arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Tingzeng Wu

25 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-08-25
Solution to an open problem on the computational complexity of immanant
Immanants are a class of generalized matrix functions associated with the irreducible characters of the symmetric group. Bürgisser [SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2000), pp. 1023--1040] proved that the computation of hook immanants and immanants corresponding to rectangular Young diagrams of polynomially growing width is VNP-complete under $p$-projections. And he posed an open problem: whether the family of immanants corresponding to rectangular Young diagrams of width $2$ is VNP-complete under $p$-projections. This paper gives a solution to this problem. We prove that, over any field of characteristic zero, the immanant families associated with rectangular Young diagrams of width $2$ and of length $2$ are both VNP-complete under $p$-projections.
2026-08-21
On the Greedoid Tutte Polynomial for simple rooted graphs
The Tutte polynomial, through its rank-generating formula, provides a unified framework for describing various combinatorial structures of graphs and matroids, and serves as an important polynomial invariant connecting graph theory, matroid theory, and their related applications. Let $G=(V(G),E(G),r(G))$ be a simple rooted graph, where $V(G)$ is the vertex set, $E(G)$ is the edge set, and $r(G)$ is the root. Let $Γ(G)$ be the greedoid induced by the rooted graph $G$, and let its greedoid Tutte polynomial be denoted by $T(Γ(G);x,y)$. Let $r=r(G)$, $L_r(G)=\{v\in V(G)\setminus\{r\}: rv\in E(G),\ d_G(v)=1\}$, and $\ell_r(G)=|L_r(G)|$. Gordon and McMahon proposed the following conjecture: for rooted graphs, $\operatorname{ord}_{x}T(Γ(G);x,y)=\ell_r(G)$, where $\operatorname{ord}_{x}T(Γ(G);x,y)=\max\{a\in\mathbb Z_{\geq0}:x^a\mid T(Γ(G);x,y)\}$, that is, the highest power of $x$ dividing $T(Γ(G);x,y)$ is equal to the number of leaf vertices adjacent to the root. In this paper, we proved that this conjecture holds for all simple rooted graphs.
2026-07-30
An improved range for the maximum critically $t$-intersecting hypergraphs
Let $k>t\ge 1$ be integers and set $d=k-t$. A $k$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal F$ is called $t$-intersecting if any two edges intersect in at least $t$ vertices, and is called $t$-critical if its minimum $t$-transversal has size $k$. Frankl proved that, for $k\ge d^4$,$|\mathcal F|\le \binom{k+d}{d},$ with equality only for the complete $k$-graph on $k+d$ vertices, and conjectured that the same conclusion should hold when $k>c d^2$ for some constant $c$. In this paper we confirm this conjecture for $c=30$. The proof relies on Frankl's fixed-edge decomposition and Füredi's pseudo-sunflower method.
2026-04-06
Immanantal polynomials of the linear combination matrices of graphs
In this paper, we focus on the study of immanantal polynomials for linear combination matrices composed of the degree matrix and adjacency matrix of a graph. First, applying the concept of vertex orientation for general graphs, we provide a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the immanantal polynomials for the linear combination matrices of graphs, and we also characterize the bounds of these coefficients. These bounds implicitly encompass the existing results of Chan and Lam on trees and bipartite graphs. Furthermore, we give a solution to the open problem posed by Merris. Second, we characterize the first six coefficients of the hook immanantal polynomial. And the necessary and sufficient condition under which the linear combination matrices of two regular graphs have the same hook immanantal polynomial is proved. Third, we generalize the Frobenius--König theorem and the Laplace expansion theorem to immanants. Using these two theorems, we show that the star degree of a graph is always a lower bound for the multiplicity of a certain root of the immanantal polynomial of its linear combination matrix. Finally, we derive formulas for the first six coefficients of the hook immanantal polynomial for several important graph matrices.
2026-03-26
Bollobás-type inequalities for subspaces via weight invariance
Let $V$ be an $n$-dimension real vector space with a direct sum decomposition $V = V_1 \oplus \cdots \oplus V_r$. Let $\mathcal{P} = \{(A_i, B_i) : i \in [m]\}$ be a skew Bollobás system of subspaces of $V$ such that each $i\in [m]$, $ A_i = \bigoplus_{k=1}^r (A_i \cap V_k)$ and $ B_i = \bigoplus_{k=1}^r (B_i \cap V_k)$. We prove that $$\sum_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{k=1}^{r} \left[ \binom{a_{i,k} + b_{i,k}}{a_{i,k}} (1 + a_{i,k} + b_{i,k})^{-1} \right] \leq 1,$$ where $a_{i,k} = \dim(A_i \cap V_k)$ and $b_{i,k} = \dim(B_i \cap V_k)$. This extends a recent result of Yue from set systems to finite dimensional subspaces. We then consider Tuza's theorem on weak Bollobás system for $d$-tuples. We give an alternative proof of the original set version of Tuza, and also establish its vector space analogue. Precisely, let $\mathcal{P} = \{(A_i^{(1)}, \ldots, A_i^{(d)}) : i \in [m]\}$ be a skew Bollobás system of $d$-tuples of subspaces of finite dimensional space $V$ with $a^{(\ell)}_i=\dim (A_i^{(\ell)})$. Then, for any positive real numbers $p_1, \ldots, p_d$ satisfying $p_1 + \cdots + p_d = 1$, we prove that $ \sum_{i=1}^{m} \prod_{\ell=1}^{d} p_{\ell}^{a_i^{(\ell)}} \leq 1. $
2025-12-22
The number of rooted spanning forests of bicirculant graphs
A bi-Cayley graph over the cyclic group $(\mathbb{Z}_n, +)$ is called a bicirculant graph. Let $Γ=BC(\mathbb{Z}_n; R,T,S)$ be a bicirculant graph with $R=-R\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_n\setminus \{0\}$ and $T={-}T\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_n\setminus \{0\}$ and $S\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_n$. In this paper, using Chebyshev polynomials, we obtain a closed formula for the number of rooted spanning forests of $Γ$. Moreover, we investigate some arithmetic properties of the number of rooted spanning forests of $Γ$, and find its asymptotic behaviour as $n$ tends infinity.
2025-08-27
Non-uniform pairwise cross $t$-intersecting families
Let $ n\geqslant t\geqslant 1$ and $ \mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_m \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ be non-empty families. We say that they are pairwise cross $t$-intersecting if $|A_i\cap A_j|\geqslant t$ holds for any $A_i\in \mathcal{A}_i$ and $A_j\in \mathcal{A}_j$ with $i\neq j$. In the case where $m=2$ and $\mathcal{A}_1=\mathcal{A}_2$, determining the maximum size $M(n,t)$ of a non-uniform $t$-intersecting family of sets over $[n]$ was solved by Katona (1964), and enhanced by Frankl (2017), and recently by Li and Wu (2024). In this paper, we establish the following upper bound: if $ \mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_m \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ are non-empty pairwise cross $t$-intersecting families, then $$ \sum_{i=1}^m |\mathcal{A}_i| \leqslant \max \left\{ \sum_{k=t} ^{n}\binom{n}{k} + m - 1, \, m M(n, t) \right\}. $$ Furthermore, we provide a complete characterization of the extremal families that achieve the bound. Our result not only generalizes an old result of Katona (1964) for a single family, but also extends a theorem of Frankl and Wong (2021) for two families. Moreover, our result could be viewed as a non-uniform version of a recent theorem of Li and Zhang (2025). The key in our proof is to utilize the generating set method and the pushing-pulling method together.
2025-08-25
Hook immanantal equalities for linear combination matrices of (di)graphs and their applications
Let $χ_λ$ be an irreducible character of the symmetric group $S_n$. For an $n \times n$ matrix $M = (m_{ij})$, define the immanant of $M$ corresponding to $χ_λ$ by \begin{eqnarray*} d_λ(M) = \sum_{σ\in S_n} χ_λ(σ) \prod_{i=1}^n m_{iσ(i)}. \end{eqnarray*} For $λ= (k, 1^{n-k})$, the immanant $d_{(k, 1^{n-k})}(M)$ is called the hook immanant and denoted by $d_k(M)$. The hook immanant polynomial of matrix $M$ is defined as $d_{k}(xI_n - M)$, where $I_n$ is the $n \times n$ identity matrix. Let $G$ and $\overrightarrow{G}$ be a graph and a digraph, respectively. Suppose that $D(G)$ and $A(G)$ (resp. $D(\overrightarrow{G})$ and $A(\overrightarrow{G})$) are the degree matrix and adjacency matrix of $G$ (resp. $\overrightarrow{G}$), respectively. In this paper, we characterize two hook immanantal equalities for the linear combination of matrices $βD(G)+γA(G)$ and $βD(\overrightarrow{G})+γA(\overrightarrow{G})$, where $β$ and $γ$ are real numbers. As applications, we derive recursive formulas for the hook immanantal polynomials and hook immanants of graph matrices.
2025-07-19
On the edge reconstruction of the second immanantal polynomials of undirected graph and digraph
Let $M=(m_{ij})$ be an $n\times n$ matrix. The second immanant of matrix $M$ is defined by \begin{eqnarray*} d_{2}(M)=\sum_{σ\in S_{n}}χ_{2}(σ)\prod_{s=1}^{n}m_{sσ(s)}, \end{eqnarray*} where $χ_{2}$ is the irreducible character of $S_{n}$ corresponding to the partition $(2^{1},1^{n-2})$. The polynomial $d_{2}(xI-M)$ is called the second immanantal polynomial of matrix $M$. Denote by $D(G)$ (resp. $D(\overrightarrow{G})$) and $A(G)$ (resp. $A(\overrightarrow{G})$) the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of undirected graph $G$ (resp. digraph $\overrightarrow{G}$), respectively. In this article, we prove that $d_{2}(xI-A(G))$ (resp. $d_{2}(xI-A(\overrightarrow{G}))$) can be reconstructed from the second immanantal polynomials of the adjacency matrix of all subgraphs in $\{G-uv,G-u-v|uv\in E(G)\}$ (resp. $\{\overrightarrow{G}-e|e\in E(\overrightarrow{G})\}$). Furthermore, the polynomial $d_{2}(xI-D(\overrightarrow{G})\pm A(\overrightarrow{G}))$ can also be reconstructed by the second immanantal polynomials of the (signless) Laplacian matrixs of all subgraphs in $\{\overrightarrow{G}-e|e\in E(\overrightarrow{G})\}$, respectively.
2025-02-18
Improved bounds for the coefficient of flow polynomials
Let $G$ be a connected bridgeless $(n,m)$-graph which may have loops and multiedges, and let $F(G,t)$ denote the flow polynomial of $G$. Dong and Koh \cite{Dong1} established an upper bound for the absolute value of coefficient $c_{i}$ of $t^{i}$ in the expansion of $F(G,t)$, where $0\leqslant i \leqslant m-n+1$. In this paper, we refine the aforementioned bound. Specifically, we demonstrate that when $n \leqslant m \leqslant n+3$, $|c_{i}|\leqslant d_{i}$, where $d_{i}$ is the coefficient of $t^{i}$ in the expansion $\prod\limits_{j=1}^{m-n+1}(t+j)$; and when $m\geqslant n+4$, $|c_{i}|\leqslant d_{i}$, with $d_{i}$ being the coefficient of $t^{i}$ in the expansion $(t+1)(t+2)(t+3)^{2}(t+4)^{m-n-3}$. Furthermore, we prove that if $G$ is a connected bridgeless cubic graph having only real flow roots, then $b_{i}\leqslant |c_{i}|$, where $b_{i}$ is the coefficient of $t^{i}$ in the expansion $(t+1)(t+2)^{\frac{n}{2}}$. Notably, if $G$ is simple connected bridgeless cubic graph with only real flow roots, then $b_{i}$ is the coefficient of $t^{i}$ in the expansion $(t+1)(t+2)^{\frac{n}{2}-2}(t+3)^{2}$.
2025-02-18
On the edge reconstruction of the second immanantal polynomials of undirected graph and digraph
Let $M=(m_{ij})$ be an $n\times n$ matrix. The second immanant of matrix $M$ is defined by \begin{eqnarray*} d_{2}(M)=\sum_{σ\in S_{n}}χ_{2}(σ)\prod_{s=1}^{n}m_{sσ(s)}, \end{eqnarray*} where $χ_{2}$ is the irreducible character of $S_{n}$ corresponding to the partition $(2^{1},1^{n-2})$. The polynomial $d_{2}(xI-M)$ is called the second immanantal polynomial of matrix $M$. Denote by $D(G)$ (resp. $D(\overrightarrow{G})$) and $A(G)$ (resp. $A(\overrightarrow{G})$) the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of undirected graph $G$ (resp. digraph $\overrightarrow{G}$), respectively. In this article, we prove that $d_{2}(xI-A(G))$ (resp. $d_{2}(xI-A(\overrightarrow{G}))$) can be reconstructed from the second immanantal polynomials of the adjacency matrix of all subgraphs in $\{G-uv,G-u-v|uv\in E(G)\}$ (resp. $\{\overrightarrow{G}-e|e\in E(\overrightarrow{G})\}$). Furthermore, the polynomial $d_{2}(xI-D(\overrightarrow{G})\pm A(\overrightarrow{G}))$ can also be reconstructed by the second immanantal polynomials of the (signless) Laplacian matrixs of all subgraphs in $\{\overrightarrow{G}-e|e\in E(\overrightarrow{G})\}$, respectively.
2025-02-18
Brualdi-Goldwasser-Michael problem for maximum permanents of {\rm(0,1)}-matrices
Let $\mathscr{U}(n,τ)$ be the set of all {\rm(0,1)}-matrices of order $n$ with exactly $τ$ 0's. Brualdi et al. investigated the maximum permanents of all matrices in $\mathscr{U}(n,τ)$(R.A. Brualdi, J.L. Goldwasser, T.S. Michael, Maximum permanents of matrices of zeros and ones, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 47 (1988) 207--245.). And they put forward an open problem to characterize the maximum permanents among all matrices in $\mathscr{U}(n,τ)$. In this paper, we focus on the problem. And we characterize the maximum permanents of all matrices in $\mathscr{U}(n,τ)$ when $n^{2}-3n\leqτ\leq n^{2}-2n-1$. Furthermore, we also prove the maximum permanents of all matrices in $\mathscr{U}(n,τ)$ when $σ-kn\equiv0 (mod~k+1)$ and $(k+1)n-σ\equiv0(mod~k)$, where $σ=n^{2}-τ$, $kn\leqσ\leq (k+1)n$ and $k$ is integer.
2023-11-23
Further results on the permanental sums of bicyclic graphs
Let $G$ be a graph, and let $A(G)$ be the adjacency matrix of $G$. The permanental polynomial of $G$ is defined as $π(G,x)=\mathrm{per}(xI-A(G))$. The permanental sum of $G$ can be defined as the sum of absolute value of coefficients of $π(G,x)$. Computing the permanental sum is $\#$P-complete. Any a bicyclic graph can be generated from three types of induced subgraphs. In this paper, we determine the upper bound of permanental sums of bicyclic graphs generated from each a type of induced subgraph. And we also determine the second maximal permanental sum of all bicyclic graphs.
2023-06-23
Enumeration of maximum matchings of graphs
Counting maximum matchings in a graph is of great interest in statistical mechanics, solid-state chemistry, theoretical computer science, mathematics, among other disciplines. However, it is a challengeable problem to explicitly determine the number of maximum matchings of general graphs. In this paper, using Gallai-Edmonds structure theorem, we derive a computing formula for the number of maximum matching in a graph. According to the formula, we obtain an algorithm to enumerate maximum matchings of a graph. In particular, The formula implies that computing the number of maximum matchings of a graph is converted to compute the number of perfect matchings of some induced subgraphs of the graph. As an application, we calculate the number of maximum matchings of opt trees. The result extends a conclusion obtained by Heuberger and Wagner[C. Heuberger, S. Wagner, The number of maximum matchings in a tree, Discrete Math. 311 (2011) 2512--2542].
2022-04-16
The characterizing properties of (signless) Laplacian permanental polynomials of bicyclic graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $G$ be a graph with $n$ vertices, and let $L(G)$ and $Q(G)$ be the Laplacian matrix and signless Laplacian matrix of $G$, respectively. The polynomial $π(L(G);x)={\rm per}(xI-L(G))$ (resp. $π(Q(G);x)={\rm per}(xI-Q(G))$) is called {\em Laplacian permanental polynomial} (resp. {\em signless Laplacian permanental polynomial}) of $G$. In this paper, we show that two classes of bicyclic graphs are determined by their (signless) Laplacian permanental polynomials.
2021-10-10 v4
On complexity of substructure connectivity and restricted connectivity of graphs
The connectivity of a graph is an important parameter to evaluate its reliability. $k$-restricted connectivity (resp. $R^h$-restricted connectivity) of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $S$ of vertices in $G$, if exists, whose deletion disconnects $G$ and leaves each component of $G-S$ with more than $k$ vertices (resp. $δ(G-S)\geq h$). In contrast, structure (substructure) connectivity of $G$ is defined as the minimum number of vertex-disjoint subgraphs whose deletion disconnects $G$. As generalizations of the concept of connectivity, structure (substructure) connectivity, restricted connectivity and $R^h$-restricted connectivity have been extensively studied from the combinatorial point of view. Very little is known about the computational complexity of these variants, except for the recently established NP-completeness of $k$-restricted edge-connectivity. In this paper, we prove that the problems of determining structure, substructure, restricted, and $R^h$-restricted connectivity are all NP-complete.
2020-12-23
Forcing and anti-forcing polynomials of a polyomino graph
Published • View PublicationBIB
The forcing number of a perfect matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is the smallest number of edges inside $M$ that can not be contained in other perfect matchings. The anti-forcing number of $M$ is the smallest number of edges outside $M$ whose removal results in a subgraph with a single perfect matching, that is $M$. Recently, in order to investigate the distributions of forcing numbers and anti-forcing numbers, the forcing polynomial and anti-forcing polynomial were proposed, respectively. In this work, the forcing and anti-forcing polynomials of a polyomino graph are obtained. As consequences, the forcing and anti-forcing spectra of this polyomino graph are determined, and the asymptotic behaviors on the degree of freedom and the sum of all anti-forcing numbers are revealed, respectively.
2019-12-10 v2
Unpaired many-to-many disjoint path cover of balanced hypercubes
The balanced hypercube $BH_n$, a variant of the hypercube, was proposed as a desired interconnection network topology. It is known that $BH_n$ is bipartite. Assume that $S=\{s_1,s_2,\cdots,s_{2n-2}\}$ and $T=\{t_1,t_2,\cdots,t_{2n-2}\}$ are any two sets of vertices in different partite sets of $BH_n$ ($n\geq2$). It has been proved that there exists paired 2-disjoint path cover of $BH_n$. In this paper, we prove that there exists unpaired $(2n-2)$-disjoint path cover of $BH_n$ ($n\geq2$) from $S$ to $T$, which improved some known results. The upper bound $2n-2$ of the number of disjoint paths in unpaired $(2n-2)$-disjoint path cover is best possible.
2019-05-12
Fractional matching preclusion for restricted hypercube-like graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
The restricted hypercube-like graphs, variants of the hypercube, were proposed as desired interconnection networks of parallel systems. The matching preclusion number of a graph is the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in the graph with neither perfect matchings nor almost perfect matchings. The fractional perfect matching preclusion and fractional strong perfect matching preclusion are generalizations of the concept matching preclusion. In this paper, we obtain fractional matching preclusion number and fractional strong matching preclusion numbers of restricted hypercube-like graphs, which extend some known results.
2019-05-11
On the conjecture of bijection between perfect matching and sub-hypercube in folded hypercubes
Dong and Wang in [Theor. Comput. Sci. 771 (2019) 93--98] conjectured that the resulting graph of the $n$-dimensional folded hypercube $FQ_n$ by deleting any perfect matching is isomorphic to the hypercube $Q_n$. In this paper, we show that the conjecture holds when $n=2,3$, and it is not true for $n\geq4$.