arXiv++ Combinatorics

A tanglegram of size n is a graph formed from two rooted binary trees with n leaves each and a perfect matching between their leaf sets. Tanglegrams are used to model co-evolution in various settings. A tanglegram layout is a straight line drawing where the two trees are drawn as plane trees with their leaf-sets on two parallel lines, and only the edges of the matching may cross. The tangle crossing number of a tanglegram is the minimum crossing number among its layouts. It is known that tanglegrams have crossing number at least one precisely when they contain one of two size 4 subtanglegrams, which we refer to as cross-inducing subtanglegrams. We show here that a tanglegram with exactly one cross inducing subtanglegram must have tangle crossing number exactly one, and ask the question whether the tangle-crossing number of tanglegrams with exactly k cross-inducing subtanglegrams is bounded for every k.

Levels and sublevels in arrangements -- and, dually, $k$-sets and $(\leq k)$-sets -- are fundamental notions in discrete and computational geometry and natural generalizations of convex polytopes, which correspond to the $0$-level. A long-standing conjecture of Eckhoff, Linhart, and Welzl, which would generalize McMullen's Upper Bound Theorem for polytopes and provide an exact refinement of asymptotic bounds by Clarkson, asserts that for all $k\leq \lfloor \frac{n-d-2}{2}\rfloor$, the number of $(\leq k)$-sets of a set $S$ of $n$ points in $\mathbf{R}^d$ is maximized if $S$ is the vertex set of a neighborly polytope. As a new tool for studying this conjecture and related problems, we introduce the $g$-matrix, which generalizes both the $g$-vector of a simple polytope and a Gale dual version of the $g$-vector studied by Lee and Welzl. Our main result is that the $g$-matrix of every vector configuration in $\mathbf{R}^3$ is non-negative, which implies the Eckhoff--Linhart--Welzl conjecture in the case where $d=n-4$. As a corollary, we obtain the following result about crossing numbers: Consider a configuration $V\subset S^2 \subset \mathbf{R}^3$ of $n$ unit vectors, and connect every pair of vectors by the unique shortest geodesic arc between them in the unit sphere $S^2$. This yields a drawing of the complete graph $K_n$ in $S^2$, which we call a spherical arc drawing. Complementing previous results for rectilinear drawings, we show that the number of crossings in any spherical arc drawing of $K_n$ is at least $\frac{1}{4}\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$, which equals the conjectured value of the crossing number of $K_n$. Moreover, the lower bound is attained if $V$ is coneighborly, i.e., if every open linear halfspace contains at least $\lfloor (n-2)/2 \rfloor$ of the vectors in $V$.

We prove that, as $m$ grows, any family of $m$ homotopically distinct closed curves on a surface induces a number of crossings that grows at least like $(m \log m)^2$. We use this to answer two questions of Pach, Tardos and Toth related to crossing numbers of drawings of multigraphs where edges are required to be non-homotopic. Furthermore, we generalize these results, obtaining effective bounds with optimal growth rates on every orientable surface.

We study 3-plane drawings, that is, drawings of graphs in which every edge has at most three crossings. We show how the recently developed Density Formula for topological drawings of graphs (KKKRSU GD 2024) can be used to count the crossings in terms of the number $n$ of vertices. As a main result, we show that every 3-plane drawing has at most $5.5(n-2)$ crossings, which is tight. In particular, it follows that every 3-planar graph on $n$ vertices has crossing number at most $5.5n$, which improves upon a recent bound (BBBDHKMOW GD 2024) of $6.6n$. To apply the Density Formula, we carefully analyze the interplay between certain configurations of cells in a 3-plane drawing. As a by-product, we also obtain an alternative proof for the known statement that every 3-planar graph has at most $5.5(n-2)$ edges.

The crossing number of a graph $G$ denotes the minimum number of crossings in any planar drawing of $G$. In this short note, we confirm a long-standing conjecture posed by Pach, Spencer, and Tóth over 25 years ago, establishing an optimal lower bound on the crossing number of graphs that satisfy some monotone properties. Furthermore, we address a related open problem introduced by Pach and Tóth in 2000, which explores the interplay between the crossing number of a graph, its degree sequence, and its bisection width.

We provide theoretical insights around the cutwidth of a graph and the One-Sided Crossing Minimization (OSCM) problem. OSCM was posed in the Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge 2024, where the cutwidth of the input graph was the parameter in the parameterized track. We prove an asymptotically sharp upper bound on the size of a graph in terms of its order and cutwidth. As the number of so-called unsuited pairs is one of the factors that determine the difficulty of an OSCM instance, we provide a sharp upper bound on them in terms of the order $n$ and the cutwidth of the input graph. If the cutwidth is bounded by a constant, this implies an $\mathcal{O}(2^n)$-time algorithm, while the trivial algorithm has a running time of $\mathcal{O}(2^{n^2})$. At last, we prove structural properties of the so-called crossing numbers in an OSCM instance.

For every connected graph $G$ and surface $S$, we consider the well-known string of inequalities $δ_S(G) \leq μ_S(G) \leq ν_S(G)$, where $μ$ and $ν$ denote skewness and crossing number and $δ$ is the Euler-formula lower bound. Recent developments are surveyed; new results are given for the ``folded'' cube including its genus.

We show that for all $n \equiv 0 \pmod{6}$, $n \geq 18$, there is an orientable triangular embedding of the octahedral graph on $n$ vertices that can be augmented with handles to produce a genus embedding of the complete graph of the same order. For these values of $n$, the intermediate embeddings of the construction also determine some surface crossing numbers of the complete graph on $n$ vertices and the genus of all graphs on $n$ vertices and minimum degree $n-2$.

An $r$-regular graph is an $r$-graph, if every odd set of vertices is connected to its complement by at least $r$ edges. Seymour [On multicolourings of cubic graphs, and conjectures of Fulkerson and Tutte.~\emph{Proc.~London Math.~Soc.}~(3), 38(3): 423-460, 1979] conjectured (1) that every planar $r$-graph is $r$-edge colorable and (2) that every $r$-graph has $2r$ perfect matchings such that every edge is contained in precisely two of them. We study several variants of these conjectures. A $(t,r)$-PM is a multiset of $t \cdot r$ perfect matchings of an $r$-graph $G$ such that every edge is in precisely $t$ of them. We show that the following statements are equivalent for every $t, r \geq 1$: 1. Every planar $r$-graph has a $(t,r)$-PM. 2. Every $K_5$-minor-free $r$-graph has a $(t,r)$-PM. 3. Every $K_{3,3}$-minor-free $r$-graph has a $(t,r)$-PM. 4. Every $r$-graph whose underlying simple graph has crossing number at most $1$ has a $(t,r)$-PM.

Let $Δ$ and $B$ be the maximum vertex degree and a subset of vertices in a graph $G$ respectively. In this paper, we study the first (non-trivial) Steklov eigenvalue $σ_2$ of $G$ with boundary $B$. Using metrical deformation via flows, we first show that $σ_2 = \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{Δ(g+1)^3}{|B|}\right)$ for graphs of orientable genus $g$ if $|B| \geq \max\{3 \sqrt{g},|V|^{\frac{1}{4} + ε}, 9\}$ for some $ε> 0$. This can be seen as a discrete analogue of Karpukhin's bound. Secondly, we prove that $σ_2 \leq \frac{8Δ+4X}{|B|}$ based on planar crossing number $X$. Thirdly, we show that $σ_2 \leq \frac{|B|}{|B|-1} \cdot δ_B$, where $δ_B$ denotes the minimum degree for boundary vertices in $B$. At last, we compare several upper bounds on Laplacian eigenvalues and Steklov eigenvalues.

The basic (and traditional) crossing number problem is to determine the minimum number of crossings in a topological drawing of an input graph in the plane. We develop a unified framework that smoothly captures many generalized crossing number problems, and that yields fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for them not only in the plane but also on surfaces. Our framework takes the following form. We fix a surface S, an integer r, and a map \k{appa} from the set of topological drawings of graphs in S to Z+\cup{\infty}, satisfying some natural monotonicity conditions, but essentially describing the allowed drawings and how we want to count the crossings in them. Then deciding whether an input graph G has an allowed drawing D on S with \k{appa}(D)<=r can be done in time quadratic in the size of G (and exponential in other parameters). More generally, we may take as input an edge-colored graph, and distinguish crossings by the colors of the involved edges; and we may allow to perform a bounded number of edge removals and vertex splits to G before drawing it. The proof is a reduction to the embeddability of a graph on a two-dimensional simplicial complex. This framework implies, in a unified way, quadratic FPT algorithms for many topological crossing number variants established in the graph drawing community. Some of these variants already had previously published FPT algorithms, mostly relying on Courcelle's metatheorem, but for many of those, we obtain an algorithm with a better runtime. Moreover, our framework extends, at no cost, to these crossing number variants in any fixed surface.

Determining the crossing numbers of Cartesian products of small graphs with arbitrarily large paths has been an ongoing topic of research since the 1970s. Doing so requires the establishment of coincident upper and lower bounds; the former is usually demonstrated by providing a suitable drawing procedure, while the latter often requires substantial theoretical arguments. Many such papers have been published, which typically focus on just one or two small graphs at a time, and use ad hoc arguments specific to those graphs. We propose a general approach which, when successful, establishes the required lower bound. This approach can be applied to the Cartesian product of any graph with arbitrarily large paths, and in each case involves solving a modified version of the crossing number problem on a finite number (typically only two or three) of small graphs. We demonstrate the potency of this approach by applying it to Cartesian products involving all 133 graphs $G$ of orders five or six, and show that it is successful in 128 cases. This includes 60 cases which a recent survey listed as either undetermined, or determined only in journals without adequate peer review.

The classical Crossing Lemma by Ajtai et al.~and Leighton from 1982 gave an important lower bound of $c \frac{m^3}{n^2}$ for the number of crossings in any drawing of a given graph of $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. The original value was $c= 1/100$, which then has gradually been improved. Here, the bounds for the density of $k$-planar graphs played a central role. Our new insight is that for $k=2,3$ the $k$-planar graphs have substantially fewer edges if specific local configurations that occur in drawings of $k$-planar graphs of maximum density are forbidden. Therefore, we are able to derive better bounds for the crossing number $\text{cr}(G)$ of a given graph $G$. In particular, we achieve a bound of $\text{cr}(G) \ge \frac{37}{9}m-\frac{155}{9}(n-2)$ for the range of $5n < m \le 6n$, while our second bound $\text{cr}(G) \ge 5m - \frac{203}{9}(n-2)$ is even stronger for larger $m>6n$. For $m > 6.77n$, we finally apply the standard probabilistic proof from the BOOK and obtain an improved constant of $c>1/27.48$ in the Crossing Lemma. Note that the previous constant was $1/29$. Although this improvement is not too impressive, we consider our technique as an important new tool, which might be helpful in various other applications.

We establish a bijection between $01$-fillings of stack polyominoes with at most one $1$ per column and labelings of the corners along the top-right border of stack polyominoes. These labellings indicate the lengths of the longest increasing and decreasing chains of the largest rectangular region below and to the left of the corners. Our results provide an alternative proof of Guo and Poznanović's theorem on the lengths of the longest increasing and decreasing chains have a symmetric joint distribution over $01$-fillings of stack polyomino. Moreover, our results offer new perspective to Chen, Guo and Pang's result on the crossing number and the nesting number have a symmetric joint distribution over linked partitions. In particular, our construction generalizes the growth diagram techniques of Rubey for the $01$-fillings of stack polyominoes with at most one $1$ per column and row.

We study the impact of forbidding short cycles to the edge density of $k$-planar graphs; a $k$-planar graph is one that can be drawn in the plane with at most $k$ crossings per edge. Specifically, we consider three settings, according to which the forbidden substructures are $3$-cycles, $4$-cycles or both of them (i.e., girth $\ge 5$). For all three settings and all $k\in\{1,2,3\}$, we present lower and upper bounds on the maximum number of edges in any $k$-planar graph on $n$ vertices. Our bounds are of the form $c\,n$, for some explicit constant $c$ that depends on $k$ and on the setting. For general $k \geq 4$ our bounds are of the form $c\sqrt{k}n$, for some explicit constant $c$. These results are obtained by leveraging different techniques, such as the discharging method, the recently introduced density formula for non-planar graphs, and new upper bounds for the crossing number of $2$-- and $3$-planar graphs in combination with corresponding lower bounds based on the Crossing Lemma.

Visualizing a graph $G$ in the plane nicely, for example, without crossings, is unfortunately not always possible. To address this problem, Masařík and Hliněný [GD 2023] recently asked for each edge of $G$ to be drawn without crossings while allowing multiple different drawings of $G$. More formally, a collection $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of $G$ is uncrossed if, for each edge $e$ of $G$, there is a drawing in $\mathcal{D}$ such that $e$ is uncrossed. The uncrossed number $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ of $G$ is then the minimum number of drawings in some uncrossed collection of $G$. No exact values of the uncrossed numbers have been determined yet, not even for simple graph classes. In this paper, we provide the exact values for uncrossed numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs, partly confirming and partly refuting a conjecture posed by Hliněný and Masařík. We also present a strong general lower bound on $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ in terms of the number of vertices and edges of $G$. Moreover, we prove NP-hardness of the related problem of determining the edge crossing number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest number of edges of $G$ taken over all drawings of $G$ that participate in a crossing. This problem was posed as open by Schaefer in his book [Crossing Numbers of Graphs 2018].

Vertex connectivity and edge connectivity are fundamental concepts in graph theory that have been widely studied from both structural and algorithmic perspectives. The focus of this paper is on computing these two parameters for graphs embedded on the plane with crossings. For planar graphs -- which can be embedded on the plane without any crossings -- it has long been known that vertex and edge connectivity can be computed in linear time. Recently, the algorithm for vertex connectivity was extended from planar graphs to 1-plane graphs (where each edge is crossed at most once) without $\times$-crossings -- these are crossings whose endpoints induce a matching. The key insight, for both these classes of graphs, is that any two vertices/edges of a minimum vertex/edge cut have small face-distance (distance measured by number of faces) in the embedding. In this paper, we attempt at a comprehensive generalization of this idea to a wider class of graphs embedded on the plane. Our method works for all those embedded graphs where every pair of crossing edges is connected by a path whose vertices and edges have a small face-distance from the crossing point. Important examples of such graphs include optimal 2-planar and optimal 3-planar graphs, $d$-map graphs, $d$-framed graphs, graphs with bounded crossing number, and $k$-plane graphs with bounded number of $\times$-crossings. For all these graph classes, we get a linear-time algorithm for computing vertex and edge connectivity.

The billiard table is modeled as an $n$-dimensional box $[0,a_1]\times [0,a_2]\times \ldots \times [0,a_n] \subset \mathbb{R}^n$, with each side having real-valued lengths $a_i$ that are pairwise commensurable. A ball is launched from the origin in direction $d=(1,1,\ldots,1)$. The ball is reflected if it hits the boundary of the billiard table. It comes to a halt when reaching a corner. We show that the number of intersections of the billiard curve at any given point on the table is either $0$ or a power of $2$. To prove this, we use algebraic and number theoretic tools to establish a bijection between the number of intersections of the billiard curve and the number of satisfying assignments of a specific constraint satisfaction problem.

Given a drawing $D$ of a graph $G$, we define the crossing number between any two cycles $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ in $D$ to be the number of crossings that involve at least one edge from each of $C_1$ and $C_2$ except the crossings between edges that are common to both cycles. We show that if the crossing number between every two cycles in $G$ is even in a drawing of $G$ on the plane, then there is a planar drawing of $G$. This result can be extended to arbitrary surfaces. We also establish an equivalence between our result and a fundamental result due to Cairns-Nikolayevsky and Pelsmajer-Schaefer-Štefankovič, about drawing graphs on surfaces, and derive the Loebl-Masbaum theorem from it.

We study the difference between the number of facets of the order polytope and the chain polytope of a poset. Hibi and Li classified posets where the gap is exactly zero. We describe the bounds on this gap using the new notion of crossing numbers, and then use this result to classify the posets where the gap is exactly one.