arXiv++ Combinatorics

A famous conjecture of Anton Kotzig states that for every even integer $n\ge 4$, the complete graph $K_n$ of order $n$ can be decomposed into $n - 1$ perfect matchings such that every pair of these matchings forms a Hamilton cycle. Despite the great interest, the conjecture is far from being solved. Here we show that the conjecture holds asymptotically, namely that $K_n$ can be decomposed into $n-1$ perfect matchings such that $(1-o(1))n$ of them have the property that any pair forms a Hamilton cycle.

We investigate the minimum size of finite abelian Cayley graphs that admit an isometric embedding of a finite connected graph. While every connected graph on n vertices embeds isometrically into a binary Cayley graph of dimension at most n-1, the smallest possible abelian host has remained largely unexplored. We establish fundamental lower bounds showing that every binary host has dimension at least max(diam(G), floor(log2 n)), whereas every finite abelian host has order at least max(n, 2^diam(G)). Moreover, we prove that the minimum host order equals n if and only if G is itself an abelian Cayley graph. Exact binary dimensions are obtained for several important graph families. Hypercubes, complete graphs of order 2^k, and even cycles attain the lower bound. For stars we prove k_min(K1,q)=floor(log2 q)+1 using maximum sum-free sets, yielding an exponential improvement over the naive and isometric dimensions. For odd cycles we prove k_min(Cm)=m-1 for all m<17 and reduce the general case to a cyclic-interval lemma, showing that the universal upper bound is tight. Our computational contribution is a certified exhaustive census of all 995 connected graphs with 2<=n<=7 vertices under general abelian compactifications. The data reveal an "abelian dividend": 569 graphs (57 percent) admit a strictly smaller abelian host than the best binary host, 707 (71 percent) admit an optimal host containing a cyclic factor Zm with m>2, and only 17 graphs attain the theoretical order floor max(n,2^diam(G)). These results demonstrate that compact non-binary abelian hosts are typical rather than exceptional, while binary hosts remain the universal worst-case construction. 2020 MSC:05C12, 05C25, 05C30, 11B75, 20K01

Network realignment complexes were introduced by Kozlov. We generalise their definition to arbitrary connected base graphs. For a connected graph $G$, we characterise the connected components of the associated network realignment complex $X_G$ and show that $X_G$ admits an $\operatorname{Aut}(G)$-equivariant strong deformation retraction onto the disjoint union of a complete graph and a discrete $\operatorname{Aut}(G)$-space. For the complete base graph $K_n$, we study the metric structure of the network realignment graph $\mathcal{G}_n$ and obtain explicit upper and lower bounds for its diameter. Finally, we prove that $X_n$ is a cubical flag complex and that every automorphism of $X_n$ is induced by a relabelling of the underlying vertex set. In particular, $\operatorname{Aut}(X_n)\cong S_n$ for all $n\geq 5$.

The Graham-Pollak theorem says that one needs at least $n - 1$ complete bipartite graphs to cover each edge of a complete graph $K_{n}$ on $n$ vertices exactly once. The odd cover problem is a parity analogue which seeks the minimum number of complete bipartite graphs, denoted by $b_2(n)$, such that each edge of $ K_n $ is covered an odd number of times. An odd cover of a complte 3-graph $K_n^{(3)}$ on $n$ vertices is a family of complete $3$-partite $3$-graphs such that every triple is covered an odd number of times. Let $b_3(n)$ be the minimum size of such a family. The values of $b_2(n)$ and $b_3(n)$ are determined for some $n$ in several previous works. In this paper, we first determine the value of $b_2(n)$ for all $n$, which confirms a conjecture due to Buchanan et al. (JGT, 2026), and then show $b_3(n+1)=b_2(n)$ by which the value of $b_3(n)$ is determined for all $n$, that resolves a question posed by Leader and Tan (EJC, 2026).

Throughout, all graphs are simple, finite and have vertex sets of the form $\{ 0, 1, 2, \ldots, n - 1 \}$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$. For graphs $G$ and $H$, and a permutation group $Γ$ on the vertex set of $H$, we say that $H$ is $Γ$-embeddable in $G$ if there exists a graph homomorphism from $H$ to $G$ of the form $ψ\circ \varphi$, where $\varphi \in Γ$ and $ψ$ is an increasing injection. Recently, standard and ordered Ramsey numbers of graphs were unified through the introduction of permutational Ramsey numbers, defined as follows. For graphs $H_1, H_2, \ldots, H_k$ and permutation groups $Γ_1, Γ_2, \ldots, Γ_k$ on their respective vertex sets, the permutational Ramsey number $R(H_1^{Γ_1}, H_2^{Γ_2}, \ldots, H_k^{Γ_k})$ is the minimum $n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for every $k$-edge-coloring of a complete graph on $n$ vertices, there exists some $j \in \{1, 2, \ldots, k\}$ for which $H_j$ is $Γ_j$-embeddable in the spanning subgraph of the complete graph comprising the edges of color $j$. Here, we consider reflective (resp. dihedral) Ramsey numbers, which are a specific class of permutational Ramsey numbers in which each group $Γ_j$ is the reflection group (resp. dihedral group) on the naturally ordered vertex set of $H_j$. Focusing on the two-color case, we apply the SAT-based approach originally proposed by Poljak for ordered Ramsey numbers and recently extended to cyclic Ramsey numbers. We utilize the Kissat SAT solver to obtain exact values and lower bounds for small reflective and dihedral Ramsey numbers whose two arguments belong to the following graph classes: monotone and alternating paths, monotone cycles, start-central stars, complete graphs and nested matchings. We also derive several general results and formulate conjectures based on the computational findings.

A drawing of a graph is {\em $x$-monotone} if every vertical line intersects each edge of the graph at most once. We present an $O(n^5)$ time algorithm for deciding whether a simple drawing of the complete graph $K_n$ is weakly isomorphic to an $x$-monotone drawing. We note that this algorithm can also decide whether a drawing of $K_n$ is strongly isomorphic to an $x$-monotone drawing.

Subdivisions of complete graphs play a central role in combinatorics, having deep connections to structural, extremal, and topological aspects of graph theory. A celebrated conjecture of Mader, proved independently by Bollobás and Thomason and by Komlós and Szemerédi, states that every graph of average degree of order $h^2$ contains a subdivision of $K_h$. In this paper, we consider the induced variant of this problem. A theorem of Kühn and Osthus implies that, for every fixed graph $H$ and every $s\ge 1$, graphs of sufficiently large average degree contain either a copy of $K_{s,s}$ or an induced subdivision of $H$. However, even for $H=K_h$, the best previous quantitative bounds were far from optimal. We prove nearly tight bounds for forcing induced subdivisions of $K_h$. We show that every $K_{s,t}$-free graph of average degree $Ω_{s,t}(h^{2(s-1)}\log^{7(s-1)} h)$ contains an induced subdivision of $K_h$, and that every $C_{2k}$-free graph with $k \geq 3$ and average degree $Ω_k(h\log^5 h)$ contains an induced subdivision of $K_h$. These bounds substantially improve the previously known results and are nearly optimal in both settings. They also hold if $K_h$ is replaced by any other graph on $h$ vertices.

We consider the set of matchings of a graph and a local change operation, called a flip, between them. In the combinatorial setting, the base graphs are either complete graphs or complete bipartite graphs, and in the geometric setting, the graphs are embedded on point sets in the plane, with the requirement that edges must be drawn as straight lines and must not cross. For base graphs with an even number of vertices, we consider perfect matchings, i.e., all vertices are matched, and for base graphs with an odd number of vertices, we consider almost-perfect matchings, i.e., all but one vertex of the graph are matched. A 2-flip between two perfect matchings exchanges two edges, and a 1-flip between two almost-perfect matchings exchanges one edge. The corresponding flip graph has the set of perfect or almost-perfect matchings as vertices, with pairs of them connected by an edge if they differ in a 2-flip or 1-flip, respectively. In this work, we provide a comprehensive picture of Hamiltonicity properties of these flip graphs. We prove that the flip graphs in the combinatorial setting are Hamilton-connected, i.e., they admit a Hamilton path between any two vertices, or, if the flip graphs are bipartite, we prove that they are Hamilton-laceable, i.e., they admit a Hamilton path between any two vertices from different partition classes. In the geometric setting, we prove that any path in them misses exponentially many vertices, in particular, they have no Hamilton paths or cycles. For points in convex position and almost-perfect matchings under 1-flips, we complement this by constructing a cycle in the flip graph that visits almost all vertices.

For graphs $F$ and $H$, a spanning subgraph $G$ of $F$ is weakly $H$-saturated in $F$ if the edges in $E(F)\setminus E(G)$ can be added one at a time, each addition creating a new copy of $H$. Recently, Tancer and Tyomkyn proved that, given an $n$-vertex graph $F$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,K_3)=n-1$ is NP-hard. In this paper, we study the decision version of the weak saturation problem and show that, for every fixed integer $r\ge 3$, given a graph $F$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,H)\le k$ is NP-complete when $H\in\{K_r,K_{r,r}\}$. Our approach uses new graph-theoretic and topological ideas and techniques, yielding new constructions that build on the construction of Tancer and Tyomkyn. In particular, our proofs further reveal a connection between weak saturation and the flag-no-square property, a fundamental property in topology that is of independent interest.

Maker-Breaker subgraph games are among the most famous combinatorial games. For $n,q\in\mathbb{N}$ and a fixed subgraph $C$ of the complete graph $K_n$, the two players, called Maker and Breaker, alternately claim edges of $K_n$. Maker claims one unclaimed edge per round and Breaker may claim up to $q$ edges per round. If Maker is able to claim all edges of a copy of $C$, he wins the game. Otherwise Breaker wins. Bednarska and Łuczak (2000) determined in a landmark work the asymptotics of the treshold bias as $Θ(n^{1/m(C)})$ where $m(C)$ is the 2-density of $C$, analysing random strategies. Since then it has been a major open problem to determine the treshhold bias, if it exists, with corresponding strategies, leading to sharp constants in the $Θ$-notion. A famous case is the triangle game ($C=C_3$), studied by Chvatal and Erd"os (1978), who showed Maker wins if $q\le \sqrt{2n}$ and Breaker wins if $q\ge2\sqrt{n}$. Glazik and Srivastav (2022) improved this via a potential method, showing Breaker wins already for $q\ge\sqrt{8/3}\sqrt{n}$. Spencer (2019) conjectured generalizability to arbitrary subgraphs $C$. We confirm this conjecture, presenting a general winning strategy for Breaker if the potential function fullfils conditions depending on $C$. With this result we give the first constructive (polynomial-time) strategies for Breaker in the $k$-cycle Maker-Breaker game for arbitrary, but fixed $k \geq 4$: Breaker wins if $q>\sqrt[k-1]{(k-1)\big(\frac{2(k-1)}{k}\big)^{k-2}n^{k-2}}$. By Bednarska and Łuczak (2000) our bound is asymptotically optimal. However, our constants are better than those arising from their random strategies. More recently, Sowa and Srivastav (2025) gave the first constructive Maker strategy for $C_4$. Our work may motivate study of Maker strategies for $C_k, k \ge 5$, narrowing the gap towards the Breaker bounds presented.

In this paper, we investigate the effective resistance on the graph $G_N^{(r)}$, which is obtained by deleting all edges corresponding to circular distances $\{\pm1, \pm2, \dots, \pm r\}$ from the complete graph $K_N$. We utilize the cyclic symmetry of the graph to diagonalize the Laplacian matrix via the discrete Fourier basis and derive a finite trigonometric sum representation for the effective resistance between two vertices at distance $\ell$. Specifically, we treat the cases $r=1$ and $r=2$ in detail and provide explicit formulas. For the case of $r=1$, we use Fourier analysis to rederive the closed form in terms of Bejaia and Pisa numbers given by Chair. For the case of $r=2$, we show that the denominator reduces to a quadratic polynomial with complex roots and introduce a generalized Bejaia-Pisa-type complex sequence. Using this sequence, we provide some closed forms for the effective resistance and various related formulas.

Automated conjecturing programs scan collections of graphs for inequalities between invariants that no stored graph violates, then offer the survivors for proof or refutation. TxGraffiti, one such program, conjectured that every nontrivial connected graph $G$ satisfies $α(G) \ge \bigl(a(G) + R(G)\bigr)/Δ(G)$, where $α$ is the independence number, $a$ the annihilation number, $R$ the residue, and $Δ$ the maximum degree. Established only for two special families of graphs, the conjecture has otherwise remained open. The note proves the degree-sequence inequality $a \le \tfrac{Δ+1}{2}W$, where $W$ is the Caro-Wei sum; the same inequality is known for the independence number in place of $a$. Combined with the classical lower bounds $α\ge R$ and $α\ge W$, it proves the conjecture for every connected graph of maximum degree at least three, and a direct argument settles maximum degree two; the conjecture fails only for the single edge, of maximum degree one. The inequality also brackets the independence number between the polynomial-time quantities $R$ and $a$, within a factor $(Δ+1)/2$. The conjecture's bound is sharp, with equality attained, for instance, by the complete graph on four vertices.

The paper studies the graph algebra whose monomial basis is naturally indexed by simple graphs on a fixed set of vertices. This algebra is at the same time the algebra of pseudo-Boolean functions on the Boolean cube and a natural object of algebraic combinatorics, related to the Boolean lattice of subsets of the edge set of the complete graph. The main aim of the paper is to study two compatible representation-theoretic structures on this algebra: the action of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_2$, arising from the operators of adding and deleting one edge, and the action of the pair group $S_n^{(2)}$, induced by the renumbering of vertices. It is proved that the graph algebra with this $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-action is isomorphic to a tensor power of the standard two-dimensional $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-module, and on this basis its decomposition into irreducible $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-modules is obtained. Primitive spaces, that is, the kernels of the edge-deletion operator on rank components, are also described, and it is shown that they have a natural interpretation in terms of two-row Specht modules. It is then established that the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-action commutes with the action of the pair group. It follows that the space of graph invariants also inherits the structure of an $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-module. Using Schur--Weyl duality, primitive invariants are described through the fixed parts of the restrictions of two-row Specht modules from the full symmetric group on the edge set to the pair group. As a consequence, the classical enumeration of non-isomorphic graphs by the number of edges receives a representation-theoretic refinement: the orbital components entering the Burnside--Polya formula decompose into natural primitive contributions associated with the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-structure and two-row Specht modules.

More than forty years ago, Andersen and Hoffman independently proved that every symmetric Latin rectangle can be extended to a symmetric Latin square with prescribed diagonal entries. We generalize this theorem as follows. Let $k\leq n^2$, and let $M$ be an $n\times n$ array whose top-left $r\times r$ subarray is filled with symbols from $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$. Suppose that, for each $i\in\{1,\ldots,r\}$ and each symbol, the number of occurrences of that symbol in row $i$ equals its number of occurrences in column $i$, and that each remaining diagonal entry is either empty or already contains a symbol from $\{1,\ldots,k\}$. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for completing $M$ so that the resulting array is symmetric off the prescribed $r\times r$ subarray, each symbol occurs a specified total number of times in $M$, and, for every symbol, its numbers of occurrences in any two rows (respectively, columns) differ by at most one. Restricted to symmetric arrays, our theorem generalizes results of Cruse (1974), Goldwasser et al. (2015), and Bahmanian and Hilton (2025). It also extends Baranyai's theorem for complete graphs (1973) by characterizing when a partial coloring of $K_r$ with a loop on every vertex can be extended to an almost regular coloring of $K_n$ with a loop on every vertex, where $n\geq r$.

We develop a unified framework for the exact enumeration and asymptotic analysis of the three most studied classes of phylogenetic networks: tree-child (TC), reticulation-visible (RV) and orchard networks, whose cardinalities satisfy the strict ordering $|\mathrm{TC}_{\ell,k}|<|\mathrm{RV}_{\ell,k}|<|\mathrm{Orch}_{\ell,k}|$ for reticulation number $k\geq2$ (with $\mathrm{TC}\subsetneq\mathrm{RV}$ and $\mathrm{TC}\subsetneq\mathrm{Orch}$, while $\mathrm{RV}$ and $\mathrm{Orch}$ are incomparable as sets). Using the Chang--Fuchs structural theorem, we derive a two-level master functional equation for the RV bivariate generating function and obtain exact closed-form identities for the differences $Δ_k(\ell):=|RV_{\ell,k}|-|TC_{\ell,k}|$ for $k=2,3$, with the asymptotic universality $Δ_k(\ell)/|TC_{\ell,k}|\sim k!/\ell$. For orchard networks, we prove a \emph{universal hypergeometric law} that resolves the exact enumeration problem for all $\ell$: the column generating function $F_\ell(v)$ is rational with denominator $D_\ell(v)=\prod_{j=2}^\ell X_j(v)$, where \[ X_\ell(v) = \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor\ell/2\rfloor}(-1)^k\, \frac{\ell!}{(\ell-2k)!\,k!}\,v^k \] is the matching polynomial of the complete graph $K_\ell$ and a rescaled Jacobi polynomial. This immediately resolves the intractable $\ell=9$ case: $D_9$ has degree 20, dominant growth rate $\approx40.73$, and all spectral roots are positive real. A complete enumeration table is provided extending the published data of Cardona, Ribas and Pons.

We prove that for all $c\in\mathbb N$ and nonnull graphs $H_1,\ldots,H_t$, there exists $n\in\mathbb N$ such that if $G$ is a $c$-edge-colored complete graph with no monochromatic induced copy of the complete join of $H_1,\ldots,H_t$, then $V(G)$ is the union of $n$ sets $V_1,\ldots,V_n$ such that within each set $V_j$ with $|V_j|\neq 1$, the edges of some color form a graph that excludes at least one of $H_1,\ldots,H_t$ as an induced subgraph. In fact, the same holds even if the colors overlap, and with a different list of graphs $H_1,\ldots,H_t$ assigned to each color. When $H_1,\ldots,H_t$ each have a single vertex, this is Ramsey's theorem, and when $c=2$, this is the "excluding pairs of graphs" theorem of Chudnovsky, Scott, and Seymour.

For which graphs $H$ does there exist a graph $G$ with at least one edge and no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, such that deleting any edge of $G$ creates an induced copy of $H$? We call such a graph "$H$-deletion-saturated". This version of the well-studied notion of "$H$-induced-saturated" graphs -- where both adding and deleting any edge creates an induced copy of $H$ -- appears more tractable. For example, while it remains wide open whether $H$-induced-saturated graphs exist for every even cycle $H$, we proved recently that deletion-saturated graphs exist for all even cycles. In fact, apart from complete graphs, no graph $H$ is known for which $H$-deletion-saturated graphs do not exist. We conjecture that $H$-deletion-saturated graphs exist for every non-complete graph $H$, and prove this conjecture for several types of graphs, including: complete bipartite graphs with parts of unequal size, triangle-free graphs with one cycle, graphs with two leaves at distance at most three, and line graphs of trees. In fact, in all cases, we prove the conjecture for substantially more general families. We also verify our conjecture for every graph $H$ on at most six vertices.

Let $H$ be a graph. A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ is $H$-free, but adding any edge between two non-adjacent vertices of $G$ yields an $H$-copy as a subgraph. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n, H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $H$-saturated graph on $n$ vertices. The saturation number for the join of a vertex and a graph $F$, denoted by $K_1\vee F$, has attracted considerable attention. Cameron and Puleo [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), 112867] proved that $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)\le n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ for $n > |V(F)|$. A natural question is when the above equality holds. Most existing results impose conditions on $F$ and assume that $F$ has no isolated vertices. Let $K_p^-$ be the graph obtained by deleting one edge from the complete graph $K_p$. In this paper, we investigate the saturation number of $K_1\vee F$ when $F$ contains isolated vertices, and determine the exact value of $\mathrm{sat}(n, K_1\vee F)$ when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1(s\ge 1)$ or $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1(p\ge 5)$. In our results, $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)= n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ holds when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1$ for any $s\ge 1$, but fails when $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1$ for $p\ge 5$.

Keevash and Michaeli recently proved that, under the robustness assumption that \(G\) is an \(s\)-connector (i.e. \(\overline G\) is \(K_{s,s}\)-free), \(G\) has essentially the same multicolour Ramsey matching properties as complete graphs, with an additive error \(O(qs)\), where \(q\) is the number of colours. They asked whether the dependence on \(q\) can be removed. We answer this question in a stronger exact form. For \({\bf t}=(t_1,\ldots,t_q)\in\mathbb N_+^q\), let \(R_s({\bf t})\) be the smallest integer \(N\) such that every \(N\)-vertex \(s\)-connector \(G\) satisfies \( G\to (t_1K_2,\ldots,t_qK_2). \) We determine the exact value \[ R_s({\bf t})=\sum_{j\in[q]}(t_j-1)+ \max\left\{2s,\ s+\max_{j\in[q]}t_j\right\}. \] While Keevash and Michaeli's proof uses a compression algorithm based on the Gallai--Edmonds decomposition to reduce the colouring to a structured form, our proof is a direct minimal-counterexample argument together with a new counting method for monochromatic matchings which can be applied to \(s\)-connectors.

In this paper we introduce "graph linear notation" -- a complete graph invariant -- which is positioned as an alternative definition for the finite graphs. This invariant is constructed using an algorithm similar to the algorithm of finding canonical forms of graphs. Storing graph linear notation instead of a regular graph allows us to greatly simplify two major problems: the construction of illustrations for graphs with regards to possible graph symmetries, and the comparison of two graphs for isomorphism. We also demonstrate the transferability to the graph linear notations such classical graph theory concepts as colourings and graph paths.