-dominating sets of $G$. A well-known conjecture in the study of locating-dominating sets is that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \frac{n}{2}$. Recently, Bousquet et al. [Discrete Math. 348 (2025), 114297] proved that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \lceil\frac{5n}{8}\rceil$ and posed the question whether the vertex set of such a graph can be partitioned into two locating sets. We answer this question affirmatively for twin-free distance-hereditary graphs, maximal outerplanar graphs, split graphs, and co-bipartite graphs. In fact, we prove a stronger result that for any graph $G$ without isolated vertices and twin vertices, if $G$ is a distance-hereditary graph or a maximal outerplanar graph or a split graph or a co-bipartite graph, then the vertex set of $G$ can be partitioned into two locating-dominating sets. Consequently, this also confirms the original conjecture for these graph classes.

Two of the most prominent unresolved conjectures in graph theory, the Albertson-Berman conjecture and the Matheson-Tarjan conjecture, have been extensively studied by many researchers. (AB) Every planar graph of order $n$ has an induced forest of order at least $\frac{n}{2}$. (MT) Every plane triangulation of sufficiently large order $n$ has a dominating set of cardinality at most $\frac{n}{4}$. Although partial progress and weaker bounds are known, both conjectures remain unsolved. To shed further light on them, researchers have explored a variety of related notions and generalizations. In this paper, we clarify relations among several of these notions, most notably connected domination and induced outerplanar subgraphs, and investigate the corresponding open problems. Furthermore, we construct an infinite family of plane triangulations of order $n$ whose connected domination number exceeds $n/3$. This construction gives a negative answer to a question of Bradshaw et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 36 (2022) 1416-1435], who asked whether the maxleaf number of every plane triangulation of order $n$ is at least $2n/3$. We also obtain new results on induced subgraphs with bounded treewidth and induced outerplanar subgraphs.

A long-standing conjecture by Albertson and Berman states that every planar graph of order $n$ has an induced forest with at least $\lceil \frac{n}{2} \rceil$ vertices. As a variant of this conjecture, Chappell conjectured that every planar graph of order $n$ has an induced linear forest with at least $\lceil \frac{4n}{9} \rceil$ vertices. Pelsmajer proved that every outerplanar graph of order $n$ has an induced linear forest with at least $\lceil \frac{4n+2}{7}\rceil$ vertices and this bound is sharp. In this paper, we investigate the order of induced subgraphs of outerplanar graphs with a given pathwidth. The above result by Pelsmajer implies that every outerplanar graph of order $n$ has an induced subgraph with pathwidth one and at least $\lceil \frac{4n+2}{7}\rceil$ vertices. We extend this to obtain a result on the maximum order of any outerplanar graph with at most a given pathwidth. We also give its upper bound which generalizes Pelsmajer's construction.

We show that the strong odd chromatic number on any proper minor-closed graph class is bounded by a constant. We almost determine the smallest such constant for outerplanar graphs.