poset ↗ reference
2214 papers tagged with this keyword
Combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the order polynomial of fence posets
Given a fence poset P , we define a new statistic on permutations, denoted by blP, that provides a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the order polynomial of P , answering a question of Ferroni, Morales, and Panova (2025). Using the fact that the base polytope of a lattice path matroid can be decomposed into order polytopes of fence posets, we also obtain a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the Ehrhart polynomial of the base polytope of Schubert matroids, answering a question of Stanley (1999). As an application of this statistic, we establish the first nontrivial lower bound for the linear coefficient of the Ehrhart polynomial of an order polytope. Finally, we conjecture generalizations of this statistic to skew-shape posets and circular fence posets.
The chain replacement of a poset flow
We introduce the chain replacement of a poset flow: it is obtained by considering the simplicial nerves of the posets of strictly increasing chains in the given poset, ordered by refinement. It maps finite posets to q-cofibrant flows and inclusions of finite posets to q-cofibrations. Using the combinatorial properties of the chain replacement, we prove that pushouts along the chain replacement of an order-reflecting inclusion of finite posets preserve spaces of execution paths. By introducing the Hurewicz model structure on flows (or H-model structure), we deduce the same property for any q-cofibrant replacement of an order-reflecting inclusion of finite posets.
On the maximum size of $B_3$-free families
A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a weak copy of the poset $(P,\leqslant)$ if there exists a bijection $ι:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ with $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ whenever $p\leqslant q$. $\mathcal{G}$ is a strong copy if $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ if and only if $p\leqslant q$ holds. A family is weak (strong) $P$-free if it does not contain any weak (strong) copies of $P$. For a poset $P$, let $e(P)$ ($e^*(P)$) denote the most number of middle layers of $2^{[n]}$ that does not contain a weak (strong) copy of $P$. Ellis, Ivan, and Leader were the first to show the existence of posets $P$ for which there exists a positive real $\varepsilon_P$ such that $La(n,P)\ge (e(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ and $La^*(n,P)\ge (e^*(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ holds, where $La(n,P)$ ($La^*(n,P)$) denotes the maximum size of a weak (strong) $P$-free family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$. More precisely, they showed that $P=B_d$ are such posets for all $d\ge 4$, where $B_d$ is the Boolean lattice ordered by inclusion. Very recently, Tompkins showed that the diamond $B_2$ is also such a poset. In this short note, we apply his method to settle the case of the last Boolean poset $B_3$. We show that there exists a positive $\varepsilon$ such that $$La^*(n,B_3)\ge La(n,B_3)\ge La(n,D_6)\ge (3+\varepsilon)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor},$$
where $D_6$ is the poset on eight elements $a<b_1,\dots,b_6<c$.
Magnitude homology of tope graphs
We completely determine the magnitude homology of tope graphs of real hyperplane arrangements. Their ranks can be described as the Hilbert functions of the Stanley--Reisner rings of certain simplicial complexes naturally associated with the arrangements. For Coxeter arrangements, this gives a computation of the magnitude homology of the Cayley graph of the corresponding Coxeter group. We also prove the homological reciprocity for central arrangements conjectured by Koizumi--Liu. The proof combines poset combinatorics, the Edelman--Walker theorem, and Alexander duality.
An Overlap Construction for Relative Linear Extension Ratios
Chan and Pak introduced the relative linear extension ratio $ρ(P,x)=e(P)/e(P-x)$, where $e(P)$ is the number of linear extensions of a finite poset $P$, and let $ν(c,d)$ be the least number of elements of a poset that realizes $ρ(P,x)=d/c$. They proved that $ν(c,d)\le d/c+O(\log d\log\log d)$ for $d\ge 3c$, and asked whether the hypothesis $d\ge 3c$ can be relaxed to $d\ge(1+\varepsilon)c$ or removed. We prove the fixed-gap form of this question: for every fixed $\varepsilon>0$, $ν(c,d)\le \frac{d}{c}+O_{\varepsilon}(\log d\log\log d)$ whenever $d\ge(1+\varepsilon)c$, and the implied constant is absolute once $d\ge 2c$. The new ingredient is a one-element overlap construction: if $x$ is minimal in $P$ and $y$ is minimal in $Q$, then there is a poset $R$ with $|R|=|P|+|Q|-1$ and an element $z$ such that $ρ(R,z)=ρ(P,x)+ρ(Q,y)-1$. Together with the continued-fraction construction of Chan and Pak and Rukavishnikova's tail bound for sums of partial quotients, this removes the factor $3$ in their range. We also show that the fixed-gap hypothesis is essentially optimal for this construction. In the range $1 < d/c < 2$, with $h=d-c$, the size bound the construction can certify is at least $\lfloor c/h\rfloor$, so the method reaches the stated error term only when $h$ is at least of order $c/(\log c\log\log c)$. The remaining obstruction to removing the hypothesis is a short-interval problem for sums of partial quotients, which we describe. The deductive part of the argument has been checked with the Lean proof assistant.
Planarity and dimension II
The dimension of a poset $P$ is the minimum positive integer $d$ such that $P$ is an induced subposet of $\mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with the product order. We give a constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithm for computing dimension in the class of posets with a planar (Hasse) diagram. While computing the dimension of a poset is NP-hard in general, the computational complexity of the problem for planar posets remains open. The algorithmic result is driven by a structural understanding of the canonical obstruction to small dimension: standard examples. A longstanding problem, originating in the early 1980s, asked whether every poset with a planar diagram has dimension bounded by a function of the maximum order of a standard example that it contains. In the first paper of the series, we have resolved the problem in a more general setting of posets with planar cover graphs by establishing a polynomial bound. We prove a stronger bound in the original setting, namely, for every poset $P$ with a planar diagram $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 96\mathrm{se}(P)+672$, where $\mathrm{dim}(P)$ denotes the dimension of $P$ and $\mathrm{se}(P)$ denotes the maximum order of a standard example contained in $P$.
An Improved Lower Bound for Diamond-Free Families
We construct a diamond-free family in the Boolean lattice whose size is asymptotically larger than the union of two middle layers. Denote the diamond poset by $Q_2$ and let $La(n,Q_2)$ be the maximum size of a family in $2^{[n]}$ containing no weak copy of $Q_2$. We prove $La(n,Q_2) \ge (c+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$, where $c \approx 2.147908$. In particular, this disproves the diamond conjecture.
Subword representations and weak hypercube dimension for acyclic categories
We introduce a categorical analogue of weak hypercube representations of finite posets by means of faithful embeddings into categories of subwords of finite words. For finite acyclic categories, we characterize those admitting such a weak subword representation: they are precisely the monic categories whose hom-sets carry a left-compatible local total order. The proof is constructive and gives an explicit word representation. We also introduce a query game for categories, generalizing a Boolean query game for posets, and show how winning sets produce explicit word representations and hence upper bounds for the weak word dimension.
Orlik--Solomon sheaf homology of geometric lattices
We associate the Orlik--Solomon sheaf with a finite geometric lattice and compute its sheaf homology. We show that this homology concentrates in top degree, admitting a convolution-type decomposition into a principal ideal OS piece tensoring with a principal filter complement poset homology. Applications to uniform matroids provide interesting representations of symmetric groups.
Equality conditions for correlation inequalities
We prove equality conditions for the Ahlswede--Daykin (AD) inequality and the Fortuin--Kasteleyn--Ginibre (FKG) inequality. We then present a number of applications and special cases of these equality conditions. These include Björner's and Fishburn's inequalities for linear extensions of finite posets, the Lam--Postnikov--Pylyavskyy (LPP) and the Okounkov inequalities for Schur positivity of products of Schur functions. We conclude with equality conditions for the Ahlswede--Daykin--Schur (ADS) inequality recently introduced in Chan--Chen--Pak--Soskin (2026), which is an AD type extension of the LPP inequality.
A note on long nontrivial cycle in Hamiltonian graphs
Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph containing a Hamiltonian cycle and with minimum degree at least $3$. Girão, Kittipassorn and Narayanan (Israel J. Math., 2019) proved that $G$ contains another cycle of length at least $n-O(n^{4/5})$. In this paper, we improve their bound to $n-O(n^{2/3})$. Our proof is combined with a constructive method, which is based on a poset result, and a nonconstructive method. And the bound is best possible under these two methods.
Characterizing finite posets whose probabilistic powerdomain are RB-domains
We classify the finite posets whose probabilistic powerdomain is an RB-domain. For a finite nonempty poset \(P\), let \(\Vone(P)\) be the probability powerdomain of $P$, which is the probability simplex ordered by the stochastic order. We prove that \(\Vone(P)\) is an RB-domain if and only if \(P\) has a least element and the undirected Hasse graph of \(P\) is a tree. Consequently, the probabilistic powerdomain does not preserve RB-domains; the four-point diamond gives a finite counterexample. The proof separates two obstructions. First, if \(P\) has no least element, then the face of probability measures supported on the minimal points must be fixed pointwise by every deflation below the identity. Secondly, once a least element exists, the Hasse graph is connected, and a cycle in it makes the local stochastic cone non-simplicial. A Euclidean finite-step cone argument then rules out the finite-valued monotone approximations supplied by the RB property.
The structure of FAC posets and the Aharoni--Korman conjecture
A poset $P$ is said to satisfy the finite antichain condition, or FAC for short, if it has no infinite antichain. Such posets exhibit rich and complex structure, and it was conjectured by Aharoni and Korman in 1992 that any FAC poset $P$ possesses a chain $C$ and a partition into antichains such that $C$ meets every antichain of the partition. While this conjecture is now known to be false, in this paper we prove that the conjecture does hold true for a broad class of posets. In particular, we prove that the Aharoni--Korman conjecture holds for countable posets containing no saturated chain $D$ such that either $D$ or its reverse $D^*$ is of the form $\bigoplus_{x\inω} D_x$, where each $D_x$ is infinite and co-wellfounded.
In pursuit of this goal, we prove several structural results, the foremost of which demonstrates how a countable FAC poset may be broken up into a collection of scattered posets which reflect the structure of the poset as a whole.
Multiplicity for partially ordered sets
Let $\mathcal Q=\{Q_a:a\geq1\}$ be a nested family of finite posets such that $Q_a\subseteq Q_{a+1}$ and $|Q_a|<|Q_{a+1}|$. For a poset $Q$, let $\mathcal C_t(Q)$ denote the set of all strict $t$-chains in $Q$. Given an $r$-coloring of $\mathcal C_t(Q_a)$ and posets $P_1,\ldots,P_r$, a weak copy of $P_i$ is called monochromatic of color $i$ if all $t$-chains in the copy have color $i$; the strong version is defined in the same way for induced copies. The corresponding weak and strong multiplicity parameters are the minimum possible total number of such monochromatic copies in the host poset.For the Boolean lattice $B_n$, define $E_n={(S,T,U)\in B_n^3:S\subsetneq T\subsetneq U,\ |S|+|T|=|U|}.$ For a two-coloring $χ:B_n\to{0,1}$, a triple $(S,T,U)\in E_n$ is monochromatic if $χ(S)=χ(T)=χ(U)$. Let $R^{\mathrm{arith}}_2$ be the least integer $n$ such that every two-coloring of $B_n$ contains a monochromatic triple in $E_n$, and let $M^{\mathrm{arith}}_2(B_n)$ be the minimum number of monochromatic triples in $E_n$ over all two-colorings of $B_n$. We prove that $R^{\mathrm{arith}}_2=9.$ Moreover, $|E_n|=\binom{2n}{n}-[x^n](1+x+x^2)^n-2^n+1=\frac{4^n}{\sqrt{πn}}\bigl(1+o(1)\bigr),$ and $2^{δn+o(n)}\le M^{\mathrm{arith}}_2(B_n)\le 2^{γn+o(n)}, $ where $δ\approx 1.356779$ and $γ\approx 1.567837$ are explicit entropy constants. For general nested host families, we prove a double-counting lower bound for strong poset multiplicity. For an arbitrary finite host poset $R$, we also introduce a Fourier-Möbius method and give an exact Fourier expansion for strong multiplicity, a Parseval-type error bound, and a spectral lower bound.
Type B c-Birkhoff polytopes are order polytopes
In a previous work, we defined (type A) c-Birkhoff polytopes and showed that they were unimodularly equivalent to order polytopes of heap posets. In this note we answer the question: What about type B?
Order polytopes of generalized snake posets are $h^*$-real-rooted
Order polytopes for generalized snake posets were recently studied by von Bell et al. (2022), and are known to be unimodularly equivalent to strength-one flow polytopes for acyclic directed graphs strongly dual to generalized snake posets. Lee, Vindas-Meléndez, and Wang (2026) conjectured that the Ehrhart $h^*$-polynomials of these order polytopes are real-rooted. We prove this conjecture using a connection between these $h^*$-polynomials and non-nesting rook polynomials, which were recently introduced by Alexandersson and Jal (2024+) in connection with $P$-Eulerian polynomials for width two posets.
Decomposition of Greedy Tamari Intervals and Bipartite Planar Maps
The greedy Tamari poset, inspired by the well-studied Tamari lattice, was recently defined by Dermenjian in the more general setting of greedy $ν$-Tamari posets. Bousquet-Mélou and Chapoton counted intervals of the greedy $m$-Tamari poset in 2024 by solving a functional equation, and found that they are equi-enumerous to planar $(m+1)$-constellations. In this work, we give a combinatorial proof of this fact for the case $m = 1$, which also gives the refined enumeration conjectured by Bousquet-Mélou and Chapoton. This is done by establishing a recursive decomposition of greedy Tamari intervals isomorphic to that of bipartite planar maps. We also propose a more general and refined conjecture for the case of general $m$.
The number of labeled partial orders and topologies on 19 points
We report the exact value of the number of labeled partially ordered sets (equivalently, labeled $T_0$ topologies) on 19 points, P(19) = 646099441937791106493755218560442089979, a 39-digit integer extending OEIS A001035, whose largest previously computed term was P(18) (Brinkmann and McKay). By the Stirling transform we also obtain the number of labeled topologies on 19 points, A000798(19) = 689054943207246404281592791142107048261. Our route is the Erné-Stege moment reduction, which expresses P(19) through a few sums of antichain counts over the posets on at most 16 points. All of these are available from the posets on at most 15 points (whose number is catalogued, and which standard software generates on demand), except a single moment over the 16-point posets. That moment is obtained not by enumerating the 16-point posets but by inserting a single element into the 15-point ones, with a per-parent kernel that advances the sum at the cost of computing the parent's own antichain count. The result passes several independent checks, among them the residue predicted by the modular periodicity of A001035 and the recovery from the same sweep of the known count P(16) and the Erné-Stege moments G(16,1) and G(16,2). We also report the moments G(16,3) and G(16,4), the latter an input to the analogous computation for 20 points.
On the Complexity of Counting Orderings in Graphs
We study the computational complexity of several counting problems on graphs. Each of these problems consists of counting orderings of the vertices or edges with adjacency constraints. We show $\#P$-completeness for all of them via a common new technique. Given a counting function $C$ of interest, we define a parameterized family of instances $G_q$, where the parameter $q$ controls the amplification of a simple gadget. After multiplying by an explicit factor $f(q)$, we show that the values of $f(q) \cdot C(G_q)$, for positive integers $q$, agree with a rational function in $q$ whose numerator and denominator can be interpolated in polynomial time. We then recover a $\#P$-hard function by evaluating this rational function symbolically at a limiting value $L \in \mathbb{Q} \cup \{\infty, -\infty\}$. With this methodology, we show $\#P$-completeness for the following counting problems: (a) successive vertex orderings of bipartite graphs, (b) st-numberings of graphs, (c) shellings of bipartite graphs, (d) linear extensions of N-free posets of height $3$, and (e) linear extensions of posets of height $2$. Result (d) settles a conjecture of Felsner and Manneville (2015). Although result (e) was first proved by Dittmer and Pak (2018), we include an alternative proof, using our technique, that does not rely on the result of Brightwell and Winkler (1991) about the hardness of counting linear extensions for general posets.
Minimum Size of a Poset Realizing $\Z_{2}\times\Z_{2^{n}}$ as its Automorphism Group
We study the realization of finite groups as automorphism groups of finite posets. Given a finite group $G$, let $β(G)$ denote the smallest number of elements in a poset $P$ with $\Aut(P)\cong G$. While $β(G)$ is known for several cyclic and small abelian groups, the non-cyclic abelian case is largely open. In this paper we prove that $β(\Z_{2}\times\Z_{2^{n}})=2^{\,n+1}+2$ for every $n\ge 3$.