bipartite graph
2514 papers tagged with this keyword
Proper conflict-free list-coloring, odd minors, subdivisions, and layered treewidth
Published in Discrete Math. 347 (2024), 113668
• View Publication
• BIB
Proper conflict-free coloring is an intermediate notion between proper coloring of a graph and proper coloring of its square. It is a proper coloring such that for every non-isolated vertex, there exists a color appearing exactly once in its (open) neighborhood. Typical examples of graphs with large proper conflict-free chromatic number include graphs with large chromatic number and bipartite graphs isomorphic to the $1$-subdivision of graphs with large chromatic number. In this paper, we prove two rough converse statements that hold even in the list-coloring setting. The first is for sparse graphs: for every graph $H$, there exists an integer $c_H$ such that every graph with no subdivision of $H$ is (properly) conflict-free $c_H$-choosable. The second applies to dense graphs: every graph with large conflict-free choice number either contains a large complete graph as an odd minor or contains a bipartite induced subgraph that has large conflict-free choice number. These give two incomparable (partial) answers of a question of Caro, Petruševski and Škrekovski. We also prove quantitatively better bounds for minor-closed families, implying some known results about proper conflict-free coloring and odd coloring in the literature. Moreover, we prove that every graph with layered treewidth at most $w$ is (properly) conflict-free $(8w-1)$-choosable. This result applies to $(g,k)$-planar graphs, which are graphs whose coloring problems have attracted attention recently.
On Factors with Prescribed Degrees in Bipartite Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We establish a new criterion for a bigraph to have a subgraph with prescribed degree conditions. We show that the bigraph $G[X,Y]$ has a spanning subgraph $F$ such that $g(x)\leq deg_F(x) \leq f(x)$ for $x\in X$ and $deg_F(y) \leq f(y)$ for $y\in Y$ if and only if $\sum\nolimits_{b\in B} f(b)\geq \sum\nolimits_{a\in A} \max \big\{0, g(a) - deg_{G-B}(a)\big\}$ for $A\subseteq X, B\subseteq Y$. Using Folkman-Fulkerson's Theorem, Cymer and Kano found a different criterion for the existence of such a subgraph (Graphs Combin. 32 (2016), 2315--2322). Our proof is self-contained and relies on alternating path technique. As an application, we prove the following extension of Hall's theorem. A bigraph $G[X,Y]$ in which each edge has multiplcity at least $m$ has a subgraph $F$ with $g(x)\leq deg_F(x)\leq f(x)\leq deg(x)$ for $x\in X$, $deg_F(y)\leq m$ for $y\in Y$ if and only if $\sum_{y\in N_G(S)}f(y)\geq \sum_{x\in S}g(x)$ for $S\subseteq X$.
Neighbour sum distinguishing edge-weightings with local constraints
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A $k$-edge-weighting of $G$ is a mapping $ω:E(G)\longrightarrow \{1,\ldots,k\}$. The edge-weighting of $G$ naturally induces a vertex-colouring $σ_ω:V(G)\longrightarrow \mathbb{N}$ given by$σ_ω(v)=\sum_{u\in N_G(v)}ω(vu)$ for every $v\in V(G)$. The edge-weighting $ω$ is neighbour sum distinguishing if it yields a proper vertex-colouring $σ_ω$, \emph{i.e.}, $σ_ω(u)\neq σ_ω(v)$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$.We investigate a neighbour sum distinguishing edge-weighting with local constraints, namely, we assume that the set of edges incident to a vertex of large degree is not monochromatic. A graph is nice if it has no components isomorphic to $K_2$. We prove that every nice graph with maximum degree at most~5 admits a neighbour sum distinguishing $(Δ(G)+2)$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Furthermore, we prove that every nice graph admits a neighbour sum distinguishing $7$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~6 are incident with at least two edges of different weights. Finally, we show that nice bipartite graphs admit a neighbour sum distinguishing $6$-edge-weighting such that all the vertices of degree at least~2 are incident with at least two edges of different weights.
Analysis of a Gray-Box Operator for Vertex Cover
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Combinatorial optimization problems are a prominent application area of evolutionary algorithms, where the (1+1) EA is one of the most investigated. We extend this algorithm by introducing some problem knowledge with a specialized mutation operator which works under the assumption that the number of 1s of a solution is critical, as frequently happens in combinatorial optimization. This slight modification increases the chance to correct wrongly placed bits while preserving the simplicity and problem independence of the (1+1) EA. As an application of our algorithm we examine the vertex cover problem on certain instances, where we show that it leads to asymptotically better runtimes and even finds with higher probability optimal solutions in comparison with the usual (1+1) EA. Precisely, we compare the performance of both algorithms on paths and on complete bipartite graphs of size $n$. Regarding the path we prove that, for a particular initial configuration, the \alg1+1 takes in expectation $Θ(n^4)$ iterations while the modification reduces this to $Θ(n^3)$, and present experimental evidence that such a configuration is reached. Concerning the complete bipartite graph our modification finds the optimum in polynomial time with probability $1-1/2^{Ω(n^ξ)}$ for every positive constant $ξ< 1$, which improves the known probability of $1-1/\text{poly}(n)$ for the (1+1) EA..
Coloring graphs with forbidden almost bipartite subgraphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov conjectured in 1999 that for every finite graph $F$, there exists a quantity $c(F)$ such that $χ(G) \leq (c(F) + o(1)) Δ/ \logΔ$ whenever $G$ is an $F$-free graph of maximum degree $Δ$. The largest class of connected graphs $F$ for which this conjecture has been verified so far, by Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov themselves, comprises the almost bipartite graphs (i.e., subgraphs of the complete tripartite graph $K_{1,t,t}$ for some $t \in \mathbb{N}$). However, the optimal value for $c(F)$ remains unknown even for such graphs. Bollobás showed, using random regular graphs, that $c(F) \geq 1/2$ when $F$ contains a cycle. On the other hand, Davies, Kang, Pirot, and Sereni recently established an upper bound of $c(K_{1,t,t}) \leq t$. We improve this to a uniform constant, showing $c(F) \leq 4$ for every almost bipartite graph $F$. This surprisingly makes the bound independent of $F$ in all the known cases of the conjecture. We also establish a more general version of our bound in the setting of DP-coloring (also known as correspondence coloring) and consider some algorithmic consequences of our results.
Saturation of Ordered Graphs
Recently, the saturation problem of $0$-$1$ matrices gained a lot of attention. This problem can be regarded as a saturation problem of ordered bipartite graphs. Motivated by this, we initiate the study of the saturation problem of ordered and cyclically ordered graphs.
We prove that dichotomy holds also in these two cases, i.e., for a (cyclically) ordered graph its saturation function is either bounded or linear. We also determine the order of magnitude for large classes of (cyclically) ordered graphs, giving infinite many examples exhibiting both possible behaviours, answering a problem of Pálvölgyi. In particular, in the ordered case we define a natural subclass of ordered matchings, the class of linked matchings, and we start their systematic study, concentrating on linked matchings with at most three links and prove that many of them have bounded saturation function.
In both the ordered and cyclically ordered case we also consider the semisaturation problem, where dichotomy holds as well and we can even fully characterize the graphs that have bounded semisaturation function.
A note on the conflict-free chromatic index
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $G$ be a graph with maximum degree $Δ$ and without isolated vertices. An edge colouring $c$ of $G$ is conflict-free if the closed neighbourhood of every edge includes a uniquely coloured element. The least number of colours admitting such $c$ is the conflict-free chromatic index of $G$, denoted by $χ'_{CF}(G)$. In "Conflict-free chromatic number versus conflict-free chromatic index" [J. Graph Theory, 2022; 99: 349--358] it was recently proved by means of the probabilistic method that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq C_1\log_2Δ+C_2$, where $C_1>337$ and $C_2$ are constants, whereas there are families of graphs with $χ'_{CF}(G)\geq (1-o(1))\log_2Δ$. In this note we provide an explicit simple proof of the fact that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2Δ+1$, which is a corollary of a stronger result: $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2χ(G)+1$. For this aim we prove a few auxiliary observations, implying in particular that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 4$ for bipartite graphs.
The $m$-bipartite Ramsey number of the $K_{2,2}$ versus $K_{6,6}$
Given bipartite graphs $G_1, \ldots, G_n$, the bipartite Ramsey number $BR(G_1,\ldots, G_n)$ is the last integer $b$ such that any complete bipartite graph $K_{b,b}$ with edges coloured with colours $1,2,\ldots,n$ contains a copy of some $G_i$ ($1\leq i\leq n$) where all edges of $G_i$ have colour $i$. As another view of bipartite Ramsey numbers, for given bipartite graphs $G_1, \ldots, G_n$ and a positive integer $m$, the $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(G_1, \ldots, G_n)$, is defined as the least integer $b$, such that any complete bipartite graph $K_{m,b}$ with edges coloured with colours $1,2,\ldots,n$ contains a copy of some $G_i$ ($1\leq i\leq n$) where all edges of $G_i$ have colour $i$. The size of $BR_m(G_1, G_2)$, where $G_1=K_{2,2}$ and $G_2\in \{K_{3,3}, K_{4,4}\}$ for each $m$ and the size of $BR_m(K_{3,3}, K_{3,3})$ and $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{5,5})$ for special values of $m$, have been determined in several article up to now. In this article, we compute the size of $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{6,6})$ for some $m\geq 2$.
Exact Matching in Graphs of Bounded Independence Number
In the Exact Matching Problem (EM), we are given a graph equipped with a fixed coloring of its edges with two colors (red and blue), as well as a positive integer $k$. The task is then to decide whether the given graph contains a perfect matching exactly $k$ of whose edges have color red. EM generalizes several important algorithmic problems such as perfect matching and restricted minimum weight spanning tree problems. When introducing the problem in 1982, Papadimitriou and Yannakakis conjectured EM to be $\textbf{NP}$-complete. Later however, Mulmuley et al.~presented a randomized polynomial time algorithm for EM, which puts EM in $\textbf{RP}$. Given that to decide whether or not $\textbf{RP}=\textbf{P}$ represents a big open challenge in complexity theory, this makes it unlikely for EM to be $\textbf{NP}$-complete, and in fact indicates the possibility of a deterministic polynomial time algorithm. EM remains one of the few natural combinatorial problems in $\textbf{RP}$ which are not known to be contained in $\textbf{P}$, making it an interesting instance for testing the hypothesis $\textbf{RP}=\textbf{P}$. Despite EM being quite well-known, attempts to devise deterministic polynomial algorithms have remained illusive during the last 40 years and progress has been lacking even for very restrictive classes of input graphs. In this paper we finally push the frontier of positive results forward by proving that EM can be solved in deterministic polynomial time for input graphs of bounded independence number, and for bipartite input graphs of bounded bipartite independence number. This generalizes previous positive results for complete (bipartite) graphs which were the only known results for EM on dense graphs.
Matching Theory and Barnette's Conjecture
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Barnette's Conjecture claims that all cubic, 3-connected, planar, bipartite graphs are Hamiltonian. We give a translation of this conjecture into the matching-theoretic setting. This allows us to relax the requirement of planarity to give the equivalent conjecture that all cubic, 3-connected, Pfaffian, bipartite graphs are Hamiltonian.
A graph, other than the path of length three, is a brace if it is bipartite and any two disjoint edges are part of a perfect matching. Our perspective allows us to observe that Barnette's Conjecture can be reduced to cubic, planar braces. We show a similar reduction to braces for cubic, 3-connected, bipartite graphs regarding four stronger versions of Hamiltonicity. Note that in these cases we do not need planarity. As a practical application of these results, we provide some supplements to a generation procedure for cubic, 3-connected, planar, bipartite graphs discovered by Holton et al. [Hamiltonian Cycles in Cubic 3-Connected Bipartite Planar Graphs, JCTB, 1985]. These allow us to check whether a graph we generated is a brace.
Odd Covers of Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Given a finite simple graph $G$, an odd cover of $G$ is a collection of complete bipartite graphs, or bicliques, in which each edge of $G$ appears in an odd number of bicliques and each non-edge of $G$ appears in an even number of bicliques. We denote the minimum cardinality of an odd cover of $G$ by $b_2(G)$ and prove that $b_2(G)$ is bounded below by half of the rank over $\mathbb{F}_2$ of the adjacency matrix of $G$. We show that this lower bound is tight in the case when $G$ is a bipartite graph and almost tight when $G$ is an odd cycle. However, we also present an infinite family of graphs which shows that this lower bound can be arbitrarily far away from $b_2(G)$.
Babai and Frankl (1992) proposed the "odd cover problem," which in our language is equivalent to determining $b_2(K_n)$. Radhakrishnan, Sen, and Vishwanathan (2000) determined $b_2(K_n)$ for an infinite but density zero subset of positive integers $n$. In this paper, we determine $b_2(K_n)$ for a density $3/8$ subset of the positive integers.
The $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(K_{2,2},K_{5,5})$
The bipartite Ramsey number $BR(H_1,H_2,\ldots,H_k)$, is the smallest positive integer $b$, such that each $k$-decomposition of $E(K_{b,b})$ contains $H_i$ in the $i$-th class for some $i, 1\leq i\leq k$. As another view of bipartite Ramsey numbers, for given two bipartite graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ and a positive integer $m$, the $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(H_1, H_2)$, is defined as the least integer $n$, such that any subgraph of $K_{m,n}$ say $H$, results in $H_1\subseteq H$ or $H_2\subseteq \overline{H}$. The size of $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{3,3})$, $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{4,4})$ for each $m$, and the size of $BR_m(K_{3,3}, K_{3,3})$ for some $m$, have been determined in several papers up to now. Also, it is shown that $BR(K_{2,2}, K_{5,5})=17$. In this article, we compute the size of $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{5,5})$ for some $m\geq 2$.
A bound on the dissociation number
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The dissociation number ${\rm diss}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the maximum order of a set of vertices of $G$ inducing a subgraph that is of maximum degree at most $1$. Computing the dissociation number of a given graph is algorithmically hard even when restricted to subcubic bipartite graphs. For a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, $k$ components, and $c_1$ induced cycles of length $1$ modulo $3$, we show ${\rm diss}(G)\geq n-\frac{1}{3}\Big(m+k+c_1\Big)$. Furthermore, we characterize the extremal graphs in which every two cycles are vertex-disjoint.
Using Edge Contractions and Vertex Deletions to Reduce the Independence Number and the Clique Number
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We consider the following problem: for a given graph G and two integers k and d, can we apply a fixed graph operation at most k times in order to reduce a given graph parameter $π$ by at least d? We show that this problem is NP-hard when the parameter is the independence number and the graph operation is vertex deletion or edge contraction, even for fixed d=1 and when restricted to chordal graphs. We also give a polynomial time algorithm for bipartite graphs when the operation is edge contraction, the parameter is the independence number and d is fixed. Further, we complete the complexity dichotomy on H-free graphs when the parameter is the clique number and the operation is edge contraction by showing that this problem is NP-hard in ($C_3+P_1$)-free graphs even for fixed d=1. Our results answer several open questions stated in [Diner et al., Theoretical Computer Science, 746, p. 49-72 (2012)].
Counterexamples to the characterisation of graphs with equal independence and annihilation number
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We disprove the characterisation of graphs with equal independence and annihilation number by Larson and Pepper (2011). Series of counterexamples with arbitrary number of vertices, arbitrary number of components, arbitrary large independence number and arbitrary large difference between the critical and the regular independence number are provided. Furthermore, we point out the error in the proof of the theorem. However, we show that the theorem still holds for bipartite graphs and connected claw-free graphs.
Hypergraph removal with polynomial bounds
Published in Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 178 (2025) 321-330
• View Publication
• BIB
Given a fixed $k$-uniform hypergraph $F$, the $F$-removal lemma states that every hypergraph with few copies of $F$ can be made $F$-free by the removal of few edges. Unfortunately, for general $F$, the constants involved are given by incredibly fast-growing Ackermann-type functions. It is thus natural to ask for which $F$ one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. One trivial case where such bounds can be obtained is when $F$ is $k$-partite. Alon proved that when $k=2$ (i.e. when dealing with graphs), only bipartite graphs have a polynomial removal lemma. Kohayakawa, Nagle and Rödl conjectured in 2002 that Alon's result can be extended to all $k>2$, namely, that the only $k$-graphs $F$ for which the hypergraph removal lemma has polynomial bounds are the trivial cases when $F$ is $k$-partite. In this paper we prove this conjecture.
Combinatorial aspects of sandpile models on wheel and fan graphs
Published in European Journal of Combinatorics, Volume 110, May 2023
• View Publication
• BIB
We study combinatorial aspects of the sandpile model on wheel and fan graphs, seeking bijective characterisations of the model's recurrent configurations on these families. For wheel graphs, we exhibit a bijection between these recurrent configurations and the set of subgraphs of the cycle graph which maps the level of the configuration to the number of edges of the subgraph. This bijection relies on two key ingredients. The first consists in considering a stochastic variant of the standard Abelian sandpile model (ASM), rather than the ASM itself. The second ingredient is a mapping from a given recurrent state to a canonical minimal recurrent state, exploiting similar ideas to previous studies of the ASM on complete bipartite graphs and Ferrers graphs. We also show that on the wheel graph with $2n$ vertices, the number of recurrent states with level $n$ is given by the first differences of the central Delannoy numbers. Finally, using similar tools, we exhibit a bijection between the set of recurrent configurations of the ASM on fan graphs and the set of subgraphs of the path graph containing the right-most vertex of the path. We show that these sets are also equinumerous with certain lattice paths, which we name Kimberling paths after the author of the corresponding entry in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.
Extremal graphs for edge blow-up of lollipops
Given a graph $H$ and an integer $p$ ($p\geq 2$), the edge blow-up $H^{p+1}$ of $H$ is the graph obtained from replacing each edge in $H$ by a clique of order $(p+1)$, where the new vertices of the cliques are all distinct. The Turán numbers for edge blow-up of matchings were first studied by Erdős and Moon. Very recently some substantial progress of the extremal graphs for $H^{p+1}$ of larger $p$ has been made by Yuan. The range of Turán numbers for edge blow-up of all bipartite graphs when $p\geq 3$ and the exact Turán numbers for edge blow-up of all non-bipartite graphs when $p\geq χ(H) +1$ has been determined by Yuan (2022), where $χ(H)$ is the chromatic number of $H$. A lollipop $C_{k,\;\ell}$ is the graph obtained from a cycle $C_k$ by appending a path $P_{\ell+1}$ to one of its vertices. In this paper, we consider the extremal graphs for $C_{k,\;\ell}^{p+1}$ of the rest cases $p=2$ and $p=3$.
Exact values for unbalanced Zarankiewicz numbers
Published in J. Graph Theory 106 (2024), 81-109
• View Publication
• BIB
For positive integers $s$, $t$, $m$ and $n$, the Zarankiewicz number $Z_{s,t}(m,n)$ is defined to be the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with parts of sizes $m$ and $n$ that has no complete biparitite subgraph containing $s$ vertices in the part of size $m$ and $t$ vertices in the part of size $n$. A simple argument shows that, for each $t \geq 2$, $Z_{2,t}(m,n)=(t-1)\binom{m}{2}+n$ when $n \geq (t-1)\binom{m}{2}$. Here, for large $m$, we determine the exact value of $Z_{2,t}(m,n)$ in almost all of the remaining cases where $n=Θ(tm^2)$. We establish a new family of upper bounds on $Z_{2,t}(m,n)$ which complement a family already obtained by Roman. We then prove that the floor of the best of these bounds is almost always achieved. We also show that there are cases in which this floor cannot be achieved and others in which determining whether it is achieved is likely a very hard problem. Our results are proved by viewing the problem through the lens of linear hypergraphs and our constructions make use of existing results on edge decompositions of dense graphs.
The $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(H_1,H_2)$
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
In a $(G^1,G^2)$ coloring of a graph $G$, every edge of $G$ is in $G^1$ or $G^2$. For two bipartite graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$, the bipartite Ramsey number $BR(H_1, H_2)$ is the least integer $b\geq 1$, such that for every $(G^1, G^2)$ coloring of the complete bipartite graph $K_{b,b}$, results in either $H_1\subseteq G^1$ or $H_2\subseteq G^2$. As another view, for bipartite graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ and a positive integer $m$, the $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(H_1, H_2)$ of $H_1$ and $H_2$ is the least integer $n$, such that every subgraph $G$ of $K_{m,n}$ results in $H_1\subseteq G$ or $H_2\subseteq \overline{G}$. The size of $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{2,2})$, the size of $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{3,3})$ and the size of $m$-bipartite Ramsey number $BR_m(K_{3,3}, K_{3,3})$ have been computed in several articles up to now. In this paper we determine the exact value of $BR_m(K_{2,2}, K_{4,4})$ for each $m\geq 2$.