arXiv++ Combinatorics

We define a bivariate polynomial for unlabeled rooted trees and show that the polynomial of an unlabeled rooted tree $T$ is the generating function of a class of subtrees of $T$. We prove that the polynomial is a complete isomorphism invariant for unlabeled rooted trees. Then, we generalize the polynomial to unlabeled unrooted trees and we show that the generalized polynomial is a complete isomorphism invariant for unlabeled unrooted trees.

Any function can be constructed using a hierarchy of simpler functions through compositions. Such a hierarchy can be characterized by a binary rooted tree. Each node of this tree is associated with a function which takes as inputs two numbers from its children and produces one output. Since thinking about functions in terms of computation graphs is getting popular we may want to know which functions can be implemented on a given tree. Here, we describe a set of necessary constraints in the form of a system of non-linear partial differential equations that must be satisfied. Moreover, we prove that these conditions are sufficient in both contexts of analytic and bit-valued functions. In the latter case, we explicitly enumerate discrete functions and observe that there are relatively few. Our point of view allows us to compare different neural network architectures in regard to their function spaces. Our work connects the structure of computation graphs with the functions they can implement and has potential applications to neuroscience and computer science.

In this paper we study the adjacency spectrum of families of finite rooted trees with regular branching properties. In particular, we show that in the case of constant branching, the eigenvalues are realized as the roots of a family of generalized Fibonacci polynomials and produce a limiting distribution for the eigenvalues as the tree depth goes to infinity. We indicate how these results can be extended to periodic branching patterns and also provide a generalization to higher order simplicial complexes.

A syntax tree is a planar rooted tree where internal nodes are labeled on a graded set of generators. There is a natural notion of occurrence of contiguous pattern in such trees. We describe a way, given a set of generators $\mathfrak{G}$ and a set of patterns $\mathcal{P}$, to enumerate the trees constructed on $\mathfrak{G}$ and avoiding $\mathcal{P}$. The method is built around inclusion-exclusion formulas forming a system of equations on formal power series of trees, and composition operations of trees. This does not require particular conditions on the set of patterns to avoid. We connect this result to the theory of nonsymmetric operads. Syntax trees are the elements of such free structures, so that any operad can be seen as a quotient of a free operad. Moreover, in some cases, the elements of an operad can be seen as trees avoiding some patterns. Relying on this, we use operads as devices for enumeration: given a set of combinatorial objects we want enumerate, we endow it with the structure of an operad, understand it in term of trees and pattern avoidance, and use our method to count them. Several examples are provided.

Phylogenetic diversity indices provide a formal way to apportion 'evolutionary heritage' across species. Two natural diversity indices are Fair Proportion (FP) and Equal Splits (ES). FP is also called 'evolutionary distinctiveness' and, for rooted trees, is identical to the Shapley Value (SV), which arises from cooperative game theory. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which FP and ES can differ, characterise tree shapes on which the indices are identical, and study the equivalence of FP and SV and its implications in more detail. We also define and investigate analogues of these indices on unrooted trees (where SV was originally defined), including an index that is closely related to the Pauplin representation of phylogenetic diversity.

Phylogenomics commonly aims to construct evolutionary trees from genomic sequence information. One way to approach this problem is to first estimate event-labeled gene trees (i.e., rooted trees whose non-leaf vertices are labeled by speciation or gene duplication events), and to then look for a species tree which can be reconciled with this tree through a \emph{reconciliation map} between the trees. In practice, however, it can happen that there is no such map from a given event-labeled tree to \emph{any} species tree. An important situation where this might arise is where the species evolution is better represented by a \emph{network} instead of a tree. In this paper, we therefore consider the problem of reconciling event-labeled trees with species networks. In particular, we prove that any event-labeled gene tree can be reconciled with some network and that, under certain mild assumptions on the gene tree, the network can even be assumed to be multi-arc free. To prove this result, we show that we can always reconcile the gene tree with some multi-labeled (MUL-)tree, which can then be "folded up" to produce the desired reconciliation and network. In addition, we study the interplay between reconciliation maps from event-labeled gene trees to MUL-trees and networks. Our results could be useful for understanding how genomes have evolved after undergoing complex evolutionary events such as polyploidy.

We study commutative ring structures on the integral span of rooted trees and $n$-dimensional skew shapes. The multiplication in these rings arises from the smash product operation on monoid representations in pointed sets. We interpret these as Grothendieck rings of indecomposable monoid representations over $\fun$ - the "field" of one element. We also study the base-change homomorphism from $\mt$-modules to $k[t]$-modules for a field $k$ containing all roots of unity, and interpret the result in terms of Jordan decompositions of adjacency matrices of certain graphs.

DNA graph has important contribution in completing the computational step of DNA sequencing process. Using $(α,k)$-labeling, several families of digraphs have characterized as DNA graphs. Dicycles and dipaths are DNA graphs, rooted trees and self adjoint digraphs are DNA graphs if and only if their maximum degree is not greater than four, while the $m^{\text{th}}$ line digraph of dicycle with one chord is a DNA graph for all $m\in\mathbb{Z}^+$. In this paper we construct $(α,k)$-labeling to show that for all $m\in\mathbb{Z}^+$, the $m^{\text{th}}$ line digraph of dicycle $C_n$ with $\left\lfloor{\frac{n}{3}}\right \rfloor$ chords are DNA graphs for $n\geq 6$, and the $m^{\text{th}}$ line digraph of $\infty$-digraph $C_n\cdot C_p$ and 3-blade-propeller $C_n\cdot C_p \cdot C_q$ are DNA graphs for $n\geq 3$ and certain values of $p$ and $q$.

Arborified zeta values are defined as iterated series and integrals using the universal properties of rooted trees. This approach allows to study their convergence domain and to relate them to multizeta values. Generalisations to rooted trees of the stuffle and shuffle products are defined and studied. It is further shown that arborifed zeta values are algebra morphisms for these new products on trees.

We introduce the notion of the Automatic Logarithm $\mathcal L_{\mathcal A, \mathcal B}$ with the purpose of studying the expanding properties of Schreier graphs of action of the group generated by two finite initial Mealy automata $\mathcal A$ and $\mathcal B$ on the levels of a regular $d$-ary rooted tree $\mathcal T$, where $\mathcal A$ is level-transitive and of bounded activity. $\mathcal L_{\mathcal A, \mathcal B}$ computes the lengths of chords in this family of graphs. Formally, $\mathcal L$ is a map $\partial \mathcal T \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_d$ from the boundary of the tree to the integer $p$-adics whose values are determined by a Moore machine. The distribution of its outputs yields a probabilistic measure $μ$ on $\partial \mathcal T$, which in some cases can be computed by a Mealy-type machine (we then say that $μ$ is finite-state). We provide a criterion to determine whether $μ$ is finite-state. A number of examples illustrating the different cases with $\mathcal A$ being the adding machine is provided.

The quantity that captures the asymptotic value of the maximum number of appearances of a given topological tree (a rooted tree with no vertices of outdegree $1$) $S$ with $k$ leaves in an arbitrary tree with sufficiently large number of leaves is called the inducibility of $S$. Its precise value is known only for some specific families of trees, most of them exhibiting a symmetrical configuration. In an attempt to answer a recent question posed by Czabarka, Székely, and the second author of this article, we provide bounds for the inducibility $J(A_5)$ of the $5$-leaf binary tree $A_5$ whose branches are a single leaf and the complete binary tree of height $2$. It was indicated before that $J(A_5)$ appears to be `close' to $1/4$. We can make this precise by showing that $0.24707\ldots \leq J(A_5) \leq 0.24745\ldots$. Furthermore, we also consider the problem of determining the inducibility of the tree $Q_4$, which is the only tree among $4$-leaf topological trees for which the inducibility is unknown.

A subset of leaves of a rooted tree induces a new tree in a natural way. The density of a tree $D$ inside a larger tree $T$ is the proportion of such leaf-induced subtrees in $T$ that are isomorphic to $D$ among all those with the same number of leaves as $D$. The inducibility of $D$ measures how large this density can be as the size of $T$ tends to infinity. In this paper, we explicitly determine the inducibility in some previously unknown cases and find general upper and lower bounds, in particular in the case where $D$ is balanced, i.e., when its branches have at least almost the same size. Moreover, we prove a result on the speed of convergence of the maximum density of $D$ in strictly $d$-ary trees $T$ (trees where every internal vertex has precisely $d$ children) of a given size $n$ to the inducibility as $n \to \infty$, which supports an open conjecture.

Typed decorated trees are used by Bruned, Hairer and Zambotti to give a description of a renormalisation processon stochastic PDEs. We here study the algebraic structures on these objects: multiple prelie algebrasand related operads (generalizing a result by Chapoton and Livernet), noncommutative and cocommutative Hopf algebras (generalizing Grossman and Larson's construction),commutative and noncocommutative Hopf algebras (generalizing Connes and Kreimer's construction),bialgebras in cointeraction (generalizing Calaque, Ebrahimi-Fard and Manchon's result). We also define families of morphisms and in particular we prove that any Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebraof typed and decorated trees is isomorphic to a Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebra of non--typed and decoratedtrees (the set of decorations of vertices being bigger), through a contraction process,and finally obtain the Bruned-Hairer-Zambotti construction as a subquotient.

In 2001 Allen and Steel showed that, if subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied to two unrooted phylogenetic trees, the reduced trees will have at most 28k taxa where k is the TBR (Tree Bisection and Reconnection) distance between the two trees. Here we reanalyse Allen and Steel's kernelization algorithm and prove that the reduced instances will in fact have at most 15k-9 taxa. Moreover we show, by describing a family of instances which have exactly 15k-9 taxa after reduction, that this new bound is tight. These instances also have no common clusters, showing that a third commonly-encountered reduction rule, the cluster reduction, cannot further reduce the size of the kernel in the worst case. To achieve these results we introduce and use "unrooted generators" which are analogues of rooted structures that have appeared earlier in the phylogenetic networks literature. Using similar argumentation we show that, for the minimum hybridization problem on two rooted trees, 9k-2 is a tight bound (when subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied) and 9k-4 is a tight bound (when, additionally, the cluster reduction has been applied) on the number of taxa, where k is the hybridization number of the two trees.

We consider the Dirichlet problem on infinite and locally finite rooted trees, and we prove that the set of irregular points for continuous data has zero capacity. We also give some uniqueness results for solutions in Sobolev $ W^{1,p} $ of the tree.

The machinery of zonotopal algebra is linked with two particular polytopes: the Stanley-Pitman polytope and the regular simplex $\mathfrak{Sim}_n(t_1,...,t_n)$ with parameters $t_1,...,t_n\in \mathbb{R}_+^n$, defined by the inequalities $\sum_{i=1}^n r_i\leq \sum_{i=1}^n t_i, \mbox{ } r_i\in \mathbb{R}_+^n,$ where the $(r_i)_{i\in [n]}$ are variables. Specifically, we will discuss the central Dahmen-Micchelli space of the broken wheel graph $BW_n$ and its dual, the $\mathcal{P}$-central space. We will observe that the $\mathcal{P}$-central space of $BW_n$ is monomial, with a basis given by the $BW_n$-parking functions. We will show that the volume polynomial of the the Stanley-Pitman polytope lies in the central Dahmen-Micchelli space of $BW_n$ and is precisely the polynomial in a particular basis of the central Dahmen-Micchelli space which corresponds to the monomial $t_1t_2\cdots t_n$ in the dual monomial basis of the $\mathcal{P}$-central space. We will then define the generalized broken wheel graph $GBW_n(T)$ for a given rooted tree $T$ on $n$ vertices. For every such tree, we can construct $2^{n-1}$ directed graphs, which we will refer to as \textit{generalized broken wheel graphs}. Each generalized broken wheel graph constructed from $T$ will give us a polytope, its volume polynomial, and a \textit{reference monomial}. The $2^{n-1}$ polytopes together give a polyhedral subdivision of $\mathfrak{Sim}_n(t_1,...,t_n)$, their volume polynomials together give a basis for the subspace of homogeneous polynomials of degree $n$ of the corresponding central Dahmen-Micchelli space, and their reference monomials together give a basis for its dual.

Ramanujan defined the polynomials $ψ_{k}(r,x)$ in his study of power series inversion. Berndt, Evans and Wilson obtained a recurrence relation for $ψ_{k}(r,x)$. In a different context, Shor introduced the polynomials $Q(i,j,k)$ related to improper edges of a rooted tree, leading to a refinement of Cayley's formula. He also proved a recurrence relation and raised the question of finding a combinatorial proof. Zeng realized that the polynomials of Ramanujan coincide with the polynomials of Shor, and that the recurrence relation of Shor coincides with the recurrence relation of Berndt, Evans and Wilson. So we call these polynomials the Ramanujan-Shor polynomials, and call the recurrence relation the Berndt-Evans-Wilson-Shor recursion. A combinatorial proof of this recursion was obtained by Chen and Guo, and a simpler proof was recently given by Guo. From another perspective, Dumont and Ramamonjisoa found a context-free grammar $G$ to generate the number of rooted trees on $n$ vertices with $k$ improper edges. Based on the grammar $G$, we find a grammar $H$ for the Ramanujan-Shor polynomials. This leads to a formal calculus for the Ramanujan-Shor polynomials. In particular, we obtain a grammatical derivation of the Berndt-Evans-Wilson-Shor recursion. We also provide a grammatical approach to the Abel identities and a grammatical explanation of the Lacasse identity.

An additive functional of a rooted tree is a functional that can be calculated recursively as the sum of the values of the functional over the branches, plus a certain toll function. Janson recently proved a central limit theorem for additive functionals of conditioned Galton-Watson trees under the assumption that the toll function is local, i.e. only depends on a fixed neighbourhood of the root. We extend his result to functionals that are "almost local" in a certain sense, thus covering a wider range of functionals. The notion of almost local functional intuitively means that the toll function can be approximated well by considering only a neighbourhood of the root. Our main result is illustrated by several explicit examples including natural graph theoretic parameters such as the number of independent sets, the number of matchings, and the number of dominating sets. We also cover a functional stemming from a tree reduction process that was studied by Hackl, Heuberger, Kropf, and Prodinger.

Given a rooted tree $T$ with leaves $v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_n$, we define the ancestral matrix $C(T)$ of $T$ to be the $n \times n$ matrix for which the entry in the $i$-th row, $j$-th column is the level (distance from the root) of the first common ancestor of $v_i$ and $v_j$. We study properties of this matrix, in particular regarding its spectrum: we obtain several upper and lower bounds for the eigenvalues in terms of other tree parameters. We also find a combinatorial interpretation for the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of $C(T)$, and show that for $d$-ary trees, a specific value of the characteristic polynomial is independent of the precise shape of the tree.

Let $\mathcal{B}$ be the set of rooted trees containing an infinite binary subtree starting at the root. This set satisfies the metaproperty that a tree belongs to it if and only if its root has children $u$ and $v$ such that the subtrees rooted at $u$ and $v$ belong to it. Let $p$ be the probability that a Galton-Watson tree falls in $\mathcal{B}$. The metaproperty makes $p$ satisfy a fixed-point equation, which can have multiple solutions. One of these solutions is $p$, but what is the meaning of the others? In particular, are they probabilities of the Galton-Watson tree falling into other sets satisfying the same metaproperty? We create a framework for posing questions of this sort, and we classify solutions to fixed-point equations according to whether they admit probabilistic interpretations. Our proofs use spine decompositions of Galton-Watson trees and the analysis of Boolean functions.