arXiv++ Combinatorics

A Walecki tournament is any tournament that can be formed by choosing an orientation for each of the Hamilton cycles in the Walecki decomposition of a complete graph on an odd number of vertices. In this paper, we show that if some arc in a Walecki tournament on at least $7$ vertices lies in exactly one directed triangle, then there is a vertex of the tournament (the vertex typically labelled $*$ in the decomposition) that is fixed under every automorphism of the tournament. Furthermore, any isomorphism between such Walecki tournaments maps the vertex labelled $*$ in one to the vertex labelled $*$ in the other. We also show that among Walecki tournaments with a signature of even length $2k$, of the $2^{2k}$ possible signatures, at least $2^k$ produce tournaments that have an arc that lies in a unique directed triangle (and therefore to which our result applies).

Let $G$ be a $d$-regular graph and let $F\subseteq\{0, 1, 2, \ldots, d\}$ be a list of forbidden out-degrees. Akbari, Dalirrooyfard, Ehsani, Ozeki, and Sherkati conjectured that if $|F|<\tfrac{1}{2}d$, then $G$ should admit an $F$-avoiding orientation, i.e., an orientation where no out-degrees are in the forbidden list $F$. The conjecture is known for $d\leq 4$ due to work of Ma and Lu, and here we extend this to $d\leq 6$. The conjecture has also been studied in a generalized version, where $d, F$ are changed from constant values to functions $d(v), F(v)$ that vary over all $v\in V(G)$. We provide support for this generalized version by verifying it for some new cases, including when $G$ is 2-degenerate and when every $F(v)$ has some specific structure.

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is said to be word-representable if a word $w$ can be formed using the letters of the alphabet $V$ such that for every pair of vertices $x$ and $y$, $xy \in E$ if and only if $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$. A \textit{semi-transitive} orientation is an acyclic directed graph where for any directed path $v_0 \rightarrow v_1 \rightarrow \ldots \rightarrow v_m$, $m \ge 2$ either there is no arc between $v_0$ and $v_m$ or for all $1 \le i < j \le m$ there is an arc between $v_i$ and $v_j$. An undirected graph is semi-transitive if it admits a semi-transitive orientation. For given positive integers $n, a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k$, we consider the undirected circulant graph with set of vertices $\{0, 1, 2, \ldots, n-1\}$ and the set of edges$\{ij ~ | ~ (i - j) \pmod n$ or $(j-i) \pmod n$ are in $\{a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k\}\}$, where $ 0 < a_1 < a_2 < \ldots < a_k < (n+1)/2$. Recently, Kitaev and Pyatkin have shown that every $4$-regular circulant graph is semi-transitive. Further, they have posed an open problem regarding the semi-transitive orientability of circulant graphs for which the elements of the set $\{a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k\}$ are consecutive positive integers. In this paper, we solve the problem mentioned above. In addition, we show that under certain assumptions, some $k(\ge5)$-regular circulant graphs are semi-transitive, and some are not. Moreover, since a semi-transitive orientation is a characterisation of word-representability, we give some upper bound for the representation number of certain $k$-regular circulant graphs.

For a set F of finite tournaments, the F-free orientation problem is the problem of deciding if a given finite undirected graph can be oriented in such a way that the resulting oriented graph does not contain any member of F. Using the theory of smooth approximations, we give a new shorter proof of the complexity dichotomy for such problems obtained recently by Bodirsky and Guzmán-Pro. In fact, our approach yields a complexity dichotomy for a considerably larger class of computational problems where one is given an undirected graph along with additional local constraints on the allowed orientations. Moreover, the border between tractable and hard problems is also described by a decidable algebraic condition.

A tournament $T$ is a tournament completion of a bipartite tournament $D$ if $D$ is a spanning subdigraph of $T$, i.e., $V(D)=V(T)$ and $A(D)\subseteq A(T)$. If $C$ is a $k$-dicycle (i.e., directed cycle of length $k$) in a tournament completion $T$ of $D$ and $C$ is not a dicycle in $D$, i.e., $A(C)\subseteq A(T)$ and $A(C)\not\subseteq A(D)$, then we call $C$ an augmented $k$-dicycle of $T$. In this paper, we investigate the families of bipartite tournaments for which there exists a tournament completion with exactly one augmented $3$-dicycle and with no augmented $4$-dicycles. Our investigation may be viewed as a variant of the orientation completion problem initiated by Bang-Jensen et al..

For most problems pertaining to perfect matchings, one may restrict attention to matching covered graphs - that is, connected nontrivial graphs with the property that each edge belongs to some perfect matching. There is extensive literature on these graphs that are also known as 1-extendable graphs (since each edge extends to a perfect matching) including an ear decomposition theorem due to Lovász and Plummer. A cycle $C$ of a graph $G$ is conformal if $G-V(C)$ has a perfect matching; such cycles play an important role in the study of perfect matchings, especially when investigating the Pfaffian orientation problem. A matching covered graph $G$ is cycle-extendable if - for each even cycle $C$ - the cycle $C$ is conformal, or equivalently, each perfect matching of $C$ extends to a perfect matching of $G$, or equivalently, $C$ is the symmetric difference of two perfect matchings of $G$, or equivalently, $C$ extends to an ear decomposition of $G$. In the literature, these are also known as cycle-nice or as 1-cycle resonant graphs. Zhang, Wang, Yuan, Ng and Cheng, 2022, provided a characterization of claw-free cycle-extendable graphs. Guo and Zhang, 2004, and independently Zhang and Li, 2012, provided characterizations of bipartite planar cycle-extendable graphs. In this paper, we establish a characterization of all planar cycle-extendable graphs - in terms of $K_2$ and four infinite families.

An oriented graph is a digraph obtained from an undirected graph by choosing an orientation for each edge. Given a positive integer $n$ and an oriented graph $F$, the oriented Tur$\acute{\rm a}$n number $ex_{ori}(n,F)$ is the maximum number of arcs in an $F$-free oriented graph of order $n$. In this paper, we investigate the oriented Tur$\acute{\rm a}$n number $ex_{ori}(n, \overrightarrow{S_{k,1}} )$, where $\overrightarrow{S_{k,1}}$ is the $1$-subdivision of the in-star of order $k+1$. We determine $ex_{ori}(n,\overrightarrow{S_{k,1}}) $ for $k=2,3$ as well as the extremal oriented graphs. For $k\ge 4$, we establish a lower bound and an upper bound on $ex_{ori}(n,\overrightarrow{S_{k,1}})$.

In an oriented graph $\vec{G}$, the inversion of a subset $X$ of vertices consists in reversing the orientation of all arcs with both endvertices in $X$. The inversion graph of a labelled graph $G$, denoted by ${\mathcal{I}}(G)$, is the graph whose vertices are the labelled orientations of $G$ in which two labelled orientations $\vec{G}_1$ and $\vec{G}_2$ of $G$ are adjacent if and only if there is an inversion $X$ transforming $\vec{G}_1$ into $\vec{G}_2$. In this paper, we study the inversion diameter of a graph which is the diameter of its inversion graph denoted by $diam(\mathcal{I}(G))$. We show that the inversion diameter is tied to the star chromatic number, the acyclic chromatic number and the oriented chromatic number. Thus a graph class has bounded inversion diameter if and only if it also has bounded star chromatic number, acyclic chromatic number and oriented chromatic number. We give some upper bounds on the inversion diameter of a graph $G$ contained in one of the following graph classes: planar graphs ($diam(\mathcal{I}(G)) \leq 12$), planar graphs of girth 8 ($diam(\mathcal{I}(G)) \leq 3$), graphs with maximum degree $Δ$ ($diam(\mathcal{I}(G)) \leq 2Δ-1$), graphs with treewidth at mots $t$ ($diam(\mathcal{I}(G)) \leq 2t$). We also show that determining the inversion diameter of a given graph is NP-hard.

The shrinking operation converts a hypergraph into a graph by choosing, from each hyperedge, two endvertices of a corresponding graph edge. A hypertree is a hypergraph which can be shrunk to a tree on the same vertex set. Klimošová and Thomassé [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 156 (2022), 250--293] proved (as a tool to obtain their main result on edge-decompositions of graphs into paths of equal length) that any rank $3$ hypertree $T$ can be shrunk to a tree where the degree of each vertex is at least $1/100$ times its degree in $T$. We prove a stronger and a more general bound, replacing the constant $1/100$ with $1/2k$ when the rank is $k$. In place of entropy compression (used by Klimošová and Thomassé), we use a hypergraph orientation lemma combined with a characterisation of edge-coloured graphs admitting rainbow spanning trees.

This paper first discusses the size and orientation of hat supertiles. Fibonacci and Lucas sequences, as well as a third integer sequence linearly related to the Lucas sequence are involved. The result is then generalized to any aperiodic tile in the hat family.

A complex unit gain graph (or a $\mathbb{T}$-gain graph) $Θ(Σ,\varphi)$ is a graph where the unit complex number is assign by a function $\varphi$ to every oriented edge of $Σ$ and assign its inverse to the opposite orientation. In this paper, we define the two gain distance Laplacian matrices $DL^{\max}_{<}(Θ)$ and $DL^{\min}_{<}(Θ)$ corresponding to the two gain distance matrices $D^{\max}_{<}(Θ)$ and $D^{\min}_{<}(Θ)$ defined for $\mathbb{T}$-gain graphs $Θ(Σ,\varphi)$, for any vertex ordering $(V(Σ),<)$. Furthermore, we provide the characterization of singularity and find formulas for the rank of those Laplacian matrices. We also establish two types of characterization for balanced in complex unit gain graphs while using the gain distance Lapalcian matrices. Most of the results are derived by proving them more generally for weighted $\mathbb{T}$-gain graphs.

Fair division is the problem of allocating a set of items among agents in a fair manner. One of the most sought-after fairness notions is envy-freeness (EF), requiring that no agent envies another's allocation. When items are indivisible, it ceases to exist, and envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) emerged as one of its strongest relaxations. The existence of EFX allocations is arguably the biggest open question within fair division. Recently, Christodoulou, Fiat, Koutsoupias, and Sgouritsa (EC 2023) showed that EFX allocations exist for the case of graphical valuations where an instance is represented by a graph: nodes are agents, edges are goods, and each agent values only her incident edges. On the other hand, they showed NP-hardness for checking the existence of EFX orientation where every edge is allocated to one of its incident vertices, and asked for a characterization of graphs that exhibit EFX orientation regardless of the assigned valuations. In this paper, we make significant progress toward answering their question. We introduce the notion of strongly EFX orientable graphs -- graphs that have EFX orientations regardless of how much agents value the edges. We show a surprising connection between this property and the chromatic number $χ(G)$ of the graph $G$. In particular, we show that graphs with $χ(G)\le 2$ are strongly EFX orientable, and those with $χ(G)>3$ are not strongly EFX orientable. We provide examples of strongly EFX orientable and non-strongly EFX orientable graphs of $χ(G)=3$ to prove tightness. Finally, we give a complete characterization of strong EFX orientability when restricted to binary valuations.

For an oriented graph $D$ and a set $X\subseteq V(D)$, the inversion of $X$ in $D$ is the graph obtained from $D$ by reversing the orientation of each edge that has both endpoints in $X$. Define the inversion number of $D$, denoted $\mathrm{inv}(D)$, to be the minimum number of inversions required to obtain an acyclic oriented graph from $D$. The dijoin, denoted $D_1\rightarrow D_2$, of two oriented graphs $D_1$ and $D_2$ is constructed by taking vertex-disjoint copies of $D_1$ and $D_2$ and adding all edges from $D_1$ to $D_2$. We show that $\mathrm{inv}({D_1 \rightarrow D_2}) > \mathrm{inv}(D_1)$, for any oriented graphs $D_1$ and $D_2$ such that $\mathrm{inv}(D_1) = \mathrm{inv}(D_2) \ge 1$. This resolves a question of Aubian, Havet, Hörsch, Klingelhoefer, Nisse, Rambaud and Vermande. Our proof proceeds via a natural connection between the graph inversion number and the subgraph complementation number.

We show that if $D$ is an $n$-vertex digraph with more than $(k-1)n$ arcs that does not contain any of three forbidden digraphs, then $D$ contains every antidirected tree on $k$ arcs. The forbidden digraphs are those orientations of $K_{2, \lceil k/12\rceil}$ where each of the vertices in the class of size two has either out-degree $0$ or in-degree $0$. This proves a conjecture of Addario-Berry et al. for a broad class of digraphs, and generalises a result for $K_{2, \lfloor k/12\rfloor}$-free graphs by Balasubramanian and Dobson. We also show that every digraph $D$ on $n$ vertices with more than $(k-1)n$ arcs contains every antidirected $k$-arc caterpillar, thus solving the above conjecture for caterpillars. This generalises a result of Perles.

This is a book on higher-categorical diagrams, including pasting diagrams. It aims to provide a thorough and modern reference on the subject, collecting, revisiting and expanding results scattered across the literature, informed by recent advances and practical experience with higher-dimensional diagram rewriting. We approach the subject as a kind of directed combinatorial topology: a diagram is a map from a "directed cell complex", encoded combinatorially as a face poset together with orientation data. Unlike previous expositions, we adopt from the beginning a functorial viewpoint, focussing on morphisms and categorical constructions. We do not tie ourselves to a specific model of higher categories, and instead treat diagrams as independent combinatorial structures that admit functorial interpretations in various contexts. Topics covered include the theory of layerings of diagrams; acyclicity properties and their consequences; constructions including Gray products, suspensions, and joins; special shapes such as globes, oriented simplices, cubes, and positive opetopes; the interpretation of diagrams in strict omega-categories and their geometric realisation as simplicial and CW complexes; and Steiner's theory of directed chain complexes.

We compute an explicit formula for the antipode of the double bialgebra of graphs in terms of totally acyclic partial orientations, using some general results on double bialgebras. In analogy to what was already proven in Hopf-algebraic terms for the chromatic polynomial of a graph, we show that the Fortuin-Kasteleyn polynomial (a variant of the Tutte polynomial) is a morphism of the double algebra of graphs into that of polynomials, which generalizes the chromatic polynomial. When specialized at particular values, we give combinatorial interpretations of the Tutte polynomial of a graph, via covering graphs and covering forests, and of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn polynomial, via pairs of vertex--edge colorings. Finally we show that the map associating to a graph all its orientations is a Hopf morphism from the double bialgebra of graphs into that one of oriented graphs, allowing to give interpretations of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn polynomial when computed at negative values.

Let $G$ be a graph and $g,f:V(G)\to2^N$ be two set functions such that $g(v)\le f(v)$ and $g(v)\equiv f(v)\pmod 2$ for every $v\in V(G)$. An orientation $O$ of $G$ is called a $(g,f)$-parity orientation if $g(v)\le d^+_O(v)\le f(v)$ and $g(v)\equiv d^+_O(v)\pmod 2$ for every $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we give a Tutte-type characterization for a graph to have a $(g,f)$-parity orientation.

We present two graph drawing algorithms based on the recently defined "grand-Schnyder woods", which are a far-reaching generalization of the classical Schnyder woods. The first is a straight-line drawing algorithm for plane graphs with faces of degree 3 and 4 with no separating 3-cycle, while the second is a rectangular drawing algorithm for the dual of such plane graphs. In our algorithms, the coordinates of the vertices are defined in a global manner, based on the underlying grand-Schnyder woods. The grand-Schnyder woods and drawings are computed in linear time. When specializing our algorithms to special classes of plane graphs, we recover the following known algorithms: (1) He's algorithm for rectangular drawing of 3-valent plane graphs, based on transversal structures, (2) Fusy's algorithm for the straight-line drawing of triangulations of the square, based on transversal structures, (3) Bernardi and Fusy's algorithm for the orthogonal drawing of 4-valent plane graphs, based on 2-orientations, (4) Barriere and Huemer's algorithm for the straight-line drawing of quadrangulations, based on separating decompositions. Our contributions therefore provide a unifying perspective on a large family of graph drawing algorithms that were originally defined on different classes of plane graphs and were based on seemingly different combinatorial structures.

We give a proof of Ollinger's conjecture that the problem of tiling the plane with translated copies of a set of $8$ polyominoes is undecidable. The techniques employed in our proof include a different orientation for simulating the Wang tiles in polyomino and a new method for encoding the colors of Wang tiles.

The online list coloring game is a two-player graph-coloring game played on a graph $G$ as follows. On each turn, a Lister reveals a new color $c$ at some subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of uncolored vertices, and then a Painter chooses an independent subset of $S$ to which to assign $c$. As the game is played, the revealed colors at each vertex $v \in V(G)$ form a color set $L(v)$, often called a list. The paintability of $G$ measures the minimum value $k$ for which Painter has a strategy to complete a coloring of $G$ in such a way that $|L(v)| \leq k$ for each vertex $v \in V(G)$. The paintability of a graph is an upper bound for its list chromatic number, or choosability. The online list coloring game is a special case of the DP-painting game, which is defined similarly using the setting of DP-coloring. In the DP-painting game, the Lister reveals correspondence covers of a graph $G$ rather than colors, and the Painter chooses independent subsets of these covers. The DP-painting game has a parameter known as DP-paintability which is analogous to paintability. In this paper, we consider upper bounds for the paintability and DP-paintability of a graph $G$ with large maximum degree $Δ$ and chromatic number at most some fixed value $r$. We prove that the paintability of $G$ is at most $\left(1 - \frac{1}{4r+1} \right ) Δ+ 2$ and that the DP-paintability of $G$ is at most $Δ- Ω( \sqrt{Δ\log Δ})$. We prove our first upper bound using Alon-Tarsi orientations, and we prove our second upper bound by considering the strict type-$3$ degeneracy parameter recently introduced by Zhou, Zhu, and Zhu.